<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1:1.6</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1:1.6</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:pdlpsci:bodin.livrep.perseus-eng1" xml:lang="eng"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><head><hi rend="italic">CHAP. VI.</hi> ¶ What a Citisen is, and how much Citisens
                     differ from Citisens, and how much from strangers: what also is to be
                     vnderstood by the name of a Towne, a Citie, and of a Commonweale.</head><p><seg rend="decorInit">W</seg>Hat we have before said concerning a whole
                     Familie, and every part thereof, containeth in it the beginning of all
                     Commonweals. And as foundations can of themselves stand without the forme of an
                     house, before <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> the walles be built higher, or
                     any roofe laid upon them: so also a Familie can of it selfe be without a Citie
                     or a Commonweale: and so can also the maister of a Familie vse his power and
                     command over his houshold without depending of the power of any other man: as
                     they say there are many such families in the frontiers of the kingdomes of Fes
                     and of Marocco, and in the West Indies: but a Commonweale can no more be
                     without a Familie, than a Citie without houses, or an house without a
                     foundation. Now when the maister of the Familie goeth out of his owne house
                     where he commaundeth, to entreat and trafficke with other heads <pb n="47" facs="26"/> of Families, of that concerneth them all in generall, he then
                     loaseth the title of maister,<milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> head, and lord,
                     to be a companion, equall and fellow like with others, leauing his familie to
                     enter into a Citie, and his domesticall affaires to entreat of publick; and in
                     stead of a lord calleth himselfe a Citisen, which is no other in proper tearmes
                     than <hi rend="italic">A free</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The definition of a Citisen.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">subiect holding of the soueraigntie of another man.</hi> For
                     before there was either Citie or citisen, or any forme of a Commonweale amongst
                     men, euerie master of a familie was a maister in his owne house, hauing power
                     of life and death over his wife and children: but after that force, violence,
                     ambition, couetousnesse, and desire of revenge had armed one against another,
                     the issues of warres and combats giuing victorie unto the one side, made the
                     other to become unto them slaues: and amongst them that ouercame, he that was
                     chosen cheefe and captaine, under whose conduct and leading they <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> had obtained the victorie, kept them also in his power
                     and commaund as his faithfull and obedient subiects, and the other as his
                     slaues. Then that full and entire libertie by nature giuen to every man, to
                     live as himselfe best pleased, was altogether taken from the vanquished, and in
                     the vanquishers themselves in some measure also diminished, in regard of the
                     conquerour; for that now it concerned euerie man in priuat to yeeld his
                     obedience unto his chiefe soueraigne; and he that would not abate any thing of
                     his libertie, to live under the lawes and commaundement of another, lost all.
                     So the word of <hi rend="italic">Lord</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Seruant,</hi>
                     of <hi rend="italic">Prince</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Subiect,</hi> before
                     vnknowne unto the world, were first brought into vse. Yea Reason, and the verie
                     light of nature, leadeth vs to beleeue very<note place="marg" anchored="true">That violence and
                        oppression gaue the beginning unto Commonweals.</note> force and violence to
                     have giuen course and beginning unto Commonweals. And albeit <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> that there were no reason therefore, it shal be hereafter
                     declared by the vndoubted▪ testimonies of the most credible historiographers,
                     that is to say, of <hi rend="italic">Thucydides, Plutarch, Caesar,</hi> &amp;
                     also by the laws of <hi rend="italic">Solon,</hi> That the first men that bare
                     rule, had no greater honour and vertue, than to kill, massacre and rob men, or
                     to bring them in slauerie. These be the words of <hi rend="italic">Plutarch.</hi> Yet have we more also the witnesse of the sacred history,
                     where it is said, that <hi rend="italic">Nimroth</hi> the nephew of <hi rend="italic">Cham,</hi> was the first that by force and violence brought
                     men into his subiection, establishing his kingdome in the countrey▪ of <hi rend="italic">Assyria:</hi> and for this cause they called him the <hi rend="italic">Mightie hunter,</hi> which the Hebrews interpret to be a
                     theefe and robb<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>. Which thing also <hi rend="italic">Philo</hi> the Iew, and <hi rend="italic">Iosephus</hi> by their
                     testimonies confirme, <hi rend="italic">viz. <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/>

                     </hi> by his wealth and power to have first exercised <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> tyrannie. Wherein it appear <gap reason="illegible" extent="1_word" instant="false"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Demosthenes, Aristotle,</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Cicero,</hi> to have mistaken<note place="marg" anchored="true">That kings were not first
                        chosen for their iustice and vertue.</note> themselves, in following the
                     errour of <hi rend="italic">Herodotus,</hi> who saith, That the first kings
                     were chosen for their iustice and vertue; and have hereof faigned unto vs I wot
                     not what heroicall and golden worlds: an opinion by me by most certaine
                     arguments and testimonies elswhere refelled; seeing that the first Cities and
                     Commonweals, long before the time of <hi rend="italic">Abraham</hi> were full
                     of slaues: as also not long agoe the Westerne islands did swarme with them at
                     such time as the Spaniards subdued them: a thing that could not possibly be,
                     but by extreame violent forcing the free lawes of nature. And it is not yet
                     past seuentie yeares that the people of Gaoga in Africke had neuer felt or
                     heard of any king or lord whatsoeuer, vntill that one amongst them a trauell or
                        <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> had in his trauell seene and noted the
                     maiestie of the king of Tombut: and thereupon conceiuing a desire to make
                     himselfe a king also in his owne countrie, hee at first to begin withall,
                     killed a rich marchant; and so possessed of his horses armes and marchandise,
                     divided them amongst his nie kinsfolks and friends, acquainted with his
                     purpose; by whose aid he by force and violence subdued now some, and after
                     others, killing the richest, and ceasing upon their goods: in such sort that
                     his sonne became rich with the robberies of his father, made himselfe king,
                     whose successor hath so continued after him in great power, as we read in <hi rend="italic">Leo</hi> of Africke. This was the beginning of <pb n="48" facs="27"/> the kings of Gaoga, which in short time greatly
                        encreased.<milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/>

                  </p><p>And thus much concerning the beginning of Commonweals, which may serue to
                     manifest the definition of a Citisen, by vs before set down, to be true, which
                     is no other thing to say, but <hi rend="italic">A free subiect holding of the
                        soueraignitie of another man. A free subiect</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">A Citisen must be a free subiect.</note> I say, for albeit
                     that a slaue be much more subiect unto the commaund of the highest authoritie
                     than a free man; yet so it is, that al people have alwayes with their common
                     consent agreed, That a slaue is no Citisen, and in questions of right is
                     accounted no<note place="marg" anchored="true">Slaues not to bee accounted Citisens.</note>
                     bodie; which cannot truely be said of mens wiues and children, who are free
                     from all seruitude and bondage; albeit that their rights and liberties, and the
                     power to dispose of their owne goods, be from them in some sort cut off by the
                     domesticall power: in sort that a man may say, that euerie Citisen is a
                     subiect, some small part of his libertie <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> being
                     diminished by the maiestie of him to whome he oweth obeysance. But euerie
                     subiect is not a Citisen, as we have said of a slaue; and may also so say of a
                     stranger, who comming into an other mans segniorie, is not receiued for a
                     Citisen, hauing not any part in the rights and priueledges of the Citie;
                     neither is to bee accounted in the number of friends, allies, or coallies, who
                     are not altogether straungers, (as the Lawyer saith) neither enemies also.
                     Howbeit that the Greeks of old called straungers enemies, as also did the
                     Latines, which <hi rend="italic">Cicero</hi> hath noted out of the law of the
                     twelue tables;<note place="marg" anchored="true">* Cice. officiorum. lib. 1.</note> The
                     mildnesse of the word (saith he) mitigating the hardnesse of the thing: and
                     they were called enemies which had conspired against the state. And it may well
                     bee also that those whom we yet by a common word cal <hi rend="italic">Hotes,</hi> or <hi rend="italic">Hostes,</hi> were in antient time
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> nothing els but straungers. But men haue
                     since corrected the proprietie of words, the forme of speech still remaining:
                     for the Greeks have called their enemies <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/>, as men making warre upon them; and
                     straungers <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/>, which
                     signifieth not pilgrims (as saith <hi rend="italic">Acursius</hi>) but
                     straungers, be they another mans subiects, or themselves soueraignes in their
                     owne countrey.</p><p>Now amongst them whome we said to be subiects unto publick empires and
                     soueraigne power; some are naturall, some are naturallised; and of them which
                     are naturall<note place="marg" anchored="true">The diuision of subiects.</note> some are free
                     borne, some are slaues, and these slaues being set at libertie, in an instant
                     become Citisens, whereas straunger slaues be not so. Yet true it is that the
                     enfranchised slaues in Greece were not admitted to be Citisens, although that
                     they were <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> of the same countrie, and naturall
                     subiects. For the request of <hi rend="italic">Demosthenes</hi> the Orator,
                     which he made unto the people after the great ouerthrow at Cherronaea, That all
                     the inhabitants of Athens, as well the enfranchised as others, might be
                     accounted Citisens; was reiected and denied, for feare least the enfranchised
                     men (of whom there was a great multitude) should become lords of their estate,
                     and with the number of voyces exclude the naturall Citisens from all honours
                     and promotions; which the greatest number still carried away: which thing the
                     Romans at the first not regarding, had almost before they were aware fallen
                     into the power of the enfranchised men, had not <hi rend="italic">Fabius
                        Maximus</hi> in good time foreseene the matter, and thrust the multitude of
                     the enfranchised men, before dispersed amongst all the tribes, into foure
                     tribes apart by <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> themselves; to the intent that
                     one and thirtie tribes of the free borne men and auntient Citisens, might stil
                     with the number of voices preuaile: for they counted not in Rome their voices
                     by the poll, as in auntient time they did at Athens, and now doe also at
                     Venice; but by degrees and centuries, in the assemblies of their great estates;
                     and by lines or tribes, in their lesse estates. And for that it so great a
                     matter was without sedition done by the onely wisedome of <hi rend="italic">Fabius</hi> the Censor, he tooke the surname of <hi rend="italic">Maximus</hi> (or of the Greatest:) in which doing he amended the errors of
                        <hi rend="italic">Appius</hi> the Censor▪<note place="marg" anchored="true">Why Fabius was
                        called Maximus.</note> who had dispersed the enfranchised and naturallised
                     Citisens (the issue of slaues and <pb n="49" facs="27"/> straungers) amongst
                     all the tribes of the free borne men: yet afterwards (notwithstanding
                        <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> the order taken by <hi rend="italic">Fabius</hi>) it was granted unto the Citisens enfranchised, that they might
                     enroll one of their sonnes beeing five yeares olde or more in the tribe or line
                     of their patron: But when those foure tribes of the enfranchised Citisens
                     seemed yet too puissant and strong, it was decreed, That there should by lot
                     one tribe bee drawne out, wherein all the enfranchised Citisens should giue
                     their voyces. And this was the state of the enfranchised Citisens, vntill the
                     civill warre betwixt <hi rend="italic">Marius</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Sylla,</hi> at which time the people at the motion of <hi rend="italic">Pub. Sulpitius</hi> made a law, That the enfranchised Citisens should from
                     that time forward be againe divided amongst all the tribes, which was the first
                     and principall cause of the ruine of that Commonweale. Wherefore as of slaues
                     some are borne, some are made; so also of Citisens some are made, some are
                        <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> borne: the naturall Citisen, is he that is
                     free of that wherein he is borne; whether he be borne but of one of his parents
                     a Citisen, or of both of them Citisens. True it is that of<note place="marg" anchored="true">The naturall citisen.</note> auntient time (and yet at this present also in
                     diuers Commonweals) to bee a Citisen it was needfull to have both father and
                     mother Citisens, as in Greece, otherwise they called them Bastards, or
                     Mungrels, which were but Citisens on the one side, and could not themselves
                     neither their children be partakers of the greatest benefits or offices in the
                     Commonweale, which they called Archontes, as saith <hi rend="italic">Demosthenes</hi> in his Oration against <hi rend="italic">Neaera,</hi>
                     albeit that many (as <hi rend="italic">Themistocles</hi> himselfe) were
                     thereinto secretly entered. But in the time of <hi rend="italic">Pericles</hi>
                     five thousand of them were sold slaues, who had born<note place="marg" anchored="true">* Plut.
