<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1:1.9</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1:1.9</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1" xml:lang="eng"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><pb n="114" facs="59"/><head><hi rend="italic">CHAP. IX.</hi><milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> ¶ Of a Prince tributarie or feudatarie: and
                     whether he be a soueraigne Prince: and of the prerogative of honour amongst
                     Soueraigne Princes.</head><p><seg rend="decorInit">T</seg>His question deserueth a speciall Chapter by it
                     selfe, for that it hath no communitie with the auntient markes of Soueraigntie,
                     which were before the right of Fees, used in all Europe and Asia, and yet more
                     in Turkie than in any place of the world: where the Timariots hold not the Fees
                     they have to serue in the warres, but so long as pleaseth the king of the
                     Turkes, who giueth them no longer but for tearme of their lives: which haue
                     them with condition, that in time of warre the Timariots <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> shall of their owne charge without any pay bring such a
                     number of horsemen and horses, as is appointed in the subsidie bookes,
                     according to the proportion of the rent of the fees, which they cal <hi rend="italic">Timar,</hi> which is to say in their language, the <hi rend="italic">Vse and profit,</hi> deriued as I suppose of the Greeke word
                        <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/>; and the word <hi rend="italic">Timar</hi> signifying with them the honourable vse and profit,
                     which is the true nature of Fee, to bee free from all tribute or base charges.
                     And for this cause the vassall in the auntient law of the Lombards, is called
                        <hi rend="italic">Leude,</hi> which is to say, franke and free: <hi rend="italic">Aldius</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Alda,</hi> affranchised,
                     from whence the words <hi rend="italic">Alaudium</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Laudimia</hi> are deriued, signifying the honourable rewards woont to be
                     giuen to the lord of the fee, taking the oath of fealty of his vassall. But
                     hauing thus much said for the explanation of these words, let vs proceed
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> unto our purpose.</p><p>We have said here before, him to be an absolute soueraigne, who next vnto
                     almightie God, is subiect unto none: neither holdeth any thing next unto God,
                     but of his owne sword: For if he be enforced to serue any man, or to obey any
                     mans commaund (be it by his owne good liking, or against his will) or if he
                     hold of another man, he looseth the title of maiestie, and is no more a
                     soueraigne, as saith a certaine Poet:</p><lg><l>Esse sat est seruum, iam nolo <note n="*" place="marg" anchored="true">These Vicarij were
                           slaues commaunded.</note> vicarius esse:</l><l>Qui Rex est, Regem Maxime non habeat.</l></lg><lg><l>To be a slaue it is enough, I will not serue a slaue:<milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/>

                     </l><l>Who is a king, friend <hi rend="italic">Maximus,</hi> no other king must
                        haue.</l></lg><p>If they then which hold in fealtie and homage have no maiestie or soueraigntie,
                     there should be but few soueraigne princes to be found. And if were graunt that
                     they which hold in fealtie and homage, or that are tributaries, be soueraignes,
                     wee must by the same reason confesse, the vassall and his lord, the master and
                     the seruant, to be equal in greatnes, power, and authoritie. And yet the
                     doctors of the law hold that the dukes of Milan, Mantua, Ferrara, and Sauoy,
                     yea euen and some Counties also are soueraignes:<note place="marg" anchored="true">The county
                        of A<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ti.</note> which altogether differ from those
                     things which wee have before said of the right of maiestie and soueraigntie.
                     Wherefore it is requisit for vs more exquisitly to <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> entreat of these matters, whereof dependeth the principall
                     point of soueraigntie, and the prerogative of honour amongst princes, which
                     they esteeme as a thing unto them most deare of all things in the world.</p><p>Wee said before in the Chapter of Patronage (which we otherwise call
                     Protection) that princes which are in protection, if they have no other
                     subiection, hold yet their maiestie and soueraigntie, although they have enred
                     into inequal alliance, whereby they are bound to acknowledge their protectors
                     in all honour. But there is great difference betwixt them which are in simple
                     protection onely, and them which hold <pb n="115" facs="59"/> in fealtie and
                     homage. For the client, or he which is the simple protection of another
                        <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The difference betwixt him which is onely in the simple
                        protection of another prince, and him that oweth unto him fealtie and
                        homage.</note> prince onely, acknowledgeth his patron his superiour, in the
                     league of their confederation, but no further than the dignitie of the person
                     and place requireth: but the vassall, or he which holdeth in fealtie and
                     homage, is glad not onely to acknowledge his lord for his superiour, but is
                     enforced also in humble wise to giue unto him his faith and dutie, or els to
                     forgo his fee. When I say fealtie &amp; homage, I meane the oath of fidelity,
                     the submission, the seruice, and dutie of the vassall, which he is by the
                     tenour of his fee bound to giue unto his lord.</p><p>Which that it may be the better vnderstood, we will make nine degrees of
                        inferiours,<note place="marg" anchored="true">Nine degrees of subiection of inferiors
                        towards their superiors.</note> in respect of their superiours: beside him
                     who next unto almightie God, acknowledgeth none superiour unto himselfe. The
                     first sort, is of such princes as are in the <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/>
                     protection of him whose maiestie they obserue and reuerence, and commonly giue
                     themselves into his protection, so to bee the safer against their most mightie
                     enemies. The second, is of such princes as acknowledge a superiour in their
                     confederation, unto whome they vse to pay a tribute or pension, so by his helpe
                     and aid to bee the safer: which deserueth not to be called patronage, because
                     it is mercenarie, whereas unto kind dutie no reward is due. The third is, of
                     such princes as being overcome by the more mightie, have of him receiued peace,
                     who yet keepe their maiestie and soueraigntie, with condition, courteously to
                     reuerence the maiestie of the victor, and to pay unto him a yearely tribute,
                     for which they are from him to receiue neither protection nor aide. And albeit
                     that these seeme to be more charged than they which are <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> but in protection; yet is it so, that in effect they are
                     greater, for in paying the tribute they have promised for their peace, they are
                     acquited, and have nothing to doe with any other for the defence of their
                     estate. The fourth sort is of them which are themselves kings, and freely
                     exercise their soueraigntie over their owne subiects; but yet are vassales or
                     feudataries to some other prince for some fee, bee it greater or bee it lesse,
                     which they from him receiue. The fift sort, is of them which are not kings,
                     neither have any soueraigntie, but are become vassals for their fee, and are
                     simply called meere vassals, who are bound to defend the honour of their lord,
                     and to take up arms for him, but not at all times, nor against all men. The
                     sixt sort are they whom wee call liege vassals, who are not naturall subiects
                     unto the prince, but hauing giuen him their <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>
                     faith, are bound to defend his dignitie and honour, and for his defence to take
                     up armes without exception; yet not alwaies, nor in all places, but so farre
                     forth as the profit of the fee, or the contract of their vassallage extendeth.
                     The seuenth sort are they whom we call subiects, whether they be vassals or
                     tenants, or such as hold no land at all, who are bound to fight for the honour
                     and defence of their prince as well as for themselves, and to have the same
                     enemies and the same friends that he hath. The eight sort is of them, which in
                     former time delivered from slauerie, yet retaine a certaine kind of seruitude,
                     as doe they which are tied unto the soyle, and are of vs called Mort-maines.
                     The last sort are the right slaues. This distinction of the degrees of
                     subiection, I have made to take away the confusion that many make of the
                     subiect with the vassall; and of the <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> simple
                     vassall with the liege man; and hold, that the liege man oweth all obedience
                     unto his lord towards and against all men; and that the simple vassall
                     reserueth his superior: and yet neuerthelesse there is but the subiect onely
                     which oweth his obeysance. For the vassall, be he liege or simple, if he be not
                     a subiect, oweth but the seruice and homage expressed in his inuestiture, from
                     which hee may without fraud exempt<note place="marg" anchored="true">The difference of a
                        vassall, or a liege man from a naturall subiect.</note> himself, by yeelding
                     up his fee: but the naturall subiect, which holds in fee, in farme, or fee
                     simple, or be it that he hold nothing at all that he can call his owne, yet can
                     hee not by any meanes without the consent of his prince exempt himselfe from
                     the personall <pb n="116" facs="60"/> obligation wherewith he is unto him
                     bound, as we have before declared. The simple <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/>
                     vassall is bound but once in his life to giue his oath of fidelitie unto his
                     lord: and such a vassall it may be as is neuer bound to giue his oath: for that
                     the fee may bee without any such obligation of giuing his faith, as is to be
                     seene in the old lawes of fees, (contrarie to that which <hi rend="italic">M,
                        Charles du Molin</hi> hath both thought and writ) but the subiect whatsoeuer
                     is alwaies and in all places bound to give his oath, and so oft as it shal
                     please his soueraigne prince to require it: yea although he were a bishop
                     without any temporalitie at all. As for the liege man, it is not requisite that
                     he should bee subiect unto the lord of whom he holdeth: for it may be, that he
                     may be a soueraigne prince, holding some seignorie of another prince in liege,
                     fealtie and homage: it may also be, that he may be the naturall subiect of one
                     prince, and liege man to another, by reason of his <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> fee: or well the simple vassall of one Lord, without being
                     subiect or liegeman to another: and naturall subiect to another, to whome he is
                     iusticiable, and yet holdeth of him neither fee nor reuenew. For the vassall of
                     a vassall is not for that, either vassall or subiect of the same lord, if it
                     bee not in regard of the same fee. But it is needfull to explaine that we haue
                     said by examples.</p><p>We find that the kings of England have giuen their liege faith and homage vnto
                     the kings of Fraunce for all the countries which they hold on this side the
                     sea, except the counties of Oye and Guynes: And yet neuerthelesse they held the
                     kingdomes of England and Ireland in soueraigntie without acknowledgement of any
                     other prince whatsoeuer. But after in the yeare 1212 they made themselves
                     vassals unto the Pope <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> and the church of Rome,
                     and not onely vassals, but also tributaries: beside the annuall gift of smoke
                     money, of auntient time graunted by <hi rend="italic">Ine</hi> king of England,
                     in the yeare 740, &amp; augmented by <hi rend="italic">Etelpe,</hi> which they
                     called <hi rend="italic">S. Peters pence.</hi> For it is found, that <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> king of England, by the consent of all the counties,
                     barrons and lords of the land, made himselfe vassall unto the pope and church
                     of Rome, and vowed to hold the realmes of England and Ireland of him in fealtie
                     and homage, with the charge to pay the yearely rent and reuenew of a thousand
                     markes for euer, upon <hi rend="italic">Michaelmas</hi> day, beside the <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> pence, which I have spoken of: &amp; gaue his faith
                     and homage unto the legat of pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the third, in
                     the yeare 1213, in the presence of his chauncelor, the archbishop of
                     Canterburie, foure bishops, sixe counties, and many other great
                        lords.<milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> The Bull was made in autentique
                     forme, whereof I have seene the copie in a register of the Vatican, taken out
                     by the commaundement of chauncelour du Prat, when he was Legat. And albeit that
                        <hi rend="italic">Sir Thomas More,</hi> chauncelour of England, was the
                     first that maintained the contrarie: yet so it is, that in the same time, and
                     vntill that king <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the eight reuolted from the
                     pope, in the yeare 1534, the yearely reuenew and tribute was alwaies paied. But
                     that is worth the noting, that the act of fealtie and homage, giuen unto pope
                        <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the the third, importeth that <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> then king of England, humbly requested forgiuenesse
                     of his sinnes of the popes legat. Whereby it is plaine, that patronage of the
                     bishop of Rome to have bene by him sought for, to extenuat the horrible murder
                     which he had cruelly committed upon the person of young <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Arthure</hi> his brothers sonne, duke of Britaine, and
                     lawfull successour to the crowne of England; least otherwise he should haue
                     bene therfore excommunicated by the pope. Whereas <hi rend="italic">Philip
                        Augustus,</hi> king of Fraunce, for the same cause had confiscated the
                     duchies of Normandie, Guyenne, Aniou, Touraine, le Maine, &amp; all the
                     countries whereunto he pretended any right, on this side the sea: which the
                     kings of England held by fealtie and liege homage of the king of Fraunce; and
                     yet had the chiefe soueraigntie<note place="marg" anchored="true">The king<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> of Scots vassals to the English.</note> over the
                     realmes of England, Ireland, and Scotland. For first <hi rend="italic">Constantine</hi> king of the Scots, with the rest of the nobilitie of that
                     country, did fealtie and homage to <hi rend="italic">Adelstan</hi>

