<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.julianus_flavius_claudius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:I.julianus_flavius_claudius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="I"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="julianus-flavius-claudius-bio-1" n="julianus_flavius_claudius_1"><head><label xml:id="tlg-2003"><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Julia'nus</addName>,
         <forename full="yes">Fla'vius</forename><surname full="yes">Clau'dius</surname></persName></label> or <persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Clau'dius</surname><addName full="yes">Apostata</addName></persName></head><p>surnamed <hi rend="smallcaps">APOSTATA</hi>, "the Apostate," Roman emperor, <date when-custom="361">A. D. 361</date>-<date when-custom="363">363</date>, was born at Constantinople on the
      17th of November, <date when-custom="331">A. D. 331</date> (332?). He was the son of Julius
      Constantius by his second wife, Basilina, the grandson of Constantius Chlorus by his second
      wife, Theodora, and the nephew of Constantine the Great. [See the Genealogical Table, Vol. I.
      pp. 831, 832.]</p><p>Julian and his elder brother, Flavius Julius Gallus, who was the son of Julius Constantius
      by his first wife, Galla, were the only members of the imperial family whose lives were spared
      by Constantius II., the son of Constantine the Great, when, upon his accession, he ordered the
      massacre of all the male descendants of Constantine Chlorus and his second wife, Theodora.
      Both Gallus and Julian were of too tender an age to be dangerous to Constantius, who
      accordingly spared their lives, but had them educated in strict confinement at different
      places in Ionia and Bithynia, and afterwards in the castle of Macellum near Caesareia: and we
      know from Julian's own statement in his epistle to the senate and people of Athens, that,
      although they were treated with all the honours due to their birth, they felt most unhappy in
      their royal prison, being surrounded by spies who were to report the least of their words and
      actions to a jealous and bloodthirsty tyrant. However, they received a careful and learned
      education, and were brought up in the principles of the Christian religion: their teachers
      were Nicocles Luco, a grammarian, and Ecebolus, a rhetorician, who acted under the
      superintendence of the eunuch Mardonius, probably a pagan in secret, and of Eusebius, an
      Arian, afterwards bishop of Nicomedeia. Gallus was the first who was released from his slavery
      by being appointed Caesar in <date when-custom="351">A. D. 351</date>, and governor of the East, and
      it was through his mediation that Julian obtained more liberty. The conduct of Gallus in his
      government, and his execution by Constantius in <date when-custom="354">A. D. 354</date>, are
      detailed elsewhere. [<hi rend="smallcaps">CONSTANTIUS</hi> II., p. 848.] Julian was now in
      great danger, and the emperor would probably have sacrificed him to his jealousy but for the
      circumstance that he had no male issue himself, and that Julian was consequently the only
      other surviving male of the imperial family. Constantius was satisfied with removing Julian
      from Asia to Italy, and kept him for some time in close confinement at Milan, where he lived
      surrounded by spies, and in constant fear of sharing the fate of his brother. Owing to the
      mediation of the empress Eusebia, an excellent woman, who loved Julian with the tenderness of
      a sister, the young prince obtained an interview view Constantius, and having succeeded in
      cahniag the cmperor's suspicions, was allowed to <pb n="645"/> lead a private life at Athens
       (<date when-custom="355">A. D. 355</date>). Athens was then the centre of Greek learning, and there
      Julian spent short but delightful period in intercourse with the most celebrated philosophers,
      scholars, and artists of the time, and in the society of a company of young men who were
      devoted to the pursuit of knowledge, and among whom was Gregory Nazianzen, who became
      afterwards so celebrated as a Christian orator. Among those learned men Julian was not the
      least in renown, and he attracted universal attention both by his talents and his knowledge.
