<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.autolycus_6</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1:A.autolycus_6</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:base="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><body xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:pdlrefwk:viaf88890045.003.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" subtype="alphabetic_letter" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="entry" xml:id="autolycus-bio-6" n="autolycus_6"><head><persName xml:lang="la" xml:id="tlg-1210"><surname full="yes">Auto'lycus</surname></persName></head><p>(<persName xml:lang="grc"><surname full="yes">Ἀυτολύκος</surname></persName>), a mathematician,
      who is said to have been a native of Pitane in Aeolis, and the first instructor of the
      philosopher Arcesilaus. (<bibl n="D. L. 4.29">D. L. 4.29</bibl>.) From this, it would follow,
      that he lived about the middle of the fourth century B. C., and was contemporary with
      Aristotle. We know nothing more of his history.</p><div><head>Works</head><p>Autolycus wrote two astronomical treatises, which are still extant, and are the most
       ancient existing specimens of the Greek mathematics.</p><div><head><title xml:lang="la">The Motion of the Sphere</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ
         κινουμένης σφαῖρας</foreign>)</head><p>The first is on <title xml:lang="la">the Motion of the Sphere</title> (<foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ κινουμένης σφαῖρας</foreign>). It contains twelve propositions
        concerning a sphere which with its principal circles is supposed to revolve uniformly about
        a fixed diameter, whilst a fixed great circle (the horizon) always divides it into two
        hemispheres (the visible and invisible). Most of them are still explicitly or implicitly
        included amongst the elements of astronomy, and they are such as would naturally result from
        the first systematic application of geometrical reasoning to the apparent motion of the
        heavens.</p></div><div><head/><p><title xml:lang="la">The Motion of the Sphere</title> may be considered as introductory to
        the second, which is on <title xml:lang="la">the risings and settings of the fixed
         stars</title>, <foreign xml:lang="grc">περὶ ἐπιτολῶν καὶ δύσεων</foreign> in two
        books. Autolycus first defines the <hi rend="ital">true</hi> risings and settings, and then
        the <hi rend="ital">apparent.</hi> The former happen when the sun and a star are actually in
        the horizon together ; and they cannot be <hi rend="ital">observed,</hi> because the sun's
        light makes the star invisible. The latter happen when the star is in the horizon, and the
        sun just so far below it that the star is visible, and there are in general four such
        phaenomena in the year in the case of any particular star; namely, its first visible rising
        in the morning, its last visible rising in the evening, its first visible setting in the
        morning, and last visible setting in the evening. In a favourable climate, the precise day
        of each of these occurrences might be observed, and such observations must have constituted
        the chief business of practical astronomy in its infancy; they were, moreover, of some real
        use. because these phaenomena afforded a means of defining the seasons of the year. A star
        when rising or setting is visible according to its brilliance, if the sun be from 10 to 18
        degrees below the horizon. Autolycus supposes 15 degrees, but reckons them along the
        ecliptic instead of a vertical circle; and he proceeds to establish certain general
        propositions concerning the intervals between these apparent risings and settings, taking
        account of the star's position with respect to the ecliptic and equator. It was impossible,
        without trigonometry, to determine beforehand the absolute time at which any one of them
        would happen; but one having been observed, the rest might be roughly predicted, for the
        same star, by the help of these propositions. The demonstrations, and even the enunciations,
        are in some cases not easily understood without a globe; but the figures used by Autolycus
        are simple. There is nothing in either treatise to shew that he had the least conception of
        spherical trigonometry.</p></div></div><div><head>Editions</head><p>There seems to be no complete edition of the Greek text of Autolycus. There are three Greek
       manuscripts of each treatise in the Bodleian and Savilian libraries at Oxford.</p><p><bibl>The propositions without the demonstrations were printed in Greek and Latin by
        Dasypodius in his "Sphaericae Doctrinae Propositiones," Argent. 1572.</bibl><bibl>Both the works were translated into Latin from a Greek MS. by Jos. Auria, Rom. 1587 and
        1588</bibl>; <bibl>and a translation of the first by Maurolycus, from an Arabic version, is
        given, without the name of Autolycus, at p. 243 of the " Universae Geometriae, etc.
        Synopsis" of Mersennus, Paris, 1645.</bibl></p></div><div><head>Further Information</head><p>A full account of the works of Autolycus may be found in Delambre's <hi rend="ital">Hist.
        de l'Astronomie Ancienne.</hi> Brucker quotes an essay by Carpzovius, <hi rend="ital">de
        Autolyco Pitaneo Diatribe,</hi> Lips. 1744. See also Schaubach, <hi rend="ital">Geschichte
        der Griechischen Astronomie,</hi> p. 338; Fabric. <hi rend="ital">Bibl. Graec.</hi> vol. ii.
       p. 89. </p></div><byline>[<ref target="author.W.F.D">W.F.D</ref>]</byline></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>