<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.hagiotheodorita_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:H.hagiotheodorita_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="H"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="hagiotheodorita-bio-1" n="hagiotheodorita_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Hagiotheodorita</surname></persName></head><p>a commentator on the Basilica.</p><div><head>Works</head><div><head>Commentary on the <title>Basilica</title></head><div><head><term xml:lang="la">Glossa Ordinaria</term></head><p>The earliest scholia that were appended to this work were, in the opinion of Zachariae
          (<hi rend="ital">Hist. Jur. Gr. Rom. Delin.</hi> § 38), extracts selected in the
         reign of Constantinus Porphyrogenitus from the ancient translations of the Corpus Juris,
         and from the old commentators on the compilations of Justinian. Mortreueil, however (<hi rend="ital">Histoire du Droit Byzantin,</hi> vol. ii. p. 123), thinks that these extracts
         were themselves part of the primitive official text, and were analogous to the
          <title>interpretatio</title> of the Breviarium Alaricianum. Additions seem to have been
         made to the early scholia in the tenth and eleventh centuries, from the writings of later
         jurists. In the twelfth century a kind of <term xml:lang="la">glossa ordinaria</term> was
         formed, compiled from the previous scholia. Thus the gloss was made up from the works of
         writers who were for the most part antecedent in date to the composition of the Basilica,
         their language being sometimes altered, and their references being accommodated to the
         existing state of the law. After the formation of the <term xml:lang="la">glossa
          ordinaria</term>, new annotations were added, and, as in the manuscripts, the <term xml:lang="la">glossa ordinaria</term> was a marginal commentary on the text, so the new
         annotations were written on the extreme margin that was left. In the West, the <term xml:lang="la">glossa ordinaria</term> on the <title xml:lang="la">Corpus Juris
          Civilis</title> was formed, and received additions in a very similar manner.</p></div><div><head><term xml:lang="la">Glossa Ordinaria</term> produced by Hagiotheodorita</head><p>Specimens of the last kind of annotation exist in the manuscripts of the 11th, 12th,
         13th, 14th, and 60th books of the Basilica. They appear for the most part to have been
         written by Hagiotheodorita, and to have been added by one of his disciples. <hi rend="ital">Basil.</hi> ed. Fabrot. vol. vii. p. 121, 653.) These annotations are not given entire in
         the portions of the Basilica published by Cujas, nor in the edition of Fabrotus.</p></div><div><head>Nicolaus Hagiotheodorita as author</head><p>Fabricius (<hi rend="ital">Bibl. Gr.</hi> vol. xii. p. 483), Heimbbach (<hi rend="ital">De Basil Orig.</hi> p. 83), and Pohl (<hi rend="ital">ad Suares. Nolit. Basil.</hi> p.
         139, n. (<foreign xml:lang="grc">λ</foreign>)), identify the commentator on the Basilica
         with Nicolaus Hagiotheodorita, metropolitan of Athens, who lived under Manuel Comnenus in
         the time of Lucas, patriarch of Constantinople. (Bilsamo, <hi rend="ital">ad Photii
          Nomocan.</hi> tit. 13. <hi rend="ital">c.</hi> 2.) A letter, written in Greek by friend of
         Nicolaus Hagiotheodoria, lamenting his death, was copied by Wolfius from a Bodleian
         manuscript, and was first published by Fabricius. (<hi rend="ital">Bibl. Gr.</hi> vol. xii.
         p. 483.)</p><div><head>Synopsis of the Novells</head><p>According to the worse than doubtful testimony of Nic. Comnenus Papadopoli, the
          metropolitan of Athens composed a synopsis of the Novells (<hi rend="ital">Praenot.
           Mystsay.</hi> p. 372), and illustrated with scholia the Novells of Leo the philosopher.
           (<hi rend="ital">Ib.</hi> p. 393.)</p></div></div><div><head>Michael Hagiotheodorita as author</head><p>Zachariae is disposed to consider the commentator on the Basilica as the same person with
         Michael Hagiotheodorita, who, in <date when-custom="1166">A. D. 1166</date>, was logothertadromi
         under Manuel Commenus. (Leunclavius <hi rend="ital">J. G. R.</hi> vol. i. p. 167, vol. ii.
         p. 192.) </p></div></div></div><byline>[<ref target="author.J.T.G">J. T. G.</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>