                     <pb n="117" facs="60"/> king of England; and after that <hi rend="italic">Baliol</hi> king of Scots did fealtie and homage also to the <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> king of England, declaring himselfe to hold the
                     kingdome of Scotland under the protection of the English, excepting the xxxij
                     Islands of the Orcades, which then &amp; afterwards also were holden in fealtie
                     and homage of the kings of Norway; and owe unto the new king comming to the
                     crowne ten markes of gold, as was agreed betwixt the kings of Scotland and
                     Denmark, to end the warres, which were renewed for the same isles, in the yeare
                     1564; as I have learned by the letters of <hi rend="italic">M. Danzai,</hi>
                     ambassador for the king in Denmarke. Howbeit the kings of Scotland which
                     raigned after <hi rend="italic">Baliol,</hi> renounced their homage unto the
                     English, neither acknowledging them for their superiours, or yet to be vnto
                     them vassals. And albeit that <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi> king of Scots did
                     what he could with his subiects to consent that the kingdome of Scotland might
                     bee holden <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> of England in fealtie and homage:
                     yet so it was, that he remained nine yeares in prison, and by the treatie made
                     betwixt <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> the third his brother in law, and him, it
                     was agreed, that he should be set at libertie, without any more obtained from
                     his estates but that he should live in amitie and friendship with him. As for
                     the realme of Ireland, it is not long since it receiued the English government,
                     excepting yet the earle of Argueil, who seemed alwayes to keepe the state of
                     soueraigntie.</p><p>So might we say also of the king of Denmarke, who is a soueraigne prince in
                        part<note place="marg" anchored="true">The kings of Denmarke in antient time vassals vnto
                        the German empire.</note> of the kingdome of Norway, without acknowledging
                     any prince for his superiour whatsoeuer; and yet holdeth part of the duchie of
                     Holsatia of the emperour in fealty and homage: in which sort he in auntient
                     time held the countrey of Denmarke, which <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> was
                     but a plaine dukedome, when <hi rend="italic">Canutus</hi> duke of Denmarke
                     yeelded fealtie and homage unto the emperour <hi rend="italic">Lothaire,</hi>
                     and afterward to the emperour <hi rend="italic">Frederike</hi> the fift: who
                     first of all sent unto <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> duke of Denmarke the sword
                     and the crowne, and honoured him with royall dignitie; yet with condition, That
                     hee should for euer yeeld unto the emperour fealtie and homage: howbeit that
                     his posteritie afterwards reuolted from the empire. And yet neuerthelesse these
                     whome I have named, beeing no subiects, neither acknowledging the greatnes of
                     any prince, but in respect of the fees<note place="marg" anchored="true">A fee is not to be
                        giuen up but simply and without fraud.</note> that they hold of other
                     princes, are acquitted of their fealtie homage and seruice, by giuing up their
                     fee without fraud. I say without fraud, for that it is not lawfull for the
                     vassall to forsake his lord and patron at his need, although he would renounce
                     his fee: albeit <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> that there be no other
                     penaltie but the losse of fee appointed for him who in time of warre forsaketh
                     his lord; for that he doth an irreparable preiudice unto his honour, which for
                     euer remaineth engaged for so foule a fact, as to have forsaken his lord in
                     time of daunger: seeing that by the oath of fidelitie the vassall, but
                     especially the liege vassall ought to aide him, were it against his owne
                     brethren and children. Yea some lawyers are of opinion, that he ought to aid
                     his lord and patron, euen against his owne father: wherein I can in no wise
                     agree with them, for that the first and chiefe fidelitie is due unto our
                     parents. But if the vassall be also a subiect, hee looseth not onely his fee
                     and honour, if he forsake his soueraigne prince at his need, but euen his life
                     thereon dependeth: seeing that it is death euen for a common souldior, not to
                     defend his captaine <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> in battell. Wherefore we
                     are not to maruell, if <hi rend="italic">Iohn de Montfort,</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Peter,</hi> dukes of Britaigne would neuer yeeld their fealtie
                     unto the French kings without exception, as their liege men for the dukedome of
                     Britaigne: about which matter the chauncelors of Fraunce and Britaigne were
                     twice at debate before the kings, <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift, and
                        <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the sixt. And albeit that these two kings
                     caused two acts to be produced, concerning the fealtie and homage done by the
                     dukes of Britaigne, to <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the victorious and <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the eight: yet for all that, the dukes would not
                     doe their homage as liege men, but were receiued doing their simple homage
                     onely. True it is, that the liege <pb n="118" facs="61"/> homage yeelded to <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the eight, was not but for the life of him that did
                     it, as appeared <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> by the act, without binding of
                     his successours. And the other act which is of yong <hi rend="italic">Arthure,</hi> was not pure and simple, but onely conditionall; as to be
                     restored by <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the victorious, unto the territories
                     and segnories from which he was embarred; which he did not. Now such is the
                     force and nature of true and lawfull acts, as not to admit any time or
                     condition, and the act of fealtie and homage of all other acts the least. But
                     the end of the controuersie was, that the simple oath of <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> should bee taken, least they
                     should seeme to bee the liege vassals of the French: although both those dukes
                     ought of right to have bene depriued of the fee of the dukedome of Britaigne,
                     for that they had renounced the French king their lawfull patron. Neither
                        is<note place="marg" anchored="true">The auntient countie<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> of
                        Britaigne, vassals to the kings of France.</note> there any doubt, but that
                     in truth the auntient counties of Britaigne were true subiects <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> and liege men unto the kings of Fraunce (as is to be seene
                     in the histories of <hi rend="italic">Gregorie</hi> bishop of Tours) and being
                     reuolted, were subdued by <hi rend="italic">Charlemaigne,</hi> and afterwards
                     by <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the deuout, to whome they did homage, and
                     yeelded all obeysance with hostages; as a man may see in the histories of <hi rend="italic">Floard</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Girald,</hi> whome some call
                        <hi rend="italic">Vitald,</hi> the nephew of <hi rend="italic">Charlemaigne.</hi> And againe for another rebellion against <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the Bauld, in the yeare 1359, they were accused
                     unto the estates, of treason, &amp; so condemned and executed: which could not
                     have taken place but against the naturall subiect, for treason against his
                     soueraigne prince. And after that <hi rend="italic">Herispo</hi> countie of
                     Britaigne, doing his fealtie, and with a great summe of money giuen appeased
                        <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the Bauld: as had also before him duke <hi rend="italic">Iudicael</hi> pleased <hi rend="italic">Dagobert.</hi> Neither
                     is it true, or <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> like to be true, that <hi rend="italic">Clodoueus,</hi> who had bounded the kingdome of Fraunce with
                     the Pyrenei Mountaines, both the seas, and the riuer of Rheine; or <hi rend="italic">Charlemaigne</hi> that had in many places vanquished infinit
                     numbers of the barbarous nations, and had subdued Spaine, Italie, Hungarie,
                     Germanie, the Saxons, them of Pomerland, the Polonians, and Russians, and had
                     extended his empire euen as faire as Scithia, would have receiued the dukes of
                     Britaigne, euen in the bowels of Fraunce, as companions of the French empire.
                     And admit that by the favour of any the French kings, they obtained respite of
                     homage, that could not be preiudicial unto the kings their successors, and much
                     lesse unto the crowne of Fraunce. And that more is, in the treaties betwixt the
                     kings of Fraunce, and the first dukes of Normandie, it is expresly set downe,
                     That the <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> counties of Britaigne, should be
                     vassals unto the dukes of Normandie, unto whome they had oftentimes giuen their
                     fealtie and homage: which could nor possibly have bene, if they had not bene
                     vassals and liege men unto the crowne, seeing that the dukes of Normandie had
                     giuen their fealtie and liege homage unto the kings of Fraunce, &amp; the
                     counties of Britaigne unto the dukes. And if true it be, that the vassall can
                     neuer prescribe for his fealtie and homage against his lord; how then can the
                     subiect prescribe for his subiection against his prince? So the Seneschall of
                     Renes (a man verie well learned) cannot abide that <hi rend="italic">Peter de
                        Dreux</hi> prince of the blood, surnamed <hi rend="italic">Maucler,</hi> had
                     acquited the soueraigntie of Britaigne unto the kings of Fraunce, seeing that
                     hee was vassall and naturall subiect unto the king: and yet neuerthelesse, in
                     yeelding the homage,<milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> had reseruation to make
                     lawes, to graunt pardons, to call parliaments, to take the<note place="marg" anchored="true">Roialties reserued unto the dukes of Britaigne, notwithstanding their
                        homage due unto the French king.</note> benefit of confiscations euen in
                     cases of high treason, the regall rights in churches, and feofments of trust.
                     By which arguments not onely probable, but also necessarie, I am persuaded to
                     write the dukedome of Britaigne, now euen from the times of the first kings of
                     Fraunce, to have bene a prouince of the kingdome of France, although <hi rend="italic">Argentraeus</hi> otherwise thinke. Yet is it worth the noting
                     that <hi rend="italic">Iohn Montfort</hi> and his successors, although they
                     went about to have rent the dukedome of Britaigne from the kingdome of Fraunce,
                     yet as counties of Montfort and Virtus to have alwaies yeelded <pb n="119" facs="61"/> their fealtie unto the French kings, without exception, as we
                     read in the records, although <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> that they still
                     exercised in the countries of Britaigne certaine roialties granted them by the
                     king.</p><p>There is then great difference betwixt him which holdeth simply in fealtie and
                     homage (being himselfe no soueraigne, nor subiect unto him which is lord of the
                     fee) and him which is soueraigne of a countrey, and yet vassall to some other
                     lord for some fee; as of him which is in protection onely, or which is
                     tributarie unto a prince, hauing soueraigntie over his subiects, or which is
                     himselfe a naturall subiect. Wherfore<note place="marg" anchored="true">The prince that holdeth
                        of another, is himselfe no absolute Soueraigne.</note> we conclude, that
                     there is none but he an absolute soueraigne, which holdeth nothing of another
                     man; considering that the vassall for any fee whatsoeuer it be, be hee Pope or
                     Emperor, oweth personall seruice by reason of the fee which he holdeth. For
                     albeit <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> that this word <hi rend="italic">Seruice,</hi> in all matter of fees, and customes, is not preiudiciall vnto
                     the naturall libertie of the vassall; yet so it is, that it importeth a
                     certaine right, dutie, honor and reuerence that the vassall oweth unto the lord
                     of the fee: which is not indeed a seruitude reall, but is annexed and
                     inseperable from the person of the vassall, who cannot be therefrom freed, but
                     by quitting his fee: prouided yet, that hee bee no naturall subiect of the
                     lords of the fee, from whome he cannot discharge himselfe by renouncing his
                     fee.</p><p>Now when I say, that homage and personall seruice is inseperable from the
                        vassall;<note place="marg" anchored="true">Homage a personall seruice, and not to be
                        performed by a deputie.</note> that is so true, as that the vassall cannot
                     acquit himselfe thereof by his deputie or atturney, as was permitted by the
                     auntient lawes of fees; which in this point is abrogated <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> in Europe, and Asia; yea and in Italie it selfe from whence
                     the lawes of fees (as many thinke) first tooke their beginning. For <hi rend="italic">Lewes Sfortia,</hi> gouernour of Lombardie, sent his Agent
                     into Fraunce, to king <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the eight, to haue
                     obtained of him that his nephew the duke of Milan might by him be receiued to
                     do his homage by his deputie for the duchie of Genes: whereunto the king would
                     not condescend. And when question was made of taking of fealtie and homage of
                     the marques of Salusse, the court of Paris decreed, That his deputie shuld be
                     admitted in his name, if the king so thought it good; for that the marques
                     pretended himselfe to be sicke: yet with that condition, that so soone as he
                     was able he should come and doe it himselfe in person. The same hath also bene
                     oft times iudged in such like cases. But contrariwise the lord of the fee
                        <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> may constraine his vassall to yeeld his
                     fealtie and homage unto his deputie, as is commonly vsed. But if the vassall be
                     yet under age, or so young as that he yet wanteth understanding, he is to be
                     borne with for doing of his fealtie and homage, vntill he be of age to do it,
                     except it pleaseth the lord of the fee to receiue it by his deputie: As did
                     king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xj, who by <hi rend="italic">Philip
                        Commines</hi> his ambassador receiued fealtie &amp; homage of the mother of
                     young <hi rend="italic">Galeas</hi> duke of Milan, for the duchie of Genes, the
                     duke her sonne being under age, and paying fiftie thousand ducats for reliefe.
                     And for the same cause in the treatie made betwixt <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi>
                     the eleuenth, and <hi rend="italic">Maximilian</hi> archduke of Austria, in the
                     yeare 1482, in the 56 article it was expresly set downe, That the subiects on
                     both parts should be receiued to do their homage by their atturneies, which
                     otherwise <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> they should have bene constrained
                     themselves in person to have done, if they had not bene sicke, or had some
                     other iust and reasonable let; or that it was some bodie collegiat. For it much
                     concerneth the honour of the lord and patron, whether homage be done unto him
                     in the person of a king his vassall, or by some oeher base atturney or deputie.
                     And for this cause it was agreed in the treatie of Amiens, made betwixt <hi rend="italic">Philip the</hi> faire the French king, and <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> king of England, in the yeare 1303, That the king of England
                     should himselfe in persom come to do his fealtie and homage without exception,
                     if he were not otherwise letted by sicknesse without deceit: in which case <pb n="120" facs="62"/> he should send his eldest sonne to doe the fealtie in
                     his stead. And by another treatie <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> made in the
                     yeare 1330, betwixt <hi rend="italic">Philip Valois,</hi> and king <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> the third, it was also said, That the king of
                     England should in person come to doe his fealtie and homage, if he were not
                     without fraud by sicknesse letted; which ceasing, hee should then also come.
                     And by the treatie of peace, made in the yeare 1259, betwixt <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the ninth the French king, and <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the
                     second, king of England, it is expresly declared, That the king of England
                     should in person himself yeeld his fealtie &amp; liege homage unto the French
                     king. Which liege homage (as they tearme it) is of that force, as that the
                     person of no prince, pope, or emperour, is therein excepted. Now the forme of
                     the homage declared by the treatie, in the yeare 1331, betwixt <hi rend="italic">Philip Valois</hi> the French king, and <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> the third, is this: The king of England hauing his hands
                     ioyned, and put <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The forme of the homage made by the kings of England vnto
                        the kings of Fraunce.</note> betwixt the hands of the French king, the
                     Chauncel or of Fraunce for the French king, shall thus say unto the king of
                     England, <hi rend="italic">Thou shalt become a liege man to the king of
                        Fraunce, who here is, as duke of Guyenne, and peere of Fraunce, countie of
                        Poitou, and Monstrueil, and shalt promise to beare unto him faith and
                        loyaltie:</hi> Whereunto the king of England shall say, <hi rend="italic">I
                        consent thereunto:</hi> Then the king of Fraunce shall receiue the king of
                     England into his fealtie with a kisse. But the oath of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the king of Nauarre was more religious, when he yeelded his
                     fealtie unto <hi rend="italic">Charls</hi> the fift, the French king, in the
                     yeare 1370: for that he was not onely the French kings vassall, but his subiect
                     also, unto whome hee promised his faith and loialtie towardes and against all
                     men, which could live or die: albeit that he was then soueraigne king of
                     Nauarre, and pretended <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> a right unto the
                     soueraigntie of Berne, which yet resteth vndecided. The forme of the simple
                     homage done by <hi rend="italic">Iohn de Montfort, Arthure</hi> the second, and
                        <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> the second, dukes of Britaigne, is like,
                     excepting the word <hi rend="italic">Liege man.</hi> But for vassals which be
                     also subiects, the forme of fealtie is more religious &amp; precise, for that
                     they are bound with a double bond, whereas the forren vassals are not so. For
                     the king of England, <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> the third being come to
                     Amiens to doe his homage unto the king of Fraunce, refused to ioyne his hands
                     betwixt the hands of the king, and so returned into his kingdome, where it was
                     sixe moneths debated betwixt the French kings commissioners, and the assembly
                     of the estares, about the resolution for the forme of the homage: in fine, king
                        <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> thought it better to follow the prescript
                     forme, than to loose so many <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> benefits as he
                     then enioyed in Fraunce. But if the vassall be also a naturall subiect unto his
                     lord and patron, he is bound to lay by his sword, his gloues, his hat, his
                     cloke, his spurres, and upon his knees to put his hands ioyned together, into
                     the hands of his prince, or of his deputie, and so to take his oath: and by the
                     custome of this realme, if it pleaseth not the lord, he is not bound to be
                     present, or to kisse his vassall; but may (if he so please) being present, see
                     him in forme, as we have aforesaid, giue his fealtie and homage to some small
                     officer, or before his house, by kissing the hammer of his doore. But by the
                     customs of Vermandbis, the vassall is bound to do his fealtie unto his lord
                     being present; but if he be absent, it is sufficient for the vassall being
                     present, to cause it to be done by his atturney, least the honour of the
                     vassall should bee impaired by the <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> basenesse
                     of the person of his lords atturney. But if the vassall have thirtie heires,
                     every one of them is constrained to yeeld his fealtie unto his patron requiring
                     the same: as was long since prouided by the decree of <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the Victorious, the French king, in the yeare 1209. Yet some
                     vse another custome.</p><p>Shall we then say, a Vassall (that is to say another mans man) although he at
                        home<note place="marg" anchored="true">Homage a base &amp; seruile thing, and therefore
                        detested of honorable princes.</note> enioy a kingdome, to have a soueraigne
                     maiestie and power? Shall we call him that is bound to doe most vile seruices,
                     (and to vse the words of fealtie) him that serueth another man, shall we call
                     him, I say, a soueraigne prince? And that is it for which manie▪ <pb n="121" facs="62"/> honourable princes had rather to loose and forgoe right great
                     seignories, and their <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> most rich fees, than to
                     serue such a slauerie. And othersome againe, to the contrarie, would not sell
                     their soueraigntie for any thing in the world. As the prince of Orange refused
                     of king <hi rend="italic">Lewis</hi> the eleuenth, ten times so much as his
                     principalitie was worth, which stood him in more than hee receiued profit
                     thereby: And for the same cause <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> the third, king
                     of England, in the first article of the treatie of Bretigni expresly excepted,
                     that all royalties should be giuen unto himselfe in those countries which he
                     had by inheritance in Fraunce; least he should for them have beene enforced to
                     have yeelded fealtie and homage unto the French kings. Neither for any other
                     cause did <hi rend="italic">Stephen,</hi> Vayuod of Valachia, reuolt from the
                     kings of Polonia, but for that the king of Polonia had caused his tent to be
                     cast wide open at the same very instant that the <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> Vayuod was therein doing unto him his homage, that so he might be seene of
                     all men in doing of it. Which s<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ie disgrace the Vayuod
                     tooke in very euill part: which is not to be maruelled at in so great a lord as
                     he, if wee doe but consider, that <hi rend="italic">Calisthenes</hi> the nephew
                     of <hi rend="italic">Aristotle</hi> chose rather to loose his life, than after
                     the Persian guise, in humble and deuout manner upon his knees to honour <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the Great: albeit that <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> courteously tooke them up with a kisse that so honoured him.
                     Which was also an vsuall thing with the Romane emperours, when they gaue vnto
                     the kings that were in their protection, their scepters and diademes. For so
                        <hi rend="italic">Tiridates</hi> king of Armenia being come to Rome, humbled
                     himselfe upon his knee before the emperour <hi rend="italic">Nero,</hi> whom
                        <hi rend="italic">Nero</hi> taking by the hand, lift him up, kissed him, and
                     taking his turbant from off <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> his head, set
                     thereon a royall crowne, and caused him to sit on his right hand. For albeit
                     that the kingdomes were giuen by the Romane emperours without reseruation of
                     fealtie or homage, yet so it was, that the kings laying aside their scepters
                     and crownes, of their owne accord serued the Romane emperours, some as
                     seruitors in their chambers, othersome called themselves but the Romane
                     stewards, as <hi rend="italic">Adherball</hi> king of Numidia tearmed himselfe
                     nothing but the steward of the people of Rome. And <hi rend="italic">Eumenes</hi> king of Pergame after the discomfiture and death of <hi rend="italic">Mithridates</hi> king of Pontus<note place="marg" anchored="true">The wearing
                        of a cap was in auntient time the marke of them that were but lately made
                        free, to cover their heads that were shauen when they were slaues.</note>
                     came to Rome, and with a cap upon his head (in token of his late recouered
                     libertie) thanked the people of Rome for the same. But <hi rend="italic">Prusias</hi> king of Bithynia as oft as he went into the Senate, commonly
                     kissed the threshold of the gate, calling himselfe <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> the Senates slaue: albeit that he was neither subiect nor
                     tributarie, nor so much as in the Romanes protection, but ioyned unto them in
                     equall confederation. All these honours, were they neuer so great, proceeding
                     from their owne voluntarie will, did little or nothing at all diminish the
                     maiestie of a soueraigne prince, as doth that forme of homage which is seruile
                     and constrained, and which the Tartars, Persians, and Turkes esteeme to bee the
                     true seruice of a very slaue. And truly <hi rend="italic">Solyman</hi> the
                     Turkish king was about to have restored <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> king of
                     Hungarie into his kingdome in the yeare 1555, with condition to have holden the
                     same of him in fealtie and homage, without other subiection (as he by a Chiaus
                     his embassadour, certified <hi rend="italic">Sigismundus Augustus</hi> king of
                     Polonia) if king <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand,</hi> who pretended the kingdome
                        <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> of Hungarie to belong unto himselfe by
                     inheritance, had not letted him so to doe; as I have seene by the letters of
                        <hi rend="italic">Sanislaus Rosdrazeroski,</hi> a Polonian, written to <hi rend="italic">Anne Mommorancie</hi> constable of Fraunce the same yeare
                     1555. And for this cause <hi rend="italic">Francis</hi> the French king to
                     hinder that <hi rend="italic">Charlet</hi> of Austria should not bee chosen
                     emperour, declared unto the princes, Electors of the Empire, that the maiestie
                     of the Empire should be much debased, if they should of his vassall make their
                     head and Emperour: wherewith the emperour not a little moued, and afterwards at
                     the battell of Pa<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ie hauing taken him prisoner, would
                     neuer consent unto his deliverance, vntill hee had quite <pb n="122" facs="63"/> discharged the Low countries from the fealtie and homage wherein they were
                     before <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> bound unto the French.</p><p>But it seemeth that it is not enough to say, that <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> of Austria was vassall unto the crowne of Fraunce, but that he
                     was thereunto a liegeman also; and not onely a<note place="marg" anchored="true">Charles the
                        fift a naturall subiect of these French Kings▪</note> liegeman, but euen the
                     French kings naturall subiect; as borne &amp; brought up in Flanders, then a
                     prouince of the French kingdom: although many think the citie of Gaunt the
                     natiue place of <hi rend="italic">Charles,</hi> and the cities upon the sea
                     coast to have bene excepted. For the earles of Flaunders were alwaies accounted
                     peers of Fraunce, euen from the first beginning of that kingdome: and the
                     soueraigne roialties thereof, alwaies before reserued unto the same, but
                     especiallie at the solemne treatie of Arras betwixt <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the seuenth and <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the second duke
                     of Burgundie. Also <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift beeing chosen
                        <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> emperour, asked leaue of <hi rend="italic">Francis</hi> the French king, that hee might leuie of his subiects the
                     subsidie graunted him at Arras, in the yeare 1520; whereunto the kings aunswere
                     was, That he would therein do what he might, without diminishing in any thing
                     the right of his crowne: as I have seene by the instructions giuen to <hi rend="italic">M. De la Roche-Gaucourt</hi> at such time as hee was sent
                     ambassadour into Spaine. Although that greater causes might have beene
                     alleaged, which might have stayed German princes from the election of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift. For <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> of
                     Austria was as then<note place="marg" anchored="true">Charls the fift vassall and liegeman vnto
                        the pope and the Church of Rome.</note> not onely the vassall, liegeman, and
                     naturall subiect to the king of Fraunce, but also a liegeman unto the pope and
                     the church of Rome, for all the countries, lands, and seignories that he then
                     held, except that which he held of the crowne of Fraunce, or of the <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> empire; howbeit that he as then held nothing of the
                     empire, but the lands neere unto the Rhene, and Cambray: For <hi rend="italic">Arnold</hi> the last of that name, countie of Burgundie, gaue it with the
                     other countries to the emperor <hi rend="italic">Conrade</hi> the second, in
                     the yeare 1205, and after that, the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the
                     fourth gaue it to <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the sixt, the Dolphin, by
                     fealtie and homage, as appeareth by the inuestiture thereof in the treasure of
                     Fraunce, the copie whereof we have out of the records. But at such time as he
                        professed<note place="marg" anchored="true">The kingdom<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> of Naples
                        and Sicilie holden of the pope.</note> himselfe to be the liegeman of the
                     bishop of Rome, in his fealtie giuen for the kingdome of Naples, he then
                     promised by his oath, not to take upon him either the charge of the German
                     empire, if he were chosen emperour by the German princes; either of the
                     dukedome of Milan; and with these conditions gaue his fealtie and homage vnthe
                        <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> pope: which is not to be thought any new
                     clause, but an auntient condition, ioyned unto all the acts of fealtie and
                     homage giuen unto the pope by the kings of Naples and Sicilie, since the time
                     that pope <hi rend="italic">Vrban</hi> the fift, therin inuested <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> of France brother unto king <hi rend="italic">Lewes.</hi> And in the inuestiture of that kingdome, made by <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the fourth, unto <hi rend="italic">Edmond</hi>
                     the sonne of <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> king of England, in the yeare 1255,
                     the copie whereof we have written out of the Vatican records, are these words,
                        <hi rend="italic">Ego Henricus, Dei gratia Rex Angliae, nomine Edmundi filij
                        nostri Regis Siciliae, plenum &amp; ligeum vassallagium facio ecclesiae
                        Romana. viz.</hi> I <hi rend="italic">Henrie,</hi> by the grace of God king
                     of England, in the name of <hi rend="italic">Edmund</hi> our sonne, king of
                     Sicilie, yeeld full and liege homage unto the church of Rome, &amp;c. And in
                     the act of fealtie and liege homage giuen <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> by
                        <hi rend="italic">Robert</hi> king of Sicilie, in the 1338, he by oath
                     promised neuer to receiue the imperiall crowne, neither the dukedome of Milan,
                     nor any seignorie whatsoeuer in Tuscanie, upon paine of the losse of all such
                     right as he might pretend unto the kingdomes of Naples and Sicilie. The like is
                     also found giuen by <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> king of Naples, in the yeare
                     1295: and by queene <hi rend="italic">Ione</hi> in the yeare 1348, as I haue
                     read in the register of the Vatican. And for this onely cause pope <hi rend="italic">Iulius</hi> the second refused to inuest <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand</hi> king of Arragon, <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift the
                     emperours grandfather by the mothers side, in the kingdome of Naples, but upon
                     the conditions I have aforesaid: and a yearely <pb n="123" facs="63"/> rent of
                     eight thousand ounces of gold, or of foure score thousand crownes, which the
                        <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The ounce is worth ten crownes</note> kings of Naples were
                     bound to pay euerie yeare, and a white ambling gelding, beside the aid
                     expressed in the inuesture, with reseruation of the countie of Beneuent. Which
                     their obligation was of such consequence unto the popes, that so soone as they
                     denounced warre unto any, the kings of Naples were straight wayes in armes for
                     the defence of the Church of Rome. So <hi rend="italic">Alphonsus</hi> king of
                     Naples, at the denuntiation of pope <hi rend="italic">Sextus,</hi> made warre
                     upon the state of Florence, for that they had hanged the Cardinall of Pisa, the
                     popes Legat <hi rend="italic">a latere</hi> in his pontificalibus. And in our
                     time pope <hi rend="italic">Paulus</hi> the third by his Ambassadour <hi rend="italic">Alexander Farnesius,</hi> summoned the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift, being then with a great armie in
                     France, to make peace with the French king, so with their vnited forces to make
                     warre upon the Protestant princes, as was <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/>
                     agreed upon in the first article of the treatie of Soissons, made in September
                     in the yere 1544: which haply the emperour would not have done (hauing had his
                     armie but a little before by the French men ouerthrowne in Italie, and now with
                     doubtfull euent making warre in Fraunce) if he had not bene liege vassall vnto
                     the pope, &amp; by him threatned to loose the kingdoms of Naples and Sicilie,
                     as he was well giuen to vnderstand. Which the pope did, not so much moued with
                     the publike calamitie or troubled estate of the Church, as with the power of
                        <hi rend="italic">Charles,</hi> wherewith he was like to have subdued most
                     part of Europe, had hee not bene letted by the armes and power of the French.
                     And albeit that in the yeare 1528, by the treatie made betwixt pope <hi rend="italic">Clement</hi> the vij and his Cardinals, besieged in the castle
                     S. Angelo on the one side, and the emperour <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift on the other, it was set downe, That
                     the kings of Naples should for euer be acquited of the yerely rent of 8000▪
                     ounces of gold, and of all the arearages, which amounted unto great summes: yet
                     so it was, that all the rest of the pointes of the auntient inuestiture, still
                     stood in their former force and vertue. But euer since, the German emperours
                     have well knowne, and the pope better, (seeing Rome sacked, and himselfe put to
                     ransome of 400000 duckets, after he had released the fairest rights of S. <hi rend="italic">Peters</hi> demaine) what daunger it was to make choice of the
                     vassall of a soueraigne prince, and the natural subiect of another, to be head
                     of the Empire: For with the forces of Germanie he brought downe the pope, and
                     with the popes power hee ruinated the princes of Germanie. And albeit that by
                     the imperiall title hee held the duchies of <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>
                     Milan, of Gelders, and other seignories of the empire, yet so it is, that hee
                     was the popes antient vassall &amp; liege man, and so consequently to him first
                     bound, &amp; that more straitly unto the Church than to the empire. Ioine
                     hereunto also, that the popes have since<note place="marg" anchored="true">Pius Quintus the
                        pope angrie with Ferdinand the emperour for not recei<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ing of him the imperiall crowne.</note> this 300
                     yeres pretended that the emperor may not take upon him the empire, but hauing
                     before of them receiued the imperiall crowne; as pope <hi rend="italic">Pius</hi> the fift by his Legats sharply rebuked the emperour <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand,</hi> for that he had not of him receiued the
                     imperiall crowne, which his brother <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> had not
                     before doubted so to receiue; and had by excommunication compelled him so to
                     doe, had hee not by the intreatie of king <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> his
                     kinsman, and of the French king, otherwise appeased.</p><p>But heresome man will say, How could it be that the emperor <hi rend="italic">Charls</hi> the fift, should <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The same man cannot be liegeman to diuers princ<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>.</note> be liegeman unto the pope, the French king,
                     and the empire? seeing that no man can be liegeman unto many lords, although he
                     have many fees holden of them all separatly: For his faith and aid is due to
                     one alone, and him the first and chiefest, without exception of any man liuing.
                     And in case he be the vassall of many coheires for one and the same fee, he is
                     liegeman unto them all together, but not to any of them separatly, considering
                     that his fealtie cannot be divided; neither can he do his liege homage unto one
                     of them without exception, for the concurrence of the rest: yet truer it is,
                     his fealtie to be due unto one onely of his patrons, whome he shall make choice
                     of, if that <pb n="124" facs="64"/> his patrons cannot agree, or els to them
                     altogether; and that law we now vse. For the <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/>
                     condition of the vassall ought not to be made more hard, than if there were
                     unto one man, but one heire; but it should be much harder if he should bee
                     enforeed to doe many duties, many seruices, and many times to giue his faith:
                     and that much more the liege vassall, who cannot giue unto manie his faith
                     seuerally, without exception.</p><p>I here vnderstand the liege homage properly as it is to bee vnderstood in the
                     lawes of Fees; for that our auncestors have abused this word <hi rend="italic">Liege,</hi> in all their auntient treaties of alliance and oathes that they
                     made: I remember that I have seene 48 treaties of alliance, which our kings <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the v, and <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the v.
                     vj. vij. and <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xj, made with the three electors
                     on this side the Rhine, and diuers other the princes of the empire, wherein
                     they by oath sworne betwixt the hands of the kings deputies, solemnly
                        <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> promised to serue them in their warres
                     against all men, except the emperour, and the king of the Romans; vowing to be
                     their vassals and liege men, more or lesse; some calling themselves
                     councellours, some other pentioners, all liege vassals: except the Archbishop
                     of Treuers, Elector of the empire, who no otherwise called himselfe, but the
                     kings confederat, and not his vassall, although he receiued his pention from
                     the king, as did the other princes; who for all this held nothing of the crowne
                     of France, but were nothing but pentioners unto the French kings, to whome they
                     gaue their oath to aid them, at their charge, upon the conditions expressed in
                     their oathes. Onely the oath of the duke of Guelders, and countie of Iuliers, I
                     will for example set downe, that thereby men may iudge of the rest, in Latine
                     conceiued in these words, <hi rend="italic">Ego deuenio vassallus ligius</hi>