                        in Peri.</note> the countenance of Citisens. And <hi rend="italic">Pericles</hi> himselfe hauing lost his children that were <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> right Citisens, made request unto the people, That his sonne
                     might be enrolled among the Citisens, which sonne he had begot at Athens of his
                     wife being a straunger. Wee also read that the Romans made a Collonie of foure
                     thousand Spaniards, whome the Romans had begot of Spanish women, for that they
                     were not true Citisens. But afterward it tooke place that he should be a
                     Citisen whose father was a citisen: and in many places it is sufficient for the
                     making of a citisen, that his mother was a citisen. For the place maketh not
                     the child of a straunger (man or woman) to be a citisen: and hee that was borne
                     in Africk of two Roman citisens is no lesse a citisen, than if hee had bene
                     borne in Rome. Now the made or naturallised citisen is he who hath submitted
                     himselfe unto the soueraigntie of another, and is so receiued into the number
                     of citisens.<milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The naturalised citisen.</note> For the citisen of honour
                     onely, who for his merits towards the Commonweale, or of<note place="marg" anchored="true">The
                        citisen of honour properly no citisen.</note> speciall favour hath obtained
                     the right and priueledge of a citisen, cannot of right bee called a citisen,
                     for that hee hath not put himselfe under the power of of anothers commaund.</p><p>Wherfore of many citisens, be they naturals, or naturallised, or els slaues
                     enfranchised (which are the three meanes that the law giueth to become a
                     citisen by) is made a Commonweale, when they are gouerned by the puissant
                     soueraigntie of one or many rulers: albeit that they differ among themselves in
                     lawes, language, customes, religions, and diuersitie of nations. But if all the
                     citisens be gouerned by the selfesame lawes and customes, it is not onely one
                     Commonweale, but also one very citie, albeit that <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The enclosure of wals make not a citie, but the government
                        of the citisens under the self same lawes: although they dwell in <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>uers townes or prouinces dispersed.</note> the
                     citisens be divided in many villages, townes, or prouinces. For the enclosure
                     of wals make not a citie, (as many have written) no more than the wals of an
                     house make a familie, which may consist of many slaues or children, although
                     they bee farre distant one from another, or in diuers countries, prouided that
                     they bee all subiect unto the commaund of one head of the familie: So say we of
                     a Citie, which may have many townes and villages, which vse the same customes
                     and fashions, as are the Bailiwicks, or Stewardships of this realme: And so the
                     Commonweale may have many cities and prouinces which may have diuers customes,
                     and yet are neuerthelesse subiect unto the<note place="marg" anchored="true">* viz. <hi rend="italic">France.</hi>

                     </note>

                     <pb n="50" facs="28"/> command of their soueraigne lords, and unto their edicts
                     and ordinances. And it may <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> also be that every
                     towne and citie may have certaine priuileges in particuler, which are not
                     common unto them of the suburbes; and the suburbs also may have certaine
                     prerogatives which are not common unto the villages, nor to the inhabitants of
                     the open countrie; who are yet neuerthelesse subiects of the same Commonweale,
                     and citisens of their citie; yet are they not for all that burgesses: for the
                     word citisen hath I know not how a more speciall signification with vs, than
                     hath the word Burgesse: and is properly the naturall subiect, who hath the
                     right of a corporation, or colledge, or<note place="marg" anchored="true">The difference
                        betwixt a citisen and a burgesse.</note> certaine other priueledges, which
                     are not common also unto the burgesses. I have said the naturall subiect, for
                     that the subiect naturallised although hee dwell in the towne, and enioy the
                     right of a burgesse, is yet called in many places a burgesse: &amp; the
                        <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> other is called a citisen, who enioyeth a
                     certaine particular priueledge proper unto free borne citisens. As in Paris
                     there is none but naturall citisens, and borne in Paris, that can be Prouost of
                     the marchants. And in Geneua a burgesse cannot be Syndic, or Senator of the
                     priuie counsell of xxv, which a citisen may well be: which is also used amongst
                     the Swissers, and all the townes of Germanie.</p><p>And thus much briefly concerning the difference of subiects, citisens,
                     burgesses, and straungers; as also concerning a Commonweale, a Citie, and a
                     Towne. But for as much as there is neither Greeke nor Latine, nor any other
                     writer that I have seene, which have used these definitions, it is needfull by
                     lawes and by examples to make plaine that which I have before said, being
                     otherwise of it selfe obscure. For we oftentimes <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> see great quarrels and controuersies to arise as well betwixt princes, as
                     citisens of the same towne or citie amongst themselves. For not understanding
                     the difference of these words, yea they from whome wee ought to expect the true
                     resolutions of these things, are themselves oftentimes farre wide, mistaking a
                     citie for a towne, a Commonweale for a citie, and straungers for citisens. But
                     they which write of a Commonweale without knowledge of the law, and of the
                     common right, are like unto them which go about to build faire high houses,
                     without any foundations at all. <hi rend="italic">Aristotle</hi> hath
                        defined<note place="marg" anchored="true">* Arist. Politic. lib. 3. cap. 6.</note> unto vs;
                     A citie to be a multitude of citisens, hauing all things needfull for them to
                     live well and happily withall: making no difference betweene a Commonweale and
                     a citie: saying also, That it is not a citie if all the citisens dwell not in
                     one and the selfe same <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> place: which is
                     absurditie in matter of a Commonweale; as <hi rend="italic">Iulius Caesar</hi>
                     in his Commentaries well declareth, saying, That euerie citie of the Heluetians
                     had foure villages, or cantons. Where it appeareth that the word Citie, is a
                     word of right or iurisdiction, which signifieth not one place or region, as the
                     word Towne, or Citie; which the Latines call <hi rend="italic">Vrbem</hi> of
                        <hi rend="italic">Vrbo,</hi> that is to say of <hi rend="italic">aratio,</hi> or plowing: for that as <hi rend="italic">Varro</hi> saith,
                     the compasse and circuit of cities was marked out with the plough. It is also
                     certaine in question of right, That he which hath caried out of the citie, that
                     which was by the law forbidden to be carried out, and hath carried the same
                     into another citie or towne of the same prouince; is neither to be said to haue
                     caried the thing out of the citie, neither to have offended against the law.