      The study of Greek literature and philosophy was his principal and favourite pursuit. He had
      been brought up by Greeks and among Greeks, and his predilection for whatever was Greek was of
      course very natural ; but he did not neglect Latin literature, and we Jearn from Ammianus
      Marcellinus (<bibl n="Amm. 16.5">16.5</bibl>), that he had a fair knowledge of the Latin
      language, which was then stil spoken at the court of Constantinople. While Julian lived in
      happy retirement at Athens, the cmperor was bent down by the weight of public affairs, and the
      empire being exposed to the invasions of the Persians in the east, and of the Germans and
      Sarmatians in the west and the north, he followed the advice of Eusebia, in opposition to his
      eunuchs, in conferring the rank of Caesar upon Julian, who was accordingly recalled from
      Athens and summoned to Milan, where Constantius was residing. Julian obeyed reluctantly : the
      Greek Minerva had more charms for him than the Roman Jupiter, and he was too well acquainted
      with the mythology of his ancestors not to know that even the embraces of Jupiter are
      sometimes fatal. On the 6th of November, A. D. 355, Julian was solemnly proclaimed Caesar, and
      received, as a guarantee of the emperor's sincerity, the hand of his sister Helena, who was
      the youngest child of Constantine the Great. At the same time he was invested with the
      government of the provinces beyond the Alps, but some time elapsed before he set out for Gaul,
      where he was to reside, and during this time he began to accustom himself to behave with that
      composure and artihcial dignity which suited a person of his exalted station, but which
      corresponded so little with his taste and habits. When he first entered upon public life he
      was timid and clumsy, and he used afterwards to laugh at his own awkwardness on those
      occasions. The internal peace of Gaul was still suffering from the consequences of the revolt
      of Sylvanus, and her frontiers were assailed by the Germans, who had crossed the Rhine, burnt
      Strassburg, Trèves, Cologne, and many other flourishing cities, and made devastating
      inroads into the midland provinces of Gaul. Accustomed to the quiet occupations of a scholar,
      Julian seemed little fitted for the command in the field, but he found an experienced
      lieutenant in the person of the veteran general Sallustius, and the wisdom he had learned in
      the schools of Greece was not merely theoretical philosophy, but virtue : temperate to the
      extreme, he despised the luxuries of a Roman court, and his food and bed were not better than
      those of a common soldier. In his administration he was just and forbearing; and never
      discouraged by adversity nor inflated by success, he showed himself worthy to reign over
      others, because he could reign over himself.</p><p>Julian arrived in Gaul late in <date when-custom="355">A. D. 355</date>, and, after having stayed
      the winter at Vienna (Vienne in Dauphiné), he set out in the spring of 356 to drive the
      barbarians back over the Rhine. In this campaign he fought against the Alemanni, the invaders
      of Southern Gaul. He made their first acquaintance near Rheims, and paid dearly for it : they
      fell unexpectedly upon his rear, and two legions were cut to pieces. But as he nevertheless
      advanced towards the Rhine, it seems that the principal disadvantage of his defeat was only a
      loss of men. In the following spring (357) he intended to cross the Rhine, and to penetrate
      into the country of the Alemanni; and he would have executed his plan but for the strange
      conduct of the Roman general Barbation, who was on his march from Italy with an army of
      25,000, or perhaps 30,000 men, in order to effect his junction with Julian. A sufficient
      number of boats was collected at Basel for the purpose of throwing a bridge over the Rhine,
      and provisions were kept there for supporting his troops, but barbation remained inactive on
      the left bank, and proved his treacherous designs by burning both the ships and the
      provisions. In consequence of this, Julian was compelled to adopt the defensive, and the
      Alemanni, headed by their king Chnodomarius, crossed the Rhine, and took up a position near
      Strassburg (August, A. D. and took up a position near Strassburg strong : Julian had only
      13,000 veterans; but he did not decline the engagement, and, after a terrible conflict, he
      gained a decisive victory, which was chiefly owing to the personal valour of the young prince.
      Six thousand of the barbarians remained on the field, perhaps as many were slain in their
      flight or drowned in the Rhine, and their king Chnodomarius was made prisoner. The loss of the
      Romans in this memorable battle is stated by Ammianus Marcellinus to have been only 243
      privates and four officers; but this is not credible. Chnodomarius was well treated by Julian,
      who sent him to the court of Constantius. [<hi rend="smallcaps">CHNODOMARIUS.</hi>]</p><p>Immediately after this victory Julian invaded the territory of the Alemanni on the right
      bank of the Rhine, but more for the purpose of exhibiting his power than of making any
      permanent conquests, for he advanced only a few miles, and then returned and led his troops
      against the Franks, who had conquered the tract between the Seheldt, the Maas, and the Lower
      Rhine. Some of the Frankish tribes he drove back into Germany, and others he allowed to remain
      in Gaul, on condition of their submitting to the Roman authority. Upon this he invaded Germany
      a second time, in 358, and a third time in 359, in order to make the Alemanni desist from all
      further attempts upon Gaul, and he not only succeeded, but returned with 20,000 Romans, whom
      the Alemanni had taken, and whom he compelled them to give up.</p><p>The peace of Gaul being now established, Julian exerted himself to rebuild the cities that
      had been ruined on the frontiers of Germany : among those rebuilt and fortified by him were
      Bingen, Andernach, Bonn, and Neuss, and, without doubt, Cologne also, as this city had been
      likewise laid in ashes by the Germans. As the constant inroads of the barbarians had
      interrupted all agricultural pursuits in those districts, there was a great scarcity of corn,
      but Julian procured an abundant supply by sending six hundred barges to England, which came
      back with a sufficient quantity for both grinding and sowing. The minimum of the quantity <pb n="646"/> of corn thus exported from England has been calculated at 120,000 quarters, and it
      has been justly observed that the state of agriculture in this country must have been in an
      advanced condition, since so much corn could be exported nearly altogether at the same time.
