<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.leo_10</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:L.leo_10</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="L"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="leo-bio-10" n="leo_10"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Leo</surname><addName full="yes">AEGYPTIUS</addName></persName></head><p>3. <hi rend="smallcaps">AEGYPTIUS</hi>, or the <hi rend="smallcaps">EGYPTIAN.</hi> The early
      Christian writers, in their controversy with the heathens, refer not unfrequently to a Leo or
      Leon as having admitted that the deities of the antient gentile world had been originally men,
      agreeing in this respect with Evemerus [<hi rend="smallcaps">EVEMERUS</hi>], with whom he was
      contemporary, or perhaps rather earlier. Augustin (<hi rend="ital">De Consensu Evangel.</hi>
      1.33, and <hi rend="ital">De Civ. Dei,</hi> 8.5), who is most explicit in his notice of him,
      says he was an Egyptian priest of high rank, " magnus antistes, " and expounded the popular
      mythology to Alexander the Great, in a manner which, though differing from those rationalistic
      explanations received in Greece, accorded with them in making the gods (including even the dii
      majorum gentium) to have been originally men. Augustin refers to an account of the statements
      of Leo contained in a letter of <ref target="alexander-the-great-bio-1">Alexander</ref> to his
      mother. It is to be observed, that although Leon was high in his priestly rank at the time
      when <ref target="alexander-the-great-bio-1">Alexander</ref> was in Egypt (<date when-custom="-332">B. C. 332</date>-<date when-custom="-331">331</date>), his name is Greek; and Arnobius (<hi rend="ital">Adv. Gentes,</hi> 4.29) calls him Leo Pellaeus, Leo of Pella, an epithet which
      Fabricius does not satisfactorily explain. Worth (<hi rend="ital">Not. ad Tatian.</hi> p. 96,
      ed. Oxford, 1700) would identify our Leo with Leo of Lampsacus, the husband of Themista or
      Themisto, the female Epicurean (<bibl n="D. L. 10.5.25">D. L. 10.5. 25</bibl>). But the
      husband of Themista was more correctly called Leonteus, while the Egyptian is never called by
      any other name than Leo. Arnobius speaks in such a way as to lead us to think that in his days
      the writings of Leon on the human origin of the gods were extant and accessible; but it is
      possible that he refers, like Augustin, to Alexnnder's letter. The reference to Leon in
      Clemens Alexandrinus is not more explicit. (<hi rend="ital">Stromata,</hi> 1.21.106. p. 139,
      ed. Sylburg. p. 382, ed. Pott. vol. ii. p. 75, ed. Klotz, 12mo. Lipsiae, 1831.) But Tatian's
      distinct mention of the <foreign xml:lang="grc">γπομνήματα</foreign>, or <hi rend="ital">Commentaries</hi> of Leo, shows that his system had been committed to writing by himself;
      and Tertullian (<hi rend="ital">De Corona,</hi> 100.7) directs his readers to " unrol the
      writings of Leo the Egyptian." Hyginus (<hi rend="ital">Poeticon Astronomicon,</hi> 100.20)
      refers to Leon in terms which seem to intimate that he wrote a history of Egypt, " Qui res
      Aegyptiacus scripsit;" and the scholiast on Apollonius Rhodius (4.262) gives a reference here
      to what Leon had said respecting the antiquity of the Egyptians, " in the first (of the books
      or letters ?) to his mother." But we suspect the last reference is to the statements of Leon
      already mentioned, as given by Alexander the Great in his letter to his mother; and perhaps
      the reference of Hyginus is to the same document, for the subject of it belongs to the mythic
      period of history. (Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. vii. pp. 713, 719, vol. xi.
      p. 664; Voss. <hi rend="ital">De Hist. Graec.</hi> lib. iii. p. 179, ed. Amsterdam, 1699.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>