                     Yea the doctors go farther, saying, That hee hath <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> not done contrarie unto the law, that hath transported the
                     thing forbidden into any other citie or towne subiect unto the same prince. And
                     albeit that writers oftentimes confound both, taking sometimes the one for the
                     other, as the greeks oftentimes vse the word <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/>, and the Latines the word <hi rend="italic">Ciuitas</hi> for a towne, a citie, or the right of citisens,
                     for that the generall which is the citie, comprehendeth in it the particular,
                     which is the town: yet so it is, that they abused not the word <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/>, as we see that <hi rend="italic">Cicero</hi> hath well kept the proprietie both of the one and
                     of the other: for the word<note place="marg" anchored="true">* Cice ad A<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ticum. lib. 4.</note>

                     <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/> signifieth properly a
                     towne, wherof came the word <hi rend="italic">astuti,</hi> which with the
                     Greeks <pb n="51" facs="28"/> signifieth as much as doth with the Latines <hi rend="italic">Vrbani,</hi> for that the inhabitants of townes <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> are commonly in their behauiour more civill and
                     gratious, than are the pesants or rude countrey men: for the word <hi rend="italic">Ciuilis,</hi> which we call civill, was not of the auntient
                     Latines receiued for <hi rend="italic">Vrbanas,</hi> that is to say courteous,
                     or after the manner of the citie. And least any man should thinke them to be
                     rashly confounded, and to be but a question of words, and not of matter: it may
                     be that a towne may be well built and walled, and that more is well stored also
                     with people, and furnished with plentie of all things nececessarie to live
                     withal, &amp; yet for all that be no citie, if it have not laws and magistrats
                     for to establish therin a right government (as we have said in the first
                     chapter) but is more truely to be called an Anarchie than a citie. And so
                     contrariwise it may be, that a towne may be in all points accomplished and haue
                     the right of a citie, and of an vniuersitie,<milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/>
                     and well ruled also with lawes and magistrats; and yet neuerthelesse shall it
                     not bee a Commonwealth: as we see the townes and cities subiect unto the
                     seignorie of Venice, which are no Commonweals no more than the townes in the
                     prouinces subiect and tributarie unto the citie of Rome were of auntient time
                     no Commonweals, neither enioyed the right or priuiledge of Commonweals; but the
                     citie of Rome it selfe onely, which had great priueledges and prerogatives
                     against them all in generall, and against every one of them in particuler:
                     albeit that the lawes speaking, of the other townes, doe oftentimes vse this
                     word (Citie) but that also vnproperly, for <hi rend="italic">Traian</hi> the
                     emperour writing to <hi rend="italic">Plinie</hi> the yonger, Proconsul of
                     Asia, denieth the citie of the Bithynians to have the right of a Commonweale,
                     in being preferred before other priuat <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>
                     creditos in the right of a pledge, and that truely. For why? that was proper
                     unto the citie of Rome, and to them to whome they had especially giuen this
                     prerogative, as was onely the citie of Antioch in all the Roman Empire. So wee
                     see that a towne<note place="marg" anchored="true">That the citisens, and not the wals or
                        buildings of a citie, make a citie.</note> may be without a citie, and a
                     citie without a towne, and neither the one nor the other of necessitie a
                     Commonweale: and that more is, one and the same citie may still bee kept in the
                     whole and entire state of a citie, the wals thereof being laid flat with the
                     ground, or it quite abandoned by the citisens; as did the Athenians at the
                     comming of the Persian king, unto whome they left their towne, putting all
                     themselves upon the sea, after they had put their wiues and children in safetie
                     amongst the Trezenians; following therein the counsell of the Oracle, which had
                     aunswered them, That their citie <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> could not be
                     saued but by woodden wals: which <hi rend="italic">Themistocles</hi>
                     interpreted, That the citie (which consisteth in the lawfull bodie of citisens)
                     could not be saued but by ships. In like manner it happened also unto the
                     inhabitants of Megalopolis, who understanding of the comming of <hi rend="italic">Cleomenes</hi> king of Lacedemonia, all voyded their towne,
                     which for all that was no lesse a towne than before; yet was it then neither
                     citie nor Commonweale: in sort that a man might say, That the citie was gone
                     out of the towne. So spake <hi rend="italic">Pompey</hi> the Great, after he
                     had drawne out of Rome two hundred Senators, and the better part of the
                     citisens, and so leauing the towne unto <hi rend="italic">Caesar,</hi> said
                     thus, <hi rend="italic">Non est in parietibus respublica,</hi> The Commonweale
                     is not in the wals. But forasmuch as it had in it two sorts of partakers, and
                     that the citisens divided into two parts <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> had
                     put themselves under the protection of two diuers heads, they now seeme of one
                     Commonweale to have made two. Wherfore by these words Citie, Towne,
                     Commonweale, Colledge, Court, Parish, Familie, are signified the right of these
                     things. And as oftentimes it hath bene iudged that the church being without the
                     wals of the citie, and the parishioners within the citie, that they should
                     enioy the right of citisens, as if the parish were within the compasse of the
                     wals: so also is it to bee iudged of a citie. Neither let it seeme unto any man
                     straunge, that I stand something the longer uppon this matter; if he but
                     remember what importance the lacke of knowledge of these <pb n="52" facs="29"/>
                     things was long ago unto the Carthaginensians. For at such time as question was
                        <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> made in the Senat of Rome, for the rasing
                     of Carthage: the report thereof being bruited abroad, the Carthaginensians sent
                     their ambassadors to Rome, to yeeld themselves unto the mercie of the Romans,
                     and to request the Senat not vnworthily to rase that their citie one of the
                     fairest of the world, famous for the noble acts therof, an ornament of Rome it
                     selfe, and a monument of their most glorious victories. Neuerthelesse the
                     matter being long and throughly debated in the Senat, it was at last resolued
                     upon, That for the safetie of the Roman empire Carthage should bee destroied,
                     as well for the oportunitie of the place, as for the naturall persidiousnesse
                     of the Carthaginensians themselves, who had now alreadie made warre upon the
                     allies of the Romans, rigged up a number of ships contrarie to the agreement of
                     peace, and secretly stirred up their <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> neighbour
                     people unto rebellion. The matter thus resolued upon, the Carthaginensian
                     ambassadors were sent for into the Senat, unto whome aunswere was giuen by the
                     Consull, That they should continue in their faith and fidelitie unto the Senat
                     and the people of Rome, and in pawne thereof to deliver unto the people of Rome
                     three hundred hostages and their ships: in which doing they should have their
                     citie safe, with all their rights, priueledges and liberties, that euer before
                     they had enioyed. With this answere the ambassadors returned merily home. But
                     by and by after commission<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Carthaginensian ambassadors
                        deceiued for not well understanding what a citie in <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>uth is.</note> was giuen unto <hi rend="italic">Scipio Africanus</hi> the
                     yonger, To go in all hast with a fleet to Carthage, and with fire and sword to
                     destroy the towne, sauing the citisens and all other things else that they
                     could carrie out of the towne. <hi rend="italic">Scipio</hi> ariuing in Africke
                     with his <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> armie, sent <hi rend="italic">Censorinus</hi> his lieutenant to Carthage, who after he had receiued the
                     promised hostages together with the Carthaginensian ships, commaunded all the
                     people of Carthage to depart out of the towne, yet with free leaue to carrie
                     out with them what they would, and to build them a citie further off from the
                     sea, or elswhere to their best liking. With this strait commaund of the
                     lieutenant the Carthaginensians astonished, appealed unto the faith of the
                     Senat, &amp; of the people of Rome, saying, That they had promised them that
                     their citie should not be rased: to whome it was aunswered, That the faith
                     giuen unto them by the Senat should in all points be kept; but yet that the
                     citie was not tied unto the place, neither unto the wals of Carthage. So the
                     poore inhabitants were constrained to depart and abandon the towne unto the
                     fire, which was <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> set upon it by the Romans, who
                     had not had it so good cheape, had the ambassadors before vnderstood the
                     difference betweene a towne and a citie. As oftentimes it chanceth that many
                     embassadors ignorant of the law of armes, and of that which right is, do euen
                     in matters of state commit many grosse faults. Although that <hi rend="italic">Modestinus</hi> writeth, That Carthage was no more a citie after it was
                     rased, and that the vse and profit left unto the citie, was in this case
                     extinct aboue an hundred yeares before: but hee was in the same errour wherein
                     the ambassadours of the Carthaginensians were, unto whome all their rights,
                     prerogatives, and priueledges were reserued. The like errour was committed in
                     the agreement made betwixt the Cantons of Berne and Friburg, in the yeare 1505,
                     wherein it was agreed, That the amitie and alliance betwixt those two
                        <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> Commonweals should be for euer, and so long
                     to endure as the wals of both the cities should stand. Neither are we to stay
                     upon the abuse which is ordinarily committed, or upon the acts of greatest
                     importance of them, which call one and the same thing a towne, a citie, and an
                     vniuersitie: as some say of Paris, and certaine other places, calling that the
                     citie which is contained in the Isle, and the vniuersitie the place wherein the
                     colledges stand, and all the rest the towne, when as the towne it selfe is
                     contained within the compasse of the wals and suburbs: howbeit that wee herein
                     follow not the proprietie of the law, calling it the towne and suburbs, for the
                     diuers priuiledges graunted <pb n="53" facs="29"/> unto them by diuers kings;
                     and the vniuersitie the bodie of all the burgesses of Paris <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> together: but the citie the coniunction or ioyning together
                     of the towne it selfe and the liberties, as also of the men vsing the same
                     lawes and customes, that is to say the coniunction of the prouostship and of
                     the countie of Paris together: which abuse is growne, for that of auntient time
                     all the towne was not but the isle inuironed with wals, and the riuer about the
                     wals, so as we read in the Epistle of <hi rend="italic">Iulian,</hi> gouernour
                     of the West empire, who made his ordinarie residence in Paris; the rest of the
                     citie that now is being then in gardens and arable land.</p><p>But the fault is much more, to say, That he is not a citisen, which is not
                     partaker of the offices of government, of giuing of voices in the consultations
                     of the people, whether<note place="marg" anchored="true">Aristotle his definition of a Citisen
                        impugned.</note> it be in matters of iudgement, or affaires of the state.
                     This is the definition of a citisen,<milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> which <hi rend="italic">Aristotle</hi> hath left unto vs by writing, which he
                     afterward correcting himself,<note place="marg" anchored="true">* Lib. 3. cap. 1. &amp; cap. 4.
