<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.erasistratus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:E.erasistratus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="E"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="erasistratus-bio-1" n="erasistratus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Erasi'stratus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Ἐρασίστρατος</surname></persName>).</p><p>1. One of the most celebrated physicians and anatomists of antiquity, is generally supposed
      to have been born at Iulis in the island of Ceos (Suidas, <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐραδίστρ</foreign>.; Strab. 10.5, p. 389, ed. Tauchn.), though
      Stephanus Byzantinus (<hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">Κῶς</foreign>) calls him a native of Cos, Galen of Chios (<hi rend="ital">Introd.</hi> 100.4, vol. xiv. p. 683), and the emperor Julian of Samos. (<hi rend="ital">Misopog.</hi> p. 347.) Pliny says he was the grandson of Aristotle by his
      daughter Pythias (<hi rend="ital">H. N.</hi> 29.3), but this is not confirmed by any other
      ancient writer; and according to Suidas, he was the son of Cretoxena, the sister of the
      physician Medius, and Cleombrotus ; from which expression it is not quite clear whether
      Cleombrotus was his <hi rend="ital">father</hi> or his <hi rend="ital">uncle.</hi> He was a
      pupil of Chrysippus of Cnidos (<bibl n="D. L. 7.7.10">D. L. 7.7.10</bibl>, p. 186; <bibl n="Plin. Nat. 29.3">Plin. Nat. 29.3</bibl> ; Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Ven. Sect. adv.
       Erasistr.</hi> 100.7, vol. xi. p. 171), Metrodorus (Sext. Empir. <hi rend="ital">c.
       Mathem.</hi> 1.12, p. 271, ed. Fabric.) and apparently Theophrastus. (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Sang. in Arter.</hi> 100.7, vol. iv. p. 729.) He lived for some time at the court of
      Seleucus Nicator, king of Syria, where lie acquired great reputation by discovering the
      disease of Antiochus, the king's eldest son, probably <date when-custom="-294">B. C. 294</date>.
      Seleucus in his old age had lately married Stratonice, the young and beautiful daughter of
      Deme <pb n="43"/> trius Poliorcetes, and she had already borne him one child. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Demtetr.</hi> 100.38; Appian, <hi rend="ital">de Rebus Syr.</hi> 100.59.)
      Antiochus fell violently in love with his mother-in-law, but did not disclose his passion, and
      chose rather to pine away in silence. The physicians were quite unable to discover the cause
      and nature of his disease, and Erasistratus himself was at a loss at first, till, finding
      nothing amiss about his body, he began to suspect that it must be his mind which was diseased,
      and that he might perhaps be in love. This conjecture was confirmed when he observed his skin
      to be hotter, his colour to be heightened, and his pulse quickened, whenever Stratonice came
      near him, while none of these symptoms occurred on any other occasion; and accordingly he told
      Seleucus that his son's disease was incurable, for that he was in love, and that it was
      impossible that his passion could be gratified. The king wondered what the difficulty could
      be, and asked who the lady was. " My wife," replied Erasistratus; upon which Seleucus began to
      persuade him to give her up to his son. The physician asked him if he would do so himself if
      it were <hi rend="ital">his</hi> wife that the prince was in love with. The king protested
      that lie would most gladly; upon which Erasistratus told him that it was indeed his own wife
      who had inspired his passion, and that he chose rather to die than to disclose his secret.
      Seleucus was as good as his word, and not only gave up Stratonice, but also resigned to his
      son several provinces of his empire. This celebrated story is told with more or less variation
      by many ancient authors, (Appian, <hi rend="ital">de Rebus Syr.</hi> 100.59-61; Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Praenot. ad Epig.</hi> 100.6. vol. xiv. p. 630; Julian, <hi rend="ital">Misopog.</hi> p. 347, ed. Spanheim; Lucian, <hi rend="ital">de Syria Dea,</hi> §§
      17, 18; <bibl n="Plin. Nat. 29.3">Plin. Nat. 29.3</bibl>; <bibl n="Plut. Demetr. 100.38">Plut.
       Demetr. 100.38</bibl>; Suidas, <hi rend="ital">s. v.</hi>
      <foreign xml:lang="grc">Ἐρασίστρ</foreign>.; Jo. Tzetz. <hi rend="ital">Chil.</hi> vii.
      Hist. 118; Valer. Max. 5.7), and a similar anecdote has been told of Hippocrates (Soranus, <hi rend="ital">Vita Hippocr.</hi> in Hippocr. <hi rend="ital">Opera,</hi> vol. iii. p. 852),
      Galen (<hi rend="ital">de Praenot. ad Epig.</hi> 100.6. vol. xiv. p. 630), Avicenna (see <hi rend="ital">Biogr. Dict.</hi> of the <title>Usef. Knowl. Soc.</title>), and (if the names be
      not fictitious) Panacius (Aristaen. <hi rend="ital">Epist.</hi> 1.13) and Acestinus. (Heliod.