      Julian bestowed the same care upon the other provinces of Gaul, and the country evidently
      recovered under his administration, although the power with which he was invested was by no
      means extensive enough to check the system of rapacity and oppression which characterises the
      government of the later Roman emperors. His usual residence was Paris: he caused the large
      island in the Seine, which is now called l'île de la Cité, and whereupon stood
      ancient Paris or Lutetia, to be surrounded by a stone wall and towers, and he built the
      Thermae Juliani, a palace with baths, the extensive remains of which, " les thermes de
      Julien," are still visible in the Rue de la Harpe, between the palace of Cluny and the School
      of Medicine.</p><p>While Julian became more and more popular in the provinces entrusted to his administration,
      and his fame was spreading all over the empire, Constantius once more gave way to the
      suggestions of jealousy and distrust, and believed that Julian aimed at popularity in order to
      gain for himself the supreme authority. It happened that in A. D. 360 the eastern provinces
      were again threatened by the Persians. Constantius commanded Julian to send to the frontiers
      of Persia four of his best legions and a number of picked soldiers from his other troops,
      apparently that he might be able apprehend him, which it was impossible to do while he was
      surrounded by so many thousands devoted warriors. This order surprised Julian in April 360: to
      obey it was to expose Gaul to new inroads of the Germans, and Britain to the ravages of the
      Scots and Picts, whose incursions had assumed such a dangerous character that Julian just
      despatched Lupicinus to defend the island; but to disobey the order was open revolt. His
      soldiers also were unwilling to march into Asia; but Julian, notwithstanding the dangers that
      awaited him, resolved to obey, and endeavoured to persuade his troops to submit quietly to the
      will of their master. His endeavours were in vain. In the night large bodies of soldiers
      surprised the palace of Julian, and proclaimed him emperor. He had hid himself in his
      apartments; but they soon discovered him, dragged him, though respectfully, before the
      assembled troops, and compelled him to accept the crown. Upon this he despatched Pentadius and
      Eutherius with a conciliatory message to Constantius, in which, however, he positively
      demanded to be acknowledged as Augustus, and to be invested with the supreme authority in
      those provinces over which he had ruled as Caesar, viz. Gaul, Spain, and Britain. The
      conditions of Julian were haughtily declined; and after a considerable time had elapsed in
      fruitless negotiations, which Julian employed in making two more expeditions beyond the Rhine
      against the Franks and the Alemanni, he at last resolved to wage open war, and to march upon
      Constantinople. His army was numerous and well disciplined, and the frontier along the Rhine
      in an excellent state of defence: his troops, who had refused leaving Gaul without him, now
      joyfully left it with him. Meanwhile, Constantius likewise collected a strong army, and gave
      directions for the defence of his capital from Antioch, from whence he had superintended the
      Persian war. Informed of his plans, Julian resolved to thwart them by quickness and energy. At
      Basel on the Rhine he divided his army into two corps: one, commanded by Novitta, was to march
      through Rhaetia and Noricum; the other, under the orders of Jovius and Jovinus, was to cross
      the Alps and march through the north-eastern corner of Italy: both divisions were to unite at
      Sirmium, a town on the Savus, now Save. Julian, at the head of a small but chosen body of 3000
      veterans, plunged into the wildernesses of the Marcian, now Black Forest; and for some time
      the rival of Constantius seemed to be lost in those dark glens whence issue the sources of the
      Danube. But when Novitta, Jovius and Jovinus arrived at Sirmium, they be held, to their joy
      and astonishment, the active Julian with his band, who had descended the Danube and had
      already defeated the extreme outposts of Lucilian, the lieutenant of Constantius in those
      regions.</p><p>From Sirmium Julian moved upon Constantinople: the officers of Constantius fled before him,
      but the inhabitants received him with acclamations of joy; and at Athens, Rome, and other
      important cities, he was either publicly or privately acknowledged as emperor, having
      previously sent explanatory letters to the authorities of those distant places. Informed of
      the unexpected appearance of Julian on the Danube, Constantius set out from Syria to defend
      his capital; and a terrible civil war threatened to desolate Italy and the East, to when
      Constantius suddenly died at Mopsocrene in Cilicia, on the third of November, <date when-custom="361">A. D. 361</date>, leaving the whole empire to the undisputed posses sion of
      Julian. On the 11th of December following, Julian made his triumphal entrance into
      Constantinople. Shortly afterwards the mortal remains of Constantius arrived in the Golden
      Horn, and had were buried by Julian in the church of the Holy Apostles with great solemnity
      and magnificence.</p><p>While Julian thus gave a Christian burial to the body of his rival, he had long ceased to be
      a Christian himself. According to Julian's own statement (<hi rend="ital">Epist.</hi> ii.), he
      was a Christian up to his twentieth year; and the manner in which he praises his tutor,
      Mardonius, seems to imply that Mardonius and the philosopher Maximus first caused him to love
      the religion of the ancient Greeks, without, however, precisely estranging him from the
      Christian religion, which seems to have been the effect of his study of the ancient Greek