                        Polit. * Topi. lib. 6. * Pol. li. 3. ca. 1</note> sayeth it not to haue
                     place put in the popular state only. Now he in another place himselfe
                     confesseth that definition not to be good which is not generall. Small
                     apparance also is there in that he saith in another place, The noble to be more
                     a citisen than the base, and the inhabitant of the towne rather than the plaine
                     country peasant; and that as for the yong citisens, they as yet but grow as
                     nouices, whilest the elder citisens decay; and that they of the middle age are
                     the entire citisens, and the other but in part. Now the nature of a definition
                     neuer receiueth diuision; neitheir containeth in it any thing more or lesse
                     than is in the thing defined. And yet neuerthelesse that description of a
                     citisen that <hi rend="italic">Aristotle</hi> hath giuen unto vs, is defectiue
                     and lame, not being aptly to be <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> applied euen
                     unto the popular estate, seeing that in the Athenian estate it selfe which had
                     no peere for the libertie and authoritie of the people, the fourth ranke or
                     degree of citisens being more than three times as great as all the rest of the
                     people, had no part in the offices of government, or in iudgements. So that if
                     we will receiue the definition of <hi rend="italic">Aristotle,</hi> we must
                     needs confesse, that the greater part of the naturall burgesses of Athens, were
                     in their owne Commonweales strangers, vntill the time of <hi rend="italic">Pericles.</hi> And as for that which he saith, The noble to be alwaies more
                     citisens than the base and vnnoble, is vntrue, not onely in the popular estate
                     of the Athenians, but also in the popular Commonweals of the Swissers, and
                     namely in Strasbourg, where the nobles (in the qualitie of nobles) have no part
                     in the offices of state and government.<milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>

                  </p><p>Wherefore it is better and more truly said of <hi rend="italic">Plutarch,</hi>
                     That they are to bee called<note place="marg" anchored="true">Who indeed be citisens.</note>
                     citisens that enioy the rights and priueledges of a citie. Which is to be
                     vnderstood according to the condition and qualitie of euerie one; the nobles as
                     nobles, the commonets as commoners; the women and children in like case,
                     according unto the age, sex, condition, and deserts of every one of them. For
                     should the members of mans bodie complaine of their estate? Should the foot say
                     to the eye, Why am not I set aloft in the highest place of the bodie? or is the
                     foot therefore not to be accounted amongst the members of the bodie? Now if <hi rend="italic">Aristotles</hi> definition of a citisen should take place, how
                     many seditions, how many civill warres, what slaughters of citisens would arise
                        <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> euen in the middest of cities? Truly the
                     people of Rome, for no other cause departed from the Senators, than for that
                     they enioyed not the same authoritie and priueledges that the nobilitie did;
                     neither could it otherwise be appeased than by the meane of the fable of the
                     members of mans bodie, whereby the graue and wise Senator <hi rend="italic">Agrippae</hi> reconciled the people unto the Senators. For <hi rend="italic">Romulus</hi> the founder of the citie of Rome, excluded the
                     people from the great offices of commaund, from the offices of priesthood, and
                     from the augureships; commaunding the same to be bestowed upon such onely as
                     were descended from them whome he himselfe had chosen into the Senat, <pb n="54" facs="30"/> or els from them whome he had afterwards ioyned vnto
                     them. And this new <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> people hauing vanquished
                     their neighbours, enforced many of them to abandon their owne countrey and
                     customes, to become inhabitants and citisens of Rome, as they did the Sabines.
                     Afterwards hauing vanquished the Tusculans, the Volscians, and Herniques, they
                     agreed together that the vanquished should have part in their offices, and
                     voices also in the assemblies of their estates, without any other chaunge
                     either in their law or customes; who for that cause were not called citisens,
                     but municipes (as who should say, Men made partakers of their immunities) yet
                     indeed lesse esteemed and honoured than the Romans themselves, albeit that
                     their estate were vnited unto that of the Romans. As we see that <hi rend="italic">Cateline</hi> descended of the auntient familie of the <hi rend="italic">Sergians</hi> in Rome, and so a naturall Roman, by way of
                     disgrace obiected to <hi rend="italic">M.</hi>

                     <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Tullius Cicero,</hi> That he was but a new upstart of
                     Arpinas. And that was the cause that many municipiall townes chose rather to
                     vse the Roman lawes than their owne, to become true citisens of Rome, vntil the
                     time of <hi rend="italic">Tiberius</hi> the emperor, who vtterly took away the
                     verie shadow of the popular libertie which <hi rend="italic">Augustus</hi> the
                     emperour had yet left; hauing remoued the popular assemblies from the people
                     unto the Senat: at which time the municipiall townes of Italie refused the
                     priueledges of the citie of Rome, whereat the emperour <hi rend="italic">Adrian</hi> maruelled (as saith <hi rend="italic">Aul. Gellius</hi>) but
                     without cause, for that they seeing the popular honours and offices to be all
                     in one mans bestowing, they thought it now better to vse their owne lawes than
                     others.</p><p>Thus we see two sorts of citisens differing in priueledges, that is to wit, the
                     Roman <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The diuers sorts of citisens in Rome.</note> citisen, and
                     the municipiall or countrey citisen. Now the third sort were the Latines, who
                     had at the beginning threescore townes, but were afterward augmented with
                     twelue Latine Colonies, who after long warres made peace with the Romans uppon
                     condition, That they should live after their own maners and customes, and yet
                     should be made citisens of Rome, whosoeuer of them should remoue his dwelling
                     into the citie, hauing yet left behind him some lawfull issue at home in the
                     countrey. Yet when many of them fraudulently abused this agreement, &amp; gaue
                     their children unto the citisens of Rome in adoption, or under the colour of
                     seruitude, to the intent that by them forthwith againe set at libertie, they
                     might in a moment enioy the liberties and priueleges of the citie; order was
                     taken by the law <hi rend="italic">Claudia,</hi> confirmed by a decree of the
                        <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> Senat, and edict of the Consuls, That all
                     the Latines which had so by craft obtained the freedome of the citie, should be
                     constrained againe to returne into the Latine cities: which thing was done at
                     the request of the Latine cities themselves. And so is that to be vnderstood
                     that <hi rend="italic">Boetius</hi> writeth, The Romans sent into the Latin
                     Colonies, to have lost the liberties of the citie: as also that which <hi rend="italic">Titus Liuius</hi> saith, The Roman Colonies sent to Puteoli
                     and Salerne by the decree of the Senat, to have bene no more citisens: which is
                     not further to be vnderstood or extended, but to their right for giuing of
                     voices, by that meanes now taken from them. So were they of Reims, of Langres,
                     of Saintonges, of Bourges, of Meaux, and of Autun, free people of Fraunce,
                     allies of the Romans, and citisens also, but without voice (as saith <hi rend="italic">Tacitus</hi>) before that it was permitted <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> unto them to have states and honourable offices in Rome. And
                     those of Autun were the first that had the priueledge to bee Senators of Rome,
                     and therefore called themselves Brethren unto the Romans: howbeit that the
                     Auuergnats tooke unto them the same priueledge &amp; title, as descended from
                     the Troians (as saith <hi rend="italic">Lucan.</hi>) Now it is not to be
                     doubted, but that that the Roman Colonies were true and natural citisens of
                     Rome, drawne out of the Roman blood, vsing the same lawes, magistrats, and
                     customes; the true markes of a true citisen. But the further that these
                     Colonies were distant from the citie of Rome, the lesse they felt of the glorie
                     and brightnesse of <pb n="55" facs="30"/> the sunne, and of the honours and
                     offices which were divided among the citisens and <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> inhabitants of Rome: insomuch that the inhabitants of the
                     Roman Colonies at Lyon, Vienne, and Narbone, thought themselves verie happie to
                     have gained but the priueledges of the Italians, who were of auntient time the
                     allies and confederats of the Romans, enioying the honourable freedome of
                     citisens, and yet without chaunging either of their owne lawes or customes, or
                     loosing any point of their liberties. And forasmuch as the Romans, holpen by
                     the strength &amp; power of their friends and allies, had subdued diuers other
                     nations, and yet suffered not those their friends and companions<note place="marg" anchored="true">The cause of the confederat warre in Italle against the
                        Romans.</note> to be admitted to sue for the honours and honourable offices
                     in the citie; thereof rise the confederats warre in all Italie against the
                     Romans, which neuer tooke end vntill that after much harme on both sides both
                     done and receiued, the libertie of the <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> citie
                     of Rome was by the law <hi rend="italic">Iulia</hi> graunted unto <note n="*" place="marg" anchored="true">Plu. in Syl<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>

                     </note> all Italians, some few onely excepted. For the cities of Italie were
                     called some Colonies, some Allies, some of them of the Latines, and some of the
                     Italian iurisdiction, and all of them different. And that is it for which <hi rend="italic">Titus Liuius</hi> saith, <hi rend="italic">I am inde morem
                        Romanis Colendi socios, ex quibus alios in</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">* Liui. lib. 26.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">ciuitatem, at que aequum ius accepissent: alios in ea fortuna
                        haberent, vt socij esse quam ciues mallent. viz.</hi> Now since that time
                     the manner of the Romans was to honour their fellowes, of whome some they tooke
                     into the citie, and into like freedome with themselves: othersome they had in
                     that estate, as that they had rather to have them their fellowes, than citisens
                     with them. And hereof proceeded that speech of <hi rend="italic">Tiberius</hi>
                     the emperour, in the Oration which he had in the Senat, which is yet seene
                     engrauen <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> in brasse in Lyon. <hi rend="italic">Quidergo? Num Italicus Senator prouinciali potior est?</hi> What then? Is
                     an Italian Senator better than the prouinciall Senator? As if he would haue
                     said them both to have bene Senators alike. And yet the same emperour excluded
                     the Frenchmen which had obtained the freedome of the citie of Rome, from suing
