<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.p_consa_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.p_consa_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="p-consa-bio-1" n="p_consa_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><forename full="yes">P.</forename><surname full="yes">Consa</surname></persName></label></head><p>A Roman jurist of this name is mentioned by legal biographers and by writers who have made
      lists of jurists, as Val. Forsterus, Rutilius, Guil. Grotius, and Fabricius, but they give no
      authority for their statement. The only authority that we can find for this name is an
      anecdote in Plutarch's life of Cicero (100.26), repeated in his <title xml:lang="la">Apophthegmata.</title> When P. Consa, an ignorant and empty man, who held himself forth as a
      jurist, was summoned as a witness in a cause, and declared that he knew nothing whatever about
      the matter that he was examined upon, Cicero said to him, drily, " Perhaps you think that the
      question relates to law."</p><p>The reading of the name in Plutarch is exceedingly doubtful,--Publius may be Popillius, and
      Consa may be Caius, Cassius, or Cotta. </p><byline>[<ref target="author.J.T.G">J.T.G</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>