<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.leo_vi_flavius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.leo_vi_flavius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="leo-vi-flavius-bio-1" n="leo_vi_flavius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Fla'vius&gt;</surname><addName full="yes">Leo</addName><genName full="yes">Vi.</genName></persName></label> or <persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Fla'vius&gt;</surname><addName full="yes">Sa'piens</addName></persName> or <persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Fla'vius</surname><addName full="yes">Philosophus</addName></persName></head><p>surnamed SA'PIENS and PHILO'SOPHUS, emperor of Constantinople (<date when-custom="886">A. D.
       886</date>-<date when-custom="911">911</date>), second son of Basil I., the Macedonian, by his
      second wife, Eudoxia, was born in <date when-custom="865">A. D. 865</date>, and succeeded his father
      on the 1st of March, 886, after having previously been created Augustus. A short time before
      the death of Basil, young Leo narrowly escaped the punishment of a parricide, a crime,
      however, of which he was not guilty, but of which he was accused by the minister, Santabaren,
      the knavish favourite of the emperor. As soon as Leo ascended the throne he prepared for
      revenge. He began by deposing the notorious patriarch Photius, who was the chief support of
      Santabaren; and having got rid of that dangerous intriguer, he had the minister arrested,
      deprived him of his eyes, and banished him to one of the remotest corners of Asia Minor. The
      reign of Leo presents an uninterrupted series of wars and conspiracies. In 887 and 888 the
      Arabs invaded Asia Minor, landed in Italy and Sicily, and plundered Samos and other islands in
      the Archipelago: it was only in 891 that the emperor's authority was re-established in his
      Italian dominions. Styiianus, Leo's father-in-law, and prime minister, gave occasion to a
      bloody war with the Bulgarians. At that period these people were no longer so barbarous as in
      former centuries, and they carried on a considerable trade with the Byzantine empire, having
      their principal factories at Thessalonica, where they enjoyed great privileges. These
      privileges Stylianus disregarded, and exposed the Bulgarian merchants to vexations and
      ill-treatment. Thence arose a war with the Bulgarian king, Simeon, who ravaged Macedonia, and
      routed the Greek army, commanded by Leo Catacalon and Theodosius, the latter of whom was
      killed in the action, to the great regret of the nation and the emperor. The credit of
      Stylianus ceased with the death of his daughter, the empress; and his disgrace grieved him so
      much that he died of sorrow and disappointed ambition (894). Leo got rid of the Bulgarians by
      involving them, through intrigues, in a war with the Hungarians. The following years were
      rendered remarkable by several conspiracies. That of 895 proved nearly fatal to the emperor,
      but it was discovered in time, and quelled by one Samonas, who, in reward, was created
      patricius, and soon rose to great wealth and power. A few years afterwards Leo was attacked in
      a church during service by a ruffian, who felled him to the ground with a club; but on this
      occasion also the emperor escaped, and the assassin met with the fate he deserved. The
      inactivity of Leo induced the Arabs and northern neighbours of the empire to attack it at
      their convenience. The former once more invaded Sicily, and took Tauromenium; and in 904
      appeared with a numerous fleet in the harbour of Thessalonica. This splendid city, the second
      in wealth and population after Constantinople, was ill fortified and still worse garrisoned,
      so that in spite of the efforts of the inhabitants, the Arabs soon made themselves master of
      it. They destroyed a great portion of it; and after having plundered it during ten days, left
      the harbour with their fleet laden with booty and captives. The history of this conquest was
      described by Joannes Cameniata in his valuable work, <hi rend="ital">The Capture of
       Thessalonica</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἠἅλωσις τῆς Θεσσαλονίκης</foreign>). [<hi rend="smallcaps">CAMENIATA.</hi>] About this time the last remains of the authority of the
      senate were finally abolished by a constitution of Leo. In 910 Samonas was sentenced to
      perpetual imprisonment for having abused the confidence the emperors had never ceased to