                     for the honours or offices thereof. Whereby is better to be vnderstood that
                     which <hi rend="italic">Plinie</hi> writeth, Spaine to have in it 470 townes;
                     that is to wit, 12 Colonies: 3 of citisens of Rome, 47 of them which had the
                     freedome of the Latines: 4 of Allies, 6 of them that were enfranchised, and 260
                     tributaries. And albeit that the Latines were so straitly allied unto the
                     Romans, as that they seemed to be verie citisens; yet neuerthelesse that they
                     were not so, it is to be well gathered by that saying of <hi rend="italic">Cicero: Nihil acerbius Latinos</hi>

                     <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">ferre solitos esse, quam id, quod perrarò accidit, a
                        Consulibus iuberi ex vrbe exire. viz.</hi> The Latines used to take nothing
                     more heauily, than that which but verie seldome times happened, To be
                     commaunded by the Consuls to void the citie: for as for other straungers we
                     read, them to have oftentimes bene driuen out of the citie. In briefe, such was
                     the varietie of priueledges and prerogatives amongst them which were contained
                     within the Roman empire, besides their confederat and free people, as that
                     almost no one thing was so proper unto the Roman citisens in generall, as that
                     the magistrats and gouernours might not proceed in iudgement against them in
                     matters concerning<note place="marg" anchored="true">No one priueledge more common unto the
                        Roman citisens in generall, than that the magistrat might not proceed
                        against them in cases concerning life or libertie, <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ithout the peoples leaue.</note> their life and libertie, without the
                     peoples leaue. Which prerogative was by the tribunitiall law <hi rend="italic">Iunia</hi> graunted to all the citisens of Rome, after that the people had
                        <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> expulsed their kings, and was called, The
                     holy Law, being oftentimes after reuiued and confirmed by the <hi rend="italic">Valerian</hi> Consull laws, at diuers times made by the Consuls <hi rend="italic">Publius, Marcus,</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Lucius,</hi> of
                     the honourable familie of the <hi rend="italic">Valerians:</hi> and last of all
                     by the Tribunitiall law <hi rend="italic">Sempronia,</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Portia,</hi> where to meet with the proceedings of the magistrats and
                     gouernours, who encroached upon the iurisdiction of the people, and proceeded
                     oftentimes against the people, without yeelding thereunto, there was the
                     penaltie of treason annexed unto the law; for that those lawes were oftentimes
                     broken by the magistrats. And at such time as <hi rend="italic">Cicero</hi> was
                     about to have commaunded <pb n="56" facs="31"/> the Roman citisens priuie to
                     the conspiracie of <hi rend="italic">Cateline</hi> to be strangled in prison:
                        <hi rend="italic">Caesar</hi>

                     <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> desiring to dissuade the matter in the Senat,
                     said, Our auncestors imitating the maner of the Grecians, did punish and
                     correct their citisens with stripes; and of men condemned tooke the extreamest
                     punishment: but after that the Commonwealth was growne strong, the law <hi rend="italic">Portia</hi> and other lawes were prouided, whereby for men
                     condemned banishment was appointed. Which law <hi rend="italic">Cicero</hi>
                     hauing transgressed, was therefore not onely driuen into exile, but also
                     proscribed, his goods confiscated, his house (esteemed to be worth fiftie
                     thousand crownes) burnt, and a temple built in the plot thereof, which the
                     people at the motion of <hi rend="italic">Clodius</hi> their Tribune,
                     commaunded to be consecrated to Libertie: wherewith the magistrats terrified,
                     durst not but from that time forward with lesse seueritie proceed against the
                     Roman citisens, yea euen after <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> that the
                     popular state was chaunged. And that is it for which <hi rend="italic">Plinie</hi> the younger, Proconsull of Asia, writing to <hi rend="italic">Traian</hi> the emperour, concerning the assemblies made by the Christians
                     in the night, to the disquiet of his iurisdiction: I have (saith he) many in
                     prison, amongst whome there are certaine citisens of Rome, whom I have put
                     apart for to send them unto Rome. And S. <hi rend="italic">Paul</hi> at such
                     time as he was drawne into question, as a seditious person, and a troubler of
                     the common quiet; so soone as he perceiued that <hi rend="italic">Felix</hi>
                     the gouernor would proceed to the triall of his cause, he required to bee sent
                     unto the emperour; saying, That he was a citisen of Rome, for that his father
                     being of the tribe of <hi rend="italic">Beniamin,</hi> and borne at Tharsis in
                     Caramania, had obtained the right of a Roman citisen: Which so soone as the
                     gouernour vnderstood, hee surceased to proceed <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/>
                     any further in the matter; and sent him to Rome, saying, This man might haue
                     bene set at libertie, if he had not appealed unto <hi rend="italic">Caesar.</hi> Whereas otherwise if hee had not bene a citisen of Rome, the
                     gouernour would have proceeded in the matter, seeing the countrey of Palestine
                     was before brought into the forme of a prouince. As in like case <hi rend="italic">Pontius Pilat,</hi> gouernour of the same countrey, was
                     constrained to condemne Christ Iesus as a tributarie subiect of his prouince,
                     whome for all that hee seemed to have bene willing to have delivered out of the
                     hands of his enemies, and from all punishment, if he could well in so doing
                     have auoided high treason, which the people threatned him with: Which the
                     gouernour fearing, least he should seeme to have any thing therein offended,
                     sent the whole processe of the matter unto <hi rend="italic">Tiberius</hi> the
                     emperour <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> (as saith <hi rend="italic">Tertullian.</hi>) For if the municipiall magistrats of the Iewes had had
                     soueraigne power and iurisdiction, they would not have sent him back againe
                     unto the gouernour, crying That he had deserued the death, but that they had
                     not the power to proceed thereunto against him. For the municipiall magistrats
                     of prouinces had not any iurisdiction, more than to commit the offendors into
                     safe keeping, for feare of the present daunger, and to receiue cautions, or to
                     giue possession, and sometimes to appoint tutors unto poore orphans: but in
                     criminall causes, had no power or authoritie, neither over the citisen of Rome,
                     neither over the straunger or prouinciall subiect, or over others that were
                     enfranchised; but onely over their flaues, whome they might at the vttermost
                     but with stripes correct. For as for the iurisdiction giuen to them that
                        <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> had the defence of townes, they were
                     established by <hi rend="italic">Valentinian</hi> three hundred and fiftie
                     yeares after. Whereby it is to be gathered, all power and authoritie for the
                     execution of iustice to have bene giuen to the Roman gouernours, and their
                     lieutenants in their prouinces, and taken from the rest. For they but deceiue
                     vs, which thinke the Iewes priests, for the qualitie of their priesthood to
                     have made conscience to condemne to death our Sauiour Christ Iesus, as if by
                     their religion they had bene hindred so to do; and hereupon have concluded,
                     That churchmen ought not to giue iudgement that carried with it the execution
                     of blood: which proceeded of the ignorance <pb n="57" facs="31"/> of
                     fantiquitie: For it is euident that before the land of Palestine was brought
                     into <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> the forme of a prouince, it had but the
                     Senat of the Iewes, consisting of 71 persons, composed in part of priests and
                     Leuites, who had the power of condemning offendors to death, as the Chaldean
                     interpretor plainly sheweth, and the Hebrew Pandects more plainely than he.</p><p>Wherefore this was the greatest and chiefest priueledge proper to the citisens
                        of<note place="marg" anchored="true">The greatest &amp; chiefest priuelege proper unto the
                        citisens of Rome.</note> Rome, That they could not by the magistrats be
                     punished either with death or exile, but that they might still from them
                     appeale; which libertie all the citisens of Rome enioyed. The other Roman
                     subiects which had not this priueledge, were not called citisens: yet thereof
                     it followeth not, that to speake properly they were not indeed citisens, and
                     according to the true signification of a citisen: for they must needes be
                        citisens,<milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> or straungers, allies, or enemies,
                     seeing that they were not slaues; for so much as they were contained within the
                     bounds of the Roman empire. But we cannot say that they were allies, for that
                     onely free people which defended the maiestie of their estate, were called the
                     fellowes or allies of the Romans: neither could it bee said that they were
                     enemies or straungers, seeing that they were obedient subiects, and that more
                     is, paid tribute unto the Roman empire: wee must then conclude that they were
                     citisens; for it were a verie absurd thing to say, That the naturall subiect in
                     his owne countrey, and under the obeysance of his soueraigne prince, were a
                     straunger. And that is it for which we have said, That the citisen is a franke
                     subiect, holding of the soueraigntie of another man. But the prerogatives and
                     priueledges that some have more than others,<milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/>
                     maketh vs to call some of them citisens, and others tributaries. Yet we read
                     that the emperour <hi rend="italic">Augustus</hi> was so iealous of these
                     priueledges, that hee would neuer giue the right of a Roman citisen unto French
                     men, for any request that his wife <hi rend="italic">Liuia</hi> could make vnto
                     him; yet for all that, not refusing to ease them from paying of tributes:
                     neither liked he well of it, that his vncle <hi rend="italic">Caesar</hi> had
                     together &amp; at once giuen the freedome of the citie, unto that legion which
                     he had raised of Frenchmen, and in generall to all the inhabitants of Nouocome:
                     and blamed also <hi rend="italic">M. Antonius,</hi> for that he had for money
                     sold the freedome of the citie unto the Sicilians. Neuerthelesse the succeeding
                     princes kept not with so great deuotion the rights and priueledges of the Roman
                     citisens. <hi rend="italic">Antonius Pius</hi> by a generall edict gaue the
                     freedome of the citie of Rome unto <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> all the
                     citisens of the Roman empire (slaues alwaies excepted) that so the citie of
                     Rome might be the commmon countrey of all nations. Wherein hee seemed in a sort
                     to imitat the example of <note n="*" place="marg" anchored="true">Plut. in Alexandro.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the Great, who called the whole world but one
                     citie, and his campe the chiefe fortresse thereof. But <hi rend="italic">Antoninus</hi> contented himselfe with the Roman world. And albeit that the
