<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1:3.4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1:3.4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1" xml:lang="eng"><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><head><hi rend="italic">CHAP. IIII.</hi> ¶ Of the obedience that the Magistrat oweth
                     unto the Lawes <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> and Soueraigne Prince.</head><p><seg rend="decorInit">S</seg>Eeing that the Magistrat next unto the Soueraigne
                     Prince, is the principall person in the Commonweale, &amp; upon whom they which
                     have the soueraigntie discharge themselves, communicating unto him the
                     authoritie, force, and power to commaund: it is good reason before we passe
                     further, briefly to touch what obedience he oweth unto his Soueraigne Prince;
                     which is the chiefe part of his dutie. Now in this the Prince and Magistrat,
                     and both of them do most differ from a priuat<note place="marg" anchored="true">How much a
                        prince differeth from a magistrat, and both of them from a priuat <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>an.</note> man: for that the Prince seeth no man in
                     the state or Commonweal, whome he may <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> compare
                     or preferre before himselfe; but as one placed in a most high degree, and next
                     unto the immortall God, beholdeth all his subiects set a great way beneath him:
                     wheras the priuat man cannot by any publike right commaund over any other
                     subiect, although that he by priuat and domesticall commaunds rule and gouerne
                     his owne familie. As for the Magistrat, for that he is to regard many persons,
                     hee must oftentimes change his port, his gesture, his speech and countenance,
                     for the good performance of his dutie towards all: which no man can well
                     discharge, except he first know his duty towards his Soueraigne prince, as also
                     how to submit himselfe unto the other Magistrats his superiours, how to respect
                     his equals, and how to commaund his inferiours, how to defend the weake, to
                     withstand the great, and to doe iustice to all. And that is <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> it, for which the auntients commonly said, <hi rend="italic">Magistracie or authoritie to declare what was in a man,</hi> hauing as it
                     were upon the stage in the Theatre, and in the sight of all men, to performe
                     the parts of many persons. And so also may we say, A man to show what his
                     office is: For if he be such an one as he ought to be, hee graceth his place:
                     whereas if he bee otherwise, hee debaseth not only the authoritie of his place
                     and office; but euen of the maiestie of the state and Commonweale. So <hi rend="italic">Liuie</hi> speaking of <hi rend="italic">Quintus
                        Flaminius,</hi> a man vnworthy his high place, saith of him, <hi rend="italic">Non qui sibi honorem adiecisset, sed indignitate sua vim ac
                        ius Magistratui quem gerebat dempsisset,</hi> That hee had not (by <pb n="310" facs="157"/> his office) encreased his honour; but by the
                     vnworthinesse of himselfe, impaired the <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> force
                     and power of the office which he bare.</p><p>Now the better to know what obedience the Magistrat oweth unto his Soueraign,
                     it is needfull first to vnderstand, what it is that a Soueraigne Prince may of
                     right commaund<note place="marg" anchored="true">The lawful commaunds of soueraigne princes
                        right diuers.</note> every Magistrat to doe. For why, the lawfull commands
                     of Soueraigne Princes are right diuers, and vnlike themselves. Some of them
                     seruing for perpetuall edicts or lawes concerning all persons, of what
                     condition or qualitie soeuer they bee; or but for certaine persons, and for a
                     certaine time, by way of prouision: othersome containe some priuilege or
                     exemption contrarie to the edicts or lawes, for some one onely, or for some few
                     of the subiects: or some graunt not contrarie unto the law, or some reward for
                     the good, or punishment for the euill, or some office or commission; or else
                     serue <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> for the expounding of some edict or
                     priuilege, or for the denouncing of warre, or the making of peace, or for
                     raising of souldiours, or for the erecting of Faires or Markets, or for the
                     leuying of taxes, subsidies, fifteenes, new impositions, or loanes: or for the
                     sending of ambassadours to congratulat the good haps of other princes; or to
                     mone their misfortunes, or to entreat of marriages, and alliances, or other
                     such like things; or for the building or fortifying of places to be fortified,
                     for the repairing of bridges, hie wayes, ports or passages, or for to iudge of
                     certaine suits and proceedings in the law, or for the execution of some
                     commaunds, or for the maintenance of letters of iustice, or for the restoring
                     of such as be under age, or of full age, or of such as be condemned, or for
                     some particularitie, or for some remission, or pardon, which may bee of diuers
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> sorts. Of which commaunds so before
                     declared, some containe diuers kinds, as do priuileges and graunts, whether it
                     be for some gift giuen, or for exemption and immunitie from all charges, or
                     from some one: or letters of discharge, or of estate, or to have the freedome
                     of a citisen, or for to be made legitimat, or for nobilitie, or knighthood, or
                     for the erecting of corporations or colleges, or other such like things. All
                     which letters may be divided into two sorts, that is to say, into letters of
                     iurisdiction or commaund, or letters of iustice or state. Albeit that the word
                        <hi rend="italic">Iubemus,</hi> or we commaund, be as well in the letters of
                     iustice, as in the letters of grace and favour, as is to bee seene in the lawes
                     and letters pattents of the Greeke emperours. Yet the letters of grace, or
                     which proceed from the onely power and authoritie of the prince, are properly
                     in <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> Fraunce called Mandements, or Commands; and
                     the secretaries which dispatch them are also called the Secretaries of the
                     Commaunds: whereas the letters of iustice are most commonly dispatched by the
                     other secretaries; beside the difference of the great and little seale, and for
                     the most part the diuersitie of the waxe: or the single or double labell, or
                     the seale hanging in silke of diuers colours, making the difference of the
                     letters to be knowne. The auntient Latines called such instructions as were by
                     princes giuen to their ambassadours, or gouernours of countries, or generals of
                     their armies, <hi rend="italic">Mandata Principum,</hi> or Princes Commands,
                     which we do call by the name of of instructions: For so the word <hi rend="italic">Mandat<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>

                     </hi> is taken in the law, where <hi rend="italic">Iustinian</hi> the emperour
                     saith, That <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> hee had made a booke of Mandats or
                     Commaundements for the gouernours of prouinces.</p><p>But leauing the subtilitie of words, let vs go unto the matter, and examine the
                        force<note place="marg" anchored="true">The power and force of certaine clauses commonly set
                        down in the letters patents, and princes Mandats expounded.</note> of the
                     clauses commonly set downe in the letters patents and mandates of princes. And
                     first these wordes, <hi rend="italic">Vniuersis praesentibus &amp; futuris</hi>
                     (To all men present and to come) are ioyned onely unto such letters patents as
                     are to endure for euer: (howbeit that no worldly thing can so for euer
                     continue) but not unto temporarie edicts made by way of prouision, nor to
                     commissions, nor to any other letters of prouision. But this clause, <hi rend="italic">Quantum satis est &amp;c.</hi> (so much as shall suffice) is
                     of much greater importance, <pb n="311" facs="157"/> &amp; ordinarily ioyned
                     unto letters which they call letters of iurisdiction or iustice,<milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> whereby the prince leaueth unto the discretion of him
                     to whom such his letters are addressed, to allow of them, or to refuse them, as
                     his conscience, and the equitie of the cause shall require: which is not in
                     letters of commaundement which leaue nothing unto him to whom they are
                     directed, except happily sometimes the examination of the fact onely: as in
                     these words, <hi rend="italic">Si paret &amp;c.</hi> (If it shall appeare vnto
                     you &amp;c.) In such<note place="marg" anchored="true">The princes charters or letters of
                        iustice no commaunde<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> unto the magistrat to whom
                        they are directed</note> sort that one may say of all sorts of charters or
                     letters of iustice, albeit that they be granted by the prince, that they import
                     not any commaund or constraint whatsoeuer unto the magistrat to whom they are
                     directed: But to the contrarie, that by our lawes and customes it is most
                     religiously prouided, that the magistrats or judges should unto such charters
                     or letters have no further respect, than in that they were agreeable with
                        <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> equitie and trueth. And although that the
                     same forme of letters of justice, be graunted in England, as also in Spayne,
