<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.crassus_m_aquilius_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.crassus_m_aquilius_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="crassus-m-aquilius-bio-1" n="crassus_m_aquilius_1"><head><label><persName xml:lang="la"><addName full="yes">Crassus</addName>, <forename full="yes">M.</forename><surname full="yes">Aqui'lius</surname></persName></label></head><p>was praetor in <date when-custom="-43">B. C. 43</date>, and was sent by the senate into Picenum to
      levy troops, in order to resist Octavianus, when he marched upon the city in this year, in
      order to demand the consulship. Crassus was seized in a slave's dress, and brought to
      Octavianus, who did not punish him at the time, but afterwards included his name in the
      proscription. (Appian, <bibl n="App. BC 3.13.93">App. BC 3.93</bibl>, <bibl n="App. BC 3.13.94">94</bibl>.) It is thought by some commentators that we ought to read <hi rend="ital">Acilius</hi> instead of <hi rend="ital">Aquilius.</hi> If this conjecture be
      correct, the Crassus mentioned above would be the same as the Acilius, who was included in the
      proscription, and whose escape is related by Appian. (B. C. 4.39.)</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>