                     <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Caroli Regis Francorum, pro ratione quinquaginta millium
                        scutorum auri, ante festum D. Rhemigij mihi soluendorum, &amp;c. viz.</hi> I
                     become liege vassall of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the French king, for the
                     summe of fiftie thousand crownes of gold, to be paid unto mee before the feast
                     of S. <hi rend="italic">Rhemigius,</hi> &amp;c. This oath bore date in Iune, in
                     the yeare 1401. Yea, euen betwixt kings themselves leagues were oftentimes
                     conceiued in such words, as that the one of them professed himselfe to be the
                     others vassall. As in the league made betwixt <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> of
                     Valois the French king, and <hi rend="italic">Alphonsus</hi> king of Castile,
                     in the yeare 1336, it is said, <hi rend="italic">That they should giue and
                        receiue fealtie and homage the one of the other:</hi> which proceeding but
                     of the ignorance of their ambassadours, is now better vnderstood, as but an
                     abuse of the words <hi rend="italic">Vassall</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Liege:</hi> the oathes also of the kings pentioners,<milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> and their treaties, carrie no more such words.</p><p>Wherefore againe to returne from whence we have a little digressed. I say
                        then,<note place="marg" anchored="true">The vasia<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> ought first to
                        serue his most auntient Lord</note> that the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charls</hi> the fift could not yeeld his liege fealtie and homage unto the
                     pope without exception, considering that he was liege man, peere, and naturall
                     subiect unto the French king, and that the seruice and homage is inseparable
                     from the person. And admit he were not the kings subiect, but his liege man, or
                     not his liege man but his vassall onely; yet so it is, that in tearmes of right
                     the liege homage is due unto the most auntient, and that the vassall ought to
                     serue his most auntient Lord. But if the lords be equall, and yet at variance
                     amongst themselves for the seruice, hee oweth aid neither to the one nor to the
                     other: For that in matter of seruices or seruitude, the <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> seruice (for the indiuisible nature therof) is letted by the
                     concurrence of them to whom it is to be done. For amongst equals the condition
                     of him which forbiddeth (the seruice) is better: howbeit that in question of
                     simple alliance, the aid is due unto him that is wronged and inuaded in his
                     countrey against the other common allie which maketh warre upon him, as it
                     commonly falleth out if the assailant have no iust cause, and that after
                     denuntiation to him giuen by the common allies to come to some reasonable
                     agreement, he refuse so to doe.</p><p>But most certaine it is, that the naturall subiect ought alwayes to preferte
                     his naturall <pb n="125" facs="64"/> lord aboue all, if he bee present; as him
                     to whome he is first bound, &amp; from whom <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> he
                     cannot exempt himselfe. And therefore in the decrees of king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the eleuenth, and of <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the second,
                     duke of Burgundie, made for the order of Fraunce, the xiij article, and for the
                     order of the golden Fleece, the ix article, it is set downe, That the knights
                     of what prince soeuer it be, ought to aid their naturall lord, whose liege men
                     they are, and the countrey wherein they were borne, against him that shall make
                     war upon them, without any blemish to their honour; prouided that their
                     naturall lord be there in person, and not otherwise, and that they signifie so
                     much unto the chiefe of the order whereof they are knights. Whereby it
                     appeareth that the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift could not
                     giue his faith unto the electors of the empire, but with reseruation of his
                     fealtie unto the French king, and afterward unto the Pope. For beside the
                     kingdome <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> of Naples and Sicilie, holding of the
                     pope immediatly and without meane, hee was also his vassall and liege man for
                     the kingdome of Arragon, as I have red in the records taken out of the Vatican▪
                     where the graunt giuen by <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> king of Arragon is set
                     downe in these words, <hi rend="italic">Ego Petrus Dei gratia Rex Arragonum,
                        Comes Barcinonae, Dominus</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The act of the oath of the king of Arragon giue to the
                        pope.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">Montispessulani, cupiens praeter Deum, principali beati
                        Petri, &amp; Apostolicae sedis protectione mu<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ri,
                        tibi reuerendissime pater, &amp; Domine summe Pontifex Innocēti, &amp; pro
                        te, sacrosanctae Romanae Ecclesiae, &amp; Apostolicae sedi, offero regnum
                        meum: illudque tibi pro remedio animae meae primogenitorum meorum constituo
                        censuale, vt annuatim de Camera Regis ducenta quinquaginta Massimitinae
                        Apostolicae sedi reddantur: &amp; ego ac successores mei, specialiter &amp;
                        fideles &amp; obnoxi teneamur: hac autem lege perpetua seruandum forum</hi>

                     <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">decerno, quia spero &amp; confido, quod tu &amp; successores
                        tui, quali beati, Petri manibus in regem duxeris solemniter coronandum.
                        Actum Romae anno Christi</hi> 1204. In English thus: I <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> by the grace of God king of Arragon, Countie of Barcelona, Lord
                     of Montpelier, desiring next unto God to be strengthened with the principall
                     protection of blessed S. <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> and the Apostolicall See;
                     do offer unto thee most reuerent father and high Lord, Pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent,</hi> and for thee unto the most holy Church of Rome, and to the
                     Apostolicall See, my kingdome; and the same for the health of my soule and of
                     my predecessours, I make unto thee tributarie, so that out of the kings chamber
                     shall bee yerely paied unto the Apostolical See, two hundred &amp; fifty
                     Massimitines, &amp; that I and my successors shall be especially bound to be
                     (unto you) faithfull and subiect; and by <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> this
                     perpetuall law decree a court to be kept: for that my hope and trust is, that
                     thou &amp; thy successors shalt lead vs as it were with the hands of blessed
                        <hi rend="italic">Peter,</hi> to be solemnly crowned king. Enacted at Rome
                     in the yeare of Christ 1204. So that kingdome of Arragon was by the Arragonian
                     kings offered unto the Bishops of Rome, least they should for their enormities
                     and murders have bene well beaten. But the kingdomes of Sardinia and Corsica,
                     was by the popes giuen unto the kings of Arragon (as the popes guise is
                     bountifull to giue that is none of their owne) for which kingdome the Emperour
                     was also liege man unto the Pope, as I have scene by the inuestiture thereof
                     made unto <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi> the third, king of Arragon, in this
                     sort, <hi rend="italic">Pontifex Max de fratrum suorum ascensus,</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The inuestiture of the kingdomes of Sardinia and Corsica
                        granted by the pope.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">dat in feudum regnum Sardiniae &amp; Corsicae, proprietatē
                           ecclesi<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> Romanae &amp;c. Per capam</hi>

                     <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Auream te praesentialiter inuestimus, &amp;c. Ita tamen quod
                        tu &amp; successores tui, praestabitis homagium ligium, vassallagium plenum,
                        &amp; fidelitatis iuramentum, &amp;c. Et centū equites armatos, &amp; vno
                        equo ad arma, &amp; duobus equitaturis adminus per quēlibet, &amp;
                        quintagentis peditibus terrae vestrae de Arragonia, cum gagijs per
                        trimestre, a die quo intrabūt terrā Ecclesiae, &amp;c. Et in super censum
                        duorū milliū marcarū argenti bonorum, &amp; legaliū strelingorū:
                        vbicun{que} fuerit Romanus Pontifex in festo▪ beatorus Petri &amp; Pauli,
                        annis singulis, sub poena excommunicationis post quatuor menses, &amp;c.
                        &amp; post tertium terminum non solueris, tu haeredes{que} tui, a dicto
                        regno Sardiniae &amp; Corsicae cadetis ex toto, &amp; regnum ad Romanam</hi>

                     <pb n="126" facs="65"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">ecklesiam reuertetur. viz.</hi> The great bishop by the
                     assent of his bretheren, doth <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> giue in fee the
                     kingdome of Sardinia and Corsica, the inheritance of the church of Rome,
                     &amp;c. And we personally therein, inuest thee by a cape of gold, &amp;c. yet
                     so as that thou and thy successours shall therefore giue liege homage, full
                     vassalage, and oath of fidelitie, &amp;c. And an hundred armed horse-men, and
                     one horse for seruice, and two furnitures at the least for every one, and fiue
                     hundred foote-men of your country of Aragon, with pay for three moneths from
                     the day that they shall enter into the territorie of the church, &amp;c. And
                     moreover the rent of two thousand markes of good and lawfull sterling money,
                     wheresoeuer the pope shall be in the feast of the blessed Apostles, <hi rend="italic">Peter and Paul,</hi> euerie yeare, upon paine of
                     excommunication after foure moneths, &amp;c. and if after the third time thou
                     shalt not pay it, thou and thy <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> heires from the
                     said kingdome of Sardinia and Corsica, shall altogether fall; and the same
                     kingdome shall againe returne unto the church of Rome. And after that, <hi rend="italic">Iames</hi> king of Aragon, did also like homage at Valence,
                     betwixt the hands of the popes legate, in the yeare 1353, with reseruation vnto
                     the pope of appeales, put in by the clergie, and abolishing of the lawes and
                     customes brought in by the kings of that country. I finde also that <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand,</hi> and after him <hi rend="italic">Alphonsus,</hi> kings of Aragon, did the like fealtie and homage in the
                     yeare 1455. And in the publike records of the court of Rome, are to be seene
                     the names of the vassall kings set downe in this order: the kings of Naples,
                     Sicilia, Aragon, Sardinia, Hierusalem, England, Ireland, and Hungary. And this
                     is the old description of such princes as 380 yeres ago, yeelded their
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> fealtie &amp; homage unto the bishops of
                     Rome. And since the kingdom of Portugall, was<note place="marg" anchored="true">The kingdom of
                        Portugall holden of the pope.</note> by the valour of <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> of <hi rend="italic">Benonia,</hi> taken from the Moores, the
                     kings thereof made themselves vassalls unto the bishop of Rome, and payd the
                     yearely tribute of two thousand duckats into the bishop of Rome his treasure.
                     And therefore <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the fourth, bishop of Rome, by
                     his letters admonished the princes of the kingdome of Portugall, to appoint
                     ouerseers to their prodigall king, who should also take upon them the
                     gouernement of the kingdome. And as for the Islands of the <hi rend="italic">Canaries, Nigaries,</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The islands of the Canaries▪ holden of the pope.</note> and
                     the <hi rend="italic">Gorgonides;</hi> the emperour holdeth them also of the
                     pope. We also reade, that <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> king of Spaine, did
                     fealtie and homage unto the pope, in the yeare 1343, with charge to pay yearely
                     into the chamber of Rome, foure hundred florines of the <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> weight and coine of Florence. And as for the remainder of
                     the westerne Isles, and of Peru, it is certaine that pope <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the sixt, diuiding the new world betwixt the kinges of
                     Castile and Portugall, expresly kept unto himselfe the inheritance, the
                     iurisdiction and soueraignetie thereof, by consent of the two kings; who from
                     that time made themselves his vassalls, of all the purchases and conquests by
                     them already gained, and that they should from that time forward, gaine or
                     make, as the Spaniards themselves have written. In like manner pope <hi rend="italic">Iulius</hi> the second, gaue unto <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand</hi> king of Spaine, <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift, his
                     grandfather by the mothers side, the kingdomes of <hi rend="italic">Granado</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Nauarre;</hi> when he had driuen the
                     Moores out of the one, and <hi rend="italic">Peter D'Albret</hi> out of the
                     other, upon condition to hold them by fealty and homage of the <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> church of Rome. For albeit that <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift, the emperor pretended right unto the kingdome of <hi rend="italic">Nauarre,</hi> by reason of the donation to him made by <hi rend="italic">Germaine D'Foix,</hi> second wife unto king <hi rend="italic">Ferdinande:</hi> yet so it was, that his ambassadours and deputies, when
                     they came to the conference, seeing that their donation to want sure
                     foundation, doubted not to pretend the popes interdictions, as the surest stay
                     of their most vniust rapines. And the cause of the interdiction was, for that
                        <hi rend="italic">Peter Albret,</hi> king of <hi rend="italic">Nauarre,</hi>
                     would not at the command of pope <hi rend="italic">Iulius</hi> the second,
                     breake faith and friendship with <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xij, the
                     French king, who was first called father of his country, when as hee <pb n="127" facs="65"/> was king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> his liege vassall,
                     and no way bound unto the pope. So that there remained <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The maiestie of Charles the fift impugned by this French
                        author.</note> no kingdome, no not any little territorie or peece of ground,
                     which <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the emperour held not by fealtie aud
                     homage, or whereof he could call himselfe a soueraigne. For as for the Islands
                     of Maiorca and Minorca, they were long time before reunited unto the kingdome
                     of Aragon, after that they were taken from the heires of <hi rend="italic">Iames</hi> the Fortunate. And in the Low-countries, he had nothing which
                     was not of necessitie holden of the crowne of France, or of the empire. And
                     albeit that our princes have by diuers leagues, granted the principalitie of
                     Flanders and Artoise unto <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the emperour, yet
                     remaineth there a country in Burgundie, which they call the countie of
                     Charrolois, the proprietie whereof belongeth unto the king of Spaine, but the
                     soueraignetie thereof unto the French king, and is by the king of Spaine holden
                     in fealty:<milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> so that euen for that, he is to
                     ackdowledge himselfe to be our kings vassall. As for<note place="marg" anchored="true">Title
                        pretended by the French unto the kingdom of Castile.</note> the kingdome of
                     Castile, no man doubteth (which hath but looked into the Spanish affaires) but
                     that the kingdome of Castile by inheritance, descended unto king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the ix. of France, in the right of <hi rend="italic">Blanch</hi> his mother: yea, and the nobilitie of Castile by
                     solemne acts, which are yet extant in the records of France, inuited king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> to have taken upon him his mothers kingdome.
                     Howbeit I doubt not, but that the Spaniards will reply, that <hi rend="italic">Blanch,</hi> the daughter of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the ix. married
                     the king of Castile, upon condition that all such right unto the kingdome, as
                     might have fallen unto her father, should now be giuen unto his sonne in law:
                     which thing <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> could not doe unto the preiudice of
                     his successours; without the consent of the states: ioyning therevnto
                        <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> also that the French kings daughters or
                     sisters, when they are bestowed and married, can receiue nothing but money of
                     the royall possessions of the crowne of France▪ And albeit that some may thinke
                     that the French king might giue those lands unto his daughter, as not yet
                     vnited or incorporate into the crowne of France; yet neuerthelesse there is yet
                     extant in the records of France, a league made in the yeare 1369, betwixt king
                        <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift and <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi>
                     king of Castile, then driuen out of his kingdome, whereby I have seene, that
                        <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> promised as well for himselfe, as for his
                     successours, to become vassall, and to hold his kingdome of Castile, of the
                     kings of Fraunce: for that by the meanes of the king of France, he was againe
                     restored into his kingdome. Seeing then that the kingdome of Castile is
                     hereditarie descending unto the heires <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> both
                     males and females, the successours of <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> are bound
                     unto his deedes and promises. True it is, that the promise of <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> had not power to preiudice his successours, neither the estates
                     of Castile, without the consent of whom, the treatie was made, if the realme of
                     Castile had not beene hereditarie. But of the kingdome of Fraunce, it is
                     otherwise to be thought and determined. And therefore it was by the wise
                     resolued, that <hi rend="italic">Phillip</hi> the Faire, the French king, could
                     not make <hi rend="italic">Arthur</hi> duke of Britaine, vassall unto the king
                     of England, without the dukes consent; except he would by the same right, giue
                     up his kingdome of France unto the king of England, which he could by no
                     soueraigne power doe, without the consent of the estates of France. For
                     otherwise, his yeelding of it up, should be to none effect or purpose, no more
                     then that of king <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi>

                     <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> of Fraunce, made unto the king of England in
                     the treatie at Calais, wherein he without<note place="marg" anchored="true">The author haply is
                        in this partiall, or <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/> mistaken.</note> consent of the
                     states, yeelded unto the king of England, all the right and title he had in the
                     kingdome of France: which was againe disanulled by the treatie of <hi rend="italic">Chartres,</hi> whereby the king of England refused that right
                     giuen unto him by such yeelding up. The same is to be thought of the league of
                     Tricasse, wherein <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the sixt, without the consent
                     of the states, yeelded the kingdome of France unto <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi>
                     the fi<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>t, king of England. And therefore pope <hi rend="italic">Martine</hi> could by no request of the English, be perswaded
                     to ratifie that league, but called <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the seauenth,
                     sonne to <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the sixt, <pb n="128" facs="66"/> by
                     the name of the French king: for that the kingdome of Fraunce is neither
                     deuolued <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> by right of succession, (which they
                     tearme from one intestate,) neither by testament, neither by resignation, but
                     by vertue of the law royall, from which the kings themselves cannot derogat
                     without the consent of the estates; which is not so in the kingdomes of Spaine,
                     England, Scotland, Naples, and Nauarre.</p><p>But cannot the imperiall title (may some man haply say) make him a soueraigne
                     which is another mans vassall? As the prince or the people making a slaue a
                     magistrat seemeth thereby to have also enfranchised him; whereof there is no
                     doubt, if he be the princes or the peoples slaue; for otherwise it is not
                     lawfull either for the prince, or for the people, to dispose of another mans
                     seruant: so neither have the German princes any power over other mens citisens
                     or subiects, such as was <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift. Ioyne
                     hereunto <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The emperour n<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> absolute
                        soueraigne.</note> to also, that the imperiall title of the emperour
                     carrieth with it no soueraigntie: albeit that the emperour writing unto the
                     princes of the empire, vse these wordes, <hi rend="italic">Wee command you,
                        &amp;c. You shall do this, &amp;c.</hi> which other princes do not toward
                     their own subiects: yea and that more is, that the princes electors carrie the
                     titles of Butlers, Esquiers, and Tasters to the emperour, yet the soueraigntie
                     of the empire resteth not in the person of the emperour, but in the assemblie
                     of the states of the empire, who are able to giue law unto the emperour, and to
                     euerie prince of the empire in particular, in such sort as that the emperour
                     hath not power to make any particular edict, neither peace nor warre, neither
                     to charge the subiects of the empire so much as with one impost, nor to call or
                     dismisse the diets of the empire, without the consent of the princes. And
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> that is it for which the emperour <hi rend="italic">Maximilian</hi> the first, at the diet of Constance, holden in
                     the yeare 1507, said unto the estates (the popes legat then vrging that the
                     imperiall crowne was both to be requested and receiued of the pope,) That to
                     take the imperiall crowne of the pope was but a needlesse ceremonie, seruing to
                     no purpose; considering that the imperiall authoritie and power depended of the
                     estates of the empire: which in due place we will more particularly
                     declare.</p><p>Whereby a man may easily iudge, that there are few or none absolute
                        soueraigne<note place="marg" anchored="true">No prince in Italie which holdeth not of the
                        pope, or of the empire.</note> princes. For the Venetian Commonweale
                     excepted, there are no princes or Commonweals in Italie, which hold not of the
                     empire, the pope, or the crowne of Fraunce: which concerning the kingdome of
                     Sicilie and Naples, we have alreadie declared. As <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> for the duke of Milan he is a naturall vassall of the
                     empire, from which hee taketh his<note place="marg" anchored="true">The duke of Milan.</note>
                     inuesture, and thereto payeth reliefe: for which the emperour <hi rend="italic">Maximilian</hi> the first, in lesse than xv, or xvj yeares space, drue
                     thence unto himselfe, aboue three hundred thousand pounds: For king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the twelfth at one time paid therfore an hundred
                     thousand pounds: and the Sforces had it no better cheape. For they which are
                     now called dukes of Milan, in the remembrance of our auncestors, that is to say
                     about an hundred and fiftie yeares agoe, were called but lieutenants, and the
                     citie it selfe but the ordinarie chamber of the empire. And so namely <hi rend="italic">Iohn Galeace</hi> the second, and <hi rend="italic">Barnabas</hi> his brother, in the inuestiture which they had from the
                     emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth, are simply called
                     lieutenants of the empire. And <hi rend="italic">Galeace</hi> the first being
                     accused for charging <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> the subiects with
                     subsidies, without the emperours leaue, was by a decree from the emperour sent
                     prisoner unto the castle of Modene; where after he had of long time lived, he
                     at length died; whose sonne <hi rend="italic">Actius</hi> being by the emperour
                        <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> of Bauyere put into his fathers place, for the
                     summe of an hundred thousand crownes, obtained of him the first title of a
                     prince, in the yeare 1338. And after that, <hi rend="italic">Galeace</hi> the
                     third, father in law to <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> duke of Orleans, payed
                     unto the emperour <hi rend="italic">Fredericke</hi> the third, an hundred
                     thousand florines, for the honour and title of a duke, in the yeare one
                     thousand three hundred ninetie seuen.</p><p><pb n="129" facs="66"/>So say we also of the duke of Mantua, who acknowledgeth
                     himselfe to hold of the <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/><note place="marg" anchored="true">The duke of Mantua.</note> Germaine empire, and to be also a
                     prince thereof.</p><p>As for the duke of Ferrara he confesseth euen at this present to hold part of
                     his seignorie,<note place="marg" anchored="true">The duke of Ferrara.</note> euen Ferrara it
                     selfe, of the pope, and therefore payeth a yearely rent or fee into the popes
                     coffers. For not long ago, <hi rend="italic">viz.</hi> in the yeare 1372, the
                     marques of Este was by pope <hi rend="italic">Gregory</hi> first established
                     his lieutenant in the city of Ferrara, reseruing unto the church fealtie and
                     homage, iurisdiction and soueraigntie; with condition also, that he should
                     yearely pay ten thousand florens of gold into the chamber of S. <hi rend="italic">Peter,</hi> and to find an hundred men at armes paied for
                     three monethes, for the defence of the Church of Rome, so often as need should
                     require, as I have learned out of the Vatican records. And as for Rhegium and
                     Modene, he acknowledgeth him to hold them of the empire:<milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> albeit that pope <hi rend="italic">Iulius</hi> the second
                     maintained them to be the Church fees, and in that quarrell made warres upon
                     the Ferrariens and the French king, who gaue them aide: as also to have the
                     entire reuenue of the fee, beeing before diminished by pope <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the sixt, in marrying his base daughter <hi rend="italic">Lucrece</hi> unto the duke <hi rend="italic">Alphonsus.</hi> And true it
                     is, that the French kings long since tooke upon them the defence and patronage
                     of the prince of Ferrara, since the time that <hi rend="italic">Borsus,</hi>
                     first duke of Ferrara, acknowledged himselfe liege vassall unto <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the sixt, and therfore it was unto him permitted,
                     that those dukes of Ferrara might beare the armes of Fraunce, the publike acts
                     whereof yet remaine in the records of Fraunce.</p><p>As concerning the Florentines, they of long time have pretended libertie
                     against the <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The Florentine<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>