      philosophers. The vile hypocrisy of the base and cruel Constantius, the conviction of Julian
      that Con stantine the Great had at first protected, and afterwards embraced, Christianity from
      mere political motives, the persecuting spirit manifested equally by the Orthodox and Arians
      against one another,-- had also a great share in the conversion of Julian. During ten years he
      dissembled his apostacy, which was, however, known to many of his friends, and early suspected
      by his own brother Gallus and it was not till he had succeeded to the throne that he publicly
      avowed himself a pagan. Our space does not allow us to enter into the details of his apostacy,
      and we must refer the reader to the sources cited below. His apostasy was no sooner known than
      the Christians feared a cruel persecution, and the heathens hoped that paganism would be
      forced upon all who were not heathens; but they were beth disappointed by an edict of <pb n="647"/> Julian, in which he proclaimed a perfect toleration of all parties. He was not,
      however, impartial in his conduct towards the Christians, since he preferred pagans as his
      civil and military officers, forbade the Christians to teach rhetoric and grammar in the
      schools, and, in order to annoy them, allowed the Jews to rebuild their great temple at
      Jerusalem <note anchored="true" place="margin">* Respecting the alleged miracle which interrupted the Jews in
       this work, see the judicious remarks in Lardner's <hi rend="ital">Jewish and Heathen
        Testinonies;</hi> vol. iv.,</note> and compelled the followers of Jesus to pay money towards
      the erection of pagan temples, and, in some instances, to assist in building them. Had Julian
      lived longer he would have seen that his apostacy was not followed by those effects, either
      religious or political, which he flattered himself would take place: he would have learnt that
      paganism, as he understood it, was not the religion of the great mass of pagans, and that
      paganism, as it actually existed, was a rotten institution, destitute of all religious and
      moral discipline; and he would have witnessed that, however divided the Christians were, there
      was something better and healthier in Christianity than futile subjects for subtle
      controversies.</p><p>Soon after his accession Julian set out for Antioch, where he remained some time busy in
      organising a powerful army for the invasion, and perhaps subjugation, of Persia. The people of
      Antioch received him coolly: they were Christians, but also the most frivolous and luxurious
      people in the East, and they despised the straightforward and somewhat rustic manners of an
      emperor who had formed his character among stern Celts and Germans. At Antioch Julian made the
      acquaintance of the orator Libanius; but the latter was unable to reconcile the emperor to the
      sort of life which prevailed in that splendid city. He therefore withdrew to Tarsus in
      Cilicia, where he took up his winter-quarters. In the following spring (March, 363) he set out
      for Persia. The different corps of his army met at Hierapolis, where they passed the Euphrates
      on a bridge of boats, and thence moved to Carrhae, now Ilarran, a town in Mesopotamia about
      fifty miles E. N. E. from Hierapolis. Julian's plan was to march upon Ctesiphon, but in order
      to deceive the Persian king, Sapor, he despatched Procopius and Sebastianus with 30,000 men
      against Nisibis (east of Carrhae), while he himself wheeled suddenly round to the south,
      following the course of the Euphrates on its left or Mesopotamian side. Procopius and
      Sebastianus were to join Arsaces Tiranus, king of Armenia, and Julian expected to effect a
      junction with their united forces in the environs of Ctesiphon ; but the treachery of Arsaces
      prevented the accomplishment of his plan, as is mentioned below [Compare Vol. I. p. 363b.].
      While Julian marched along the Euphrates in a south-eastern direction, he was accompanied by a
      fleet of 1100 ships, fifty of which were well-armed galleys, and the rest barges, carrying a
      vast supply of provisions and military stores. At Circesium, situated on the confluence of the
      Chaboras, now the Khabur, with the Euphrates, he arrived at the Persian frontier, which rail
      along the lower part of the Chaboras, and he Fntered the Persian territory on the 7th of
      April, 363, at the head of an army of 65,000 veterans. The bridge of the Chaboras was broken
      down behind them by his orders, to convince the soldiers that a retreat was no plan of their
      master. From Circesium he continued marching along the Euphrates till he came to that narrow
      neck of land which separates the Euphrates from the Tigris in the latitude of Ctesiphon. This
      portion of the route lies partly through a dreary desert, where the Romans experienced some
      trifling losses from the light Persian horse, who hovered round them, and occasionally picked
      up stragglers or assailed the rear or the van. Previous to crossing the neck of land, Julian
      besieged, stormed, and burned Perisabor, a large town on the Euphrates; and while crossing
      that tract, he was delayed some time under the walls of Maogamalcha, which lie likewise took
      after a short siege and razed to the ground. Julian now accomplished a most difficult and
      extraordinary task: he conveyed his whole fleet across the above-mentioned neck of land, by an
      ancient canal called Nahar-Malcha, which, however, he was obliged to deepen before he could
      trust his ships in such a passage; and, as the canal joined the Tigris below Ctesiphon, he
      looked for and found an old cut, dug by Trajan, from Colche to a place somewhat above
      Ctesipllon, which, however, he was likewise compelled to make deeper and broader, so that at
      last his fleet run safely out into the Tigris. The canal of Nahar-Malcha is now called the