       <hi rend="ital">Aethiop.</hi> 4.7. p. 171.) If this is the anecdote referred to by Pliny (<hi rend="ital">l.c.</hi>), as is probably the case, Erasistratus is said to have received one
      hundred talents for being the means of restoring the prince to health, which (supposing the
      Attic standard to be meant, and to be equal to 243<hi rend="ital">l.</hi> 15<hi rend="ital">s.</hi>) would amount to 24,375<hi rend="ital">l.</hi>--one of the largest medical fees upon
      record.</p><p>Very little more is known of the personal history of Erasistratus : he lived for some time
      at Alexandria, which was at that time beginning to be a celebrated medical school, and gave up
      practice in his old age, that he might pursue his anatomical studies without interruption.
      (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Hippocr. et Plat. Deer.</hi> 7.3, vol. v. p. 602.) He prosecuted
      his experiments and researches in this branch of medical science with great success, and with
      such ardour that he is said to have dissected criminals alive. (Cels. <hi rend="ital">de
       Medic.</hi> i. praef. p. 6.) He appears to have died in Asia Minor, as Suidas mentions that
      he was buried by mount Mycale in Ionia. The exact date of his death is not known, but he
      probably lived to a good old age, as, according to Eusebius, he was alive <date when-custom="-258">B. C. 258</date>, about forty years after the marriage of Antiochus and Stratonice. He had
      numerous pupils and followers, and a medical school bearing his name continued to exist at
      Smyrna in Ionia nearly till the time of Strabo, about the beginning of the Christian era.
      (Strab. 12.8, sub fin.) The following are the names of the most celebrated physicians
      belonging to the sect founded by him : Apoemantes (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Venae Sect. adv.
       Erasistr.</hi> 100.2, vol. xi. p. 151), Apollonius Memphites, Apollophanes (Cael. Aurel. <hi rend="ital">de Morb. Acut.</hi> 2.33, p. 150) Artemidorus, Charidemus, Chrysippus,
      Heraclides, Hermogenes, Hicesius, Martialis, Menodorus, Ptolemaeus, Strato, Xenophon. He wrote
      several works on anatomy, practical medicine, and pharmacy, of which only the titles remain,
      together with a great number of short fragments preserved by Galen, Caelius Aurelianus, and
      other ancient writers: these, however, are sufficient to enable us to form a tolerably correct
      idea of his opinions both as a physician and an anatomist. It is in the latter character that
      he is most celebrated, and perhaps there is no one of the ancient physicians that did more to
      promote that branch of medical science. He appears to have been very near the discovery of the
      circulation of the blood, for in a passage preserved by Galen (<hi rend="ital">de Usu
       Part.</hi> 6.12, vol. iii. p. 465) he expresses himself as follows :--" The vein <note anchored="true" place="margin">* He is speaking of the <hi rend="ital">pulmonary artery,</hi> which received
       the name <foreign xml:lang="grc">φλέψ ὰρτηριώδης</foreign> from Herophilus. See Ruf.
       Ephes. de <hi rend="ital">Appell. Part. Corp. Hum.</hi> p. 42.</note> arises from the part
      where the arteries, that are distributed to the whole body, have their origin, and penetrates
      to the sanguineous [or <hi rend="ital">right</hi>] ventricle [of the heart]; and the artery
      [or <hi rend="ital">pulmonary vein</hi>] arises from the part where the veins have their
      origin, and penetrates to the pneumatic [or <hi rend="ital">left</hi>] ventricle of the
      heart." The description is not very clear, but seems to shew that he supposed the venous and
      arterial systems to be more intimately connected than was generally believed; which is
      confirmed by another passage in which he is said to have differed from the other ancient
      anatomists, who supposed the veins to arise from the liver, and the arteries from the heart,
      and to have contended that the heart was the origin both of the veins and the arteries.
      (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Hippocr. et Plat. Decr.</hi> 6.6, vol. v. p. 552.) With these
      ideas, it can have been only his belief that the arteries contained <hi rend="ital">air,</hi>
      and not <hi rend="ital">blood,</hi> that hindered his anticipating Harvey's celebrated
      discovery. The <hi rend="ital">tricuspid valves</hi> of the heart are generally said to have
      derived their name from Erasistratus ; but this appears to be an oversight, as Galen
      attributes it not to him, but to one of his followers. (<hi rend="ital">De Hippocr. et Plat.