                     and other kingdomes; yet so it is neuerthelesse, that it is done rather for the
                     particular profit of some one, than for the greatnes or increasing of the
                     maiestie of the king, (who graunted them by way of benefit unto the partie) or
                     for any necessitie there is thereof: seeing that the whole is remitted unto the
                     power of the magistrat, after the graunting of such letters, which was not
                     before the graunt thereof. Which was the cause that the people in the assemblie
                     of the Estates in parliament at Orleans, presented a request unto the king for
                     the cutting off of this formalitie of letters: as seruing not but to the
                     oppressing of the people, without any profit therout of to be drawne unto the
                     king or Commonweale. The auntient Greeks and Latins <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> also neuer knew this forme of letters of iustice: but the
                     magistrats upon the request of the parties did as much as do our judges upon
                     the graunt of such letters of iustice. And the clause, <hi rend="italic">Quantum satis erit quod liqueat</hi> (so much as may suffice for the
                     manifesting of the matter) is the same which was conteined in the Praetors
                     edicts, in this forme, <hi rend="italic">Si qua mihi iusta causa
                        videbitur,</hi> (if any iust cause shall seeme unto me.) True it is that the
                     power to correct, supply, and expound the lawes, concerning the civill
                     iurisdiction, together with the restitution &amp; relieuing of them which had
                     beene circumuented, or deceiued by the formalities of the lawes, (a power
                     before giuen unto the Praetors by the vertue of their office) resteth now (I
                     know not how) amongst the <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> marks of soueraigne
                     maiestie; and for this cause the Praetors authoritie and lawes were called
                     honorable; which the interpretors of the law call <hi rend="italic">Nobile
                        officium.</hi> Wherefore as offices are confounded, when as the prince
                     conuerteth unto himselfe such things as belong unto the magistrat▪ euen so also
                     are the rights of soueraigntie impaired, when as they are by the magistrats
                     vsurped. Now as for the declaration, and correcting of the edicts and lawes, we
                     have before said that it appettaineth and belongeth unto them which have the
                     soueraigntie: But as for restitutions against the extremitie of the law, and
                     all that concerneth letters of justice, it greatly appeareth not that the
                     soueraigne princes have much troubled themselves therewith, but have left them
                     to the magistrats to be in their name decided. I except only certain letters of
                     iustice, which passe under the great Scale, and whereunto the aforesaid clause,
                        <hi rend="italic">If it shall be iust, If it shall be agreeable</hi>

                     <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">unto equitie and truth,</hi> is inserted: which clause so
                     much displeased a certaine great personage, holding one of the highest places
                     of honour in this Realme, (who vnderstood not the force thereof) as that he
                     would have raced out the same; saying the maiestie of the king to be thereby
                     impaired▪ howbeit that he was therein to be excused, as being a straunger, and
                     not well seene in the lawes and customes of a straunge countrey. But how could
                     the maiestie of kings be in this respect empaired or diminished? seeing that
                     the auntient kings of Aegipt caused their magistrats solemnely to sweare,<note place="marg" anchored="true">A notable <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/>

                     </note> neuer to obey their commaundements, in case they commaunded them any
                     thing <pb n="312" facs="158"/> that was vniust: as we read in the sayings of
                     the Aegiptian kings reported by <hi rend="italic">Plutarch.</hi>

                     <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> Seeing therefore that the allowance or
                     reiecting of letters of iustice directed in the kings name unto the magistrats,
                     dependeth of the equitie and discretion of the magistrats themselves, it
                     needeth not vs to speake any more thereof. Wherefore let vs now proceed to
                     those rescripts or letters of commaund, which for that they concerne the state
                     of the Commonweale, and publique and not priuat causes, are called rescripts of
                     State; or letters of commaund or state. Concerning which, a double question may
                     be made: One whether such Rescripts or letters of the prince, containing onely
                     the simple examination of the fact, without giuing any further hearing of the
                     matter unto the magistrat, according to the desert thereof; whether (I say) the
                     magistrat fully informed of the truth of the fact according to the tenour of
                     his letters, ought to proceed to the <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> further
                     execution thereof being vniust, or to hearken unto the vniust commaunds of his
                     prince? The other, whether the magistrat hauing neither power to examine
                        the<note place="marg" anchored="true">Whether the magistrat be bound to obey his princes
                        vniust commaunds or not?</note> equitie nor truth of a matter, may refuse
                     the vniust commaunds of his prince: the doubt therein being the greater, if
                     they shall be thereunto by the prince more straitly vrged, or expresly
                     commaunded: For sometime princes by their particular and secret letters, vse to
                     request the magistrats; so with couert requests accompanying their vniust
                     commaunds: yea oftentimes in their letters patents their requests are ioyned
                     with their commaunds, because they would not seeme to wrest all things from
                     them against their wils; but to request many things of them: as when they say,
                        <hi rend="italic">We pray and commaund you,</hi> wherein the prince seemeth
                     as in nothing more to derogate from his soueraigne <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> maiestie: for if the thing be iust and honest which hee
                     commaundeth, what needeth requests? if vniust or dishonest, why doth he
                     commaund it? Now the magistrat is neuer to be requested to doe his dutie, or
                     intreated not to doe wrong, or that which is vniust or dishonest, as <hi rend="italic">Cato</hi> the Censor saith. Besides that, to commaund is a
                     thing incompatible with request. It is wisely said, <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/>,<note place="marg" anchored="true">Princes requests to
                        have the power of the most strait cōmaund.</note> Tyrants requestes to bee
                     commaunds: wherefore let vs suppose nothing to be more straitly commaunded,
                     than that which the prince seemeth by fyled speech or intreatie to persuade.
                     Wherefore to resolue this point, if the princes letters giue unto the magistrat
                     neither the examination nor the hearing or disciding of the <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> fact, or of the right and truth of the cause, but that onely
                     the execution of the princes commaund be unto him committed: the magistrat in
                     this case may not in any sort take upon him the examination or hearing of the
                     matter; except the letters of commaund be notoriously false, faultie, or
                     absurd, and contrarie to the lawes of God and nature (as we read of the
                     commaunds of <hi rend="italic">Pharao</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Agrippa:</hi>)
                     or else to robbe and spoile the poore people; as in our time <hi rend="italic">Albert</hi> Marques of Brandeburg, who amongst other his notable cruelties,
                     set up sundrie gibbets in all such townes and cities as he had taken in,
                     threatning his souldiours to hang them thereupon, if that contrarie to his
                     commaund they should spare to robbe and spoile the poore inhabitants: albeit
                     that he had neither true, nor yet any colourable cause, for his taking up of
                     armes against his <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> countrey. Now if a man
                     subiect unto a particular Lord or Iustice, be not in law or right bound to obey
                     him passing the bounds of his territorie, or the power to him giuen, (albeit
                     that the thing which hee commaundeth be both iust and honest) but may well
                     refuse his commaund: how should the magistrat then be bound to obey or to put
                     into execution the princes commaunds in things vniust and dishonest, the prince
                     in this case transgressing and breaking the sacred bounds of the lawes both of
                     God and nature? But some will say, no prince to be found so euill aduised, nor
                     that it is to be supposed that he would commaund any thing contrarie unto the
                     lawes of God and nature: and true it is; for why he worthily loseth the title
                     and honour of a Prince, which <pb n="313" facs="158"/> departing from reason,
                     and forgetting the dutie of a prince, breaketh the lawes of <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> God and nature.</p><p>We have before (as we suppose) sufficiently enough declared, what and how
                        much<note place="marg" anchored="true">What commands of the prince, and how far the
                        magistrat eught to execute the same.</note> a prince may doe by the right of
                     his soueraigntie, from whence many things may be deriued pertinent unto this
                     question here in hand: for why it is not well to be vnderstood what obedience
                     is by the magistrat due unto the soueraigne maiestie, except the rights of
                     Soueraigntie be before well vnderstood and fully knowne. But here the question
                     is, what commaunds of the prince, and how farre the magistrat ought to execute