                     </note> empire, for the payment of sixe thousand Florines unto the emperour <hi rend="italic">Rodolphe.</hi> As also do the Genowayes, who as they say, were
                     by the same emperour enfranchised. How<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Genowayes.</note>
                     be it that afterwards they hauing receiued great harme from the Venetians, gaue
                     themselves into protection unto king <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the sixt,
                     the French king: and not long after unto the duke of Milan, who receiued them
                     upon condition that they should therefore do fealtie and homage unto the French
                     kings.</p><p>In like case they of Luca paied unto the emperour <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi>
                     the fift, twelue thousand Florines to be enfranchised; Sienna ten thousand; And
                        <hi rend="italic">Peter Gambecourt</hi> payed twelue thousand unto the
                     emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth for the seignorie of
                     Pisa.</p><p>But these were not true alienations, nor exemptions from subiection; but rather
                        <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> simple graunts and gifts, with certaine
                     priueleges to gouerne their estate, under the obeisance<note place="marg" anchored="true">That
                        a prince cannot alienat any thing of the publike demaine but that his
                        successors may again resume the same.</note> of the empire. It was not also
                     in the power of the emperours, neither of any prince whatsoeuer, to alienat any
                     thing of the publike demaine, and much lesse of the rights of the soueraigne
                     maiestie, but that it was alwayes in the power of the successour to lay hand
                     thereon againe, as it is lawfull for the lord to lay hold uppon his fugitiue
                     slaue. As the emperour <hi rend="italic">Maximilian,</hi> hauing thrust his
                     armie into Italie, with the power of king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xij,
                     and hauing brought a great feare upon all the cities of Italie, gaue them well
                     to vnderstand: At which time the Florentines sent their ambassadors unto him,
                     to yeeld unto him fealtie and homage for their estate, and to obtaine of him
                     the confirmation of their priueleges, which cost them fortie thousand ducats.
                     And albeit <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> that <hi rend="italic">Cosmus</hi>
                     duke of Florence, by force of armes made himselfe lord of Sienna: yet so it
                     was, that he tooke the inuestiture therof, &amp; yeelded therfore sealtie &amp;
                     homage unto the king of Spaine, as perpetuall lieutenant of the empire. Which
                     is sufficient reason to show, that they of Sienna were not before enfranchised
                     or exempted from the empire; or if they were, why did then pope <hi rend="italic">Iulius</hi> the second pay thirtie thousand ducats to <hi rend="italic">Maximilian</hi> the emperour, to redeeme of him the libertie
                     of Sienna, to the intent to inuest therein <note n="*" place="marg" anchored="true"><gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/>.</note> the duke of Vrbin. And yet neuerthelesse all
                     that letted not, but that the duke of Florence, which had conquered it by force
                     of armes, was constrained <pb n="130" facs="67"/> to take the inuestiture
                     thereof of the king of Spaine, and to pay therefore <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> sixe hundred thousand crownes, which afterwards the king of
                     Spaine would have againe repayed unto the duke of Florence, to have restored
                     Sienna into the former estate; which he would not do, being enformed that the
                     king of Spayne would have giuen it to the duke of Parma, to reunite Placence
                     and Parma unto the duchie of Milan, from whence they had bene before
                     distracted. And how then could the German emperours, which are subiects vnto
                     the estates of the empire, alienat the demaine and rights of soueraigntie, in
                     giuing the rights of soueraigntie unto the cities of Italie, or libertie vnto
                     the tributarie people; seeing that the absolute soueraigne prince cannot so do?
                     no not so much as to distract one clod of the publike land, much lesse to giue
                     away the proprietie. For kings and other great princes (to say truely) have not
                     the proprietie <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> of the publike demaines, nay
                     not so much as the whole vse and profit: for that<note place="marg" anchored="true">That
                        princes have not the proprietie of the publike demaine but onely the bare
                        vse.</note> contenting themselves with the bare vse, the rest belongeth vnto
                     the common-weale. And for that cause the Emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth, granting the confirmation of the priuileges to
                     them of Perouze, ioyned thereunto this clause, <hi rend="italic">Quoad vi<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>eret:</hi> So long as he should live. And yet for
                     all that pope <hi rend="italic">Iulius</hi> the second tooke that towne from
                     the Baillions, and put it under the obeysance of the Church, from whence it was
                     said to have bene taken. And how could the cities of Italie, or duke of
                     Florence, have any absolute soueraigntie, seeing that for all differences and
                     controuersies concerning their estates, frontiers, demaines, and tenures, they
                     plead the same before the emperour, or at least wise in the imperiall chamber,
                     where their causes are decided, and they enforced <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> to doe as is there adiudged. And albeit that they of Genes,
                     who seemed to hold lesse of the empire than any one of the other townes of
                     Italie, where by the marques of Finall (whome they had driuen out of his
                     estate) summoned before the emperour <hi rend="italic">Maximilian</hi> the
                     second, in the yeare 1559: and that they would receiue the emperour as an
                     arbitratour, and not as a judge or a superiour: yet so it was, that the
                     emperour taking upon him the authoritie of a iudge, caused them before warned,
                     to be summoned, and when that after many peremptorie edicts they made not their
                     appearance, he pronounced sentence against them, and by an herault at armes
                     threatned to proscribe the territorie of Genes if they obeyed not his censure.
                     Now most certaine it is, that there is none but the cities and townes which
                     hold of the empire, that can be proscribed by <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">Genes threatned by Maximilian the Emperor.</note> the
                     imperiall proscription, whether it be by sentence of the emperour, or by decree
                     of the imperiall chamber. For the imperiall chamber could not have proscribed
                     Minde, Munster, Magdeburg, and others, had they not bene contained within the
                     bounds and power of the German empire: much lesse could the emperour haue
                     proscribed Genes, if it had not bene within the power of the Germans. And
                     therfore when they of Genes had appealed from the interlocutorie sentence of
                        <hi rend="italic">Maximilian</hi> unto the pope, they afterwards renouncing
                     their appeale, yeelded to the sentence, acknowledging the iurisdiction and
                     soueraigntie of the empire. And so at length the emperour gaue sentence for the
                     marques, acknowledging himselfe to be a vassal unto the German empire, whome
                     they of Genes would have had to have bene thiers. And since that the marques
                        <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> hath by that definitiue sentence bene
                     maintained in possession of his marquisat, as I have seene by the letters of
                     Signior <hi rend="italic">D'la Forest,</hi> embassadour for the king, dated at
                     Vienna the xviij of Iuly, in the yeare 1560: which iudgement the emperour gaue
                     after he had seene the opinions of the lawyers of foure vniuersities. And not
                     long after they were by another sentence of the same emperours, giuen in the
                     moneth of Iuly, in the yeare one thousand five hundred sixtie foure, condemned
                     in a processe which they had against <hi rend="italic">Anthonie Flisque,</hi>
                     by them banished, who ouerthrew them by an appeale made unto the emperour.</p><p><pb n="131" facs="67"/>Which things although they bee so plaine as that there
                     ought thereof to bee no <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> doubt, but that the
                     cities of Italie on this side the riuers Rubicon and Tiber, excepting some few,
                     are contained within the bounds of the German empire, &amp; so have of
                     themselves no soueraigntie; yet is the same made more euident by the generall
                     consent of all the lawyers of Italie, who deny it to be lawfull for any cities
                     of Italie to make any lawes or customes, contrarie or derogatorie to the Roman
                     laws, published by the commaundement of the emperour <hi rend="italic">Frederick.</hi> And that the cities of Italie either had no right of
                     soueraintie at al, or else renounced the same, it is manifest by that league
                     which was made in the citie of Constance; for in that league among such
                     priueleges as are confirmed unto the cities of Italie, the rights of
                     soueraignty are expresly excepted. And therfore <hi rend="italic">Alexander
                        Imolensis</hi> of all the lawyers of his time the most skilful, saith, A
                     certaine <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> iurisdiction to be thereby giuen vnto
                     the cities of Italie; but not the rights of maiestie or soueraigntie to be
                     therefore unto them graunted, and that euen for that reason, for that the
                     cities doubting or disagreeing about their right, the emperours were wont to
                     appoint them judges and commissioners for the deciding of their
                     controuersies.</p><p>Much lesse therefore may the imperiall townes and cities contained within
                        the<note place="marg" anchored="true">The imperial townes and cities subiect unto appeales
                        made unto the imperiall chamber</note> bounds of the German empire, pretend
                     themselves to have any soueraigntie, albeit that we see certaine of them to
                     boast of a certaine show of libertie, which they of old receiued from the
                     emperors; as Nuremberg from the emperour <hi rend="italic">Fredericke</hi> the
                     first; Isne from <hi rend="italic">Otho</hi> the third; Egre from <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> of Bauyere: yea and some of them there were, which
                     not able longer to endure the hard bondage of their lords, princes of the
                        <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> empire, set themselves at libertie, as did
                     the cities of Vlme, Brunswic, Lubec, and others: but that which they call
                     libertie, is but an old vacation from certaine seruices, and an immunitie from
                     customes and tributes graunted by the emperours, without any impeachment to
                     their maiestie. And therefore those cities which I have spoken of, honour the
                     maiestie of the German empire, receiue from it lawes, obey the magistrats
                     thereof, accept of the decrees of the imperiall chamber, and of the assemblies
                     of the empire: and not onely publique and priuat iudgements of princes and
                     cities among themselves, but also the priuat iudgements of particular men are
                     decided by the imperiall chamber, if appellation be made from the sentence
                     which exceedeth the summe of fiftie crowns. Seeing therefore that the imperiall
                     chamber may of the power of it selfe <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> confirme
                     or disanull the iudgements of princes or cities, it must needs follow, that
                     neither those prinees nor cities have the power of soueraigne maiestie: For as
                     a certaine Poet (I know not who) saith,</p><quote defective="false">Rescindere nunquam Dijs licet acta Deûm.</quote><quote defective="false">It is not lawfull for the Gods the acts of Gods t'vndoe.</quote><p>As for the Swissers Commonweals, we said before, them to have bene rent from
                        the<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Swissers Commonweal<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> to
                        be subiect either to the Empire or the king of France.</note> German empire,
                     as oppressed with the tirannnie of their gouernours: and yet they so honour and
                     reuerence the maiestie of the German empire, as that they in generall requested
                        <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> of the emperour <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand,</hi> to have the libertie of their priueleges unto them
                     confirmed: which is a certaine forme of auntient fealtie, and acknowledgement
                     that they hold their libertie of the empire. And albeit that some there be on
                     this side the Rhene, which vaunt themselves to have soueraigne power over their
                     subiects, yet must they needs be the subiects and vassals either of our kings,
                     or of the German empire. For there is no man which knoweth not (if he remember
                     the antiquitie of the French) that all the countrey of Loraine, and the realme
                     of Arles, after the death of the three children of <hi rend="italic">Lothaire</hi> were divided betwixt the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the Bauld of Fraunce, <pb n="132" facs="68"/> and <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> king of Germanie his brother. As Vitald, Floard,
                     and Lambert the best <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> antiquaries do in their
                     histories at large declare. Now so it is that the vassall can neuer prescribe
                     for his homage towards his lord, nor the subiect against the iurisdiction of
                     his prince; and that the graunts and sufferances of the emperour, and the kings
                     of France could not preiudice either the crowne or the empire: wherfore we must
                     conclude these possessours of this maiestie by sufference, to bee subiects and
                     vassals either unto ou<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> kings, or to the German
                     empire.</p><p>And albeit that many thinke the duke of Loraine to be an absolute soueraigne,
                        by<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Duke of Loraine no absolute Soueraigne, but vassall
                        of the German empire.</note> reason of the Armes that he beareth, being an
                     armed arme, saying, as it should seeme, That he holdeth nothing but of the
                     sword: yet neuerthelesse so it is, that in his title he calleth himselfe a
                     prince of the empire; which is indeed to acknowledge the imperiall <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> maiestie. Ioyne thereunto also, that he hath vsually
                     receiued judges from the imperial chamber, and submitted himselfe to the
                     iurisdiction thereof. For as for that that hee is the last among the German
                     princes, nor in their ceremonies holdeth not the place of the auntient dukes of
                     Loraine; that is, for that he holdeth but a little, <hi rend="italic">viz.</hi>
                     scarce the sixt part of the auntient duchie of Loraine (a prouince of the
                     German empire) which containeth all that countrey which lyeth betwixt the riuer
                     of the Maze and the Rhene. And therefore the dukes of Brabant, and the German
                     emperours, called themselves dukes of Loraine. So the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth, in the league which he made with <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> the French king, calleth himselfe duke of Loraine.
                     But this countrey which now is called Loraine, is a part of the German empire
                     and the duke himselfe a vassall <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> of the empire.
                     For <hi rend="italic">Stephen</hi> countie of Boulongne, was in that dukedome
                     inuested by the emperour <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the first, and for that
                     cause acknowledged himselfe a vassall of the empire, in the yeare 1019. And <hi rend="italic">Frederick</hi> of Loraine countie of Vaudemont, duke <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> being dead without heire male, before <hi rend="italic">Sigismund</hi> the emperour and the fathers assembled at
                     Constance, claimed that dukedome of right to belong unto him, as next of kin;
                     for that it was an imperiall fee, whereof <hi rend="italic">Isabel</hi> duke
                        <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> his heire, who had married <hi rend="italic">Renat</hi> duke of Aniou, was not (as he said) capable: which <hi rend="italic">Renat</hi> denyed it not to be an imperiall fee, but shewed
                     many such imperiall fees to have descended unto the daughters. And afterward
                     the title comming to be tryed by the sword, <hi rend="italic">Renat</hi> being
                     ouerthrowne and taken prisoner by <hi rend="italic">Frederick,</hi> could not
                     be before delivered, vntill <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> that he had
                     married his daughter <hi rend="italic">Yoland</hi> unto <hi rend="italic">Anthonie</hi> the sonne of <hi rend="italic">Frederick,</hi> with
                     condition, that if <hi rend="italic">Renat</hi> died without heires male, the
                     duchie of Loraine should descend unto the heires of <hi rend="italic">Frederick,</hi> &amp; so unto the house of Vaudemont, as it is come to
                     passe.</p><p>Now if so it be that the dukedome of Loraine be an imperiall fee,
                        comprehended<note place="marg" anchored="true">The duchie of Lor<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ine deuolued unto the counties of Vaudemont.</note> within the bounds of
                     the German empire: neither the lord of Lumes nor the countie of Aspremont, who
                     are contained within the precinct of Loraine, can chalenge unto themselves any
                     right of soueraigntie, as they have done, seeing that it is plaine by the law,
                     that he which hath a limited territorie, hath but the same right over euerie
                     one of his subiects which are within the compasse of his territorie, that hee
                     hath over them all in generall; except it appeare, him by some speciall
                     priuiledge to be free and from the <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> generall
                     expresly exempted. By which reason all such as pretend a soueraigntie, being
                     enclosed within the bounds and territorie of another man, may bee thereof
                     debarred: which a man cannot so easily iudge of them, which in the frontiers of
                     kingdomes, take upon them a kinde of soueraigne power; as do the five lords or
                     princes in the confines of Burgundie, whome both the free counties, and the
                     dukes have oftentimes chalenged for their vassals: and for the soueraigntie of
                     whome, at such times as they had taken up armes, they obtained of the generals
                     of both parts, that in the meane time they beeing free might be as newters,
                     vntill the euent of the warre had decided the cause: and so at <pb n="133" facs="68"/> length abusing the long possession of soueraigntie, made of that
                     their right, which <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> they had but by sufferance,
                     a perpetuitie: but as we have oftentimes before said, so wee must hereafter
                     oftentimes say, That neither the right of soueraigne maiestie, nor the<note place="marg" anchored="true">The right sou<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>raigntie and libertie
                        not to be prescribed agai<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>st.</note> right of
                     libertie, can by the client or vassall be prescribed against: and much lesse if
                     it be withholden by concealement or by sufferance. In like sort the countrey of
                     Bearne, betwixt the confines of Fraunce and Nauarre, which the kings atturney
                     generall in the court of Paris maintained to be a prouince holden of the crowne
                     of Fraunce, and disallowed of the plea of the kings atturney of the parliament
                     of Thoulouze, who had confessed it not to hold of the crowne, in the yeare
                     1505; which although it remaine vndecided, yet the king of Nauarre for all that
                     by sufference holdeth it in soueraigntie. In like case the principalitie of
                     Dombes was maintained by <hi rend="italic">Lizet</hi> the kings
                        atturney,<milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> to hold in fee of the crowne of
                     Fraunce, and that the duke of Sauoy had no power to giue it to the empire,
                     under the colour of being the emperours lieutenant, which hee showed to be done
                     in the most wofull times of the civill warre, when as the dukes of Orleans and
                     Burgundie had drawne all the whole kingdome into parts, in the yeare 1398: in
                     like manner the princes of East Frizeland, and they which hold the territory
                     betwixt England and Scotland, which they call the Batable ground: as also the
                     abbot of Gosen, betwixt Metz and Pont a Mousson, who holdeth the abbey and
                     twenty five villages, in title of soueraigntie, without acknowledging any
                     superior lord whatso. euer: as also the lords of Beauieu, willing to
                     exempt▪themselves from the crowne of Fraunce, yeelded themselves unto the
                     empire, and so by the duke of Sauoy, the emperours <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> lieutenant, were receiued into the protection of the empire,
                     from which they also by little and little exempted themselves, without
                     acknowledging either duke, king, or emperour for their soueraigne.</p><p>As for the dukes of Sauoy, the Italian doctors with one common errour haue
                        holden<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Duchie of Sauoie to hold of the empire.</note>
                     them to have absolute power and soueraigntie, and to have so beene iudged by
                     the decree of the parliament of Sauoy: a thing altogether contrarie unto the
                     office of a lieutenant and vassall. And also <hi rend="italic">Osazque</hi> the
                     first president of Piemont writeth, That the dukes of Sauoy have obtained this
                     power of the emperors, which they could not have as lieutenants of the empire;
                     as <hi rend="italic">Felinus</hi> the best interpretor of the law hath most
                     truly written. For what can be more contrarie unto soueraigne maiestie, than to
                     professe <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> ones selfe to be another mans deputie
                     or officer, (for so the name of a lieutenant doth signifie) or from whom
                     shouldest thou think thy selfe to have the power of soueraigntie in that
                     prouince wherein thou thy selfe bearest rule? But euen the dukes of Sauoy
                     themselves confesse, and all their histories declare, this prouince of the
                     German empire which is now called Sauoy, to have bene a fee of the same empire,
                     erected into a countie (holden of the empire in fealtie) by <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> the fi<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>t; and afterwards into a duchie
                     by the emperour <hi rend="italic">Sigismund.</hi> And euident it is the dukes
                     alwayes heretofore, and not long since duke <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi>
                     restored unto his countrey, to have yeelded fealtie and homage unto the
                     emperour: and two yeares after, <hi rend="italic">viz.</hi> in the yeare 1561,
                     to have sent speciall letters of atturney unto the countie <hi rend="italic">D'Arques</hi> chiefe chamberlaine to the emperour, to <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> obtaine for him of the emperour another inuestiture: for
                     because that that which hee had before taken at <hi rend="italic">Ausburg,</hi>
                     seemed not unto him in sufficient good forme, as I have seene by the letters of
                        <hi rend="italic">M. D'la Forèst,</hi> ambassadour for the king unto the
                     emperour. But an hard matter it was to make such a forme as should be unto him
                     good; for that it seemeth that the title or qualitie of a perpetuall
                     lieutenant, doth preiudice not only unto soueraigntie, but also unto the
                     qualitie of a feudatarie &amp; proprietarie in those lands which he holdeth of
                     another man, if it bee not by a doubtfull or improper kind of speech.</p><p><pb n="134" facs="69"/>The dukes of Saxonie and the counties Palatine are also
                     perpetuall lieutenants of <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/><note place="marg" anchored="true">The dukes of Saxonie and the county Palatine lieutenants of
                        the empire.</note> the empire; but that is in the emperours absence, to doe
                     iustice unto the princes and imperiall townes, yea euen against the emperour
                     himselfe, (as shall in due place bee declared) and to all them which are of
                     their government: which is a personall office, and not belonging unto lands;
                     neither can he that taketh upon him the qualitie of a deputie, lieutenant,
                        o<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> gouernour, be feudatarie or proprietarie of
                     those seignories that he holdeth of him whose lieutenant he is. And so the
                     title of perpetuall lieutenantship ought to have relation unto other countries,
                     without the terrritorie and demaines of his countrey of Sauoy: which neither
                     the Swissers, nor other princes of Italie &amp; Germanie could endure, and much
                     lesse the French king, who holdeth nothing of the empire, whereby he might be
                     iusticiable to the lieutenants of the empire. Ioyne hereunto <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> also, that the Emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the
                     fourth made <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the sixt Dauphin of Viennois,<note place="marg" anchored="true">Charles the fixt of Fraunce by the emperour made perpetual
                        lieutenant of the empire.</note> his perpetuall lieutenant, the xiiij day of
                     Ianuarie, in the yeare 1378. And for that he was but nine yeares old, he gaue
                     him the priuelege of his age, by a most ample and gracious charter, whereunto
                     hang seales of gold, which I have read in the records of our kings. But withall
                     made him perpetuall lieutenant of the kingdome of Arles, (excepting onely the
                     countie of Sauoy) and that more is, gaue him power of life and death over the
                     subiects of the empire; with power also to conferre honors, to impose and raise
                     taxes, and from the same to exempt whome he saw good, to receiue appeales made
                     unto the emperour, to make peace and warre, to giue laws unto the subiects, and
                     to disanull and abrogat the same, and such other like. This lieutenancie was
                     for all the <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> kingdome of Arles, which extended
                     from the mountaine Iura (commonly called saint <hi rend="italic">Claudius</hi>
                     mount) and the riuers Araris and Rhodanus, unto the Alpes, and the sea of
                     Genes; all which the imperials have alwaies pretended to be holden of the
                     empire. But the earles of Prouince have long since exempted themselves from the
                     German empire, amongst whome was <hi rend="italic">Raymund</hi> the last, one
                     of whose daughters was married unto <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the ninth, the
                     French king, and the other unto <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> duke of Aniou,
                     by which meanes the countie of Prouence is come to the house of Aniou, &amp;
                     from thence by the bountie of countie <hi rend="italic">Renat,</hi> unto the
                     crowne of Fraunce. Albeit that <hi rend="italic">Philip Valois</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The soneraignty of the kingdome of Arles bought of the
                        emperour by the French king.</note> the French king, had bought of the
                     emperour <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the fi<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>t, the
                     soueraigntie of all the realme of Arles, without excepting either the countie
                     of Sauoy, or the principality <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> of Oreng, or
                     Beiauieu, which was afterwards giuen to <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> duke of
                     Burbon; either of the countie of Prouence, which was then in the house of
                     Aniou; either of the franke countie, which was giuen to <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the hardie, by the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the
                     fourth, in the yeare 1362, being deuolued to the empire for want of heires
                     male. And the sale of soueraigntie of the said kingdome of Arles, was made for
                     the summe of three hundred thousand markes of siluer, with promise to cause it
                     to be ratified by the princes of the empire, who afterwards consented
                     thereunto: of which their confirmation the emperour gaue <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> king of Bohemia suretie, who sold also the towne of Luques vnto
                     the same king, for an hundred and fourescore thousand florines of gold, in the
                     yeare 1330. The contracts, ratifications, and quittances, are yet in the
                     treasurie of Fraunce to bee <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> seene, from whence
                     I have the exemplifications conferred with the originals, wel worthy to haue
                     bene seene of them who were deputed for the affaires of Sauoy, in the yeare
                     1562. But that me thinke well worth the marking, that in the deedes of bargaine
                     and sale, are comprised all the lawes of soueraigne maiestie, which the German
                     emperours giue unto themselves in all the prouinces of the kingdome of Arles:
                     wherein are contained the Sauoians, they of Belloioci, they of Prouence, they
                     of free Burgundie, which the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth
                     gaue to <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> duke of Burgundie to bee possessed in the
                     imperiall right, the issues male of the counties fayling. Whereby it is
                     manifest <pb n="135" facs="69"/> the French kings to have the right of
                     soueraigne maiestie over all the people of <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> the
                     kingdome of Arles, and not therefore to owe any fealtie or homage unto the
                     Getman empire.</p><p>And at the same time as it were the emperour <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> of
                     Bauatia made <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> the<note place="marg" anchored="true">Edward the
                        third King of England made perpetual Lieutenant of the Empire</note> third,
                     king of England his perpetuall lieutenant; and by his letters pattents gaue him
                     power to make lawes, and to administer iustice to all the subiects of the
                     empire: and that all the subiects of the empire should obey him, and in his
                     name to yeeld unto him fealtie and homage: which was an occasion rather sought
                     for, than offered, for him to make warre upon the French king, who then held
                        <hi rend="italic">Cambray</hi> and the castles of Creueceur, and Payerne,
                     members of the empire: for that by the auntient leagues made betwixt the French
                     kings and the emperours, it was prouided, That they should not one <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> of them take any thing from the other, or molest one
                     the others sublects; as was declared unto king <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> by
                     the imperiall princes allied with him, and then assembled in the towne of Hale:
                     which is a most certaine argument that the kings of Fraunce hold<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Kingdome of France not to hold any thing of the
                        Empire.</note> nothing of the empire; neither that the emperours have any
                     right in that kingdome. Which is also expresly set downe in the contract of
                     purchase of <hi rend="italic">Philip Valois,</hi> which I have here before
                     rehearsed, which beareth this clause: <hi rend="italic">And the kings and
                        realmes of Fraunce shall continue in their priueleges, enfranchisments, and
                        liberties, that they have alwayes holden against the German empire,
                        whereunto they are in nothing subiect.</hi> Which was well giuen the
                     emperour <hi rend="italic">Sigismund</hi> to vnderstand, at such time as he of
                     his imperiall power would have made the countie of Sauoy duke, in the towne of
                     Lyons▪ against <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> whome the kings officers there
                     so opposed themselves, as that hee was glad to get him out of the kingdome, at
                     libertie to vse his owne power, which he did in great choller and displeasure.
                     And this was done by the expresse commaundement of the king, <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the sixt, to cover two notable errors that had bene before
                     committed: the one passing by sufferance, in that the emperour <hi rend="italic">Sigismund</hi> being magnifically receiued at Paris, and as
                     beseemed the kings vncle, had place in a royall seat in full parliament; and
                     the other, that afterwards he was suffered to make <hi rend="italic">Seneschal
                        D' Beaucaire</hi> knight; although the court had in this last point
                     admonished the king, that unto him onely it belonged to make knights in his
                     owne kingdome; as it had twice before bene solemnely iudged by two decrees
                     against the counties of Flaunders and Neuers. Which I have <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> the more willingly noted, to show the errour of <hi rend="italic">Alciat,</hi> who hath maintained, that the<note place="marg" anchored="true">Alciat and Bartholus taxed.</note> French king is subiect to the empire;
                     which is a wilfull errour or ingratitude, considering the entertainment he had
                     in Fraunce to teach and write the truth: which I thinke not to have proceeded
                     from him of ignorance, but in favour of the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift, who drew him to Pauie, and there doubled his
                     salarie: or els to the imitation of <hi rend="italic">Bartholus,</hi> author of
                     that errour, who writ the same things of the French kings that <hi rend="italic">Alciat</hi> did: at such time forsooth as he was by the
                     emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth of a bastard not onely made
                     legitimat, and by him ennobled, but power also giuen him to take the benefit of
                     age to him and his, which should professe to teach the lawes, with armes also
                     answerable unto his dignitie and honour: <hi rend="italic">viz.</hi> a Lyon
                     Azure in a field Argent.<milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> For which so many and
                     so great benefits he writ all them to be heretikes, which should deny the
                     German emperour to be lord of all the world: which hee seemeth to have gathered
                     of the words of <hi rend="italic">Antoninus Augustus,</hi> unto the law Rhodia;
                        <hi rend="italic">I am</hi> (saith he) <hi rend="italic">the lord of the
                        world, and law of the sea:</hi> which words seeing they were spoken but for
                     ostentation sake, and for the augmenting of his honour, lesse need to bee
                     refuted; seeing that the Roman empire when it was at the greatest, (which was
                     in the time of<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Germane Empire not now the tenth part of
                        the Romane empire.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">Traian</hi> the emperour) contained scarce the thirtieth part
                     of the world, and that the German empire is not now the tenth part of the Roman
                     empire. And yet the emperour <pb n="136" facs="70"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Sigismund</hi> sick of that incurable disease of ambition,
                     sought to have brought every <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> mans government
                     under his, although he was in that his hope much deceiued. For intruding
                     himselfe to have made the duke of Lituania a king (whose countrey lieth aboue
                     two hundred leagues from the frontiers of the empire of Germany) hee sent him a
                     crowne and a sword, which for all that the duke refused, neither thought it
                     good to chaunge the name of the <hi rend="italic">Great Duke</hi> (whereby he
                     was called) although he had of himselfe shaken off the seruile yoke of the
                     Tartars, least in so doing hee might seeme to have attributed his power and
                     soueraigntie unto the Germans.</p><p>We see also that the Germaine Emperors have sent the royall Crownes vnto
                        the<note place="marg" anchored="true">The kings of Polonia hold nothing of the
                        empire.</note> Dukes of Polonia, before they were by the Pope suffered to
                     beare the Royall title; which they refused: and yet certaine it is, that the
                     Kings of Polonia neuer held any <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> thing of the
                     Empire. Oftentimes indeed the Germaines have attempted to have subdued the
                     Polonians, whose vaine attempts the Polonians have not onely repulsed, but also
                     ioyned unto their kingdom the countries of Silesia and Prussia, both rent from
                     the body of the Germaine Empire. Which when the Prutenian knights had taken in
                     euil part, and thereof oftentimes complained to the states of the empire, yet
                     the emperors thought it not good for to attempt any thing against the
                     Polonians, by whom they had knowne the imperiall armies to have been many times
                     repulsed and ouerthrown. And yet for all this, the Polonians refused not to
                     take their royall scepters from the bishops of Rome. True it is that the
                     bishops of Rome of long time striue with the Germaine<note place="marg" anchored="true">The
                        fruit that came of the strife betwixt the German emperor and the pope for
                        the soueraign tie of the Christian Commonweale.</note> emperours for the
                     soueraigntie and chiefe government of the Christian Commonweale,<milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> and as chiefetaines of the faction, drew all the
                     Christian princes and cities into armes; so that many cities and Commonweales,
                     especially in Italie, were at such mortall hatred amongst themselves, as that
                     they receiued not greater harme from the enemies of the Christian religion and
                     name, than they did from one another. Neither wanted there some which writ in
                     earnest, al Christian kings to be the bishop of Romes clyents and vassals; and
                     in case that they were foolish, furious, or prodigall, that they might haue
                     ouerseers appointed over them by the pope: which we have before said, to haue
                     been done by pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the fourth, against the king
                     of Portugall. And albe it that pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> said, That
                     his meaning therein was not in any thing to preiudice the regall power, in
                     appointing such an ouerseer; yet did not his sayings at all agree <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> with his dooings. Pope <hi rend="italic">Vrban</hi>
                     the fift also made no doubt, to make legitimate <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi>
                     the bastard king of Castile, so to thrust out of his kingdom his brother <hi rend="italic">Peter,</hi> borne in lawfull wedlocke: who thereupon, by the
                     power of the French, was not onely thrust out of his kingdom, but s<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>aine also by his bastard brother. Some there have been
                        also<note place="marg" anchored="true">The immoderat and absurd pow er which some attribute
                        unto the pope.</note> which have passed further, saying that the pope hath
                     in power iurisdiction over the emperour; but over all other kings and princes
                     really and indeed: excepting over the French king, whom the canonists
                     themselves confesse, indeed, and ofright to acknowledge none greater than
                     himselfe under God. Which <hi rend="italic">Belluga</hi> a Spanish doctor, and
                        <hi rend="italic">Oldrade</hi> the beautie of his time do also better
                     declare, saying that the French king neither in fact nor of right acknowledgeth
                     any prince of the world superiour unto himselfe.<milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> But these great clearks which thus giue the popes power over other princes,
                     have no better reason for that they say, than the authoritie of pope <hi rend="italic">Gelasius,</hi> who hath written, That the pope hath power to
                     dispoyle all kings and princes of their soueraigntie and power. And some others
                     there be which have maintained, That appeales may be made from all people and
                     princes unto the pope, That there is none but the emperour and the pope which
                     can reuoke their owne decrees, and deptiue other kings and princes of their
                     soueraigntie and rule; That there is no prince but hee, unto whom the pope hath
                     confirmed his principalitie: And that which of all other is most absurd, <pb n="137" facs="70"/> that hee of himselfe may giue priueleges, exemptions,
                     and immunities unto another <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> princes subiects
                     contrarie to the decrees and lawes of all princes; and that he is the only and
                     supreme vmpiere and judge of all mans lawes. And what maruell if he rule ouer
                     princes, which commaundeth over angels? For so truely <hi rend="italic">Clement
                        V. P. M.</hi> doubted not to commaund the angels. Yea some there be that
                     have written, That so often as the pope shall put this clause to his rescripts,
                        <hi rend="italic">De plenitudine potestatis,</hi> Of the fulnesse of our
                     power: so oft doth he therein derogat from the lawes of all princes. And albeit
                     that some have holden also, That we must rest upon that that the pope saith,
                     without farther enquire of the veritie therof; yet so it is neuerthelesse, that
                        <hi rend="italic">Baldus</hi> hath written, That a man may say unto him, <hi rend="italic">Salua reuerentia vestra,</hi> By your reuerences leaue. And
                     upon the maxime set downe by the canonists, <hi rend="italic">That the pope can
                        do all:</hi> the diuines <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> graunting it to be
                     so, do yet more subtilly, and as it were in two words moderat the same, <hi rend="italic">Claue non errante,</hi> The key not erring. And forasmuch as
                     it is every good subiects part to maintaine the greatnesse and maiestie of
                     their owne princes, I will not enter into the disputes of <hi rend="italic">Iaques de Terranne</hi> the popes chamberlaine, nor of <hi rend="italic">Capito,</hi> nor of <hi rend="italic">M. Charles du Moulin,</hi> and
                     others, who have oftentimes ouershot themselves either of set purpose, or els
                     pressed with violent passions, have vnawares entred into matter of religion,
                     and so carried away either with loue or hatred of the pope, have filled their
                     writings with raylings. Whereas I here speake not but of temporall
                     soueraigntie, which is the subiect that I entreat of, (whereof they speake not)
                     to the end it may be vnderstood, who be absolute soueraigne princes; and
                     whether the other princes be subiect <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> unto the
                     emperour, or the pope, or not.</p><p>For at the beginning, after that pope <hi rend="italic">Gregorie</hi> (he which
                     first called himselfe the seruant<note place="marg" anchored="true">The beginning of the popes
                        greatnes.</note> of the sernants of God) had obtained of <hi rend="italic">Phocas</hi> emperour of Constantinople, the prerogative over all the
                     bishops; his successours after turning the spirituall power into the temporall,
                     by little and little still encreased their power, in so much that the princes
                     as wel for the fear they then had towards God, as for the dignitie of the
                     prelacie, began to reuerence them much more than in former times; but much more
                     after that the empire of the East began to decline, which was after that the
                     popes had by their interdictions forbidden the people of Italie their obedience
                     unto the Constantinopolitan emperours, or to pay them any tribute; upon
                     occasion taken, that <hi rend="italic">Leo</hi> the emperour,<milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> surnamed <hi rend="italic">Monomachus,</hi> or the <hi rend="italic">Image breaker,</hi> and also <hi rend="italic">Thomas</hi> the
                     emperor, had caused the images of Saints to be cast downe and broken: wherewith
                     the people moued, and enraged with the authoritie of the bishop of Rome, slew
                        <hi rend="italic">Thomas</hi> in the temple of Saint <hi rend="italic">Sophia.</hi> Wherefore the power of the Greeke empire being weakened in the
                     East, by the incursions of the Barbarians; and the Greeke emperors out of hope
                     againe to recover Italie; the kings of Lombardie then also doing what they
                     might to make themselves lords of all Italie, and the popes also on their parts
                     no lesse desirous to have therein a share, and finding themselves too weake to
                     make their partie good against the Lombard kings, uppon this difference cast
                     themselves into the protection of the kings of Fraunce, who then were the
                     greatest Monarches of Christendome; <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> wherein
                     they were not of their hope deceiued. For hereupon, <hi rend="italic">Pipin</hi> Grande<note place="marg" anchored="true">The popes put themselves into the
                        protection of the French Kings, Pipin and Charlemaigne his sonne, the popes
                        great champion.</note> Mr. of Fraunce (a man of great wealth and power, who
                     then disposed of all the affaires of the realme) with a great army passing ouer
                     the Alpes, ouerthrew and discomfited the power of the Lombards, and afterward
                     going to Rome, was the first that gaue unto pope <hi rend="italic">Zacharie,</hi> part of the seignorie of Italie, who had before crowned him
                     king of Fraunce, forbidding the peeres and people of Fraunce to make choyce of
                     any other for their kings but of the house of <hi rend="italic">Pipin,</hi>
                     hauing publikely pronounced king <hi rend="italic">Childerike</hi> for his
                     sottishnesse to bee vnable for the government. Whereunto the people of <pb n="138" facs="71"/> Fraunce made so much the lesse resistance, for that <hi rend="italic">Pipin</hi> then had the nobilitie and the <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> armie of Fraunce at commaund: and for that the pope (who as
                     then was esteemed as a God upon earth) was the author thereof, unto whome <hi rend="italic">Pipin</hi> had before solemnly promised, and giuen him letters
                     pattents thereof, That if hee should become victorious over the Lombards, he
                     should giue unto the Church of Rome the Exa<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>chat of
                     Rauenna, which contained thirtie cities, and the prouince of Pentapole, which
                     contained sixteene cities moe: which he after the victorie performed, laying
                     the keyes of the said cities upon Saint <hi rend="italic">Peters</hi> altar:
                     yet reseruing unto himselfe and his successours in the crowne of Fraunce, the
                     soueraigntie of both the prouinces; and that more is, power also to chuse the
                     popes. Whereunto the pope not onely willingly graunted, but almost persuaded
                        <hi rend="italic">Pipin</hi> to take uppon him the name of an emperour:
                     which title none <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> then vsed, but the emperours
                     of Constantinople. But <hi rend="italic">Pipin</hi> being dead, the Lombards
                     againe tooke up armes, to the great disquiet of the popes, who againe had
                     recourse unto the French kings, as unto a most sure sanctuarie. Whereupon <hi rend="italic">Charles, Pipin</hi> his sonne (for his many and worthy
                     victories surnamed the <hi rend="italic">Great</hi>) with a strong army passing
                     the Alpes, not onely ouerthrew the king of the Lombards, but euen their
                     kingdome also: and hauing surely established the power of the Roman bishops,
                     was by them called Emperour: and they againe by <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi>
                     so long as he lived, all chosen bishops of Rome. But after the death of this
                        <hi rend="italic">Charlemaigne,</hi> they which were of great credit in
                     Rome, caused themselves to be chosen pope by the clergie, whether it were<note place="marg" anchored="true">How the French Kinges lost the prerogatione they had in the
                        chusing of the Pope.</note> for the distrust they had to obtaine that
                     dignitie of the kings of Fraunce, hauing no favour <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> in the court; or through the negligence of the French kings,
                     who had thereof no great care; or that it was by reason of the great civill
                     warres which arose betwixt the children of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the
                     Gentle, wherewith the French kings busied, lost the prerogative they had in
                     chusing of the chiefe Bishop. Yet <hi rend="italic">Guitard,</hi> a good
                     antiquarie, who lived in the same time writeth, 3 popes successiuely to haue
                     come into France to excuse themselves to <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the
                     Gentle, That they had beene by the clergie of Rome constrained to accept of the
                     papal dignitie, beseeching him to confirme the same: which he either as a man
                     not desirous of glorie, or els fearing to prouoke the clergie (being then in
                     great authoritie) did: of which his error he afterwards though to late full
                     sore repented him; being by the colledge of cardinals constrained to yeeld up
                     his c<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>owne, &amp; to make himself <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> a monke, and the queene his wife a nunne, shut up apart from
                     her husband in a cloister with other nunnes, who yet were againe afterwards
                     delivered by the princes and nobilitie of Fraunce, (disdaining to see the pride
                     of the clergie) and so againe restored unto their former honours.</p><p>But after the death of this <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the Gentle (who was
                     emperour of Fraunce, of Germanie, and of the greater part of Italie, and
                     Spaine) the empire was divided into three kingdomes, which the brethren <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the Bauld, <hi rend="italic">Lothaire,</hi> and
                        <hi rend="italic">Lewes,</hi> euerie one of them held in title of
                     soueraigntie, without acknowledging any superioritie of one another; and
                     againe, the kingdom of <hi rend="italic">Lothaire</hi> was divided amongst his
                     children into three parts: unto one fell the kingdome of Loraine, unto another
                     the kingdome of Arles,<milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> and to the third the
                     kingdome of Italie: <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> holding Germanie, and <hi rend="italic">Charls</hi> the emperour, Fraunce. So their divided power
                     began to decay, and the wealth of the bishops of Rome greatly to encrease: they
                     now succeeding one another by way of election, and in nothing acknowledging the
                     maiestie of the French kings, as they ought to have done: which came to passe
                     especially in the time of pope <hi rend="italic">Nicholas</hi> the first,<note place="marg" anchored="true">When the pope began first to excommunicat Princes.</note> who
                     better vnderstood to mannage matters of state than had his predecessours, and
                     was the first that used the rigour of excommunication against princes, hauing
                     excommunicated <hi rend="italic">Lothaire</hi> the younger brother of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> king of Italie. But the children of <pb n="139" facs="71"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Lothaire</hi> being afterwards dead without issue, those
                     three kingdomes which I spoke of,<milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">viz.</hi> of Loraine, Arles, and Italie, were divided betwixt
                     their vncles, <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Lewes.</hi>
                     Wherefore <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> king of Germanie gouerned Italie, which
                     fell unto his part, by his lieutenants and deputies; whose power was not such
                     asto withstand the popes, but that<note place="marg" anchored="true">The increasing of the
                        popes power.</note> they still by little and little extended their power and
                     government: which especially hapned at such time as <hi rend="italic">Guiscard</hi> the Norman had subdued the kingdome of Sicilie and Naples,
                     taken from the Greekes and Moores; who to weaken the power of the Germans, and
                     to raigne himselfe the more safely in Italie, ioyned hands against them with
                     the Bishops of Rome. But the posteritie of <hi rend="italic">Guiscard</hi>
                     being dead without heires male, left the kingdome of Naples and Sicilie unto a
                     woman their heire; married unto the German emperor <hi rend="italic">Frederick</hi> the second, who going into Italy, there to confirme his
                        <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> power, made choice of another pope (one of
                     his own fauorites) than was he whom the colledge of cardinals had before
                     chosen: which was pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the fourth, a man both
                     for his birth and learning famous; who driuen out of Italie, and comming into
                     Fraunce (the popes surest sanctuarie) and strengthened with the wealth and
                     power of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the ix, the French king (whether it were
                     for reuerence of him the pope so solemnly by the cardinals chosen, or to weaken
                     the power of the Germans) excommunicated the emperour <hi rend="italic">Frederick</hi> the second: who seeing himselfe thereby become odious vnto
                     all men, &amp; himselfe like to be forsaken euen of his own subiects, &amp;
                     great trobles arising also against him in Italy, fearefully returned into
                     Germany, hauing obtained absolution of pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent,</hi> by
                     yeelding up his authoritie and power for any more <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> creating of the bishops of Rome, leauing the kingdomes of
                     Naples and Sicilie unto his base sonne <hi rend="italic">Manfred,</hi> who was
                     also excommunicated by pope <hi rend="italic">Vrban</hi> the fist: who not yet
                     so contented, called in <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> of France, duke of
                     Aniou, brother to king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the ix, whome he inuested
                     in the aforesaid two realmes of Naples and Sicilie, reseruing unto the See of
                     Rome the countie of Beneuent; fealtie, homage, iurisdiction, and soueraigntie
                     for the rest; with a yearely and perpetual fee of eight thousand ounces of
                     gold, as we have before said. After which time the house of Arragon, which by
                     right of kindred<note place="marg" anchored="true">Why the kings of Arragonmade themselves the
                        popes vassals for the kingdomes of Naples and Sicilie, and submitted also
                        unto him the rest of their kingdoms.</note> succeeded the posteritie of <hi rend="italic">Manfred,</hi> being alwaies at oddes with the house of Aniou,
                     and so in continuall warres for these kingdomes of Naples and Sicilie; and
                     seeing it not possible for them to recover them so long as the pope was their
                     enemie, they <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>