      bestow upon him since he had crushed the conspiracy of 895. In 911 the Arabs defeated the
      Greek fleet off Samos. In this action the Greeks were commanded by Romanus Lecapenus, who
      became emperor during the minority of Constantine VII. Porphyrogenitus. Leo died in the same
      year, 911, either on the 11th of May or on the 11th of July, of a chronical dysentery. His
      successor was his infant son, Constantine Porphyrogenitus, whom he had by his fourth wife,
      Zoe; and his younger brother, Alexander, who had nominally reigned with Leo since the death of
      their father, Basil, but who, preferring luxury and idleness to business, had abandoned his
      share in the government to his elder brother Leo. Leo was married four times; in consequence
      of which he was excluded from the communion with the faithful by the patriarch Nicolaus, as
      the Greek church only tolerated a second marriage: it censured a third, and it condemned a
      fourth as an atrocious sin. The first wife of Leo was Theophano, the daughter of Constantinus
      Martinacius; the second Zoe, the widow of Theodorus Guniatzita, and the daughter of the
      minister Stylianus, who, after the marriage of Zoe, received from his son-in-law the unusual
      title of basileopator, or father of the emperor; the third was Eudoxia, a woman of rare
      beauty; and the fourth was Zoe Carbonopsina, who survived her husband. <pb n="740"/></p><p>It is difficult to understand how the exalted name of Philosophus could be given to a man
      like Leo, and one would feel inclined to take it ironically, were it not for the impudent
      flattery of the later Greeks. Gibbon, with a few striking words, gives the following character
      of this emperor: -- "The name of Leo VI. has been dignified with the title of philosopher; and
      the union of the prince and the sage, of the active and speculative virtues, would indeed
      constitute the perfection of human nature. But the claims of Leo are far short of this ideal
      excellence. Did he reduce his passions and appetites under the dominion of reason? His life
      was spent in the pomp of the palace, in the society of his wives and concubines; and even the
      clemency which he showed, and the peace which he strove to preserve, must be imputed to the
      softness and indolence of his character. Did he subdue his prejudices, and those of his
      subjects? His mind was tinged with the most puerile superstition; the influence of the clergy,
      and the errors of the people, were consecrated by his laws; and the oracles of Leo, which
      reveal in prophetic style the fates of the empire, are founded on the arts of astrology and
      divination. If we still inquire the reason of his sage appellation, it can only be replied,
      that the son of Basil was less ignorant than the greater part of his contemporaries in church
      and state; that his education had been directed by the learned Photius; and that several books
      of profane and ecclesiastical science were composed by the pen, or in the name of the imperial
      philosopher."</p><div><head>Legislative Work</head><div><head><title xml:lang="la">Basilica</title></head><p>In speaking of Leo's literary merits, we must first say a few words of his
        legislation.</p><p>In his time the Latin language had long since ceased to be the official language of the
        Eastern empire, and had gradually fallen into such disuse as to be only known to a few
        scholars, merchants, or navigators. The earlier laws being all written in Latin, opposed a
        serious obstacle to a fair and quick administration of justice; and the emperor Basil I.,
        the father of Leo, formed and partly executed the plan of issuing an authorised version of
        the Code and Digest. This plan was carried out by Leo, who was ably assisted by Sabathius,
        the commander of the imperial lifeguards. The new Greek version is known under the title of
         <title xml:lang="grc">Βασιλικαὶ Διατάξεις</title>, or shortly, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Βασιλικὰ</foreign>; in Latin, <hi rend="ital">Basilica,</hi> which means
        "Imperial Constitutions," or " Laws." It is divided into sixty books, subdivided into
        titles, and contains the whole of Justinian's legislation, viz., the Institutes, the Digest,
        the Codex, and the Novellae; as also such constitutions as were issued by the successors of
        Justinian down to Leo VI. There are, however, many laws of the Digest omitted in the
        Basilica, which contain, on the other hand, a considerable number of laws or extracts from