                     the same? for sometime dishonest and vniust thinges are by princes commaunded,
                     which the euill magistrats themselves do more willingly, and shamefully put in
                     execution, than they were by the princes commaunded. As not long agoe in the
                     time of the <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> civill warres, (wherewith all
                     Fraunce was on a light fyer) the president of the court of Normandie (whose
                     name deserueth to be buried in perpetuall obliuion) beeing commaunded
                     extraordinarily to leuie thirtie thousand crownes of them which professed the
                     reformed religion, extorted from them three hundred thousand; and for so doing
                     (the calamitie of the time considered) receiued a great reward. Howbeit that
                        <hi rend="italic">Tiberius</hi> the emperour (a man of incredible crueltie)
                     sharply reproued the gouernour of Aegypt for exacting more of the subiects than
                     he was commaunded: saying, <hi rend="italic">Tonderioues meas non cutem detrahi
                        volo,</hi> I would have my sheepe shorne, but not flaine. If therefore the
                     commaundement of the prince be not contrarie unto the lawes of God and nature,
                     the magistrat is to put it in execution, although it seeme to differ from the
                     lawes of other <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> nations: which lawes it is not
                     against nature for the princes to chaunge, for the profit or disprofit of their
                     Commonweales. For albeit that the princes (as wee have said) ought to keepe the
                     oath by him made unto his people, if hee have so bound himselfe by oath; and
                     although hee were not by oath so bound, yet neuerthelesse of duetie ought to
                     keepe the lawes and customes of the estate and Commonweal whereof hee is
                     soueraigne: yet for all that wee must not thereof conclude or gather, That if
                     the prince doe in that case commaund any thing contrarie unto his oath or the
                     duetie of a Prince, that the Magistrat is therefore to refuse to obey his
                     commaund. Forasmuch as it belongeth not unto the Magistrat to examine or
                     censure the doings<note place="marg" anchored="true">The <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> is no<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>to censure his princes cōmand, beeing not
                           contrari<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> unto the lawes of God &amp;
                        nature.</note> of his prince, or to crosse his proceedings concerning mans
                     lawes, from which the <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> prince may as he seeth
                     cause derogat. Yet if the Magistrat bee commaunded by the Prince to abrogat an
                     auntient law, being more upright and profitable to giue way unto another lesse
                     iust, and lesse profitable for the Commonweale; he may stay the execution of
                     such a law or commaundement in suspense, vntill he have shewed his reasons
                     therefore unto the prince, which he is in dutie bound to do, not once, but euen
                     twice or thrice: and then if the prince notwithstanding his remonstrances, will
                     not by him be aduised, but refuse his wholsome and profitable admonition, and
                     will needes have the law to passe further; then the Magistrat (as hauing
                     alreadie done his dutie) shall put it in execution: which he may also at the
                     first commaund of his prince doe, if the delaying thereof be daungerous. And to
                     that end and purpose tendeth that which is by <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Innocentius</hi> the fourth written, before he was Pope, That
                     Magistrats ought to put in execution the princes commaunds, albeit that they be
                     vniust: which is to bee vnderstood of civill iustice and vtilitie: but not if
                     such commaunds bee contrarie to the lawes of nature. Which interpretation may
                     serue also for the right understanding of that which the lawyers say, <hi rend="italic">That the prince may derogat euen from the law of nature.</hi>
                        VVherin<note place="marg" anchored="true">How it is to be vnderstood that a prince may
                        derogate from the law of nature.</note> their meaning is, from the law of
                     nations, and common constitutions of other people: least any deceiued by the
                     obscuritie of the words, or equiuocation of the law of nature, should thereby
                     rashly presume to breake the sacred lawes of God and nature.</p><p><pb n="314" facs="159"/>Now if any man shall obiect and say, That the emperour
                        <hi rend="italic">Anastasius</hi> expresly commaunded,<milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> That the judges and Magistrats should not so much as suffer
                     men to produce the princes rescripts or letters graunted unto particular
                     persons, contrarie to the generall edicts or lawes: Mine aunswere is, that that
                     is to be vnderstood, if in such the princes rescripts or letters no speciall
                     clause be comprehended, derogating from the generall lawes: notwithstanding
                     which derogation, yet the Magistrat ought neuerthelesse to aduertise the prince
                     thereof, and to put him in mind of his dutie: who if he be not by the
                     Magistrats reasons to be remoued from his former opinion, but command the same
                     the second time, the Magistrat is then to obey his commaund, although the thing
                     so commaunded be not agreeing with the common profit, and contrarie unto the
                     lawes. For why, the Magistrat hauing so done his dutie, is not to expect but
                     the <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> second commaund; as is by the law
                     prouided. To the example whereof the edict of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi>
                     the ninth was made, concerning the magistrats admonitions unto their prince. So
                     long before this <hi rend="italic">Theodosius</hi> the Great, at the request of
                     Saint <hi rend="italic">Ambrose</hi> the good bishop of Milan, made a law,
                     whereby he willed, That the execution of his letters pattents and commaunds,
                     should be holden in suspense thirtie dayes after the signification thereof,
                     when he had commaunded any to be more rigorously punished than the vsual manner
                     and custome was. The occasion of the making of which law was, the execution of
                     seuen thousand Thessalians, put to death by the commaundement of this <hi rend="italic">Theodosius,</hi> for that they had murthered and slaine
                     certaine of his Receiuers and Magistrats. For which cause Saint <hi rend="italic">Ambrose</hi> excommunicated the emperour, neither would suffer
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> him to be reconciled, vntill he had made
                     the aforesaid law. And hereof (as I suppose) proceed those rescripts, which are
                     yet used by the bishops of Rome: the first called <hi rend="italic">Monitorie,</hi> the second <hi rend="italic">Iussorie,</hi> and the third
                        <hi rend="italic">Executorie;</hi> or as we say in English, Edicts of
                     admonition, of Commaund, and of Execution.</p><p>The same opinion we are to haue, if the prince by his letters patents command
                        the<note place="marg" anchored="true">How the Magistrat commaunded by his prince to put in
                        execution old penall lawes, now of themselves or through the negligence of
                        the magistrats forgotten, is to proceed in the execution thereof.</note>
                     Magistrat to proceed to the execution of the penaltie uppon them that haue
                     offended against such his edicts and lawes, as by the antiquitie of themselves,
                     or by the negligence of the Magistrats seeme to have bene quite forgotten and
                     abrogated. For why, the long sufferance of the prince, and conniuence of the
                     magistrats, in the sight and <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> knowledge of
                     whome the lawes are so broken, remitteth the penaltie due by the law: which
                     could not otherwise have bene infringed, by the abuse of them which
                     transgressed the same, had it by the prince or magistrat bene still looked
                     vnto. And therefore the magistrat ought not rashly to proceed to the execution
                     of the penaltie of such forgotten or neglected lawes, before he have caused the
                     same to be againe republished, being by his default before neglected. Yea the
                     prince ought rather to proceed against his magistrats, who through their
                     remisse negligence have suffered his edicts and lawes to be contemned. For
                     otherwise it should be a thing verie vniust and sauouring of tyrannie, to make
                     edicts and lawes, and after long neglecting of them, upon a sodaine to proceed
                     against them, who by the example of others, had transgressed against them,
                     seeing <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> others before them to have escaped
                     vnpunished. Which was one of the tyrannicall slights of the most cruell
                     emperour <hi rend="italic">Nero,</hi> as of other auntient tyrants also. Wheras
                     the good emperour <hi rend="italic">Traian</hi> to the contrarie commaunded <hi rend="italic">Plinie</hi> gouernour of the lesser Asia, of new to publish
                     such edicts and lawes as were any wise before buried in obliuion, by the
                     disobedience or errour of his subiects, or the sufferance of the magistrats:
                     for that a common errour is reputed for a law, if the errour bee not against
                     the law of nature, against which no errour can probably be pretended.</p><p>But some man may aske, Whether the magistrat owe obedience unto such his
                     princes commaunds, as shall unto him seeme contrarie unto the law of nature,
                     albeit <pb n="315" facs="159"/> that indeed they be not contrarie thereunto?
