<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cononeus_1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:C.cononeus_1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="C"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="cononeus-bio-1" n="cononeus_1"><head><persName xml:lang="la"><surname full="yes">Cono'neus</surname></persName></head><p>(<label xml:lang="grc">Κονωνεύς</label>), a Tarentine, is mentioned by Appian (<hi rend="ital">Annib.</hi> 32) as the person who betrayed Tarentum to the Romans in <date when-custom="-213">B. C. 213</date>. (Comp. Frontin. <hi rend="ital">Strateg.</hi> 3.3.6, where
      Oudendorp has restored this name from Appian.) Polybius (<bibl n="Plb. 8.19">8.19</bibl>,
      &amp;c.) and Livy (<bibl n="Liv. 25.8">25.8</bibl>, &amp;c.) say, that Philemenus and Nicon
      were the leaders of the conspiracy; but Schweighäuser remarks (<hi rend="ital">ad App.
       l.c.</hi>), that as Percon was the cognomen of Nicon (see <bibl n="Liv. 26.39">Liv.
       26.39</bibl>), so there is no reason why we should not infer that Cononeus was the cognomen
      of Philemenus. [<hi rend="smallcaps">PHILEMENUS.</hi>]</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>