                     <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ound meanes to gaine the popes favour, and so made
                     themselves the popes vassals, not onely for the kingdomes of Naples and
                     Sicilie, but also for the kingdomes of Arragon, Sardinia, Corsica, Maiorque,
                     and Minorque: which they partly did also for to obtaine the popes pardon for
                     their offences, as we have before said. The bishops of Rome in the meane time
                     out of the troubles of these two great houses, encreasing their owne power and
                     profit, peaceably enioyed the territorie about Rome, Spolet, and Beneuent, with
                     a good part of Tuscanie, by vertue of the donation which wee have before spoken
                     of.</p><p>As for the citie of Rome, sometimes mistresse of the world, they brought it
                        vnder<note place="marg" anchored="true">How the citie of Rome was brought under the popes
                        obeysance.</note> their obeysance, hauing by little and little oppressed the
                     libertie thereof, no man gainsaying <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> them.
                     Albeit that <hi rend="italic">Charlemaigne</hi> hauing conquered Italie,
                     expresly commaunded that it should remaine in full libertie, with power left
                     unto the inhabitants to gouerne their estate, which the Roman bishops had also
                     by their oathes confirmed; as <hi rend="italic">Augustine Onuphre</hi> the
                     popes chamberlaine writeth, and as it well appeareth by the Vatican
                     records.</p><p>Now if there were any soueraigne prince that were a tyrant, or an heretike, or
                        that<note place="marg" anchored="true">The great daun, get princes were sometimes in by
                        reason of the popes excommunication.</note> had done any notorious crime, or
                     not obeyed the popes commaund; hee was by the pope forthwith excommunicated:
                     which was occasion enough to cause his subiects <pb n="140" facs="72"/> to
                     reuolt from him, and to arme other princes against him which was so
                     excommunicated; <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> who then had no other meane
                     left to be againe receiued into favour, but to make himselfe feudatarie to the
                     Church of Rome, and the popes vassall. As I have before said of <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> king of England, who made himselfe vassall to <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the third, for the murther committed in the
                     person of young <hi rend="italic">Arthur</hi> duke of Britaine. And augmented
                     also the feodall rent of England, for the murder committed by the commaundement
                     of the king of England, in the person of <hi rend="italic">Thomas</hi>
                     Archbishop of Canterburie. As in like case it chaunced for the murther
                     committed in the person of <hi rend="italic">Stanislaus</hi> archbishop of
                     Guesne, by the commaundement of the king: for which the pope excommunicated the
                     king, and tooke the roiall title from the kings of Polonia; enioyning also
                     their subiects therefore (as some have written) to shave their heads behind, in
                     such sort <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> as we yet see them to doe: which
                     whether it be true or no, I dare not to affirme, neither could the Polonians
                     tell me the cause thereof when I asked it of them: but manifest it is by
                     auntient records, that after the murther of that bishop, the kings of Polonia
                     all thought they had the power of soueraigne maiestie, yet were they called but
                     by the name of dukes, vntill the time of <hi rend="italic">Lucold</hi> duke of
                     Polonia, who receiued the royall crowne and title, of pope <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> the xxij, upon condition to pay into the popes coffers a certaine
                     yearely tribute, which is yet at this day paid for the lampe of Saint <hi rend="italic">Peter,</hi> as we<note place="marg" anchored="true"><hi rend="italic">Thomas Cramerus.</hi> Soveraigntie by the pope pretended
                        unto the Kingdome of Hungarie.</note> read in their histories. And beside
                     those kingdomes which wee have spoke of, <hi rend="italic">viz.</hi> England,
                     Arragon, Naples, Sicilie, Hierusalem, Polonia, Sardinia, Corsica, and the
                     Canaries, all feudataries or tributaries unto the popes, or els both together;
                     they have also <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> pretended the soueraigntie of
                     the kingdome of Hungarie, to belong unto them, and so it is comprised in the
                     Catalogue of the Chauncerie of Rome. And I have seene in the Vatican Register,
                     an act dated in the yeare 1229, whereby <hi rend="italic">Ladislaus</hi> the
                     first, king of Hungarie, promiseth his obedience unto pope <hi rend="italic">Benedict</hi> the xij, and acknowledgeth that he ought to receiue the
                     crowne at his hands. And by another act of <hi rend="italic">Ladislaus</hi> the
                     second, king of Hungarie, excommunicated for the disobedience by him committed
                     against the popes Legat; for to have his obsolution, he bound himselfe to pay
                     yearely into the popes chamber an hundred markes of siluer; which obligation
                     beareth date the yeare 1280. Yet in the same Vatican register, dated in the
                     yeare 1308, whereby it appeareth also, the barons of Hungarie to have sharply
                     opposed themselves <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> against the popes Legat,
                     alleaging Saint <hi rend="italic">Stephen</hi> the first king of Hungarie, to
                     have receiued his crowne of the pope, and that they would not endure the pope
                     to have any such prerogative over them: and yet neuerthelesse they letted not,
                     but that the king by themselves chosen, might if so pleased him cause himselfe
                     to bee crowned by the pope. And in the end of that act are many decrees of the
                     popes legat, concerning the state of that kingdome, with prohibitions to the
                     kings of Hungarie for alienating any the demaines of the crowne: which may
                     seeme to have bene the cause that <hi rend="italic">Andrew</hi> king of
                     Hungarie, was by <hi rend="italic">Honorius</hi> the pope cited to Rome, to
                     show why he had alienated part of the publike demaines. <hi rend="italic">Innocentius</hi> also the third expresly enioyned the king of Hungarie to
                     fulfill his dead fathers vow; threatning if he should refuse so to doe, to
                     depriue <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> him of his kingdome, and to giue it to
                     him that was next of kin. Which a man need not to thinke strange in those
                     times, seeing that at the same time wee see the prohibitions made by the pope
                     unto the counties of Tholouze, (and inserted into the Decretals) that they
                     should not raise any new charges upon their owne subiects. As for the kingdome
                     of Hierusalem and Syria, wonne by <hi rend="italic">Godfrey</hi> of Buillon and
                     his allies, it is manifest that he therefore professed himselfe to be the popes
                     vassall, and to hold it of him by fealtie and homage: besides that we find it
                     comprised in the Catalogue of the feudatarie kings of the church of Rome. And
                     as concerning the Grand Masters of the <pb n="141" facs="72"/> honourable order
                     of S. <hi rend="italic">Iohn Hierusalem,</hi> which was composed of eight
                     sundtie people <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The Grand Master of S. Iohn Hiersualem feudatarie both to
                        the king of Spaine and the pope.</note> of diuers language, they were
                     alwayes inuested by the pope, and yet do fealtie and homage unto the popes for
                     the soueraigne power which they have over the knights of their order: albeit
                     that they did homage also unto the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the
                     fist, for Tripolis in Barbarie, before it fell into the hands of the Turke: as
                     now also they doe at this present unto the king Catholike, for the isle of
                     Malta, which was upon that condition giuen them.</p><p>And as for the kingdome of Nauarre, under the colour of excommunication
                        taken<note place="marg" anchored="true">The kingdome of Nauarre holden of the pope.</note>
                     from <hi rend="italic">Peter Albret,</hi> we said before, that it is by the
                     kings of Spaine holden of the popes of Rome by fealtie and homage. And not many
                     yeares ago pope <hi rend="italic">Pius</hi> the fift would under the same
                     colour of religion, have taken also the rest that was yet left, from <hi rend="italic">Ione</hi>