                     For the equitie and reason which we call <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The <gap reason="illegible" extent="2_words" instant="false"/>-ture not <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/>
                        cleare and <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> fest.</note> naturall, is not alwaies so
                     cleere and manifest, but that it findeth impugners. Yea oftentimes the greatest
                     lawyers and philosophers are therein intangled, and of quite contrarie
                     opinions, and the lawes of people are therein sometime so repugnant, as that
                     some of them appoint reward, and some others punishment for the selfe same
                     fact, whereof bookes, lawes, and histories are ful, all which to prosecute were
                     a matter infinit. Wherunto I aunswere, that if that which the auntients say may
                     take place, a man neuer ought to doe that whereof he doubteth, whether it be
                     iust or not; and much lesse ought hee so to doe, if he be thereof certainly
                     persuaded that the thing which the prince commaundeth, is of it selfe by nature
                     vniust. But if question be of civill iustice onely, the<note place="marg" anchored="true">The
                        magistrate bound in ciuil causes to put his princes commaunds in execution,
                        although they seeme unto himselfe vniust or contrarie unto lawe.</note>
                     magistrat ought in such case to verifie and put in execution his princes
                     commaunds, although <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> he thinke them to be in
                     civill equitie or law vniust. And therfore the magstrats in euerie Commonweale
                     were compelled to sweare to obserue the lawes and ordinances; to the end they
                     should not call into dispute or question, that which they ought to hold, as
                     before resolued upon. And this was the manner and custome of the Romans when
                     the old magistrats receiued the oath of the new, before they entred into their
                     charge: which was commonly done upon the calends of Ianuarie, in the capitoll,
                     after solemne sacrifices there made: for otherwise the magistrat lost his place
                     of estate, if hee tooke not his oath within five daies after. Yea sometimes the
                     Tribunes which held the estate of the people constrained them in particular
                     which had withstood the publishing of a law, to sweare to obserue the same,
                     after that it was once published, and that <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>
                     upon the paine of banishment. So <hi rend="italic">L. Metellus Numidicus</hi>
                     was by a decree of the people banished, for refusing to sweare unto the lawes
                     published at the instance of the factious Tribune <hi rend="italic">Saturninus.</hi> So also after that the lawes of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the twelfth were published in the high court of the parliament
                     of Paris: for that many disliked of the same, the kings atturney generall there
                     made a request, That they might be duely obserued, and prohibition giuen for
                     any man to call them in doubt, and that upon paine of high treason; as is to be
                     seene in the records of the court. For why, it is lawfull for<note place="marg" anchored="true">Lawes once established ought not by prinat persons to be againe called into
                        dispute or question.</note> euerie man before the publishing of the law, to
                     despute and reason of the equitie thereof: which to doe after the publication
                     thereof, is not lawfull. And so, before that, when <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> as king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the eleuenth had
                     commaunded certaine vniust decrees of his to be published in the court of the
                     parliament at Paris: the court refused to yeeld thereunto, for that they seemed
                     unto euerie man vniust: but the king neuerthelesse still vrging his former
                     requests, ioyned thereunto grieuous threats also; as that they should loose
                     their heads that would not yeeld thereunto. Which thing <hi rend="italic">Lauacr<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>e,</hi> president of the parliament<note place="marg" anchored="true">A notable example.</note> understanding, accompanied with the
                     rest of the judges of that honourable court in their red robes, came unto the
                     king, not to excuse the fault by him and the rest committed, in refusing the
                     kings vniust decrees, but to show the reasons of their such refusall, and to
                     request, That he with the rest might rather bee put to death, than enforced to
                     giue their consent to the publishing of the propounded lawes. The king
                     beholding the grauitie, the port, and dignitie of these persons, and almost
                     abashed with the so constant <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> resolution of
                     such his great magistrats, and withall doubting the power and authoritie of the
                     parliament, caused those his decrees so much misliked, to bee abrogated, and in
                     their presence torne in peeces, requesting them to continue so still to
                     maintaine iustice; solemnly protesting neuer more to send unto them any edict
                     which should not be both iust and reasonable. It is a wonderfull thing to say
                     of what power and moment this thing was to keepe the king within the bounds of
                     reason, who otherwise had alwayes used his absolute power and commaund. As
                     before hee came unto the kingdome, being as yet Dauphin, he caused the
                     presidents of the court of Paris to bee <pb n="316" facs="160"/> called before
                     him▪ to rase out the clause, <hi rend="italic">De expresso mandato</hi> (by
                     expresse commaundement)<milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> which the court had
                     caused to be put unto the confirmation of the priuileges graunted unto the
                     countie of Maine, protesting, That he would neuer goe out of the citie, vntill
                     it were done, or yet take uppon him the charge by the king committed unto him.
                     Whereupon the court indeed commaunded those words to bee cancelled: but yet
                     that the cancelling might appeare, commaunded the acts to be kept, which
                        are<note place="marg" anchored="true">How the wordes <hi rend="italic">de expresso</hi> or
                           <hi rend="italic">expresissimo mandato</hi> are in princes graunts,
                        edicts or decrees to be vnderstood,</note> yet preserued vndefaced. Now
                     these words, <hi rend="italic">De expresso mandato,</hi> and <hi rend="italic">De expressissimo mandato,</hi> whereunto these words are also sometimes
                     annexed, <hi rend="italic">Multis vicibus iterato</hi> (or oftentimes repeated)
                     which are many times to be found in the records of soueraign courts ioyned vnto
                     the publication of the princes edicts and decrees, have this illation or
                     meaning, that such edicts and priuileges (graunted by the princes expresse
                        commandement)<milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> should not be so precisely
                     kept, but that shortly after they might by the sufferance of the magistrats be
                     againe forgotten and neglected, as not much regarded. And by this secret of the
                     courts, hath the state of this kingdome bene preserued in the greatnesse
                     thereof: which otherwise would have bene ruinated by the flatterers of princes,
                     who by such extorted priuileges scrape unto themselves whatsoeuer they desire:
                     and the good kings not stil able to satisfie the hungry courtiers, sometimes
                     wel eased, which have used these restrictions, being so of their subiects well
                     beloued, the confirmation of such edicts and priuileges not carrying with them
                     any effect unto the subiect, or disobedience unto the king to giue good words,
                     or charge of conscience unto the magistrat in not performing it.<milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/>

                  </p><p>But yet farther question might be made, VVhether a magistrat may bee suffered
                        to<note place="marg" anchored="true">Whether a magistrate be to be suffered to giue up his
                        place, rather than to allow an edict or commaund of his prince which he for
                        certaine thinketh to be vniust, and contrarie unto reason</note> giue up his
                     place, rather than he will allow an edict, a commission, or commandement from
                     his prince, which he for certaine thinketh to be vniust and contrarie vnto
                     naturall reason, when as the equitie of it is called in question, &amp;
                     especially if the other magistrats and multitude of the people shall hold it to
                     be iust, contrarie to the others. For the force of iustice, and power of
                     upright reason, is not perceiued but of the fewer and wiser sort: and a wise
                     man being as it were the rule of reason, is of all others the greatest enemie
                     unto the multitude. VVhich if it be so, why should a wise man bee enforced to
                     giue his consent unto the multitude of mad magistrats. In which case I say,
                     that the magistrat is not to be suffered to giue up his place, if it please not
                     his soueraign <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> prince he should so do, but
                     ought rather to bee constrained to obey his princes commaunds, if the equitie
                     thereof being called in doubt, be approued by the greater part of the
                     magistrats, which have charge to confirme such edicts: For otherwise if they
                     should be permitted to giue up their places, rather than to passe an edict
                     approued by others, it would open a perilous gap to all the subiects, by their
                     example to refuse and reiect the edicts and commaunds of their prince: and so
                     euerie one in his charge might leaue the Commonweale unto danger, and expose it
                     unto the tempest, as a ship without a Rudder, and that under the shadow of an
                     opinion of iustice▪ which may haply be but a deuise of a subtill braine, to no
                     other purpose than to contradict the more common <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> opinion. And therefore among the most lawdable laws made by <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xij, there is one which importeth, That if the
                     judges be of three or moe opinions, those which were the fewer in number should
                     be constrained to conforme and ioyne themselves unto one of the greater
                     parties, for the concluding of the decrees. VVhereupon the court of Paris of
                     long time doubted, whether this law should be published or not: for that it
                     seemed a very hard and a most strange thing unto many, to force the conscience
                     of the judges contrarie to their owne opinions, and so enforce them to iudge
                     contrarie to that they ought, and that especially in such things as were
                     committed unto the wisedome and deuotion of the judges, as are almost all both
                     publike and priuat <pb n="317" facs="160"/> iudgements. Yet neuerthelesse after
                     the court had considered of inconueniences which <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> it saw ordinarily to arise upon the varietie of opinions, and that the
                     course of iustice, and the concluding of many good decrees, was thereby also
                     often letted, the court confirmed the aforesaid law, which by processe of time
                     hath bin found to be most iust &amp; profitable. Hereunto also agreeth the
                     maner and custome of the antient Romans: for their judges oftentimes to change
                     their opinions, and to ioine themselves unto the greater part, albeit that they
                     were not thereunto constrained. As is to bee seene in <hi rend="italic">Plinie,</hi> of a iudgement wherin one part of the iudges had condēned the
                     guiltie person unto death, another part had cleerely and fully acquited him,
                     and the third part had for a time banished him: in this diuersitie of opinions,