                     citie, or rather the grant of the immunities of the citie seemed so to be
                     communicated unto all, yet were the priueledges of citisens diuers, some
                     alwaies enioying more than others; as is to bee seene not onely in the
                     Commentaries and answeres of the great lawyers, which flourished after <hi rend="italic">Antoninus</hi>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">The greatnes of the priueleges and immunities which a man
                        enioyeth, maketh him neuer a whit the more therefore a citisen.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">Pius,</hi> but also in the edicts of other princes. For <hi rend="italic">Seuerus</hi> more than fiftie yeres after <hi rend="italic">Antoninus</hi> was the first that gaue the priueledge to them of
                     Alexandria, that they <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> might be made Senators
                     of Rome: but the other Aegyptians could not be made citisens of Rome, except
                     they had before obtained the freedome of the citie of Alexandria. Which well
                     sheweth, that the greatnesse of the priueledges make not the subiect therefore
                     the more or lesse a citisen. For there is no Commonwealth where the citisen
                     hath so great freedome, but that he is also subiect unto some charge: as also
                     the nobilitie, although with vs exempted from taxes and tallages, are yet bound
                     to take up armes for the defence of the Commonweale and others: and that upon
                     paine of their goods, their blood, and life. For otherwise if the largenesse of
                     prerogatives and priuileges <pb n="58" facs="32"/> should make a citisen, then
                     verely straungers and allies were to bee called citisens,<milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> seeing that oftentimes greater and larger priueledges are
                     giuen unto strangers or allies, than to citisens themselves: For why? the
                     freedome of the citie is oftentimes for an honour giuen unto straungers, who
                     yet for all that are bound unto no commaund or necessarie duties. As the
                     Swissars gaue the freedome of their citie first to <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi>
                     the eleuenth,<note place="marg" anchored="true">Honourable citisens.</note> and so afterwards
                     unto the rest of the French kings. So <hi rend="italic">Artaxerxes</hi> king of
                     Persia, gaue the freedome of the citie unto <hi rend="italic">Pelopidas</hi>
                     (and all his posteritie) entreating of alliance with him. So the Athenians made
                     free of their citie <hi rend="italic">Euagor as</hi> king of Cyprus, <hi rend="italic">Dionysius</hi> the tyrant of Sicilie, and <hi rend="italic">Antigonus</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Demetrius</hi> kings of Asia. Yea that
                     more is, the Athenians gaue unto all them of the Rhodes the freedome of their
                     citie: and the Rhodians with like courtesie upon the agreement of the league,
                     made all the <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> Athenians citisens of their
                     citie, as we read in <hi rend="italic">Liuie:</hi> which league was called, The
                     treatise of <hi rend="italic">Comburgeosie.</hi> What manner of league that was
                     made betwixt the Valesians, and the five little Cantons in the yeare 1528; and
                     betwixt the Cantons of Berne and them of Friburg, in the yeare 1505; and againe
                     betwixt them of Geneua &amp; them of Berne in the yeare 1558: the force of
                     which leagues was such, as that there should be a mutuall communication betwixt
                     them both of their citie and amitie: and in case that any of the confederats
                     forsaking his owne citie, had rather to goe unto the citie of his fellowes and
                     confederats, he should presently become a citisen and subiect of the other
                     citie, without any new choyce or speciall letters of his naturalisation or
                     enfranchising. But the freedome of any citie giuen for honour sake unto any,
                     bindeth no <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> man unto the commaund thereof; but
                     him which forsaketh the dwelling place of his natiuitie or citie, that so he
                     may come into the power of another prince: For neither were those kings whom we
                     have spoken of; neither <hi rend="italic">Hercules,</hi> or <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the Great, when they were made honourable citisens of the
                     Corinthians, subiect or bound unto their commaunds; in such sort as that the
                     right of a free citisen was unto them but as a title of honour. Wherefore
                     seeing it impossible for one and the same person to bee a citisen, a stranger,
                     and an allie; it may well be said that the priueleges make not a citisen, but
                     the mutuall obligation of the soueraigne to the subiect, to whome for the faith
                     and obeisance he receiueth, he oweth iustice, counsell, aid, and protection,
                     which is not due unto strangers.<milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/>

                  </p><p>But some may say, How can it then bee, that the allies of the Romans, and other
                     people gouerning their estate, were citisens of Rome (as those of Marseilles
                     and of Austun?) Or what is that which <hi rend="italic">M. Tullius</hi> crieth
                     out: O the notable lawes, and of our auncestors by diuine inspiration made and
                     set downe, euen from the beginning of the Roman name, That none of vs can be
                     the citisen of more than one citie: (for dissimilitude of cities must also
                     needs have diuersities of lawes) nor that any citisen can against his will be
                     thrust out, or against his will be detained in the citie. For these are the
                     surest foundations of our libertie, every man to bee master both of keeping and
                     of leauing of his right and libertie in the citie. And yet he the same man,
                     before had said it to be a thing granted unto all other people, that euerie man
                     might be a citisen of many <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> cities: with which
                     errour (saith he) I my selfe have seene many of our citisens, ignorant men,
                     led; to have at Athens bene in the number of the judges, and of the Areopagi,
                     in certaine tribe, and certaine number, when as they were yet ignorant whether
                     they had obtained the libertie of that citie; and to have lost this, except
                     they had by the law made for the recouerie of things lost, againe recouered the
                     same. Thus much hee.</p><p>But first to that which he writeth concerning the Athenians; that law of <hi rend="italic">Solons</hi> was long before abolished, which admitted not a
                     straunger to the freedome of a citisen <pb n="59" facs="32"/> of Athens, except
                     he were banished out of his owne countrey: at which law <hi rend="italic">Plutarch</hi>

                     <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> wondreth aboue measure; not foreseeing that to
                     have bene done of <hi rend="italic">Solon,</hi> to the end (as it is like) That
                     no man should enioy the immunitie and priueleges of a citisen of Athens, and
                     that popular prerogative which the people had, except he were bound unto the
                     commaund and lawes of the Athenians. But he which is against his will detained
                     under the commaund of a straunge citie, hath without doubt lost the right of
                     his owne citie: which can in no wise be applied unto those kings whome wee haue
                     before spoken of, or yet to the Rhodians which had ordained the freedome of the
                     Athenians. Wherefore this is it, as I suppose, that <hi rend="italic">M.
                        Tullius</hi> meant (for why, hee well agreeth not with himselfe) That he
                     which was indeed a true citisen of Rome, that is to say, which was bound vnto
                     the Senat and the lawes of the people of Rome, could not <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> be bound unto the commaund of another citie. As <hi rend="italic">Pomponius Atticus</hi> borne in the citie of Rome, being a
                     Roman citisen, and of the honourable order of the knights, who for his loue
                     towards the Athenians, was thereof called <hi rend="italic">Atticus</hi> (and
                     unto whome three of the Roman emperours referred the beginning of their
                     discent) refused the freedome of the citie of Athens offered him by the
                     Athenians; least (as saith <hi rend="italic">Cornelius Nepos</hi>) he should
                     have lost the freedome of the citie of Rome: which is true in regard of the
                     true subiects and citisens; but not in the citisens of honour, which are not
                     indeed subiects: neither in respect of them which are citisens of diuers
                     cities, under the power of one and the same prince, a thing lawfull unto all
                     euen by the Roman law. For although one may be the slaue or vassall of many
                     maisters or lords, yet can no man be the subiect of <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> diuers soueraigne princes, but by the mutuall consent of the
                     princes; because that these are under no mans commaund, as are they unto whome
                     seruice is by turne done by slaues, who may by the magistrats be enforced to
                     sell their slaue, except the seruile labours, which cannot at once be done to
                     them all, be by turnes done by the slaue. And this is the point for which we
                     oftentimes see warres betwixt neighbour princes, for the subiects of their
                     frontiers, who not well knowing whome to obey, submit themselves sometimes to
                     the one and sometimes to the other: and oftentimes exempting themselves from
                     the obeisance of both two, are ordinarily inuaded and preyed upon by both the
                     one and the other. As the countrey of Walachie hauing exempted it self from the
                     obeisance of the Polonians, hath become subiect unto the Turks; and afterwards
                     submitting <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> it selfe unto the kings of Polonia,
                     paied tribute neuerthelesse unto the Turke, as I have learned by the letters of
                        <hi rend="italic">Stanislaus Rasdrazetoski</hi> sent to the c<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>nstable of France, bearing date the 17 of August 1553.
                     Neuerthelesse there are many people upon the frontiers, which have set
                     themselves at libertie, during the quarrels of princes, as it is come to passe
                     in the low countrey of Leige, of Lorraine, &amp; of Burgundie: where there are
                     more than twelue subiects of the French king, or of the empire, or of Spaine,
                     who have taken upon them the soueraigntie. Amongst whome <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fist reckoned the duke of Bouillon, whome he called his
                     vassall: and for that he was his prisoner in the yeare 1556, at the treatie
                     made for the deliverance of prisoners, hee demaunded an hundred thousand pound
                     for ransome; for that he called himselfe a soueraigne prince.<milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> But there are well also others beside the duke of Bouillon:
                     &amp; to go no further than the marchesse of Burgundie (which is called, The
                     forbidden countrey) six princes have soueraigne power over their subiects,
                     which the mutual wars betwixt the French and the Burgundians have by long
                     prescription of time brought forth. And in the borders of Lorraine, the
                     counties of Lume &amp; of Aspremont have taken upon them the right and
                     authoritie of soueraigntie. Which hath also happened upon the borders of
                     England and Scotland, where some particular men have made themselves great
                     commaunders within this twenty or thirty yeres, against the antient agreements.