                     <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> queene of Nauarre, hauing caused her to be
                     cited to Rome; and afterward for default and contumacie, causing her by his
                     commissioners to bee condemned: had not king <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the
                     ix taken upon him to protect her, as being his subiect, vassall, and neere
                     kinswoman: which he gaue all Christian princes to vnderstand, unto whose
                     maiestie the proscription of that most honourable queene might well have seemed
                     preiudiciall.</p><p>For many were of opinion that the pope was absolute soueraigne lord of all the
                     kingdoms of Christendome. And in our age, at such time as <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> the eight, king of England, was reuolted from the pope, the
                     earle of Aisimund, an Irish man, sent letters unto <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi>
                     the second the French king, (the copie whereof I have taken out of the records)
                     whereby he offered himselfe to become his subiect, if he should of the pope
                     obtaine <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> the soueraigntie of the kingdome of
                     Ireland, which we said to have bene under the fealtie of the bishop of Rome,
                     since the time of <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the third. They have also
                     pretended themselves to have the soueraigntie of Mirandula, and of the counties
                     of Concorde, Rege, Modene, Parma, &amp; Placence, for which the popes <hi rend="italic">Iulius</hi> the second and third, both of them made great
                     warres against the French king, when as yet it was most manifest those cities
                     to depend of the German empire. Of Parma, and Placence there is no doubt; and
                     the rest they confesse <hi rend="italic">Maud</hi> the countesse to have had by
                     inheritance, holden by fealtie of the emperours, which she gaue to the church
                     of Rome.</p><p>Now if we graunt the aforesaid cities might have beene giuen unto the bishop
                        of<note place="marg" anchored="true">The pope of right vassall unto the German empire for
                        the cities he holdeth thereof in fee.</note> Rome, and to have bene indeed
                     giuen, as the bishops themselves vaunt; they must also <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> confesse themselves to have bene vassals unto the German
                     empire. But for that it seemed a dishonour to the bishop of Rome, which said
                     himselfe to have power over all princes, to be accounted a vassall and client
                     of the emperours; they said (but falsly) the soueraigntie of all the cities of
                     Italie, which were within the dominions of the Church of Rome, to have bene by
                     the emperours graunted unto the bishop of Rome. And to exempt themselves, they
                     produce a donation which I have read in the Vatican register without date or
                     name of bishop, whereby <hi rend="italic">Otho</hi> the emperour (but which <hi rend="italic">Otho</hi> it is not said, when as there have bene foure of
                     that name) doth giue unto the church of Rome Pisaurum, Ancona, Fossabrum, and
                     Ausun. Other letters pattents also there is of the emperour <hi rend="italic">Otho</hi> the fourth, unto pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the third,
                     conceiued in these words,<milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Ego Otho quartus rex Romanorum semper Augustus, tibi domino
                        meo papae Innocentio tertio, tuis{que} successoribus ecclesiae Romanae,
                        spondeo, polliceor, &amp; iuro, quod omnes possessiones Ecclesiae,
                        &amp;c.</hi> I <hi rend="italic">Otho</hi> the fourth, king of the Romans,
                     alwayes victorious, do auow, promise, and sweare, to thee my lord pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the third, and to thy successours of the church
                     of Rome, that all the possessions of the Church, &amp;c. And that which
                     followeth after, containeth a most copious confirmation of all the lands and
                     cities which then were in the dominion or patrimonie of the church of Rome,
                     whether they were giuen by the emperours themselves, or by any other lords or
                     princes whatsoeuer: in the <pb n="142" facs="73"/> number of which cities are
                     these contained: <hi rend="italic">Comitatus Perusiae, Reatae, Saluiae,
                        Interamnae,</hi>

                     <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Campaniae, nee non Roman, Ferrariam, &amp;c. Marchiam,
                        Anconitanam, terram Comitisse Matildis &amp; quecunque sunt circa
                        Rodicofanum vsque Ceperanum, exerchatum Rauenne, Pentapolim cum alij terris,
                        &amp;c.</hi> The same forme of confirmation is in the Vatican records to be
                     seene, both of <hi rend="italic">Rodolph</hi> the emperour, and <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth, bearing date the yeare 1289, and
                     1368, importing that they also out of their aboundance gaue unto the pope and
                     to the church of Rome so much as should be needfull, and all that which <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the fift his grandfather had before giuen and
                     confirmed unto the church, that so all the occasions of discord which had
                     before bene betwixt the emperors &amp; the popes, might be altogether taken
                     away. So that if these donations be good, the popes are exempted from their
                     fealtie and homage due unto the emperours, by reason of the fees <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> that they hold and which are members of the German
                     empire. But if the emperours could not without the consent of the princes and
                     cities of the empire, giue away the publike territories and rights of
                     soueraigntie; and that the imperiall and publike territories cannot be
                     encroached upon; and much lesse the right of soueraigntie and patronage, whose
                     authoritie for euer over the subiects and vassals cannot bee prescribed
                     against; it must needes follow, the popes to bee the vassals of the German
                     empire.</p><p>The same we may say of the election of the bishops of Rome, which the
                        German<note place="marg" anchored="true">Right pretended by the German Emperours to the
                        election of the pope.</note> emperours pretend of right to belong unto them.
                     For the emperour <hi rend="italic">Frederick</hi> the second to have absolution
                     from pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the fourth, caused to be delivered
                     unto <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> him his letters pattents, sealed with a
                     seale of gold, dated the yere 1229: whereof I have seene the extract, and of
                     his empire the seuenth, and of his raigne in the kingdome of Sicilie the xxij.
                     Whereby he entirely renounceth the right of election which he had in the
                     creating of bishops, vsing these words, <hi rend="italic">Illum abusum abolere
                        volentes, quem quidam praedecessorum vt electiones libere fiant &amp; c<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>nonice,</hi> Wee willing to abolish that abuse which
                     some of our predecessours were knowne to have exercised in the elections of
                     prelats, graunt that those elections may be freely and canonically made. By
                     which words he seemeth to renounce not onely the creation of the bishop of
                     Rome, but all other bishops also. Howbeit that in truth that right of chusing
                     of the popes belonged to the kings of Fraunce, and not unto the German princes,
                     who have but vsurped <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> the name and title of
                     emperours, got by the prowesse and force of <hi rend="italic">Charlemaigne</hi>
                     king of Fraunce, and by him left unto his successors the kings of Fraunce, and
                     not unto the kings of Germany: for so they were called in all the auntient
                     treaties and histories of Germanie and Fraunce, and not emperours, except those
                     which were crowned by the popes. But after that the power of the German kings
                     was farre spred in Italie, they then sought to vsurpe unto themselves that
                     right of chusing of the bishops of Rome: whether it were for the encreasing of
                     their owne wealth and power, or for to take away the ambition and foule
                     corruption then used in voyces giuing, and in their elections. For the emperour
                        <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the third thrust out of his papacie <hi rend="italic">Gregorie</hi> the sixt, chosen pope by the clergie, and set
                        <hi rend="italic">Clement</hi> the second in his place; and afterwards
                        <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">Popes chosen and placed by the Germane emperour.</note>
                     compelled the clergie to sweare, not from thenceforth to admit any into the
                     papacie, without the consent of the German emperours; as we have learned out of
                     the Vatican records. But <hi rend="italic">Clement</hi> the second being dead,
                     the colledge of Cardinals sent ambassadours unto the emperour to appoint whome
                     hee thought good to bee pope, who appointed <hi rend="italic">Pepon,</hi>
                     afterwards called <hi rend="italic">Damasus</hi> the second; who dead, the
                     clergie againe sent ambassadours unto the emperour, for the creating of a new
                     pope: who sent unto them <hi rend="italic">Brunon,</hi> otherwise called <hi rend="italic">Leo</hi> the ix: and after him <hi rend="italic">Victor</hi>
                     the second. After whose death the clergie made choyce of <hi rend="italic">Frederick,</hi> and after him of <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the <pb n="143" facs="73"/> second: which when the emperour <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> the fourth vnderstood, he sent them <hi rend="italic">Cadol</hi>

                     <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> bishop of Parma for pope, who although he were
                     so receiued in all Lombardie, yet was he thrust out by pope <hi rend="italic">Alexander.</hi> After <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> succeeded <hi rend="italic">Hildebrand,</hi> otherwise called <hi rend="italic">Gregorie</hi> the seuenth, chosen also by the clergie, who upon the
                     grieuous paine of excommunication, forbad all lay men to bestow any
                     Ecclesiasticall liuings or benefices upon any whomsoeuer: And also
                     excommunicated the emperour <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the fourth, for
                     disobeying his commaundement in creating of bishops in Germanie. Wherewith the
                     emperour moued, and with his armie passing over the Alpes, chased this <hi rend="italic">Gregorie</hi> the seuenth out of the citie, who had holden the
                     papacie eleuen yeares, and placed in his stead <hi rend="italic">Clement</hi>
                     the third, who held that dignitie seauenteene yeares, against foure popes
                     successiuely chosen by the clergie. After whose death <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the 5 <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> the emperour made <hi rend="italic">Bourden</hi> pope; without regard of whom, the clergie
                     neuerthelesse made choice of <hi rend="italic">Calistus</hi> the second a
                     Burgundion, who draue out <hi rend="italic">Bourdin,</hi> before nominated by
                     the emperour: and by a decree made at Wormes, enforced <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> to sweare neuer more to take upon him to bestow any spirituall
                     liuings upon anie: yet with condition, that he might be in the assemblies of
                     the Bishops assistant, if he thought it so good. Which decree of the emperour
                        <hi rend="italic">Henry</hi> the fift is yet extant in the Vatican records,
                     in these words, <hi rend="italic">Pro salute animae meae dimitto Deo &amp;
                        sanctis Apostolis Petro &amp; Paulo, sanctaeque Ecclesiae Catholicae, omnem
                        inuestituram per annulum &amp; baculum, &amp; concedo in omnibus ecclesijs
                        quae in imperio meo sunt, Canonicam fieri electionem.</hi> For the health of
                     my soule I remit unto God and the holy Apostles <hi rend="italic">Peter</hi>
                     and <hi rend="italic">Paule,</hi> and <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> to the
                     holy Catholique Church, all inuestiture to bee made by Ring and pastorall
                     staffe, and do graunt Canonicall election to be made in all the Churches which
                     are in mine Empire. Neuerthelesse 229 yeares after, the Emperour <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> of Bauaria created <hi rend="italic">Nicholas</hi>
                     the fift bishop of Rome: <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> the two and twentith, a
                     Frenchman, then <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>itting as pope at Auignion, who
                     peremptorily citied the emperor to appeare before him and for default &amp;
                     contumacie, pronounced sentence of excommunication against him: The emperour
                     likewise on the contrarie side summoned the same pope <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> to come before him, saying the bishops of Rome to be subiect vnto
                     his edicts and commaunds, as emperour: and by sentence giuen at Rome, where <hi rend="italic">Nicholas</hi> the Antipape held his seat, depriued <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> of his papacie. Which <hi rend="italic">Nicholas</hi> afterwards retiring himselfe <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>
                     unto Pisa, was by the citizens there betraied into the hands of pope <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> his mortall enemie at Auignion, where he shut up in
                     prison, for sorrow languished to death: and the emperour excommunicated, and
                     therefore detested of all men, was forsaken of his subiects. And this was the
                     eight emperour whome the bishop of Rome excommunicated:<note place="marg" anchored="true">The
                        eight emperours excommunicated by the pope were these▪ Fredericke the first,
                        Frederick the second, Philip, Conrade, Otho the fourth, Lewes of Bauaria▪
                        Henrie the fourth, and Henry the fift.</note> after whose fall the German
                     emperours thought it not good afterwards to attempt any thing against the
                     bishops of Rome. But to the contrarie the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth gaue out his letters pattents, in the yeare 1355,
                     whereby he acknowledgeth unto pope <hi rend="italic">Innocent</hi> the fift,
                     That although hee were chosen emperour by the princes, yet that he ought to
                     take the confirmation of his election, and the imperiall crowne of him the
                     pope; beginning in these words, <hi rend="italic">Post pedum oscula beatorum,
                        &amp;c.</hi>