                     as well they which had before acquited him, as they which had condemned him to
                     death, consented both to them which would have <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/>
                     him banished. But our law is in that point better, which compelleth the fewer
                     to ioyne themselves unto the more. For in all corporations &amp; colledges
                     reason would, that that which pleaseth the greater part should take place and
                     preuaile, as strengthened with the most voices. Howbeit that in all such
                     consultations and actions the rule of the auntient wise neuer faileth; which
                     willeth, That of many honest and profitable things propounded unto vs, we
                     should chuse those which be most honest, and most profitable: and so of many
                     inconueniences and daungers, to make choice of the least: for otherwise mens
                     actions should neuer sort to good end. And a man may also say, That the equitie
                     of a law is not properly naturall, if it bee obscure or doubtfull; for that
                     true naturall iustice is more cleere and resplendent than the brightnesse of
                     the sunne, as not <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> wrapped up in obscuritie,
                     nor depending of the erroneous opinions of men, but of the most cleere and
                     immutable wisedome of the euerlasting.</p><p>And yet neuerthelesse since the law of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xij. I
                     find not that any magistrat hath giuen up his place, as fearing to be inforced
                     to maintaine or yeeld to any opinion contrarie unto his conscience: and
                     especially since the places of justice were giuen unto men for vertue, and not
                     for reward and favour. Neither hath the law of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the
                     xij. at any time constrayned the judges to iudge contrarie unto their
                     conscience, but hath rather silently giuen them leaue to giue up their places;
                     howbeit that it were more equitie so to constraine them, than to leaue it vnto
                     their will and pleasure. For which cause the kings Attourneyes general haue
                     oftentimes constrained the Iudges to iudge <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>
                     according unto Lawes and customes of the land, albeit that all the Iudges were
                     of contrarie opinion. As I remember that whilest I was at Tholouse, one <hi rend="italic">Bartholomew</hi> President of one of the Chambers of Inquirie,
                     seeing all the counsellours of his court of one and the same opinion in a suit,
                     and directly against the law: after he had assembled all the rest of the courts
                     upon the matter, he constrayned them to change their opinions, and to iudge
                     according to the law; And that iustly also: for who enforced thee to seeke for
                     thine office? or to accept of it being offered thee? and hauing taken it upon
                     thee, (being happily got either by suspending of voices, or by sure, or
                     briberie,) and being sworne, wilt thou now forsweare the lawes, which thou
                     mightest before have red, or at least wise oughtest to have red? wilt thou by
                     thy false opinion of the law and <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> iustice,
                     wrong the place thou bearest? delude the lawes? or forsake thy prince and
                     Commonweale.</p><p>Yet sometime it happeneth that such lawes as of themselves seeme unto every
                        man<note place="marg" anchored="true">Wh<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> the magistrate is to
                           d<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> in case the law<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>
                        otherwise▪ iust, now upon som<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> soden occutrents
                           <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> to be har<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> and
                        vniust.</note> most iust, may upon some suddein occurent appeare and proue
                     to be most vniust. In which case, whereas the wrong is in the fact presented
                     plaine and euident, wise magistrats vse to certifie the king thereof, (as I
                     remember it to have most oftentimes bene done in the parliament at Paris,) who
                     imparting the matter unto his Counsell, doth as he seeth cause derogate from
                     the positiue law; or adde some thing unto the same: <pb n="318" facs="161"/>
                     (which our men call the exposition or declaration of the law) a thing properly
                     belonging <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> unto the soueraigntie of a Prince,
                     as we have before declared. So that in this case, it is not lawfull for the
                     magistrat to iudge against the law, although he may suspend his sentence vntill
                     that the Princes pleasure be further knowne. But otherwise the law being cleare
                     and without difficultie, the magistrat is to iudge according thereunto without
                     disputing of the equitie thereof: for otherwise if the judge shall wittingly
                     and wilfully iudge contrarie unto the law, he is by the lawes themselves noted
                     of infamie: but if he shall so iudge of ignorance, or supposing himselfe to
                     iudge according unto the law; he is not therefore to be accounted infamous:
                     howbeit that such his iudgement is of it selfe void, as if it had not beene
                     giuen at all, in such sort as that a man by the auntient Roman law need not at
                     all to appeale therefrom.<milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/>

                  </p><p>Now there is great difference whether question be of the lawes alreadie
                     established, or of those which yet are by the magistrat to be published. For
                     why, such as be alreadie established, every man is bound to keepe, and
                     especially the magistrats, who if they wittingly swarue therefrom, (beside the
                     penaltie appointed by the law) are subiect also unto the note of infamie, as
                     periurours and forsworne men. But as for such Edicts and<note place="marg" anchored="true">Great care to be had by the greater magistrats in the publication of
                        lawes.</note> lawes as are not yet published, but are but as yet presented
                     unto the magistrats to be confirmed and published, of them it behoueth the
                     greater magistrats (to whom the publication of lawes especially appertaineth)
                     well to consider, and to show the reasons if they shall dislike of them vnto
                     the prince, albeit that it concerne but the particular interest of some one
                     priuat person; but much more, in case it concerne the great harme <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> or good of the Commonweale: which good if it be verie
                     great, may in some sort cover the iniustice of the law; (as the auntient
                     states-men say.) Yet must we not proceed so farre in respecting of the publike
                     profit be it neuer so great, as therefore to forget reason, and to be caried
                     headlong with wrong and iniustice: as were in auntient time the Lacedemonians,
                     who measured all iustice by the common profit, whereunto they directed all
                     their lawes, all their iudgements, and counsels; so that if that were once in
                     question, neither oath, nor reason, nor iustice, nor yet the law of nature was
                     by them<note place="marg" anchored="true">Better it is for the magistrat of himselfe to giue
                        way unto the law contrarie unto the lawes of God and nature.</note> once
                     respected. But much better it were for the Commonweale, and more beseeming the
                     dignitie of the magistrat, of himselfe to giue up his office (as did the
                     Chauncelour <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> of <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi>
                     the second, duke of Burgundie) than to giue way unto a law that is contrarie
                     unto the lawes of God and nature, or that in every mans iudgement seemeth to be
                     dishonest or vniust; howbeit the Duke seeing the irremoueable constancie of his
                     Chauncelour, readie to giue up his office, thought it better to reuoke such his
                     commaunds, than to want so stout &amp; wise a man. Which so constant
                     resolutions of the magistrats, hath oftentimes preserued Princes from infamie,
                     lawes from decay, and Commonweales<note place="marg" anchored="true">That a princes faults
                        which cannot be amended ought by all meanes to be of the magistrate cou<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>red.</note> from destruction. But when such
                     constancie cannot heale the diseases of the Commonweale, or faults of
                     soueraigne princes; and that the prince commaundeth the magistrats, to have his
                     actions excused unto his subiects; it is much better for the magistrat to obey
                     his commaund, and in so doing to cover and burie the memorie of a <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> wicked fact alreadie done, than in refusing so to do,
                     to irritate the prince to the doing of worse; and so (as they say) to cast the
                     helue after the hatchet. As did <hi rend="italic">Papinian</hi> the great
                     Gouernour of the empire, (and by <hi rend="italic">Seuerus</hi> the Emperour in
                     his will appointed Tutor unto the yong emperours <hi rend="italic">Anthonius
                        Caracalla,</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Geta</hi> his sonnes) who by <hi rend="italic">Caracalla</hi> commaunded to excuse unto the Senat the murder
                     by him committed upon the person of his brother <hi rend="italic">Geta,</hi>
                     would therein do nothing, but cut him off with this sharpe and short answere,
                     saying, <hi rend="italic">That murthers were more hardlie excused, than
                        committed:</hi> which was of him more stoutly then wisely said. For <hi rend="italic">Caracalla</hi> with this aunswere enraged, and yet not
                     satisfied with his brothers blood, in his rage commaunded <pb n="319" facs="161"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Papinian</hi> also to be slaine: and after the death of him
                     so great a man, (as who alone <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> might haue
                     gouerned the furious yong prince, and repressed his rage) neuer ceased without
                     any contradiction or controulment to kill, murther, and tyrannize, vntill such
                     time as he had brought himselfe together with the Empire unto destruction.
                     Which I would not have to bee so vnderstood, as spoken of vs in any respect to
                     impaire the worthie praises of so notable a man, (for that can in no wise be
                     done) but that magistrats may hereby vnderstand, how farre they are to beare
                     with the saults of princes, which once done, cannot by them be amended. For had
                        <hi rend="italic">Papinian</hi> couered that he could not now amend, he had
                     saued his owne life, and counterpeased the tyrannies and cruelties of the
                     Emperour, who alwaies before had him in greatest honour and regard. Which fault
                     in <hi rend="italic">Papinian</hi> I have thought good to note, for that many
                     have <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> right highly commended him for the same▪
                     without respecting, that such his resistance auailed nothing, but brought an
                     irrepairable losse unto the affaires of the empire, being so depriued of so
                     great a personage, as might therein doe more than any other; for that he was a
                     prince of the blood, and the greatest magistrat in the state. But had the
                     matter then stood whole and entier, and that the Emperour had commaunded him to
                     put his brother <hi rend="italic">Geta</hi> to death, he had then done both
                     stoutly and wisely in refusing so to doe, and had had iust cause rather to die
                     than to consent to that vnnaturall fact, for one brother to murther another.