                     For, for to meet with <pb n="60" facs="33"/> such enterprises, the English and
                     the Scots had of auntient time agreed, That the <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> Batable ground, (that is to say a certaine part of the countrey so called,
                     upon the frontiers of both realmes, being five miles long, and two miles broad)
                     should neither be tilled, built, or dwelt upon; howbeit that it was lawfull for
                     both people there to feed their cattell: with charge that if after the sunne
                     setting, or before the sunne rising, any of their beasts were there found, they
                     should be his that so found them: which was one of the articles agreed upon by
                     the states of Scotland, in the yere 1550, and sent to <hi rend="italic">Henrie</hi> the second the French king, as was by him prouided. But where
                     the soueraigne lords are good friends, as the Swissers of the countrey of
                     Lugan, and the other territories which belong in common to all the lords of the
                     league, whither they send their officers euerie Canton by turne: there the
                     subiects are not reputed to bee the subiects of <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> diuers soueraignes, but of one onely, which commaundeth in his order; in
                     such sort as that one of them seeke not to encroach upon the others. Whereof
                     rise a sedition betweene the seuen Cantons Catholick, and the foure
                     Protestants, in the yeare 1554, the Catholicks desiting to chastice the
                     inhabitants of Lugan and Louerts, who had seperated them from the church
                     Catholike: and the Protestants hindring them so to do, and were now upon the
                     point to have taken up armes the one against the other, if the Cantons of
                     Glaris, and Appenzell, who allow of both religions, had not together with the
                     ambassadour of the French king, interposed themselves, and so pacified the
                     matter. Now therefore the full and entire citisen or subiect of a soueraigne
                     prince, can bee no more but a citisen of honour of another seignorie. For so
                     when as we read that king <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Edward</hi> the first gaue the freedome of citisens unto all
                     the inhabitants of base Britaine; that is to be vnderstood for them to enioy
                     the liberties, exemptions and freedoms, that they of the countrey enioyed. So
                     say we also of the Bernois, and the inhabitants of Geneua, who call themselves
                     by their treaties of alliance, Equall, and by their letters Combourgeses. For
                     as for that which <hi rend="italic">Cicero</hi> saith, That the citisens of
                     Rome might<note place="marg" anchored="true">A citisen of Rome might at his pleasure giue up
                        his freedome.</note> at their pleasure leaue their freedome of citisens, to
                     become citisens of another citie: nothing was unto them therein more lawfull,
                     than that was in like case unto all other people lawfull also: and that
                     especiallie in a popular estate, where euerie citisen is in a manner partaker
                     of the maiestie of the state, and doe not easily admit strangers unto the
                     freedome of citisens. As in Athens, where to make a straunger free of their
                        citie,<milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> there must of necessitie 6000
                     citisens, by their voices in secret giuen consent therunto. But in such places
                     and countries as wherein tyrants rule, or which for the barrennesse<note place="marg" anchored="true">Not citisens only but euen strangers also in some places
                        prohibited to depart.</note> of the soile, or intemperature of the ayre are
                     forsaken by the inhabitants; not onely the citisens, but euen the strangers
                     also are oftentimes by the princes of such places prohibited to depart, as in
                     Moscouia, Tartaria, and Aethiopia; and that so much the more, if they perceiue
                     the stranger to be ingenious and of a good spirit, whome they detaine by good
                     deserts, or els by force, if he would depart: in stead whereof hee must buy it
                     deare, or right well deserue of the Commonweale, that shall get his freedome of
                     a citisen amongst the Venetians or Ragusians, or such other free states. And
                     although that by the Roman law euerie man might giue up his freedome; and that
                     in Spaine it is <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> free for every man to remoue
                     elswhere, and to be enrolled into another citie, so that it be done by
                     protestation to the prince: yet hath it and shall bee alwayes lawfull to all
                     princes and cities, by the right of their maiestie and power to keepe their
                     citisens at home. And therefore princes in making of their leagues, protest
                     that they will not receiue any the subiects or vassals of their confederats
                     into their protection, freedome, or priueleges, without their expresse consent.
                     Which is conformable unto the auntient clause of the Gaditane confederation
                     reported by <note n="*" place="marg" anchored="true">Cice. in orat▪ pro Corn Bal.</note>

                     <hi rend="italic">Cicero: Ne quis faederatorum a populo Romano ciuis
                        reciperetur, nisi is populus fundus factus esset; id est auctor. viz.</hi>
                     That <pb n="61" facs="33"/> none of the confederats▪ should of the people of
                     Rome be receiued for a citisen, except <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> that
                     people so confederat had bene the ground, (that is to say, the author thereof.)
                     For therein lieth the state of that cause: for that <hi rend="italic">Cornelius
                        Balbus</hi> was a citisen of a confederat citie, &amp; therfore could not
                     contrarie to the league, by <hi rend="italic">Pompeius</hi> be made a citisen
                     of Rome without the consent of the confederats. The same <hi rend="italic">Cicero</hi> writeth also in the leagues of the French with the Romans to
                     have bene excepted, That none of them should of the Romans be receiued for a
                     citisen. The same laws we yet at this present vse. For althogh that the
                     Swissers are with vs ioined in a most strait bond of amity &amp; frendship: yet
                     neuerthelesse is the same clause conceiued in that league, which was with them
                     made in the yeare 1520. And againe at such time as the five lesser Cantons of
                     the Swissers made a league of alliance and amitie amongst themselves, it was
                     excepted <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> that no citisens of the confederats
                     should be receiued; or if they should desire the freedome of another citie,
                     they should not otherwise obtaine it, except they would dwell<note place="marg" anchored="true">The subiect may not depart out of his countrey without the leaue of his
                        prince.</note> in the countrey, their land and goods remaining as before.
                     And besides these leagues, there is no prince which hath not taken the like
                     order. So that oftentimes the subiect dare not so much as to depart out of the
                     countrey without leaue, as in England, Scotland, Denmarke, and Sweden, the
                     noble men dare not to goe out of their countrey without leaue of the prince,
                     except they would therefore loose their goods: which is also obserued in the
                     realme of Naples, by the custome of the countrey. As also it was forbidden by
                     the emperour <hi rend="italic">Augustus</hi> to all Senators to goe out of
                     Italie without his leaue, which was alwaies right straitly looked vnto. And by
                     the ordinances of Spaine <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> it is forbidden the
                     Spaniards to passe over into the West Indies, without the leaue of the king of
                     Spaine: which was also of auntient time forbidden in Carthage, when <hi rend="italic">Hanno</hi> their great captaine had first discouered the
                     islands of the Hesperides. And by the<note place="marg" anchored="true">The Canaries.</note>
                     decrees of Milan, it is not lawfull for any subiect to receiue the freedome of
                     any other citie; or to enter into alliance or league with any other princes or
                     Commonweales, without the expresse leaue of the Senat of Milan. And that more
                     is, we see oftentimes that it is not permitted unto the subiect, so much as to
                     change his dwelling place, albeit that he depart not out of the seignorie and
                     obeysance of his soueraigne prince: as in the dutchie of Milan, the subiect
                     comming to dwell in the citie of Milan, or within a certaine circuit of Milan,
                     must first have leaue so to doe; and also pay unto his prince <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> three duckets. We also find that it was in auntient time
                     forbidden the Bithynians (subiects unto the Romans) to receiue any other
                     subiects into their towne, or to giue unto them the freedome of a citisen, as
                     they oft times did, to decline the iurisdiction of others, or to ease them of
                     paying of customes and tributes due: in which case the law commaundeth, That he
                     which hath so chaunged his dwelling should beare the charges of both places;
                     which was also decreed by the kings, <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the faire,
                        <hi rend="italic">Iohn, Charles</hi> the fift, and <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the seuenth. Howbeit that the decree of <hi rend="italic">Philip</hi> the long would, That the Prouost or bailiefe of the place,
                     assisted with three burgesses, should receiue into the freedome of their citie,
                     whosoeuer of the kings subiects as would, prouided, That within a yeare and a
                     day he should in the same citie into which hee remoued,<milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> buy an house of the price of 60 soulz Paris at the least;
                     and to signifie the same by a sergeant, unto the lord unto whome the
                     iurisdiction of the place wherein he dwelled belonged; and after that, that he
                     should dwell in the same citie whereinto he was receiued for a citisen, from
                     the first of Nouember, unto the 24 of Iune; and yet paying the like tax or
                     tribute that he did before he remoued, so long as hee dwelleth in that new
                     freedome; and without declining the iurisdiction for any suit commenced against
                     him three months before.</p><p>And albeit that it be lawfull for euerie subiect to chaunge the place of his
                     dwelling, <pb n="62" facs="34"/> yet is it lawfull for no man to forsake his
                     natiue countrie; and much lesse for them <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">Not lawfull for any man to forsake his natiue
                        countrey.</note> which are enrolled and tied to the soyle, whome we call
                     Mort-maines, who of auntient time might not chaunge their dwelling place
                     without speciall leaue. And so generally a man may say in tearmes of right,
                     That the freedome of a citisen is not lost, neither the power of a prince ouer
                     his subiect, for chaunging of the place or countrey; no more than the vassall
                     can exempt himselfe from the faith and obedience hee oweth unto his lord; or
                     the lord without iust cause refuse to protect and defend his vassall, without
                     the consent of one to the other, the bond betwixt them being mutuall &amp;
                     reciprocall. But if the one or the other have giuen their expresse or secret
                     consent; or that the subiect forsaking his prince, hath yeelded himselfe vnto
                     the protection of another prince, by the sufferance of the first, without
                     contradiction, he is no more bound unto <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> the
                     obeisance that he oweth him: neither can otherwise than as a stranger
                     afterwards returne into the former citie. For princes oftentimes by large gifts
                     or priueleges draw<note place="marg" anchored="true">Why princes oftentimes by large gifts and
                        priueleges draw into their countries ingenious strangers.</note> into their
                     countries ingenious straungers; whether it be so to weaken their neighbour
                     princes, or for the better instruction of their owne people, or so to encrease
                     their wealth and power, or els for their immortall fame and glorie which they
                     hope to get in making the towns and cities by them built, more renowned with
                     the multitude of citisens and plentie of all things. So <hi rend="italic">Theseus</hi> by proposing the libertie of the citie to all strangers, made
                     the citie of Athens most famous of all the cities of Greece. So <hi rend="italic">Alexander</hi> the Great by granting of great priueleges,
                     least the city by him built at the mouth of the riuer Nilus (which he after his
                     owne name called Alexandria) the greatest, and best traded <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> of all the cities of Aegypt. So king <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the eleuenth gaue the priueleges of the citie of Burdeaux to all
                     straungers whether they were friends or enemies (except the English) so that
                     they dwelt within the towne. So <hi rend="italic">Frauncis</hi> the Great,
                     founder of the citie by him built at the mouth of the riuer Sequana, which they
                     call The Port of Grace, proponing immunitie from all tributes, to all them that
                     should dwell therein, in short time made it a most populos citie. Neither
                     should the citie of London abound with so great wealth, nor such a multitude of
                     citisens, had not <hi rend="italic">Richard</hi> king of England proposed vnto
                     straungers all the immunities graunted unto the citisens: so that they had
                     dwelt ten yeares in the citie: which space of time for the obtaining of the
                     libertie of the citie, most part of the Swissers and Germans, indifferently
                     propounded to al strangers:<milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> a thing well
                     agreeing with the Roman lawes. True it is that more or lesse time is required
                     in one place then in another, according to the commodiousnesse of the place, or
                     the greatnesse of the priueleges. As in Venice to obtaine the grant and
                     priueledges of a simple citisen (without hauing any other interest in the
                     state, except in certain meane offices) a man must have dwelt foureteene yeares
                     within the citie. They of Ferrara were content with ten yeares, so that the
                     inhabitants had all the meane while borne the same burthen with the citisens.