                     <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> After the kissing of your blessed feet,
                     &amp;c. Which words we see still repeated in all the emperours letters unto the
                     bishop of Rome, euen from the time of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> of Bauaria,
                     vntill now.</p><p>There is also extant in the Vatican, the forme of the coronation of the
                        emperors,<note place="marg" anchored="true">Base seruices to be done by the emperour to the
                        pope.</note> and by the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fourth
                     approued; but no where more seruile seruices: where amongst other ceremonies,
                     the emperour is as a subdeacon to minister unto the pope whilest he is saying
                     masse; and after diuine seruice done, to hold his stirrop whilest he mounteth
                     to horse, and for a certaine time to lead his horse by the bridle: with diuers
                        <pb n="144" facs="74"/> other ceremonies at large set downe in the Vatican
                     records, which it is needlesse <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> here to
                     rehearse. And yet one thing more is worth the marking which is not in the
                     record expressed, which is, that the emperour to receiue the imperiall crowne,
                     must goe to seeke the pope wheresoeuer he be, and to follow him if hee chaunce
                     to remoue; as did the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift, who
                     being come into Italie, with hope to have gone unto the* pope at Rome, being
                     aduertised of his departure thence to Bononia, was<note place="marg" anchored="true">Clement
                        the s<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>uenth.</note> glad thither to follow him:
                     that so the dutie of an inferiour prince towards the maiesty of his superiour
                     might the more plainely be perceiued. But after the death of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift, <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand</hi> the emperour could
                     not obtaine, that the pope should in his absence ratifie his election; but was
                     oftentimes by the pope threatned, That hee would take such order for him, as
                     that he should have nothing to doe with the affaires of the German <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> empire: neither would he admit the emperours lawfull
                     excuse, vntill hee was by the requests and meditation of the French king, and
                     of the king of Spaine appeased: which the German princes tooke in euill part,
                     seeing they had promised unto <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand</hi> to imploy their
                     whole power for the defence of the ma<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>estie of the
                     empire, against that the popes enterprises; as I have learned by the letters of
                     the kings ambassadour,<note place="marg" anchored="true">The humble subscription Charls the
                        fift used in his letters to the pope.</note> dated at Vienna, in Iuly 1559.
                     And to show a greater submission of the emperours unto the popes, the
                     subscription of the emperours letters unto the pope, is this, <hi rend="italic">Ego manus ac pedes vestrae sanctitatis deosculor, viz.</hi> I kisse the
                     hands and feet of your Holinesse. So used alwayes the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift to subscribe to his letters, when he
                     writ unto pope <hi rend="italic">Clement</hi> the seuenth. Which he did not
                     upon a faigned courtesie, but indeed in <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> most
                     humble and seruile manner kissed the popes feet, in the open sight of the
                     people, and the greatest assemblies of many noble princes, at Bononia, Rome,
                     and last of al at Marsielles in Prouence, where were met together the pope, the
                     emperour, the kings of Fraunce and Nauarre, the dukes of Sauoy, of Buillon,
                     Florence, Ferrara, Vitemberg the Grand Master of Malta, with many other princes
                     and great lords, who all kissed the popes feet, except the dukes of Buillon and
                     Vitemberg, Protestant princes, who had forsaken the rites and ceremonies of the
                     church of Rome. In farre more base<note place="marg" anchored="true">The base submission of the
                        Duke of Venice and of Fredericke the second unto the pope.</note> sort did
                     that duke of Venice humble himselfe (who of the Venetians themselves is called
                     a dog) for that he with a rope about his necke, and creeping upon all foure
                     like a beast, so craued pardon of pope <hi rend="italic">Clement</hi> the 5.
                     But nothing was more base, than that <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> which
                     almost al historiographers which writ of the popes affairs, report of the
                     emperor <hi rend="italic">Fredericke</hi> the second▪ who to redeeme his sonne
                     out of prison, lying prostrat upon the ground at the feet of pope <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the fourth, suffered him to tread uppon his
                     head, if the histories be true. Whereby it is well to be perceiued, the
                     maiestie of the Emperours,<note place="marg" anchored="true">The maiestie of the emperours
                        greatly diminished by the pope</note> by the power (should I say) or by the
                     outragiousnesse of the Bishops of Rome, to have bene so diminished, as that
                     scarce the shadow of their antient maiestie seemeth now to remaine. They also
                     say themselves to be greater than the emperours, and that so much greater, as
                     is the Sunne greater than the Moone: that is to say, six thousand six hundred
                     fortie and five times, if we will beleeue <hi rend="italic">Ptolomee</hi> and
                     the Arabians. And that more is, they have alwaies pretended a right unto the
                     empire: for the imperiall <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> seat being vacant,
                     they have giuen the inuestitures unto them which held of the empire, and
                     receiued of them their fealtie: as they did of <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> and
                        <hi rend="italic">Luchin,</hi> vicounts of Milan, the imperiall seat being
                     emptie in the yeare 1341, who are in the records called vassals of the church
                     of Rome, and not of the empire; and are forbidden their odedience unto <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> of Bauaria the emperour, who was then
                     excommunicated, as we have before said. For which cause the Canonists haue
                     maintained, that the emperour cannot giue up his imperiall dignitie unto any,
                     but unto the pope: for which they yeeld this reason, That the emperours haue
                     their soueraigntie of men, and the popes of God: <pb n="145" facs="74"/>
                     howbeit that both of them, as all others also in general, are of right to
                     attribute all their <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> power unto almightie God.
                     Neuerthelesse the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift worne with
                     yeares and sicknesse, resigned his imperiall dignitie into the hands of the
                     princes electors, and sent unto them his resignation by the prince of Orenge.
                     But howsoever the Bishop of Rome pretended to have a soueraigntie over all
                     Christian princes, not only in spirituall, but also in temporall affaires;
                     whether they got it by force of armes, or by the deuotion and graunt of
                     princes; or by long possession and prescription: yet could not our kings euen
                     for any most short time endure the seruitude of the bishop of Rome, nor be
                     moued with any their excommunications, which the popes used as firebrands to
                     the firing of the Christian Commonweales. For these the popes
                        interdictions,<note place="marg" anchored="true">The French kings not afraid of the pops ex
                        communication.</note> or excommunications, were wont with other nations, to
                     draw the subiects from <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> the obedience and
                     reuerence of their prince: but such hath alwaies bene the loue of our kings
                     towards their people (and so I hope shall be for euer) and the loyaltie of the
                     people towards their kings: that when pope <hi rend="italic">Boniface</hi> the
                     eight saw himselfe nothing to preuaile by his excommunication, nor that the
                     people were to be drawne from the obedience of their king, after he had
                     publikely excommunicated <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the Faire, he in like
                     maner excommunicated all the French nation, with all them which tooke <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> for a king. But <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi>
                     hauing called together an assemblie of his princes, and other his nobilitie,
                     and perceiuing in his subiects in generall a wonderfull consent for the defence
                     of his state and soueraigntie: he thereupon writ letters unto <hi rend="italic">Boniface</hi> (which are common in euerie mans hand) to reproue him of his
                     folly: and shortly after sent <hi rend="italic">Nogaret</hi>

                     <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> with his armie into the popes territorie, who
                     tooke the pope prisoner, (giuing him well to vnderstand that the king was not
                     his subiect, as he had by his Bull published) but seeing him through
                     impatiencie to become furious and mad, he set him againe at libertie. Yet from
                     that the popes interdiction, the king by the aduice of his nobilitie and Senat,
                     appealed unto a generall councell, which had power over the pope, abusing the
                     holy cities. For the king next unto almightie God had none his superiour, vnto
                     whom he might appeale: but the pope is bound unto the decrees and commaunds of
                     the councell. And long tims before <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the
                     Victorious, and his realme being interdicted by pope <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the third, who would have brought him into his subiection:
                     answered him by letters, That he held nothing of the pope, nor yet of any
                     prince in the <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> world. <hi rend="italic">Benedict</hi> the third, and <hi rend="italic">Iulius</hi> the second, had
                     used the like excommunication against <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the
                     seuenth, and <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the twelfth (who was called the <hi rend="italic">Father of his countrey</hi>) that so as with firebrands they
                     might inflame the people to rebellion: yet failed they both of their hope; the
                     obedience of the subiects being in nothing diminished, but rather increased:
                     the Bull of excommunication which the popes legat brought into Fraunce, being
                     by the decree of the parliament of Paris openly torne in peeces, and the legat
                     for his presumptuousnesse cast in prison. And not long after <hi rend="italic">Iohn</hi> of Nauarre, who called himselfe countie Palatine, when he had
                     made certaine publike notaries in Fraunce, and made legitimat certaine of his
                     bastards, by vertue of the authoritie which he had (as he said) from the pope,
                     he was therfore by a decree of the parliament <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>
                     of Tholouze condemned of treason. True it is, that they which have thought
                     better to assure the maiestie of the kings of Fraunce against the power of the
                     pope, have obtained the popes buls whilest they yet sate in the citie of
                     Auignion▪ to bee exempted from their power. And namely there is in the records
                     of Fraunce a Bull of pope <hi rend="italic">Clements</hi> the fift, whereby he
                     not onely absolueth <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the Faire and his subiects
                     from the interdiction of <hi rend="italic">Boniface</hi> the eight, but also
                     declareth the king and the realme to be exempted from the popes power. Pope <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the fourth also gaue this priuilege unto the
                     realme of Fraunce, That it could not for any cause bee interdicted▪ <pb n="146" facs="75"/> which was afterward by seuen popes successiuely confirmed, <hi rend="italic">viz.</hi> by <hi rend="italic">Gregory</hi>

                     <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> the viij. ix. x. xj, <hi rend="italic">Clement</hi> the fourth, <hi rend="italic">Vrban</hi> the fift, and <hi rend="italic">Benedict</hi> the twelft; whose bul<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>
                     yet remaine in the records of Fraunce: which yet seeme unto me not to encrease,
                     but rather to diminish the maiestie of our kings, who were neuer in any thing
                     beholden unto the popes. And that more is, the court of parliament of Paris,
                     hath by many decrees declared that clause, <hi rend="italic">Auctoritate
                        Apostolica,</hi> By the authoritie Apostolicall:<note place="marg" anchored="true">The
                        clause, <hi rend="italic">Auctoritate Apostolica,</hi> vsually put into the
                        popes buls or decrees, reiected in France.</note> vsually inserted into the
                     popes rescripts sent into France, to be void, meere abusiue, and to no purpose:
                     and therefore it behoueth him, that would helpe himselfe by any such the popes
                     rescript, to protest in iudgement, That he would not any way take benefit of
                     that clause. By all which things it is plainely to be vnderstood, not onely the
                     kings, but the kingdome of Fraunce also, to have bene alwayes free from all the
                     popes power <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> and commaund. For as for that
                     which <hi rend="italic">Iohn Durand</hi> himselfe a French writer, saith, That
                     the French kings are subiect unto the pope, so farre as concerneth their oath,
                     it needeth no refuting; as by him written being bishop of Mende, and at such
                     time as under the color of oathe ioined unto contracts, the ecclesiastical
                     iudges drew unto themselves the hearing and determining of all matters: which
                     their iugling craft was both by the kings edicts, and the decrees of the high
                     courts of parliament, long since met withall, and taken away. But if the French
                     king shall in his owne priuat name contract with the pope, he may voluntarily
                     and of his owne accord bind himselfe unto the popes iurisdiction, which we read
                     to have bene done by <hi rend="italic">Philip Valois,</hi> at such time as he
                     borrowed the summe of three hundred and thirtie thousand florines of gold, of
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> pope <hi rend="italic">Clement</hi> the
                     sixt, which is an ordinarie clause in all obligations, in which sort the pope
                     himselfe might aswell as a priuat man be bound also. But this money the pope
                     may seeme also not to have lent without reward; but beeing himselfe of the
                     house of <hi rend="italic">Turene,</hi> it may be thought that he for this
                     summe so lent, procured of the king the great priueleges which the counties of
                     Turene yet at this day enioy. Yea but I know some to pretend, that the French
                     kings ought to receiue their royall crowne at the hands of the pope: for that
                     king <hi rend="italic">Pipin</hi> so receiued it at Saint <hi rend="italic">Denise</hi> in Fraunce, of pope <hi rend="italic">Zacharie:</hi> as though
                     one act in discontinued solemnities, and of so great consequence, could giue a
                     right, or establish a perpetuall law: which it cannot do in the getting of the
                     least discontinued seruice; but by the prescription of 100 yeres: albeit that
                     in truth the king <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> leaueth not to bee king,
                     without any coronation or consecration, which are not things of the
                     soueraignty. And that no man can deny, but that if the donation of the exarchat
                     of Rauenna &amp; Pentapolis, one of the fairest countries of al Italie, be made
                     by the kings of Fraunce unto the popes, and the church of Rome; it is also
                     holden of that crowne of Fraunce: seeing that the confirmation of the
                     seignories so giuen, was requested of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the Gentle,
                     successour to <hi rend="italic">Charlemaigne:</hi> which confirmation <hi rend="italic">Carolus Sigonius,</hi> a most skilfull man in the antiquities
                     of Italie, writeth himselfe to have seene and read. Wherefrom a man may draw
                     two most certaine arguments; The one, That the donation was made by the
                     predecessours of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the Gentle: And the other that
                     the soueraigntie of the seignories so giuen, was yet reserued: For otherwise
                     there should not <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> have needed any of king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> his confirmation; considering that king <hi rend="italic">Pipin</hi> had by law of armes wonne those territories from
                     the emperours of Constantinople, &amp; therfore might of right both giue them
                     by himselfe so wonne, and also appoint lawes unto them so by him giuen. Albeit
                     that the Constantinopolitan emperour sent ambassadors into France unto <hi rend="italic">Pepin,</hi> to have had him to have infringed &amp; reuoked
                     the said donatiō: which they could not of him obtaine, but returned as they
                     came; as is to be seene in the histories of <hi rend="italic">Floardus</hi> and
                        <hi rend="italic">Sigonius.</hi> And that more is, <hi rend="italic">Augustinus Onuphrius</hi> the popes chamberlaine, who had diligently
                     searched all the Vatican records (speaking of the <pb n="147" facs="75"/>
                     popes) confesseth, that the exarchat of Rauenna, Romandiola, the duchie of
                        Vrbin,<milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> and part of Tuscanie, were giuen to
                     the Church of Rome. But hee speaketh not of that which I have read in the
                     extract of the Vatican register, <hi rend="italic">viz▪. Iohn,</hi> surnamed
                        <hi rend="italic">Digitorum,</hi> to have written in letters of gold, the
                     donation pretended to have bene made by <hi rend="italic">Constantine:</hi> in
                     the end whereof are these words, <hi rend="italic">Quam fabulam longi temporis
                        mendacia finxit;</hi> which words I thought not good in any thing chaunge:
                     as being much stronger arguments than those of <hi rend="italic">La<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>. Valla,</hi> to conuince the lies of <hi rend="italic">Augustin Egubin,</hi> who of purpose to deceiue, hath forged
                     in Greeke the donation of <hi rend="italic">Constantine,</hi> to giue it the
                     more credit; whose deceit is easie to be refuted both by the manner of the
                     stile, and the knowledge of antiquitie: and is sufficiently refelled by <hi rend="italic">Sigonius</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Onuphrius</hi> both
                     Italians. Which is also well iustified by the epistle of pope <hi rend="italic">Iohn,</hi> written in the <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> yeare 876, who
                     therein confesseth the great largeses and donations bestowed upon the church of
                     Rome by <hi rend="italic">Pipin, Charlemaigne,</hi> and his successours: and by
                     the auntient marble table, which is yet to be seene at Rauenna, wherein are
                     these words contained, <hi rend="italic">Pipinus Pius primus amplificaendae
                        ecclesiae v<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>am aperuit, &amp; exarchatum Rauennae
                        cum ampliss.</hi> The rest of the inscription time hath defaced. And thus
                     much concerning the greatnesse and soueraigntie of our kings.</p><p>I will not here touch the greatnesse and soueraigntie of the <hi rend="italic">Negus</hi> of Aethiopia<note place="marg" anchored="true">The princes se<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ing the great Negus of Aethiopia no kings nor
                        soueraigns.</note> commonly called <hi rend="italic">Prester Iohn,</hi>
                     whome <hi rend="italic">Paeu. Iouius</hi> writeth to have fiftie tributarie
                     kings under him, or (to say better) gouernours of Prouinces, which yeeld vnto
                     him not onely their ordinarie tributes, but also their fealtie and homage, and
                     that in greater humilitie,<milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> than verie slaues do
                     unto their lords: as a man may see in the historie of <hi rend="italic">Francis
                        Aluares</hi> a Portugall, who dwelt sixe yeres in Aethiopia, and yet
                     neuerthelesse they are called kings without cause, because they be no absolute
                     soueraignes, seeing that they be but tributaries, yeelding fealtie and homage
                     unto another man.</p><p>As for those princes which are no Christians, I have nothing to say, for the
                     small assurance<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Mahomitaine princes by their lawe
                        forbidden to cal themselus lords or soueraigns.</note> we have by the
                     writings and reports of others, much differing among themselves. Yet
                     neuerthelesse so it is, that in one chapiter of the Alcoron, it is expresly for
                     bidden all the <hi rend="italic">Musulman</hi> (that is to say the right
                     beleeuing) princes, to call themselves lords, except their Caliph or great
                     bishop their great prophet <hi rend="italic">Muhamed</hi> his vicar. By meanes
                     of which prohibition the Mahometan bishops have vsurped absolute soueraigntie
                        <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> aboue all their princes, giuing kingdomes
                     and principalities, to whome they thought good, in name and title of
                     governments: which may be also the cause that no Musulman prince weareth a
                     crowne upon his head: albeit that before the most auntient kings of Asia and
                     Afrike did weare crownes. And namely <hi rend="italic">Ioiada</hi> the high
                     priest, hauing consecrated <hi rend="italic">Ioas</hi> king of Iuda, set a
                     crowne upon his head. But the Musulman princes think that chapter not to haue
                     bene made by <hi rend="italic">Muhamed</hi> their law giuer, but by their
                     Caliphes, (who of many diuers corrupt Alcorans made but one, long time after
                     the death of <hi rend="italic">Muhamed,</hi> defacing the rest, and for the
                     augmenting of their maiestie, to have bene into their Alcoran by them inserted.
                     But at such time as three of their great bishops had for the desire of
                     soueraignty, at one time taken upon them the name of the <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> great Caliph, the princes of Persia, the Curdes, the Turkes,
                     the Tartars, the Sultans of Aegypt, the kings of Marocco, of Fez, of Telensin,
                     of Tanes, of Bugia, and the people of Zenetes, and of Luntune, exempted
                     themselves from the obeysance of the Caliphs, to hold their kingdomes in
                     soueraigntie: as also the kings of Tombut, of Guynee, of Gaoga, and other
                     kings, which dwell more into the hart of Afrike, who know not the Caliphes
                     commaund, neither acknowledge any greater than themselves: except they<note place="marg" anchored="true">Diuers Mahomitaine kings tributaries unto the king of
                        portugal</note> which hold in fealtie and homage of the king of Portugall,
                     as the kings of Calecut, of Malachie, of Cambar, and of Canor, whomethey haue
                     compelled so to do, and to pay <pb n="148" facs="76"/> them tribute; hauing
                     also subdued all the sea coast of Afrike, and of the East Indies, and
                        <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> almost in infinit number of places built
                     fortresses; yea and in the island of Ormus euen under the nose of the Persian
                     king, hauing built a most strong castle, and straitly exacting tribute and
                     custome of such as passe that way, or chaunce to arriue in the Persian gulfe;
                     and had done the like in the red sea, had not <hi rend="italic">Barnagas</hi>
                     gouernour of that coast, and the king of Aethiopia his subiect, cut the
                     Portugals in peeces, and rased the fortresses which they had begun to build,
                     under the colour of alliance and amitie contracted by <hi rend="italic">Lopes</hi> ambassadour for the king of Portugall, with the king of
                     Aethiopia, in the yere 1519. And yet for all that certaine it is, that the king
                     of Portugall was of auntient time feudatarie or vassall unto the king of
                     Castile, and the kingdome of Portugall a member<note place="marg" anchored="true">Portugall of
                        auntient time a member of the kingdom of Castile.</note> of the kingdome of
                     Castile: which for the greater part holden by force by the <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> Moores, was giuen to <hi rend="italic">Henrie,</hi> brother
                     to <hi rend="italic">Godfrey</hi> of Buillon, in marriage with the base
                     daughter of <hi rend="italic">Alphonsus</hi> king of Castile: from whome are
                     descended all the kings of Portugall, since this foure hundred and fiftie
                     yeares, unto <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the Cardinall, who last raigned:
                     hauing (of long) exempted themselves from the soueraigntie of Castile, and
                     holding diuers kings their tributaries and feudataries, of whome <hi rend="italic">Emanuel</hi> was the greatest, and for his martiall prowesse
                     amongst the rest most famous; who vanquished the aforesaid kings, and caused
                     them to pay him tribute. For there are now no feudatarie kings in Asia, or
                     Africa, which are not also tributarie; howbeit in auntient time the kings of
                     Persia, and the Romans, hauing subdued kings unto their empire, for most part
                     made them to become their tributaries: as for such fealtie and homage as is of
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> vassals exacted, they knew not what it
                     ment. For <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the second, king of Macedon, being by
                     the Romans ouercome, they graunted him peace uppon condition, that he should
                     pay them into their common treasure, a certaine yearly tribute; which <hi rend="italic">Perseus, Philip</hi> his sonne, afterwards refusing to pay,
                     drew upon himselfe a great and heauy warre, to his owne vtter destruction. And
                     yet oftentimes such tributarie kings had others tributarie unto themselves, who
                     had also power of life and death, and other roiall soueraignties over their
                     owne subiects. So the kingdome of <hi rend="italic">Dauid</hi> was contained
                     within the bounds of Palestine, and yet he enforced the neighbour kings to pay
                     unto him tribute, his posteritie neuerthelesse not long after yeelding tribute
                     unto the Aegyptians, and the Assirians. So the kings of Slauonia, and the
                     Commonweale of Carthage <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> used the like
                     authoritie and right over the princes under their dominion, that the Romans
                     exercised over them, enforcing them to bring their yearely tributes into their
                     treasuries.</p><p>Yet is there difference betwixt a tribute and a pention: for a pention is paid
                     in respect<note place="marg" anchored="true">Difference betwixt a pention and a tribute.</note>
                     of fealtie, or in time of warres to receiue aid against our enemies: but a
                     tribut is giuen, thereby to have peace; howbeit that he which receiueth such a
                     pention, commonly boasteth of it, as of a tribute: as the kings of England
                     called the pention of fiftie thousand crownes, which <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xj paid unto them by the treatie of Piqueni, by the name of
                     a tribute; vntill that <hi rend="italic">Elizabeth</hi> the daughter of <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> king of England was married unto <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the eight, king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> his sonne.
                     Howbeit that <hi rend="italic">Philip Comines</hi>