                     But <hi rend="italic">Seneca</hi> and his companion <hi rend="italic">Burra</hi> (the gouernors of <hi rend="italic">Nero</hi>) shall be for euer
                     blamed, as hauing no excuse to pretend for their most wicked counsell,
                     persuading <hi rend="italic">Nero</hi> to kill his mother, who by chaunce had
                     escaped drowning:<milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> which most cruell counsell,
                     commaund, or fact, shall together with the authors thereof be for euer crowned
                     with eternall infamie and shame.</p><p>But what if the prince shall command any thing to be done, and that the same
                        thing<note place="marg" anchored="true">A princes commaund being begun to bee put in
                        execution, whether it b<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> by the princes contrary
                        commaund to <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> giuen ouer.</note> being begun to be put
                     in execution, he changing his mind shall reuoke his former commaund; shall the
                     magistrat in this case stay from proceeding any further, or go on with that he
                     hath begun? Whereunto a man at the first sight would say, That he ought to stay
                     and to proceed no farther: following therein the maximes of the law. Howbeit to
                     aunswere rightly thereunto, the matter is by distinction to be opened; that is
                     to wit, that if the thing so begun may be left off without the publike harme,
                     it is then so to bee <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> left off according to the
                     last commaund: but if it be so begun, as that it cannot bee left off, whithout
                     the manifest hurt of the state and Commonweale; the magistrat in this case is
                     to proceed on with that he hath so begun, notwithstanding the latter
                     countermaund, and that especially in matters of warre; as wee have before said.
                     And to this<note place="marg" anchored="true">Great things by great men vndertaken, ought also
                        to be by them performed, or else neuer taken in hand.</note> purpose <hi rend="italic">Marcellus</hi> the Consull saith, <hi rend="italic">Multa
                        magnis ducibus sicut non aggredienda, ita semel aggressis non
                        dimittenda.</hi> As many things are not of great captaines to be at all
                     taken in hand: so being once by them vndertaken, are not by them to bee againe
                     giuen ouer. And this in time of warre. But if at home the magistrat following
                     the commandement to him giuen, hath begun to execute the condemned, or them
                     that the prince hath commaunded to be put to death, he ought forthwith to
                     surcease from any further execution, if the commaundement be reuoked: and not
                     to do, as did the Consull <hi rend="italic">Fuluius,</hi>

                     <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> who hauing taken the citie of Capua, as he was
                     punishing the authors of the rebellion, and had now caused the greater part of
                     the Senators of that citie to bee beheaded, receiuing letters from the Senat of
                     Rome, willing him to stay and cease the execution, put those letters in his
                     bosome, without reading of them, &amp; doubting of the contents thereof,
                     proceeded to the execution of the rest, vntill he had put to death fourescore
                     of them. True it is, that the Senat had no power in any thing to commaund the
                     Consuls (as we have before said) yet for all that, the gouernours of prouinces,
                     and the generals of the Roman armies, yea a<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>d the
                     Consuls also, used most commonly to be obedient <pb n="320" facs="162"/> vnto
                     the Senate, and to yeelde unto the decrees thereof, as unto lawes. And truely
                        <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> the principall cause why they of Gaunt put
                     to death sixe and thirty of their lawyers, after the death of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> Duke of Burgundy, was for nothing else, but for that they had
                     condemned a citisen to death, after the death of the Duke; before they were
                     againe confirmed in their authoritie and office, although it was not a thing
                     altogether necessarie; as with like examples wee have declared. Yea it is
                     almost a perpetuall thing, for them which are in authoritie and have power to
                     commaund, to bee able of their owne right to execute that was commanded them,
                     yea after that the time of their authoritie is expired, if he that gaue them
                     the authoritie and charge knowing and wittingly shall dissemble the fact, or
                     not forbid it when he might.</p><p>Now all that we have hitherto said, is to be vnderstood onely of such letters
                     or rescripts <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> of commaund, as yet carrie with
                     them no power for the magistrat to examine the fact or matter they concerne.
                     But then what shall wee say, if such rescripts or commaunds report such things
                     as certainely knowne and true, which yet are neither publikely, nor unto the
                     magistrat so knowne to be. Heere we must againe consider, whether<note place="marg" anchored="true">Whether the magistrate b<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> to examine
                        the trueth of that he is by<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> the prince commaunded,
                        before he proceede to the examination thereof?</note> the examination of the
                     matter, be by speciall commaund expresly taken from the magistrat, or else left
                     unto him: if it be left unto him, there is then no doubt, but that the
                     magistrat may and ought to enquire of the truth of such things, as are reported
                     in the princes rescripts or letters: but if al examination of the matter be
                     taken from the magistrat, then some doubt, whether he may inquire of the truth
                     thereof or not; and especially if it be expressed in the rescript or mandate,
                     that the prince being well enformed <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> of the
                     truth, commaundeth the magistrat to proceede to the execution of his letters or
                     commaunds: howbeit the best opinion is, that the magistrat both in the one case
                     and the other, ought to examine the truth of the matter. For when to inquire of
                     the truth of the cause, is neither forbidden nor commaunded, although it bee
                     expressed in the princes rescripts or letters, to proceede to execution, yet
                     ought the magistrat neuerthelesse to examine the truth of the mater. And to the
                     intent, that the magistrats should not pretend to excuse themselves by
                     ignorance, the emperour <hi rend="italic">Constantine,</hi> prouided by an
                     expresse law, that the magistrats should inquire, whether these things were
                     true or not, which were set downe in his rescripts or letters of commaund,
                     whether it were so in them expressed, or left out. And as for the other point,
                     if in the rescripts or letters,<milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> it be expresly
                     set downe to proceede to execution, for that the prince is well enformed of the
                     truth of the matter; yet neuerthelesse ought the magistrat to examine the truth
                     thereof: notwithstanding the clause which I have said, which ought not to
                     hinder the examination of the matter, nor to be preiudiciall to any other mans
                     right; and so much lesse unto the publike, and least of all unto the truth: and
                     so generally, all such narratiue clauses as are but reported in rescripts,
                     mandates, commissions, lawes, priviledges, testaments, and sentences, cannot be
                     any thing preiudiciall unto the truth. And albeit, that during the tyranny of
                     the <hi rend="italic">Sforces,</hi> they made a law, that all faith and
                     credence should be giuen unto the princes commaunds and letters; yet was the
                     same law againe <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> disanulled, after that they
                     were by the French, driuen out of the estate of Milan. And if the faith and
                     credite must needes bee giuen unto the narratiue clauses of princes rescripts
                     and letters of commaund, that is to bee vnderstood, onely of such clauses, as
                     whereby the obscure places of their edicts, and lawes, commissions, mandates,
                     or iudgements are expounded, which none can better declare, then they
                     themselves that made them; howbeit, that such their declarations ought rather
                     to be called decrees, then expositions or declarations. But if the prince shall
                     in the bestowing of offices, places of charge, or other his grants in his
                     rescripts or letters, testifie for the fidelity, integrity, wisedome, or
                     religion of any man, it is so farre from, that the magistrat should rest
                     contented <pb n="321" facs="162"/> with that testification, as that hee ought
                     therefore with greater diligence to inquire <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">Whether the ma gistrate ought to enquire of the sufficie<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>sie of him of whose wisdom and <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> the prince shal himselfe by his rescripts or letters testifie; in the
                        bestowing of any office or other charge upon him</note> of him, for that the
                     prince supposed him to be indeede such, and would not have such benefits or
                     preferments bestowed upon an ignorant or vnwise man. But contrary wise, if the
                     prince shall simply giue unto any man an office or place of commaund, he is no
                     farther by the magistrat to bee inquired of, for that the prince in his
                     wisedome hath thought him worthy such honour and place; if the prince first
                     giue him not leaue so to doe, or that the custome of the country so require: as
                     in the latter times they did in Rome; but afterwards, almost <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ery where: but especially in the appointing of iudges.
                     So also in antient time, in the raigne of the Gothes, triall was made of the
                     Senators, before they were to bee admitted into the Senate. For <hi rend="italic">Theodoric,</hi> king of the Gothes, writing unto the Roman
                     Senate, for the receiuing of a new Senator, saieth,<milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Admittendos in Senatum examinare cogit sollicitus honor
                        Senatus▪</hi> the care (we haue) of the honour of the Senate, causeth vs to
                     examine such as are to be admitted into the Senate.</p><p>But if any man under a false pretensed colour shall encroach uppon the prince
                     the profits and commodities unto him graunted, being in the princes rescript
                     expressed, yet is he thereof by the magistrat to be embarred; and the rather,
                     if the common treasure be with immoderat gifts exhausted: unto which disease
                     euerie where spreading, remedie might be giuen, if the law of <hi rend="italic">Valois</hi> concerning gifts might take place. For <hi rend="italic">Philip
                        Valois</hi> the French king, commaunded those gifts and graunts to bee
                     reuoked from them, who in the letters of such gifts or graunts, had not
                     expressed what they or any other <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> for them, had
                     for the same cause in the letters of their graunts, before obtained; which yet
                     also is in vse in Millan. For seeing that it much concerneth the Commonweale
                     what money and profit, what rewards, and priuileges, every man obtaine<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>h, the magistrats<note place="marg" anchored="true">It much con<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>neth the Commonweale what gifts or priuileges be
                        graunted unto particular men.</note> must thereunto have a most vigilant
                     eye, and especially in popular estates, wherin as all publike things lie open
                     unto the spoyle of all men; so for the same cause occasion is ministred vnto
                     the seditious, to the trouble and oftentimes to the ruine of the Commonweale.