      canal of Sakláwíyeh, or Isa; it joins the Tigris a little below Baghdád,
      and it still affords a communication between the two rivers. Through a very skilful manoeuvre,
      he brought over his army on the left bank of the Tigris,--a passage not only extremely
      difficult on account of the rapid current of the Tigris, but rendered still more so through
      the stout resistance of a Persian army, which, however, was routed and pursued to the walls of
      Ctesiphon. The city would have been entered by the Romans together with the fugitive Persians,
      but for the death of their leader, Victor. Julian was now looking out for the arrival of
      Procopius and Sebastianus, and the main army of the Armenian king, Arsaces or Tiranus. He was
      sadly disappointed: his lieutenants did not arrive, and Tiranus arranged for a body of his
      Armenians to desert which had joined the Romans previously, and which now secretly withdrew
      from the Roman camp at Ctesiphon. Julian nevertheless began the siege of that vast city, which
      was defended by the flower of the Persian troops, king Sapor, with the main body of his army,
      not having yet arrived from the interior of Persia. Unable to take the <hi rend="ital">city,</hi> and desirous of dispersing the king's army, Julian imprudently followed the
      advice of a Persian nobleman of great distinction, who appeared in the Roman camp under the
      pretext of being persecuted by Sapor, and who recommended the emperor to set out in search of
      the Persian king. In doing so, Julian would have been compelled to Abandon his fleet on the
      Tigris to the attacks of a hostile and infuriated populace: this he avoided by setting fire to
      his ships,--the best thing he could have done, if his march into the interior of Persia had
      been dictated by absolute necessity; but as he was not obliged to leave the city, even success
      would not have compensated for the loss of 1200 ships. In proportion as the Romans advanced
      eastward, the country became more and more barren, and Sapor remained invisible. The treachery
      of the Persian noble was discovered after his secret flight, and Julian was obliged to
      retreat. <pb n="648"/> He took the direction of the province of Corduene. The Persians now
      appeared: swarms of light horse were seen hovering round the army; larger bodies followed, and
      ere long Sapor, with his main army, came in sight, and harassed fearfully the rear of the
      Romans. Still the Romans remained victorious in many a bloody engagement, especially at
      Maronga; but it was in the mouth of June, and the oppressive heat, and the want of water and
      provisions had a pernicious effect upon the troops. On the 26th of June the Roman rear was
      suddenly assailed by the Persians, and Julian, who commanded the van, hastened to the relief
      of the rear without his cuirass, the heat making a heavy armour almost insupportable. The
      Persians were repulsed, and fled in confusion. Julian was pursuing them with the utmost
      bravery, when in the middle of the mélée he was shot by an arrow, that pierced
      through his liver. He fell from his horse mortally wounded, and was conveyed to his tent.
      Feeling his death approaching, he took leave of his friends with touching words, but certainly
      not with that fine and elegant speech with which Ammianus Marcellinus (<bibl n="Amm. 25.3">25.3</bibl>) makes him bid farewell to the world.</p><p>Jovian was chosen emperor in his stead, on the field of battle. [<hi rend="smallcaps">JOVIANUS.</hi>]</p><p>We cannot enter into a long description of Juliain's character. His talents, his principles,
      and his deeds, were alike extraordinary. His pride was to be called by others and by himself a
      philosopher, yet many facts prove that he was very superstitious. Most Christian writers
      abused and calumniated him because he abandoned Christianity: if they had pitied him they
      would have acted more in accordance with that sublime precept of our religion, which teaches
      us to forgive our enemies. It must ever be recollected that the bigotry, the hypocrisy, and
      the uncharitableness, of the majority of the Christians of Julian's time, were some of the
      principal causes that led to his apostacy. In reading the ancient authorities, the student
      oughlt to bear in mind that the heathen writers extol Julian far too high, and that the
      Christians debase him far too low.</p><p>Julian was great as an emperor, unique as a man, and remarkable as an author. He wrote an
      immense number of works, consisting of orations on various subjects, historical treatises,
      satires, and letters : most of the latter were intended for public circulation. All these
      works are very elaborately composed, so much so as to afford a fatiguing and monotonous
      reading to those who peruse them merely for their merits as specimens of Greek literature but
      they are at the same time very important sources for the history and the opinions of the age
      on religion and philosophy. Julian also tried to write poetry, but he was no poet: lie lacks
      imagination, and his artificial manner of embellishing prose shows that he had no poetical
      vein. He was a man of reflection and thought, but possessed no creative genius. His style is
      remarkably pure for his time, and shows that lie had not only studied the classical Greek
      historians and philosophers, but had so far identified himself with his models, that there is
      scarcely a page in his works where we do not meet with either reminiscences from the classical
      writers, or visible efforts to express his ideas in the same way as they did. With this
      painful imitation of his classical models he often unites the exaggerated and over-elaborate
      style of his contemporaries, and we trace in his writings the influence of the Platonists no
      less than that of Plato, Aristotle, Thucydides, and so many other writers of the golden age.