                     <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> denyeth it to have bene either pention or
                     tribute; yet needes it must bee either the one or the other. So the Grand
                     Signior calleth the German emperour his tributarie, for the pention which he
                     payeth euerie yeare for the peaceable enioying of a part of Hungarie. The
                     Venetians also, the Genowayes, the Ragusians, the kings of Algiers and of
                     Tunes, in his letters and in the conuentions of peace, he calleth by the name
                     of his great friends and allies, but accounteth them indeed his tributaries.
                     But the great Precop Tartar, who in auntient time was soueraigne of all the
                     realmes from Volga to Boristhenes, held all the princes and lords of those
                     countries as his vassals and tributaries, <pb n="149" facs="76"/> who not onely
                     kneeled before himselfe, but stood before his ambassadours sitting:<milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> For so the Knez of Moscouie behaued himselfe before
                     the ambassadours of this▪ Tartar prince, and was therefore of other princes
                     commonly called but by the name of a duke: howbeit that the dukes of Moscouie,
                     for this and diuers other such indignities cast off the seruile Tartars yoke,
                     in the yeare 1524. And the first that reuolted from them was <hi rend="italic">B<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>silius</hi> the first, who called himselfe
                        <hi rend="italic">The Great Chamberlaine of God, and</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The Moscoui<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> an absolute soueraigne
                        prince.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">King of Moscouie:</hi> and so he which at this present
                     raigneth, in despight that other princes tearme him but a duke, stileth
                     himselfe <hi rend="italic">The Great Emperour:</hi> as in truth he in power
                     either excelleth, or is equall unto the greatest kings his neighbours,
                     excepting the kings of the Turkes▪ albeit that the right of soueraigne maiestie
                     be not defined by the spatiousnesse of places, or the greatnesse of countries,
                     as if that might make a prince either <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The notable saying of Eumenes to king Antigonus.</note> more
                     or lesse soueraigne: as <hi rend="italic">Eumenes</hi> being ouerthrowne, and
                     hauing nothing left him of his owne more than the castle wherein he was
                     besieged, yet when as he was to treat of peace with <hi rend="italic">Antigonus</hi> king of Asia (who as he was in power, would also in honor
                     have seemed to have bene his superiour) answered, That he <note n="*" place="marg" anchored="true">Plutar. in Eumene.</note> acknowledged no man greater than
                     himselfe, so long as he had his sword in his hand.</p><p>And yet among soueraigne princes there is a certaine prerogative of honour
                        due<note place="marg" anchored="true">Degrees of honour among soueraigne princes being
                        equall.</note> unto the more auntient Monarches and Commonweals, although
                     they bee in wealth &amp; power inferior unto them that be more new or of later
                     time: as we see amongst the xiij Cantons of the Swissers, who are all
                     soueraignes, acknowledging nether prince nor monarch in the world for their
                     soueraigne: the Canton of Zurich in all their assemblies <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The order of the Cantons of the Swissars.</note> hath the
                     prerogative of honour: For their deputie as a prince in the name of all the
                     rest of the Cantons, receiueth and dismisseth the ambassadours of other kings
                     and Commonweals; and unto him onely it belongeth to call a generall assemblie
                     of all the states of the Cantons, and againe to dismisse the same; albeit that
                     the Canton of Berne be much greater and stronger: Next unto them of Berne, are
                     Lucerne, and Vri, albeit that they are defended neither with wals nor ditches,
                     no more than are the Schwits, and Vnderuald, which follow in order unto them of
                     Vri: then follow after them Zug, Glaris, Basill, Friburg, and Soleurre. Now
                     haply a man may say, That this is done according to the time that euerie Canton
                     entred into their alliance: which is not so; for by their treaties it
                     appeareth, that the first that entred in that confederation <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> and alliance were they of Vri, Schwits, Zug, and
                     Vnderuald.</p><p>Sometimes also the more auntient Monarches and Commonweals lose their
                     prerogative of honour; as when they put themselves into the protection of
                     latter princes,<note place="marg" anchored="true">Degrees of honour betwixt soueraign princes
                        being in alliance together.</note> or yeeld themselves tributaries: in which
                     case it is most certaine, that they are alwaies lesse than the other into whose
                     protection they put themselves, or unto whome they pay tribute. As it chaunced
                     almost to all kings and princes which sought the protection of the Romans:
                     whereas others which were come into equall alliance with them, as the Hed<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>i, were in their leagues called their confederats,
                     their equals and brethren: and yet for all that, they in truth and effect were
                     inferiour unto them in honour. And verily <hi rend="italic">Augustus</hi> the
                     emperour showed himselfe wonderfull ceremonious and difficult <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> in the honours which he bestowed on kings and princes,
                     allies and under the protection of the empire of Rome; making Tetrarques,
                     inferiour unto Ethnarques, and these inferiours unto kings; and the more
                     auntient allies of the Romans, superiours unto the rest that came into their
                     alliance after them. And albeit that the Romans in the flourishing time of
                     their popular estate, seemed not much carefull of such ceremonies of dignitie
                     and honour which is of kings and princes more regarded, yet did <hi rend="italic">Q. Martius Philippus</hi> their ambassadour show himselfe
                     therein curious: Who contending with <hi rend="italic">Perseus</hi> king of
                     Macedon, which of them shuld come over the riuer upon the frontiers <pb n="150" facs="77"/> of Macedon, unto the other: and <hi rend="italic">Perseus</hi>
                     for that he was a king, refusing to come over <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/>
                     unto the Roman ambassadour, the ambassadour yet by sweet speech drew him ouer:
                     Which he did (as he said unto the ambassadors of the allies and confederats
                     there present with him) to show that the honour of the Romans was greater than
                     that of the Macedonian kings; who for all that would in nothing giue place vnto
                     the Romans. Yet was there a greater cause than that, which <hi rend="italic">Martius,</hi> or els <hi rend="italic">Liuie</hi> omitted, which was
                     forthat <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the father of <hi rend="italic">Perseus</hi> had upon conditions, receiued peace of the Romans and also
                     paid unto them tribute; which his father <hi rend="italic">Philips</hi> act, if
                     he had disliked, he should not have medled with the kingdome: although that he
                     was otherwise vnworthy therof, who his father yet liuing, had aspired unto his
                     inheritance: and being but borne of a concubine, had slaine his brother borne
                     in lawfull marriage. But after that hee <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/>
                     ouerthrowne and vanquished by <hi rend="italic">Paulus Aemilius▪</hi> had lost
                     the hope of his kingdome▪ he writ letters unto <hi rend="italic">Aemilius,</hi>
                     generall of the Roman army, yet stiling himselfe a king: which his letters the
                     Roman generall reiected, and would not vouchsafe to open them, except he first
                     renounced his roiall dignitie, which can onely agree unto him which hath a
                     soueraigne power, subiect to no other princes commaund.</p><p>And for the same cause <hi rend="italic">Francis</hi> the first the French king
                     declared unto Cardinall <hi rend="italic">Bibiene</hi> the popes legat, that
                     the pope his master ought not to suffer the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift to call himselfe king of Naples and of Sicilie,
                     seeing that he was but the Popes vassall. Whereof the legat gaue aduertisement
                     unto <hi rend="italic">Iulian Cardinall de Medices,</hi> who was afterwards
                     pope; to the end that that title might have beene rased, which <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> as he certified him by his letters, was by the charters of
                     fealtie, forbidden the kings of Naples to take: whereas for all that, in all
                     the records which wee have got out of the Vatican, that is not onely not
                     forbidden, but the name and dignitie of the king of Naples and Sicilie
                     expressely set downe, as namely in the inuestitures of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> of France, of <hi rend="italic">Carobert,</hi> and of <hi rend="italic">Iohn.</hi> So many times ambassadours euill instructed in
                     their masters affaires, through ignorance commit therein many notable defaults.
                     And by the same reason we should take the royall title of a king from the king
                     of Bohemia, who holdeth his kingdome in fealtie and homage of the empire; and
                     not for that it is so little, as many have written, that it is for that cause
                     no kingdome, which were to measure kings by the elne: but it is, for that the
                     countrey of Bohemia was by the emperour <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Fredericke</hi> the first, for title of honour onely erected
                     a kingdome, without preiudice unto the right or soueraignetie of the empire.
                     But to say truth, this title agreeth unto none that is another mans vassall,
                     nor hath nothing of his owne in title of soueraigntie. And it maybe, that for
                     this cause pope <hi rend="italic">Pius</hi> the fourth gaue not the royall
                     title to<note place="marg" anchored="true">The title of a king belongeth not unto an other mans
                        vassal neither to him which holdeth nothing of his owne in soueraigntie. The
                        maiestie of the emperour still impugned by this French author▪ and the
                        French kings too much exalted.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">Cosmus</hi> duke of Florence, albeit that he would very
                     gladly have so done: whereof the emperour <hi rend="italic">Maximilian</hi> the
                     second, being by the French embassadour aduertised, not vnfitly replied, <hi rend="italic">Italia non habet regem nisi Caesarem:</hi> Italy hath no king
                     but the emperor. Although that be to be vnderstood of the maiestie of the
                     German empire (whereof the Florentine state dependeth) &amp; not of the
                     emperour, who is himselfe subiect unto the estate of the empire: albeit that
                     all christian princes giue him the prerogative of honor,<milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> next unto the pope, whether it be for that he is chiefe of
                     the German empire, or els hath got it by long prescription of time. So also
                     next unto the emperour, all other princes have used to giue this prerogative of
                     honour unto the French kings; not only for the long possession thereof, but
                     also for that in all the world (whether you looke among the Christians, or the
                     Tartars, the Turkes, the Ethyopians, the Indians, or Barbarians) is not to be
                     found so auntient a kingdome, or such a continuall discent of kings of the same
                     stocke and line as is among the French kings. And therefore <hi rend="italic">Baldus</hi> (being himselfe an Italian Lawyer and a subiect of the empire)
                     sayth well, That the French king <pb n="151" facs="77"/> carieth the crowne of
                     glorie aboue all the kings, who have alwaies giuen him that <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> preheminence of honour. And there is also yet extant an
                     epistle of pope <hi rend="italic">Gregories</hi> unto king <hi rend="italic">Childebert,</hi> the beginning whereof is this: <hi rend="italic">Quanto
                        caeteros homines regia maiestas antecellit, tanto caeterarum gentium regna,
                        regni vestri culmen excellit:</hi> by how much the royall Maiestie excelleth
                     other men, by so much doth the Maiestie of your kingdome excell the kingdomes
                     of other nations. As in truth this prerogative is unto him due: for the Germane
                     emperours themselves cannot denie, but that the German empire was sometime a
                     prouince and member of the auntient kingdome of Fraunce, conquered by the
                     prowesse of <hi rend="italic">Charlemaigne</hi> king of France, and power of
                     the French nation: but afterwards rent againe from the same, being giuen in
                     partition to <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> of France, yongest son to <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the Gentle, at such time as <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the Bauld the French <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> emperour
                     held the imperiall seat of the empire: Howbeit that yet neuerthelesse the
                     Germane princes the <hi rend="italic">Othons,</hi> by the graunt of the Roman
                     bishops hauing got the imperial title, have by little &amp; little through the
                     ignorance of our embassadors vsurped &amp; taken unto themselves this
                     prerogative of honour aboue the French kings. As in like case the king of
                     Spaine not many yeares agoe would have preuented our kings ambassadours: but
                     was at the request of <hi rend="italic">M. Nouuaille,</hi> ambassadour for the
                     French king, by a decree of the Venetian Senat embarred so to doe, in the yeare
                     1558: and so likewise afterwards by a decree of the pope, giuen by the consent
                     of all the colledge of Cardinals: where the pope said with a lowd and cleare
                     voyce, That the French kings had beene alwayes the auntient protectours of the
                     church of Rome, and that the fairest <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> and
                     fruitfullest prouinces of the kingdome of Spaine, had bene dismembred and rent
                     from the kingdome of Fraunce: than which nothing could in that kind have beene
                     more truely spoken; for by our kings, the authoritie of the bishops of Rome
                     hath bene delivered from contempt, their wealth encreased, and their power
                        confirmed.<note place="marg" anchored="true">Contention at the counsel of Trent betwixt the
                        Spanish and French embassadours about their places.</note> Wherein the pope
                     also in some sort amended the errour committed in the councell of Trent; where
                        <hi rend="italic">Mendoza</hi> the Spanish ambassadour, preferring himselfe
                     and taking place before the French ambassadour (which then was <hi rend="italic">M. Lansac,</hi> assisted with the M. M. of Ferrier &amp; Faut)
                     was to have bin compelled to have departed from the councell, or els to haue
                     kept the auntient order of ambassadours, and so to have followed the French
                     ambassadours: who withstanding the Spanish ambassadors presumption,<milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> requested that he might not so inuert the order of the
                     ambassadours: saying, that otherwise he would himselfe forsake the Councell,
                     and cause the French bishops to depart thence also. Whereunto the Spanish
                     ambassadour craftily answered, That as he would not go before the French
                     ambassadour, so would he not be enforced to follow him; and so tooke his place
                     by himselfe apart from all the rest of the ambassadors. Yet notwithstanding
                     these two former decrees which I have spoken of, the Spanish ambassadour not
                     long after at Vienna in Austria, earnestly requested of the emperor, That he
                     might goe in the same degree and order with the French ambassadour; or that
                     they might at leastwise go formost by turnes (as did the Roman Consuls, who had
                     the preheminence, the twelue sergeants, and power to commaund, successiuely,
                     each of them <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> his day) which <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the second the French king hearing of, writ againe to his
                     ambassador, That prerogative of dignitie to be of so great moment and
                     consequence, as that nothing therein was by him to be said or done more than he
                     had commission for. And <hi rend="italic">Ferdinand</hi> the emperour not
                     willing to offend either the one or the other, thought it good to forbid them
                     both from comming together, either unto sermons or other publike<note place="marg" anchored="true">A good order for the auoiding of contētion betwixt the
                        ambassadors of great princes, for their places▪</note> assemblies. The Senat
                     of Polonia troubled with the same difficultie, thought it not good to preferre
                     one ambassadour before another, neither to preferre them by turnes, or yet to
                     make them equall: but decreed of all ambassadours in generall, that <pb n="152" facs="78"/> as every of them first came into the frontiers of the kingdome
                     of Polonia, so should <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> they be first in order
                     heard. And so accordingly <hi rend="italic">M. De Monluc</hi> bishop of Valence
                     (who for his wisedome and dexteritie for mannaging of matters of estate, had
                     beene fifteene times ambassadour) hauing by great celeritie preuented the
                     Spanish ambassador, had also first audience; wherewith the Spanish ambassadour
                     offended, would as then say nothing: as I have vnderstood by <hi rend="italic">M. de Nouuaille</hi> abbot of Belle-iste, a man of great honour and vertue;
                     who then was also ambassadour into Polonia, as he now is at Constantinople. But
                     before the yeare 1558, neuer Christian prince made question of the preheminence
                     of the French ambassadours before them of Spaine: and namely the English men
                     alwayes preferred them before the Spaniard; albeit that they had bene auntient
                     allies and friends unto the one, and enemies unto the other. As after the
                        <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> death of queene <hi rend="italic">Marie,</hi> in the chapter holden by the knights of the most honourable
                     order of the Garter, upon Saint <hi rend="italic">Georges</hi> eue, in the
                     yeare 1555, concerning the conferring<note place="marg" anchored="true">The French preferred
                        before the Spanish.</note> of honours, it was decreed, That the French kings
                     place should be aboue the rest, next unto the prince on the right hand; where
                     before was the place for Spaine, while king <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> was
                     married unto the queene. And the next day after being Saint <hi rend="italic">Georges</hi> day, a day of great solemnitie unto the knights of that order,
                     a seat was accordingly reserued for the French king, on the right hand next
                     unto the prince: and another on the left hand for the king of Spaine, next vnto
                     the emperours seat on the same side, being then emptie. And afterward in the
                     time of <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the ix, the queene of England caused to
                     be sent unto him the banner of Fraunce, of the same stuffe and greatnes that
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> her owne was, as the king was aduertised by
                        <hi rend="italic">M. de Foix</hi> then his ambassador there; and in the roll
                     or Catalogue of these knights, which is signed euerie yeare by the queene, the
                     French kings name is euer the first, next unto her owne.</p><p>But to take away these difficulties and ielousies betwixt princes, about their
                     honors, which are otherwise ineuitable and daungerous: it is declared in the
                     xiij article of the ordinances of king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xj,
                     touching the order of knights, that they should bee placed according to the
                     time of their receiuing into the order, without prerogative of king or
                     emperour. For euerie soueraigne prince who is neither tributarie, vassall, nor
                     in the protection of another, may as seemeth unto him best in his owne countrey
                     bestow the prerogatives of honour upon whomsoeuer hee pleaseth, and to reserue
                     the <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> chiefe place unto himselfe. We know right
                     well that the Venetians, the Rhagusians, the Genowayes, the Moscouites, and the
                     Polonians, are in league with the great Turk, and yet hath he alwaies giuen the
                     prerogative of honour unto the French king, calling him in his letters the
                     Greatest, and the <hi rend="italic">Greatest among the most Great Princes of
                        the Christians:</hi> &amp; stileth himselfe <hi rend="italic">The greatest
                        of all Princes, and the chiefe Sarrach or Prince of the Musulmans;</hi> that
                     is to say, <hi rend="italic">Chiefe Prince of the right beleeuing or
                        faithfull,</hi> which last prerogative of honour the Christian princes
                     themselves have giuen him by their letters: and as for the first title it
                     seemeth himselfe to have taken it from the auntient<note place="marg" anchored="true"><p><figure rend="block"/></p></note> emperours of Constantinople, who bare in their armes foure B. which we
                     call <hi rend="italic">Fusills,</hi> wherby thesewords are signified; <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/>,<milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> that is to say <hi rend="italic">King of kings, raigning
                        over kings.</hi> Which was the title that the kings<note place="marg" anchored="true">The
                        armes of the antient emperors of Constantinople.</note> of Babilon in
                     auntient time tooke upon them also, as we may see in <hi rend="italic">Ezechiel,</hi> who calleth the great king <hi rend="italic">Nabucodonosor</hi>

                     <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/> that is to say, King
                     of kings; for that all the kings of Asia were unto him tributaries: after which
                     the kings of Persia hauing ouercome the kings of Asiria, as <hi rend="italic">Esdras</hi> writeth, used the same title: &amp; after them the Parthian
                     kings also, as <hi rend="italic">Dion</hi> writeth, that <hi rend="italic">Phraates</hi> the king of Parthia called himselfe King of kings. But
                     neither feudatarie kings which hold all their territories of others; neither
                     dukes, marquesses, counties, or other like princes can of right vse the title
                     of soueraigne <pb n="153" facs="78"/> maiestie, but only of <hi rend="italic">his Highnesse, his Serenitie,</hi> or his <hi rend="italic">Excellencie,</hi> as wee have before <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> said.
                     Wherfore seeing that princes Tributaries, and Feudadaries, are not to be
                     accounted absolute soueraignes; neither they which are in the protection of
                     others: let vs now speake of the true markes of Soueraigntie, thereby the
                     better to know them who they be that be such.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>