                     And for this cause it was most straitly prouided by a law in the twelue tables,
                     that no priuilege or dispensation might in any wise be graunted, and that upon
                     paine of death, but onely in the great assembly of the whole estate of the
                     people: the words of the law being these, <hi rend="italic">Priuilegia nisi
                        Commitijs Centuriatis ne irroganto, qui</hi>

                     <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">secus faxit Capital esto,</hi>

                     <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>et no priuilege be graunted, but in the great and
                     general assembly of the people: and he that shall otherwise doe, let him die
                     the death. And after that <hi rend="italic">Constantine</hi> the emperour
                     writing unto the people, saith, <hi rend="italic">Nec d<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>mnosa fi<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>co, nec legibus contraria impetrari
                        oportet,</hi>

                     <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>t is not fit, things hurtfull unto the common
                     treasure, or<note place="marg" anchored="true">Priuileg<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>

                        <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> things odious and <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> unto the
                           law<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>, how they are to be interpreted.</note>
                     contrarie unto the laws, to be obtained▪ howbeit that all priuileges are
                     directly contrarie unto the law; for otherwise they should not be priuileges.
                     And i<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> it bee so, that they must needs passe after the
                     second commaund (as we have before said) yet beseemeth it the magistrat to cut
                     them short, and to interpret them in strictest maner that he can, and to the
                     least hurt of the Commonweale, as things odious, and contrarie unto the law;
                     and not by favourable interpretations to encrease their strength, or to draw
                        <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> them into consequence, as heretofore haue
                     the judges and the clergie, which by their faire gloses, have drawne the profit
                     and priuileges graunted onely unto souldiors, unto themselves also; vsing these
                     faire gloasing words, of worldly Souldiours and heauenly Souldiours: so laying
                     all the burthen upon the poore countrey man, unto whom the same priuileges
                     ought of better right to be communicated than to them.</p><p>But for that our purpose is not here to enter into the disputing of priuileges,
                        which<note place="marg" anchored="true">Priuileges to be most straitly examined.</note> were
                     a thing infinit, sufficeth it in passing by, in generall to aduertise the
                     magistrat to have speciall regard unto the priuileges by princes graunted, and
                     most straitly to examine <pb n="322" facs="163"/> them, what good report soeuer
                     the prince therin make of him that hath obtained <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> such priuilege: For that every man well knoweth, that the prince oftentimes
                     knoweth not them to whome such priuileges are graunted; vnworthy men still not
                     so much obtaining them, as indeed wresting them from princes, euen as it were
                     against their wils: no craft or subtiltie in this case left vnsought out, to
                     defraud the lawes, and abuse the prince and magistrats, and that with so many
                     shifts and quirkes of words, and so much deceit, as that they seeme hardly to
                     be by the magistrat to be met withal, but by plaine force. Such is that clause,
                        <hi rend="italic">De motu proprio</hi> (of our owne meere motion) which
                     inuented at Rome, hath from thence crept abroad into all Europe. For why, there
                     is almost neither king nor kesar, which when question is for the breaking of a
                     law, or repealing an edict, or for giuing way unto dispensations and
                     priuileges, ioyneth not thereunto <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> this clause,
                        <hi rend="italic">De motu nostro proprio</hi> (Of our owne proper motion)
                     howbeit that the same princes have bene importuned, and as it were enforced to
                     graunt that euen unto vnknowne and most vnworthy men, for whome they have bene
                     so importunatly requested. There is at Rome a field called Flory, or
                     Flourishing, not so much for the plentie of flowers, as of witnesses that are
                     therein; out of which euerie man may take testimonies, for the bestowing of
                     benefices upon them which dwell euen in the remotest places of Asia and
                     Affrica, and that with these words, <hi rend="italic">De motu proprio.</hi> By
                     which onely clause, all the fraud and deceit of them that sued for preferment,
                     be they neuer so bad or vniust, are easily excused: and by vertue of which
                     words the examination of all slye incommings or craftie intrusions, cease, if
                     wee will receiue the opinion of some <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> most
                     pernitious and daungerous unto the state: but such sleights and deceits wee
                     have long since bid farewell out of our Commonweale. And for that princes and
                     magistrats circumuented with the wiles of deceitfull men, could hardly, or not
                     at all escape the same, it was wisely decreed, That the princes rescripts, nor
                     letters pattents, should be of none effect, except they were presented unto the
                     magistrat the same yere that they were obtained; neither should be of any
                     force, before they were by the magistrat approued. And yet it seemeth unto me,
                     that the law of Milan is better, that is to wit, that the princes mandats and
                     letters pattents directed unto the Senat, were not to be receiued after the
                     yeare expired: neither those that were directed unto the magistrat after a
                     moneth <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> were past: and that not onely the yeare
                     and day, but euen the verie howre also, should be therein set downe, as the
                     manner is almost throughout all Germanie; following therein the opinion of many
                     great lawyers, to stop the suits and controuersies which oft times arise for
                     gifts, offices, and benefices graunted unto diuers in one day, as it was
                     decreed by the parliament at Blois, at the request there made by <hi rend="italic">Bodin</hi> deputie of Vermandois.</p><p>But what if the prince by his rescript or letters pattents, shall expresly
                     forbid the magistrat<note place="marg" anchored="true">Whether the magistrat expressely
                        forbidden to examin the trueth of things contained in the princes grants or
                        letters, may yet passe beyond such his soueraignes prohibition.</note> to
                     examine the truth of such things as are contained in them, albeit that they be
                     false or doubtfull; ought the magistrat in this case to examine the matter? And
                     it seemeth that he ought so to doe: For we have before said, that hee may, and
                     ought to <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> examine the cause, and enquire of the
                     truth of things expressed in the princes rescripts and letters, albeit that the
                     prince therein declare himselfe to know the truth thereof. Yet for all that, I
                     say, that it belongeth not unto the magistrat in this case to passe beyond the
                     prohibition of his soueraigne prince: For there is great difference when the
                     prince declareth, That he knoweth the truth; and when he forbiddeth to enquire
                     therof: For in him it is to be presumed, that he hath bene circumuented, and so
                     mistaking things false for true, and things vnknowne for knowne, to haue
                     commaunded them so to be put into his rescript, which he would not have done,
                     had hee beene truely thereof enformed: As if hee should giue a judges place
                     unto a souldior, or a captaines place <pb n="323" facs="163"/> unto a lawyer,
                     neither the one nor the other ought by the magistrat to be admitted or
                        <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> receiued, although the souldiour were
                     commonly called a lawier, and the lawier a souldiour, such pretended qualitie
                     hauing happely giuen occasion unto the prince to be so in his graunt deceiued.