        ancient jurists which are not in the Digest. The Basilica likewise give many early
        constitutions which are not contained in Justinian's Codex. They were afterwards revised by
        the son of Leo, Constantine Porphyrogenitus.</p><div><head>Editions</head><div><head>Latin editions</head><p>Hervet published a Latin translation of the books 28-30, 45-48, Paris, 1557, fol.</p><p>Cujacius, who made the <title>Basilica</title> a special subject of his studies, and
          published the criminal part of them at Lyon, 1566, fol., estimated the translation of
          Hervet but little, and accordingly published a revised edition under the title <title xml:lang="la">Libri VIII. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Βασιλικῶν Διατάξεων</foreign>, id
           est, Imperialium Constitutionum in quibus continentur totum Jus Civile, a Constantino
           Porphyrogenito in LX. libros redactum, G. Herveto interprete. Accessit Liber LX.,Jacobo
           Cujiacio interprete. Cum Praefatione D. Gothofredi,</title> Hanoviae, 1606, fol.</p><p>Previous to this edition, Joannes Leunclavius published, with notes and commentary, "
          LX. Libri <foreign xml:lang="grc">Βασιλικῶν</foreign>, id est, Universi Juris Romani,
          &amp;c., Ecloga sive Synopsis; accessit Novellarum antehac ineditarum Liber," Basel, 1575,
          fol.</p></div><div><head>Greek editions</head><p>All these are incomplete editions of Latin versions. The Greek text, with a revised
          Latin version, of 36 complete, 6 incomplete books, and fragments of the remaining 18
          books, was first published by Fabrot, Paris, 1647, 7 vols. fol.</p><p>Four of the deficient books, viz. 49-- 52, were afterwards discovered in MS., and
          published, with a Latin version by G. O. Reitz, by the Dutch jurist Meermann, in the 5th
          vol. of his Nov. Thesaur. Juris Civ. et Can.</p><p>A separate reprint of these four books was published in London 1765, fol., as a
          supplement to Fabrot's edition.</p><p>As long ago as 1830 the brothers Heimbach, in Germany, began a new critical edition of
          the whole collection, of which the first volume appeared in 1833, but which is not yet
          finished.</p></div></div><div><head>Assessment</head><p>The law of the Basilica is by no means a mere matter of antiquity: it is the groundwork
         of the legislation of the modern Greeks in Turkey as well as in the kingdom of Greece, and
         also that of the legislation of the principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia; and a closer
         investigation of the laws of Russia would perhaps trace the influence of the Basilica upon
         the history of the civilisation of that country also.</p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Montreuil, <hi rend="ital">Histoire du Droit Byzantin ;</hi> C. W. E. Heimbach, <hi rend="ital">De Basilicorum Origine,</hi> Leipzig, 1825, 8vo.; Haubold, <hi rend="ital">Manuale Basilicorum,</hi> Leipzig, 1819, 4to.</p></div></div></div><div><head>Works</head><p>The principal works written, or supposed to be written, by the emperor Leo VI. are: --</p><div><head> 1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Τῶν ἐν πολέμοις τακτικῶν σύντομος
         παράδοσις</foreign>, commonly called <title>Tactica</title></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Τῶν ἐν πολέμοις τακτικῶν σύντομος παράδοσις</foreign>,
        commonly called <title>Tactica</title>, an essay on the art of warfare in the author's time,
        which is celebrated in military history. Leo perused freely the works of earlier writers on
        the subject, but it would be unjust to charge him with plagiarism: there is a great deal of
        his own in the work, especially on the policy to be observed in warfare, but it betrays no
        genius.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The editio princeps, but only in a Latin version, is by Joannes Checus (John
          Cheke), of Cambridge, and was published at Basel, 1554, 12mo.: it is dedicated to king
          Henry VIII., and was consequently composed previously to the death of that king, in
          1547.</bibl><bibl>The Greek text, together with the translation of Cheke, revised by Jo. Meursius, was
          first published at Leyden, 1612, 4to.</bibl>; <bibl>the same in the 6th vol. of Meursii
          Opera, edited by Lami, Florence, 1745, fol.</bibl>; <bibl>the same, together with Aelian's
          Tactica, Leyden, 1613, 4to.</bibl></p></div><div><head>Translations</head><p>The importance of the work caused it to be translated into several modern languages.