      There is, however, one circumstance which reconciles the reader to many of the author's
      defects: Julian did not merely write for writing's sake, as so many of his contemporaries did,
      but he shows that he had his subjects really at heart, and that in literature as well as in
      business his extraordinary activity arose from the wants of a powerful mind, which desired to
      improve itself and the world. In this respect Julian excites our sympathy much more, for
      instance, than the rhetorician Libanius.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>The following are the editions of the entire works of Julian:--<bibl><hi rend="ital">Juliani Imperatoris Opera quae extant,</hi> with a Latin translation by P. Martinius and
        C. Cantoclarus, and the author's life by Martinius, Paris, 1583, 8vo.</bibl>: <bibl><hi rend="ital">Juliani Opera, quae quidem reperiri pottuerunt, omnia,</hi> Paris, 1630, 4to.,
        by Petavius, with notes and a Latin translation</bibl>. A better edition than either of the
       two preceding is:--<bibl><hi rend="ital">Juliani Imperatoris Opera, quae supersunt
         omnia,</hi> Leipzig, 1696, fol., by Ezechiel Spanheim</bibl>, who perused an excellent
       codex, which enabled him to publish a much purer text than Petavius, and he added the notes
       of Petavius and his translation, which he corrected, as well as an excellent commentary of
       his own. This edition contains 63 letters of Julian. <bibl>Spanheim further added to it <hi rend="ital">S. Cyrilli, Aleaandrini Archiepiscopi, contra impium Julianum Libri Decem,</hi>
        which is the more valuable as Cyrillus was one of the most able adversaries of Julian, as is
        mentioned below</bibl>.</p></div><div><head>Works</head><p>The following is a list of Julian's works, with the principal separate editions of
       each:--</p><div><head>I. Letters.</head><p>The first collection, published by <bibl>Aldus, Venice, 1499, 4to.</bibl>, contains only
        48 letters; <bibl>Spanheim published 63 in his edition of the works of Julian</bibl>; others
        were found in later times, four of which are printed in <bibl>Fabricius, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Graec.</hi></bibl>; the last and best edition is by <bibl>L. H. Heyler, Mainz,
         1828, 8vo.</bibl>; it contains 83 letters, with a Latin translation and a commentary of the
        editor.</p><p>There are besides some fragments of lost letters. Among the letters of Julian, there is
        also one which was written to him by his brother Gallus, in <date when-custom="353">A. D.
         353</date>, who advises him to remain faithful to the Christian religion. The authenticity
        of several letters is contested. They treat on various subjects, and are of great importance
        for the history of the time. One, which was addressed to the senate and people of Athens,
        and in which the author explains the motives of his having taken up arms against the emperor
        Constantius, is an interesting and most important historical document.</p></div><div><head>II. Orations.</head><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐγκώμιον πρὸς αὐτοκράτορα
         Κωνστάντιον</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐγκώμιον πρὸς αὐτοκράτορα Κωνστάντιον</foreign>,
          <bibl>with a Latin translation by Petavius, Paris, 1614, 8vo.:</bibl> an encomium of the
         emperor Constantius, in which Julian is not consisteit with his usual feelings of contempt
         and hatred towards that emperor. In general Julian speaks very badly of the whole imperial
         family, and even Constantine the Great does not escape his severe censure. Wyttenbach, in
         the work quoted below, has written some excellent observations on this work.</p></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τῶν Αὐτοκράτορος Πράξεων, ἢ περὶ
          Βασιλείας</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τῶν Αὐτοκράτορος Πράξεων, ἢ περὶ
          Βασιλείας</foreign>, two orations on the deeds and the reign of the emperor Constantius,
         which are of great importance for the knowledge of the time: in the complete editions.
         Julian wrote these orations in Gaul, and betray in many a passage his preference of
         paganism <pb n="649"/> to Christianity, as well as his enthusiastic love of the new
         Platonic philosophy.</p></div><div><head>3. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εὐσεβίας τῆς βασιλίδος Ἐγκώμιον</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Εὐσεβίας τῆς βασιλίδος Ἐγκώμιον</foreign>, an encomium
         on the empress Eusebia, the patroness of Julian: <bibl>ed. Petavius, Paris, 1614,
          8vo.</bibl></p></div><div><head>4. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὸν βασιλέα Ἥλιον</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὸν βασιλέα Ἥλιον</foreign>, an oration on the
         worship of the sun, addressed to Sallustius, his old military councillor and friend, first
         in Gaul and afterwards in Germany: <bibl>ed. by Theodorus Marcilius, Paris, 1583.
          8vo.</bibl>; by <bibl>Vincentius Marinerius, Madrid, 1625, 8vo.</bibl></p></div><div><head>5. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὴν μητέρα τῶν θεῶν</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τὴν μητέρα τῶν θεῶν</foreign>, an oration on the
         mother of gods (Cybele): Julian visited the temple of Cybele at Pessinus, and restored her
         worship.</p></div><div><head>6. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τοὺς ἀπαιδεύτους Κύνας</foreign>; and 7.