       Deer.</hi> 6.6, vol. v. p. 548.) He appears to have paid particular attention to the anatomy
      of the brain, and in a passage out of one of his works preserved by Galen (<hi rend="ital">ibid.</hi> 7.3, vol. v. p. 603) speaks as if he had himself dissected a human brain. Galen
      says (<hi rend="ital">ibid.</hi> p. 602) that before Erasistratus had more closely examined
      into the origin of the nerves, he imagined that they arose from the dura mater and not from
      the substance of the brain; and that it was not till he was advanced in life that he satisfied
      himself by actual inspection that such was not the case. According to Rufus Ephesius, he
      divided the nerves into those of sensation and those of motion, of which the former he
      considered to be hollow and to arise from the membranes of the brain, the latter from the
      substance of <pb n="44"/> the brain itself and of the cerebellum. (<hi rend="ital">De Appell.
       Part.</hi> &amp;c. p. 65.) It is a remarkable instance at once of blindness and presumption,
      to find this acute physiologist venturing to assert, that the spleen (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Atra Bile,</hi> 100.7. vol. v. p. 131), the bile (id. <hi rend="ital">de Facult.
       Natur.</hi> 2.2, vol. ii. p. 78), and several other parts of the body (id. <hi rend="ital">Comment. in Hippocr.</hi> " <hi rend="ital">CDe Alim.</hi>" 3.14. vol. xv. p. 308), were
      entirely useless to animals. In the controversy that was carried on among the ancients as to
      whether fluids when drunk passed through the trachea into the lungs, or through the oesophagus
      into the stomach, Erasistratus maintained the latter opinion. (Plut. <hi rend="ital">Sympos.</hi> 7.1; <bibl n="Gel. 17.11">Gel. 17.11</bibl>, Macrob. <hi rend="ital">Saturn.</hi> 7.15.) He is also supposed to have been the first person who added to the word
       <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἀρτηρία</foreign>, which had hitherto designated the canal
      leading from the mouth to the lungs, the epithet <foreign xml:lang="grc">τραχεῖα</foreign>,
      to distinguish it from the arteries, and hence to have been the originator of the modern name
       <hi rend="ital">trachea.</hi> He attributed the sensation of hunger to vacuity of the
      stomach, and said that the Scythians were accustomed to tie a belt tightly round their middle,
      to enable them to abstain from food for a longer time without suffering inconvenience. (<bibl n="Gel. 16.3">Gel. 16.3</bibl>.) The <foreign xml:lang="grc">πνεῦμα</foreign>, or <hi rend="ital">spiritual substance,</hi> played a very important part both in his system of
      physiology and pathology: he supposed it to enter the lungs by the trachea, thence to pass by
      the pulmonary veins into the heart, and thence to be diffused throughout the whole body by
      means of the arteries (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de Differ. Puls.</hi> 4.2, vol. viii. p. 703, et
      alibi); that the use of respiration was to fill the arteries with air (id. <hi rend="ital">de
       Usu Respir.</hi> c. l. vol. iv. p. 471); and that the pulsation of the arteries was caused by
      the movements of the pneuma. He accounted for diseases in the same way, and supposed that as
      long as the pneuma continued to fill the arteries and the blood was confined to the veins, the
      individual was in good health; but that when the blood from some cause or other got forced
      into the arteries, inflammation and fever was the consequence. (Galen, <hi rend="ital">de
       Venae Sect. adv. Erasistr.</hi> 100.2. vol. xi. p. 153, &amp;c.; Plut. <hi rend="ital">de
       Philosoph. Plac.</hi> 5.29.) Of his mode of cure the most remarkable peculiarity was his
      aversion to bloodletting and purgative medicines : he seems to have relied chiefly on diet and
      regimen, bathing, exercise, friction, and the most simple articles of the vegetable kingdom.
      In surgery he was celebrated for the invention of a catheter that bore his name, and was of
      the shape of a Roman S. (Galen, <hi rend="ital">Introd.</hi> 100.13. vol. xiv. p. 751.)
      Further information repecting his medical and anatomical opinions may be found in Le Clerc,
       <hi rend="ital">Hist. de la Méd.;</hi> Haller, <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Anat.</hi>
      and <hi rend="ital">Biblioth. Medic. Pract.;</hi> Sprengel, <hi rend="ital">Hist. de la
       Méd.;</hi> and also in the following works, which the writer has never seen : Jo.
      Frid. Henr. Hieronymi <hi rend="ital">Dissert. Inauy. exhibens Erasistrati Erasistrateorumnque
       Historinm,</hi> Jen. 1790, 8vo. ; F. H. Schwartz, <hi rend="ital">Herophilus und
       Erasistratus, cine historische Parallele,</hi> Inaug. Abhandl., Würrzburg, 1826, 8vo..;
      Jerem. Rud. Lichtenstadt, <hi rend="ital">Erasistratus als Vorgänger von Broussais,</hi>
      in Hecker's <hi rend="ital">Annal. der Heilkunde,</hi> 1830, 17.153.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>