          <bibl>The best version is the one in French, entitled, " Institutions Militaires de
          l'Empereur Léon le Philosophe, traduites du Grec par M. Joly de Mezeray," Paris,
          1771, 2 vols. 8vo., with engravings.</bibl>
         <bibl>The best German translation is entitled " Kaiser Leo's des Philosophen Strategie und
          Taktik, übersetzt von einem MS. in der Kaiserlichen Bibliothek zu Wien bei J. W. von
          Bourscheid." Vienna. 1771-1781, 5 vols. 8vo. with notes and engravings.</bibl> The notes
         are very good, but the version resembles much more the French translation by Mezeray than
         the Greek text. <pb n="741"/></p></div></div><div><head> 2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ναυμαχικά</foreign>.</head><p>Some passages extracted from the Tactica, and given by Fabricius, led to the supposition
        that they are quotations fron, and consequently fragments of, a separate work of Leo on
        naval warfare.</p></div><div><head>3. <hi rend="ital">XVII. Oracula</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">XVII. Oracula,</hi> written in Greek iambic verses, and accompanied by
        marginal drawings, on the fate of the future emperors and patriarchs of Constantinople,
        showing the superstition of Leo if he believed in his divination, and that of the people if
        they had faith in the absurd predictions.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>The 17th Oracle, on the Restoration of Constantinople, was published in Greek and
          Latin by Joan. Leunclavius ad Calcem Const. Manassae, Basel, 1573, 8vo.</bibl><bibl>Janus Rutgersius edited the other sixteen, with a Latin version by Georg. Dousa,
          Leyden, 1618, 4to. Other editions: " Espositione delli Oracoli di Leone imperatore," by T.
          Patricius, Brixen, 1596</bibl>; <bibl>by Petrus Lambecius, with a revised text from an
          Amsterdam Codex, with notes and a new translation, Paris, 1655, fol. ad Calcem
          Codini.</bibl></p></div><div><head>Translations</head><p><bibl>A German translation by John and Theodore de Bry appeared in " Vita, &amp;c.
          Muhammedis," quoted above; and a Latin one by the same translators, Frankfort, 1597,
          4to.</bibl>; the same year in which the German version was published.</p></div><div><head>Assessment</head><p>It is doubtful whether Leo is or not the author of the Oracles. Fabricius gives a learned
         disquisition on the subject.</p></div></div><div><head>4. <hi rend="ital">Orationes XXXIII.,</hi></head><p><hi rend="ital">Orationes XXXIII.,</hi> mostly on theological subjects.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>One of them appeared in a Latin version by F. Metius, in Baronius, <hi rend="ital">Annales</hi></bibl>; <bibl>nine others by Gretserus, in the 14th vol. of his <title xml:lang="la">Opera,</title> Ingolstadt, 1600, 4to.</bibl>; <bibl>three others, together
          with seven of those published by Gretserus, by Combéfis, in the first vol. of his
           <title xml:lang="la">Biblioth. PP. Graeco-Lat. Auctar. Nov.,</title> Paris, 1648,
          fol.</bibl>; <bibl><hi rend="ital">Oratio de Sto. Nicolo,</hi> Greek and Latin, by Petrus
          Possinus, Toulouse, 1654, 4to.</bibl>; <bibl><hi rend="ital">Oratio de Sto.