          <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πρὸς Ἡράκλειον Κυνικὸν, περὶ τοῦ πῶς Κυνιστέυν, και
          εἰ πρέπει τῷ Κυνὶ μύθους, πράττειν</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Εἰς τοὺς ἀπαιδεύτους Κύνας</foreign>; and 7. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πρὸς Ἡράκλειον Κυνικὸν, περὶ τοῦ πῶς Κυνιστέυν, και εἰ
          πρέπει τῷ Κυνὶ μύθους, πράττειν</foreign> two orations on true and false Cynicism,
         the latter addressed to the Cynic Heracleius.</p></div><div><head>8. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐπὶ τῆ ἐξόδῳ τοῦ ἀλαθωτάτου Σαλλουστίον
          παραμυθητικός</foreign></head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐπὶ τῆ ἐξόδῳ τοῦ ἀλαθωτάτου Σαλλουστίον
          παραμυθητικός</foreign>, a letter to the aforesaid Sallustius, in which he consoles
         himself and his friends on the recal of Sallustius, by the emperor Constantius, from Gaul
         to the East.</p></div><div><head>9. A Letter to Themistius</head><p>A letter, or more correctly dissertation, addressed to his former tutor, the philosopher
         Themistius, on the difficulty the author thinks he would experience in showing himself so
         perfect an emperor as Themistius expected.</p></div></div><div><head>III. Other Works.</head><div><head>1. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Καίσαρες ἢ Συμπόσιον</foreign> (the <title>Caesars
          or the Banquet</title>)</head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Καίσαρες ἢ Συμπόσιον</foreign>, the <title>Caesars or the
          Banquet</title>, a satirical composition, which Gibbon justly calls one of the most
         agreeable and instructive productions of ancient wit. Julian describes the Roman emperors
         approaching one after the other to take their seat round a table placed in the heavens; and
         as they come up, their faults, vices, and crimes, are censured with a sort of bitter mirth
         by old Silenus, whereupon each Caesar defends himself as well as he can, that is, as well
         as Julian allows him to do; but in this Julian shows much partiality, especially towards
         Constantine the Great and other members of the imperial family. Alexander the Great also
         appears. He and other great heroes at last acknowledge that a royal philosopher is greater
         than a royal hero, and the piece finishes with a great deal of praise bestowed upon Julian
         by himself.</p><div><head>Editions</head><p>There are many editions and translations of this remarkable production. Of these, the
          most important are the text with a Latin translation by <bibl>C. Cantoclarus, Paris, 1577,
           8vo.</bibl>, <bibl>the <hi rend="ital">Editio Princeps;</hi> the same, Paris, 1583,
           8vo.</bibl>; <bibl>the same, corrected by Frederic Sylburg, in the third volume of his
            <title xml:lang="la">Romanae Hisitoriae Scriptores Minores,</title></bibl> and
          separately, <bibl>Frankfort, 1590, fol.</bibl>; by <bibl>Petrus Cunaeas, with an elegant
           Latin translation, Leyden, 1612, 12mo., 1632, 12mo.</bibl>; the same with the notes of
           <bibl>Cellarius, Leipzig, 1693, 8vo., 1735, 8vo.</bibl></p><p>The best editions are by <bibl>J. M. Heusinger, Gotha, 1736, 8vo., 1741, 8vo.</bibl>,
          and by <bibl>Harless, the editor of Fabricius, <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Grraeca,</hi>
           Erlangen, 1785, 8vo.</bibl></p></div><div><head>Translations</head><p>An English translation of the Caesares, the Misopogon, and several other productions of
          Julian, is contained in <bibl><title>Select Works of the Emperor Julian, and some Pieces
            of the Sophist Libanius, &amp;c., with Notes from Petav, La Bléterie, Gibbon,
            &amp;c., and a translation of <hi rend="ital">La Bléterie's Vie de Jovien,</hi>
            by John Duncombe,</title> London, 1784, 8vo</bibl>.</p><p>Several French, German, Italian, and Dutch translations are mentioned by Fabricius.</p></div></div><div><head>2. <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀντιοχικὸς ἢ μισοτώλων</foreign> (<title>the
          Antiochian, or the Enemy of the Beard</title>)</head><p><foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἀντιοχικὸς ἢ μισοτώλων</foreign>, <title>the Antiochian,
          or the Enemy of the Beard</title>, a severe satire on the licentious and effeminate
         manners of the inhabitants of Antioch, with occasional ironical confessions of the author's
         own faults, who was induced to write this amusing piece during his stay at Antioch, as
         mentioned above. Julian chose the title <title xml:lang="grc">Μισοτώλων</title> because
         the inhabitants of Antioch, being accustomed to shave themselves, ridiculed Julian, who
         allowed his beard to grow, in the ancient fashion. Editions: by Petrus Martinius, Paris,
         1567, 8vo., 1583, 8vo.; by H. I. Lasius, together with the Caesares, and a German
         translation of both, Greifswald, 1770, 8vo.; there are also English, French, and German
         translations of the Misopogon. The following English translations of some of the minor
         productions of Julian are worthy of mention: " Julian's Letter to the Bostrens," translated
         by the Earl of Shaftesbury, in his "Characteristics," London, 1733, 12mo.; two Orations of
         the Emperor Julian, viz. to the Sun, and to the Mother of the Gods, with notes, &amp;c..