                     But when the prince shall expresly forbid the magistrat to examine the fact or
                     matter, it is to be presumed, that he well knoweth that which he doth, and that
                     he would not that the magistrat should farther enquire thereof. Yet may the
                     magistrat well vse the remedie by vs before spoken of, and show the prince the
                     truth, and the importance of his commaund, with the inconueniences and harmes
                     ensuing thereof, and so in what he may to draw him from his former purpose: and
                     hauing so discharged his duetie, yet neuerthelesse then to yeeld his obedience,
                     if he shall be againe so commaunded: for otherwise the maiestie of a prince or
                     Commonweal should <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> be but a mockerie, as still
                     subiect unto the controlement of the magistrates. Besides that, it is much more
                     also to be feared, least that the other magistrates, by the example of one or
                     two, and after them other priuat men also, should presume to contemne the
                     princes commaund, to the great endangering and ruine of the Commonweale.</p><p>Now if a man should say that a Prince ought not to commaund any thing that is
                     dishonest or vniust, he therein sayth well: neither ought the prince (if it
                     were possible) to commaund any thing not beseeming his honour, or that were so
                     much as subiect unto reprehension or slaunder, or knowing the magistrates to be
                     of contrarie opinion unto his, to constraine them thereunto: for that the
                     ignorant and common people is no way more moued unto disloyaltie, and contempt
                     of their princes edicts and lawes,<milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> then to see
                     the magistrates hardly delt withall, and the lawes by them contrarie to
                        their<note place="marg" anchored="true">Whether the magistrat commaunded by his prince any
                        thing contrarie to the common profit, or course of civill iustice, ought to
                        obey such his princes commaund, or to giue up his place.</note> good liking
                     published and forced. But now here the question is, what the magistrat ought to
                     doe, in case the prince forgetting his duetie, commaund any thing contrarie to
                     the common profit and civill iustice; yet prouided still that it be not against
                     the law of God and nature: whether the magistrat ought to obey such his princes
                     commaund, or to giue up his place? And if so it be, that the worldly magistrat
                     ought to be obeyed, albeit that he commaund such things as are vniust: <hi rend="italic">Ne Praetoris matestas contempta videatur,</hi> Lest the
                     maiestie of the Praetor should seeme to be contemned (as saith the law) how
                     much more then ought men to obey their soueraigne Prince, of the maiestie
                        <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> of whom all magistrates depend? Now it is
                     in many lawes repeated that we must obey the magistrat, whether the thing that
                     he commaundeth be iust or not, following the counsell of all the wise which
                     have hereof written. And to this purpose saith <hi rend="italic">Cicero</hi>
                     (albeit that he was a mortall enemie unto the Tribunes of the people) that men
                     were to obey euen the vniust oppositions of the Tribunes, in these words: <hi rend="italic">Parere iube<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> lex intercessori, quo
                        nihil praestantius: impediri enim bonam rem melius est, quàm concedi
                        malè,</hi> The law (saith he) commaundeth vs to obey the magistrat that
                     opposeth himselfe, then which nothing is better: for better it is a good thing
                     to be crossed then euill graunted. And before he had said: <hi rend="italic">Nihil exitiosius ciuitatibus, nihil tam contrarium iuri ac legibus, nihil
                        minùs ciuile &amp; humanum, quàm composita &amp; constituta republica
                        quicquam agi per vim,</hi> Nothing is more dangerous unto cities, nothing
                     more <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> contrarie unto right and law, nothing
                     more vncivill or inhumaine, then in a well ordered<note place="marg" anchored="true">Dangerous
                        unto Commonweales for the the magistrates to refuse to put in execution
                        their princes Edicts or commaunds.</note> and setled Commonweale to have any
                     thing done by force. We oft times see the subiects to take up armes against
                     their prince, the lawes violated, and iustice go to wracke, and all for the
                     false opinion that the people have of the equitie and integritie of the judges,
                     refusing to verifie and put in execution the Edicts and commaunds of their
                     prince. O but say they it is an vniust Edict or law, neither can we, nor ought
                     we, to obey the same: an honest speech, if indeed thou canst not; but where
                     learnedst thou that thou oughtest not? from whence haddest thou that doctrine?
                     wilt thou (being a <pb n="324" facs="164"/> magistrat) with stripes,
                     imprisoment, fines, yea, and with death it selfe enforce priuat <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> men to obey, yea euen thine vniust commaunds, and yet
                     thy selfe not obey the commaundement of thy Prince? But thou wilt denie thine
                     owne commaunds to be vniust: so doth the prince also denie that which he
                     commaundeth to be so: shalt thou now be iudge herein, or he? or if thou wilt
                     needs be iudge, why shouldst thou not thinke to suffer the same in thine owne
                     decrees concerning priuat men. Besides that, as no man enforced thee to take
                     upon thee thine office, so no man forbiddeth thee to giue up the same, if the
                     law thou likest not seeme to thee so vniust: it is therefore the desire of
                     bearing rule, that maketh thee that thou wouldest beare rule over priuat men,
                     and yet not obey thy prince thy selfe. Wherefore let vs upon this conclude, it
                     to be much better in all obedience to stoupe unto the soueraigne maiestie, than
                     in refusing of his <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> soueraigne commaunds to
                     giue example and occasion of rebellion unto the subiects; yet still keeping the
                     respects that we have before set downe, and especially when it concerneth the
                     honour of God, which is and ought to bee unto all subiects greater, and more
                     precious than the wealth, the life, the honour of all the princes of the world.
                     And to know how a man should beare himselfe herein, amongst many examples we
                     will vse but one or two. <hi rend="italic">Saul</hi> commaunded all the priests
                     of God without iust cause in his presence to be slaine, yet was there no man
                     which refused not his vngodly commaund, except <hi rend="italic">Doeg,</hi> who
                     himselfe alone performed that so cruell an execution. An other notable example
                     there is of one <hi rend="italic">Petronius</hi> gouernour of Syria, who
                        receiued<note place="marg" anchored="true">A notable example of a wise gouernour or
                        magistrat.</note> commaundement to place the image of <hi rend="italic">Caligula</hi> the emperour, in the fairest place of <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> the Temple of Hierusalem, as it had beene in all other
                     Temples of the empire: howbeit that the Iewes had neuer suffered those images
                     to stand in their Temples, but had still cast them downe, and broken and beaten
                     them all to peeces, euen to the verie shieldes of the emperours, which they had
                     there placed. Whereof <hi rend="italic">Petronius</hi> aduertised the Emperour,
                     and that it could not be done without great trouble and slaughter of the
                     people: wherewith <hi rend="italic">Caligula</hi> more incensed, sent more
                     expresse and strait commaund unto <hi rend="italic">Petronius,</hi> to assemble
                     all the old bands of his garison souldiours in those quarters, and so with a
                     puissant armie to put his commission in execution. Of whose comming the Iewes
                     hearing, left their Townes, and the tillage of their grounds, and so in great
                     companies all vnarmed, went to meet him, if happily they so might by their
                        <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> humble prayers intreat him; telling him
                     withall, that they ought not so much to feare any mortall man, as to commit so
                     abhominable a sinne against the maiestie of the immortall God: and therfore
                     most humbly requested him to take in good part such their constant resolution,
                     which was rather to die, than to see so great an abhomination, as the most
                     sacred Temple of God to be so polluted with the images of men. Neuerthelesse
                        <hi rend="italic">Petronius</hi> told them that it concerned his life, to
                     performe his commission: and so to terrifie them the more, marched with his
                     armie unto Tiberias, (as supposing himselfe to doe nothing contrarie to his
                     owne religion, or to the lawes of God or man) but there the people came running
                     unto him from all parts, disarmed, and resolued all <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> to die, rather than to see the image set up in the Temple,
                     humbling themselves, and bowing their heads before the armie wherewith <hi rend="italic">Petronius</hi> had beset them round: who seeing the great
                     constancie of the people, and their exceeding zeale towards the honour of their
                     God, as to chuse rather to die, than so much as to see the image of 2 man in
                     the Temple of God; wonderfully moued therewith, and with their pitifull
                     complaint and teares, (and being himselfe also a man of a courteous and milde
                     nature, and farre from that crueltie, which the Iewes feared not whatsoeuer it
                     had beene) he commaunded them all to returne home; promising againe to write in
                     their behalfe unto the Emperour, and rather himselfe to die than to execute his
                     commission, accounting <pb n="325" facs="164"/> his life a worthie ransome for
                     the sauing of the guiltles blood of so many innocent <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> people. Neuerthelesse <hi rend="italic">Caligula</hi>
                     therewith the more enraged, sent unto him a new commaund, with grieuous threats
                     to put him unto the most grieuous torture that he could possibly deuise, if he
                     forthwith put not his commission in execution, according to his commaund. But
                     the ship, together with them that brought the commission, was by force of
                     tempest caried an other way, and newes brought into Iurie of the death of the
                     tyrant, before that the cruell commission could come thither. And so <hi rend="italic">Petronius</hi> hauing discharged his conscience towards God,
                     his duetie towards his prince, and well showed his great loue toward the
                     subiects, and discharged all the parts of a most wise Gouernour: was himselfe
                     by the diuine prouidence wonderfully preserued from the cruelties unto him by
                     the tyrant threatned. But yet this is especially to be considered, that we
                        <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">That the Magistrat ought not upō a vaine show of religion,
                        or <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> conscience euill grounded, to refuse to
                        execute his princes commaunds.</note> pretend not the vaine show of
                     religion, or rather of superstition, against our princes commaunds, and so upon
                     a conscience euill grounded open a way unto rebellion: for when the magistrat
                     maketh conscience, and a matter of religion, about the executing of his princes
                     commaunds, he seemeth himselfe (and giueth occasion unto others also) to
                     suspect euill both of the religion and conscience of his prince. Wherefore he
                     ought to be well assured of the true knowledge of the eternall God, and of the
                     true worship and seruice unto him due: which consisteth not in vaine and
                     counterfeit showes of religion or conscience. Diuers other examples I could to
                     the same purpose produce, were I not afraid lest those whom we call Pagans
                     should therein ashame vs, with whom the feruent zeale unto the honour of God is
                     so abated, and by processe of time cooled, as <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>
                     that it is to be feared lest at length it be altogether frosen. And thus much
                     for the obedience of the Magistrat unto his Soueraigne Prince. Let vs now also
                     speake of his power and authoritie over particular and priuat men, and what a
                     manner of man we wish him for to to be towards them.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>