           Chrysostomo,</hi> restored from the life of that father by Georgius Alexandrinus, in the
          8th vol. of the Savilian ed. of St. Chrysostomus, Antwerp, 1614, fol.</bibl>; <bibl>some
          others in Combéfis, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Concionatoria,</hi> in the <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patrum Lugdun.,</hi></bibl><bibl>and dispersed in other works <hi rend="ital">Leonis Imp. Homilia nunc primum vulgata
           Graece et Latine, ejusdemque qua Photiana est, Confutatio,</hi> a Scipione Maffei, Padua,
          1751, 8vo.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>5. <hi rend="ital">Epistola ad Omarum Saracenum de Fidei Christianae Veritate et
         Saracenorum Erroribus</hi></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Published in Latin, Lyon, 1509, by Champerius, who translated a Chaldaean version
          of the Greek original, which seems to be lost</bibl>; <bibl>the same in the different <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patrum,</hi></bibl><bibl>and separately by Professor Schwarz, in the Program of the University of Leipzig, of
          the year 1786</bibl>.</p></div></div><div><head>6. <hi rend="ital">Canticum Compunctionis ex Meditatione extremi Judicii</hi></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl><hi rend="ital">Canticum Compunctionis ex Meditatione extremi Judicii,</hi> Greek
          and Latin, by Jac. Pontanus, Ingolstadt, 1603, 4to.</bibl>; <bibl>and in the various <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Patr.</hi></bibl></p></div></div><div><head>7. <hi rend="ital">Carmen iambicum de misero Graeciae Statu,</hi></head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Published with a Latin version by F. Lucidus, edited by Leo Allatius in his "De
          Consensu utriusque Ecclesiae."</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>8. <hi rend="ital">XXII. Versus Retrogradi</hi> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">Καρνικοί</foreign>).</head><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Published by Leo Allatius in <hi rend="ital">Excerpt. Graec. Rhetor.,</hi> Rome,
          1641, 8vo.</bibl> Different hymns of Leo are extant in MS. in various libraries.</p></div></div><div><head>9. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἠ γεγονυῖα διατύπωσις παρὰ τοῦ Βασιλέως Δεόντος
         τοῦ Σοφοῦ</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἠ γεγονυῖα διατύπωσις παρὰ τοῦ Βασιλέως Δεόντος τοῦ
         Σοφοῦ</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">ὅπως ἔχουσι τάξεως οἱ δρόνοι τῶν
         Ἐκκληοιῶν</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">τῶν ὑποκειμένων τῷ Πατριάρχῃ
         Κωνσταντινουπόλεως</foreign><hi rend="ital">Dispositio facta per Imperatorem Leonem Sapientem quem ordinem habeant
         throni Ecclesiarum Patriarchae Constantinopolitano subjectarum</hi></p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Greek and Latin, by J. Leunclavius, in <hi rend="ital">Jus Graeco-Romanum;</hi> by
          Jac. Goar, ad calcem Codini, Paris, 1648, fol.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>10. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὰ Μονομερίου</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὰ Μονομερίου</foreign>, <hi rend="ital">In Spectaculum
         Unius Dei,</hi> an epigram of little value.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p><bibl>Published with notes by Brodaeus and Opsopaeus, in <hi rend="ital">Epigram. Libri
           VII.,</hi> ed. Wechel, Frankfort, 1600.</bibl></p></div></div><div><head>Other publications ascribed to Leo</head><p>Among other productions ascribed to Leo, and of which the reader will find an account in
        the sources cited below, we mention only two books on falconry, extant in MS. in a Munich
        MS., which seems to be different from a Turin MS. entitled <title xml:lang="grc">Ὀρνεοσοφιστικὸν</title>, since the first treats on falconry exclusively, and the latter
        on various birds, though on falcons more than others: the first may be an extract of the
        second.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>Zonar. vol. ii. p. 174, &amp;c.; Cedren. p. 591, &amp;c.; Joel, p. 179; Manass. p. 108,
       &amp;c.; Glycas, p. 296, &amp;c.; Genes. p.. 61, &amp;c.; Codin. p. 63, &amp;c.; Fabric., <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. vii. p. 693, &amp;c.; Hamberger. <hi rend="ital">Nachrichten von Gelehrten Männern ;</hi> Cave, <hi rend="ital">Hist. Lit.;</hi>
       Hankius, <hi rend="ital">Script. Byzant.;</hi> Oudin, <hi rend="ital">Comment. de SS.
        Eccl.,</hi> vol. ii. p. 394, &amp;c.) </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.P">W.P</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>