         London, 1793, 8vo. The English literature is rich in works on Julian.</p></div></div><div><head>IV. Poems.</head><p>Three epigrams of little importance, in the " Anthologia Graeca," and a fourth, discovered
        by Boissonade, in the " Analecta," and in Heyler's edition of Julian's Letters.</p></div><div><head>V. Lost Works.</head><p>The most important is, <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κατὰ Χριστιανξῶν</foreign>, a
        refutation of the Christian religion, in seven books, according to Hieronymus, although
        Cyrill only speaks of three. These three books were directed against the dogmatical part of
        the Christian religion, as contained in the Gospels; and it is against this part of the work
        that Cyrill wrote his famous work <foreign xml:lang="grc">Υπὲρ τῆς τῶν Χριστιανῶν
         εὐαλοῦς σρνσκείας, πρὸς τὰ τοῦ ἐν ἀθέοις Ἰουλιανοῦ</foreign>, which is
        separately printed in Spanheim's edition of the works of Julian. All the copies of Julian's
        work which could be found were destroyed by order of the emperor Theodosius II., and the
        whole would have been lost for ever but for Cyrill, who gives extracts from the three first
        books in his refutation of Julian. But these extracts are far from giving an adequate idea
        of the work. Cyrill confesses that he had not ventured to copy several of the weightiest
        arguments of the author. The <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κατὰ Χρλστιανῶν</foreign>, was
        likewise refuted by Apollinaris, whose <foreign xml:lang="grc">Λόγος ὑτὲρ ἀληθείας
         κατὰυς Ἰουλιανοῦ</foreign> however, is lost, as are the refutations of Photius and
        Philippus of Sida. The marquis d'Argens, a chamberlain to Frederic the Great, king of
        Prussia, translated the extracts made by Cyrill, and tried to complete them, according to
        some, at the suggestion of his master. The title of the translation is, " Défense du
        Paganisme par l'Empereur Julien, en Grec et en Franfais," &amp;c. &amp;c., Berlin, 1764,
        8vo.; lb. (Geneva), 1768, 8vo.; Ib. 1769, 2 vols. 8vo. The marquis was any thing but a
        Christian, and his opinions on Julian and Paganism were attacked by G. F. Meier in his
        "Beurtheiluung der Betrachtungen des Marquis d'Argens iiber Julian," Halle, 1764, 8vo.; by
        W. Crichton," Betrachtungen über den Abfall Julian's;" and by others. Other lost works
        of Julian are: <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τῶν τριῶν σχημάτων</foreign>; <foreign xml:lang="grc">Περὶ τοῦ πόθεν τὰ κακὰ κατὰ τοὺς ἀπαιδεύτουδ</foreign>; <foreign xml:lang="grc">Τὰ καλούμενα Κπόνια</foreign>; Memoirs on his Campaigns in Germany;
        his Journal, in which he used to write down the events of every day; and others, especially
        many letters.</p><p>Julian composed his works in the following chronological order:--The Encomia on
        Constantius; the Encomium on the Empress Eusebia, not before <date when-custom="356">A. D.
         356</date>; the Letter to Sallustius, in <date when-custom="360">A. D. 360</date>; <pb n="650"/>
        the Letter to the Senate and the People of Athens, in <date when-custom="360">A. D. 360</date>;
        the Letter to Themistius, and the Oration on Helius, in 361; the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Καίσαρες</foreign>, in the winter of 361-362, or perhaps in the following year; most of
        his extant Letters during the same period; one of his Orations on false Cynicism, and that
        on the Mother of Gods, as well as a Letter on the restoration of ancient Hellenism, of which
        a fragment is extant, in 362; the Misopogon in the beginning of 363; and the <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κατὰ Χριστιανῶν</foreign> finished during his expedition against the
        Persians, in the summer of 363.</p></div></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>The works of Julian; <bibl n="Amm. 5.8">Amm. Marc. 5.8</bibl>_<bibl n="Amm. 25.5">25.5</bibl>; most of the Orations and Epistles of Libanius, especially, <hi rend="ital">Oratio Parentalis; Ad Antiochenos de Imperatoris Ira; De Neee Juliani ulciscenda;</hi>
       Socrates, <hi rend="ital">H. E.</hi> lib. iii.; Zonar. lib. xiii.; Zosim. lib. iii.; <bibl n="Eutrop. 10.14">Eutrop. 10.14</bibl>, &amp;c.; Themist. <hi rend="ital">Orat.</hi> iv.;
       Gregor. Nazianz. <hi rend="ital">Orat.</hi> iii. iv. x. xxi.; Sozomen. lib. v. vi.;
       Mamertinus in <hi rend="ital">Panegyric. Vet.</hi> (Mamertinus was Comes Largitionum to
       Julian, whom he accompanied in Gaul, and on his memorable expedition down the Danube); Aurel.
       Vict. <hi rend="ital">Constantius</hi> in fin.; Moses Chorenensis, lib. iii.; Theophanes, pp.
       29-44, ed. Paris; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graeca,</hi> vol. vi. p. 719, &amp;c. For
       other sources, especially ecclesiastical writers, and with regard to Julian's apostacy, we
       refer the reader to Fabricius, the notes to the splendid life of Julian by Gibbon, in his
        <title xml:lang="la">Decline and Fall,</title> and the Abbé de la Bléterie's
        <hi rend="ital">Vie de Julien,</hi> of which there is an English translation; Neander, <hi rend="ital">Ueber den Kaiser Julian,</hi> Leipz. 1812; Wiggers, <hi rend="ital">Dissert. de
        Juliano Apostata,</hi> Rostock, 1810, of which there is a new edition in German in Illgen's
        <hi rend="ital">Zeitschrift für Hist. Theol.</hi> 1837, vol. vii.; Schulze, <hi rend="ital">De Juliani Philosophia et Moribus,</hi> 1839; Teuffel, <hi rend="ital">De
        Juliano religionis Christiani contemptore,</hi> Tübingen. 1844. </p><p><figure/></p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.P">W.P</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>