                     And yet it sufficeth not to have dwelt in another mans countrey the time
                     prefined in the customes, to obtaine the freedome of a citisen; if the<note place="marg" anchored="true">To have dwelt long in another princes countrey maketh him neuer
                        a whit the more the strange princes subiect.</note> straunger do not demaund
                     the citisens right and freedome, and be thereinto also receiued: for it may bee
                     that the straunger would not for any thing chaunge his prince,<milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> howbeit that his affaires hold him out of his owne countrey.
                     For howbeit that many be of opinion, that a man hauing staid the prefixed time
                     in another mans countrey, without hauing obtained letters of naturalising, is
                     yet capable of testamentary legacies: they in that agree in favour of
                     testaments, and especially of charitable legacies giuen unto poore straungers,
                     who are alwaies as much to be favoured as the widdowes and orphans. But to
                     obtaine the full right and priueledge of a citisen, it sufficeth not to haue
                     dwelt the time appointed by the decrees and ordinances of the place, if a man
                     have not both demaunded and obtained the same. For as a gift is to no purpose,
                     except <pb n="63" facs="34"/> that both he which giueth, and he to whome it is
                     giuen agree, the one in giuing and the <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> other
                     in receiuing: so neither is he made a citisen that would not; neither if he
                     would could he so be, either of the princes interposing themselves. For which
                     cause those Consuls, of whome the one was by an he<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ald
                     at armes yeelded unto the Numantines; and the other to the Samnites, for that
                     they had without the commaundement of the people made peace with the enemies▪
                     left not therefore to bee citisens of Rome: because they were not receiued by
                     the enemies. Which question for all that could not yet be fully decided, for
                     the different opinions of <hi rend="italic">Brutus</hi> &amp; <hi rend="italic">Scaeuöla</hi> betwixt themselves. For when the Consull yeelded to the
                     Samnites, returning to Rome was come into the Senat, the Tribune of the people
                     compelled him to go out of the Senat: howbeit in fine the Senat by decree
                     declared, That hee had not lost the right of a citisen of <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> Rome, being refused by the enemie: howbeit that in truth he
                     was not onely depriued of the right of a citisen, but also made a slaue of the
                     enemies, by the decree of the people, for hauing without their leaue
                     capitulated and treated of peace with the enemies: and ought to have bene
                     againe restored by the people. Neuerthelesse the milder opinion of the Senat
                     interpreted that the depriuing of him of his freedome was conditionall, as in
                     case that he were of the enemie receiued. But if so be that a straunger doth
                     enen against his will retaine the rights of his owne citie, when as hee yeelded
                     himselfe unto the power of another prince, by whom he is refused: much more
                     doth he retaine the same when he requireth not the right of a straunge citie:
                     and then when it hath bene offered him, hath refused the same: and much lesse
                     if he have not bene presented <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> unto the strange
                     prince, neither hath of him required letters of his naturalising, but onely to
                     stay in his countrey as a straunger the time prefixed by the decrees. Whereby
                     is decided the difficultie and doubt which the Senat of Naples made, and therin
                     resolued nothing; that is to wit, If he that had dwelt all his life in a
                     strange countrey should enioy the right and freedome of a citisen in his owne
                     countrey. And many there be, that thinke he ought not to enioy the same;
                     saying, That regard is to be had to the place of his long dwelling: but I am of
                     opinion (if mine opinion may take place) That hee ought neuerthelesse to enioy
                     the priueledge of a free citisen, if he have not by consent of his prince
                     expresly renounced it, or els done some fact contrarie to the dutie of a
                     naturall subiect. Neither am I alone of this opinion. For the the court of
                     parliament of <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> Paris, by decree made the xiiij
                     of Iune, in the yeare 1554 adiudged that a French man hauing dwelt fiftie
                     yeares in Venice, continued yet still subiect to the French king, and was
                     receiued unto the succession of his next kinsmen: hee hauing in the meane time
                     done no harme against his countrey, neither committed any crime for which he
                     ought to loose his libertie, neither hauing refused to come being called home
                     by his prince; nor yet requested the freedome of the citie of Venice to haue
                     bene giuen him. For as for secret consent it ought to hurt no man, being
                     esteemed as no consent in things preiudiciall, except it be by word or deed
                     plainly expressed: especially when wee may otherwise interpret the mind of him
                     that hath not declared the same. Whereby it is to be vnderstood what is to be
                     iudged of the question propounded: which the court of <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> Burdeaux all the judges being assembled together could not
                     determine. As whether a Spaniard borne and brought up in Spaine, and yet the
                     sonne of a French man (which French man had alwaies dwelt in Spaine, &amp;
                     expresly renounced the place of his birth) being come into Fraunce there to
                     make his perpetuall residence, ought to enioy the priueleges of a citisen,
                     without letters of his naturalizing? Neuerthelesse I am of opinion that he is a
                     straunger, for the reasons before alleged, and that he ought not to enioy the
                     priuelege of a citisen; sauing unto the prince to reforme it if it shall so
                     seeme good unto him. And if a straunger which hath obtained letters of his
                     naturalising out <pb n="64" facs="35"/> of his owne countrey, and yet will not
                     there dwell, he looseth the right he there pretendeth:<milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> for that the lawes suffer not a double fiction. And for this
                     cause <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the xij. the French king thrust out from the
                     right of free citisens all straungers, who had obtained of him letters of their
                     naturalising, and were retired out of his realme home. For by our customes he
                     that will get the freedome of a citisen, must obtaine the princes letters to
                     that purpose, and hauing obtained them, pay his fine unto maisters of the
                     receipt.</p><p>These reasons show not onely the difference that is betwixt a citisen and him
                     that is none, but also of citisens amongst themselves; and that if we follow
                     the varietie of priueleges to iudge of the definition of a citisen, there shall
                     bee five hundred thousand of definitions of citisens, for the infinit
                     diuersitie of the prerogatives that citisens <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/>
                     have one against another, and also over straungers: seeing that it is oft times
                     better in<note place="marg" anchored="true">Better sometimes to be a straunger than a naturall
                        citisen.</note> the same citie to be a straunger, then a citisen, especially
                     in such cities as are oppressed with the crueltie and insolencie of Tyrants. As
                     in Florence many citisens requested <hi rend="italic">Cosmus</hi> the new duke
                     to be reputed and esteemed as straungers, by reason of the libertie of
                     straungers, and thraldome of the citisens, which they obtained not: and yet hee
                     allured fiftie straungers to sue for the freedome of the citie, putting them in
                     hope of the great offices and commaunds: whereby it was brought to passe, that
                     from those fiftie citisens so made, he extorted fiftie thousand crownes,
                     confirmed the authoritie of the new citisens gotten by deceit, and thereby
                     brake the power of the conspirators against him. So in auntient time the
                     Venetians empouerished and brought low by <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> the
                     warres against the Genowayes, and fearing the rebellion of many subiects, with
                     a few of the great states, sold the right and priueledge of a gentleman of
                     Venice unto three hundred citisens, so to strengthen themselves with their
                     goods, their force, and counsell, against the power of the people. It is then
                     the acknowledgement and obedience<note place="marg" anchored="true">The true difference betuixt
                        a citisen and a stranger.</note> of the free subiect towards his soueraigne
                     prince, and the tuition, iustice, and defence of the prince towards the
                     subiect, which maketh the citisen: which is the essentiall difference of a
                     citisen from a straunger, as for other differences they are casuall and
                     accidentarie; as to have part in all or certaine offices or benefices; from
                     which the straunger is debarred as it were in euerie Commonweale. As for
                     offices it is cleere. And although the Bishops of Rome have of long time
                     attempted to giue all benefices <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> to all men as
                     of right: yet have princes oftentimes reiected those ambitious decrees of the
                     Popes. I except the kings of Spaine, of all others the most obedient seruants
                     of the Bishops of Rome, who not without great reward obtained by the decree of
                        <hi rend="italic">Sixtus</hi> Bishop of Rome, That beuefices should not be
                     bestowed upon straungers. And so in Boulongne la Grace, where the Pope is
                     soueraigne lord, the offices and benefices are not giuen but to the naturall
                     inhabitants and subiects. The like whereof is done also in all the seignorie of
                     Venice. But the Swissers have farre otherwise proceeded than by way of
                     agreement, who by a law made in the yeare 1520, decreed the Popes Buls and
                     Mandats, whereby he had not doubted to giue benefices unto straungers, to bee
                     publickly torne, and they that used them to be cast in prison. And by the lawes
                     of the Polonians <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> also euen from the time of
                        <hi rend="italic">Casimire</hi> the Great, unto the raigne of <hi rend="italic">Sigismundus Augustus,</hi> straungers were kept farre from all
                     benefices; which thing also the Germans by couenants, of late wrested from the
                     Popes: in which couenants they of Mets were also comprised, and so iustly by
                     their letters complained unto <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the ix the French
                     king, those couenants to bee broken by the craft of the Bishops of Rome.</p><p>Another priueledge there is also graunted more unto citisens than to
                     straungers, in that they are exempted from many charges and payments, which the
                     straunger is constrained to beare: as in auntient time in Athens the straungers
                     payed a certaine speciall <pb n="65" facs="35"/> tribute for the right of their
                     dwelling place, which they called <gap reason="omitted" rend="〈 in non-latin alphabet 〉" instant="false"/>: whereas the citisens <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> were free from all impositions. But the most notable
                     priueledge that the citisen had aboue the straunger, is, that he had power to
                     make his will, and to dispose of his<note place="marg" anchored="true">The greatest priueledge
                        that a naturall citisen had in auntiens time aboue a straunger.</note>
                     goods, according to the customes; or leaue his neerest kinsmen his heires;
                     whereas the straunger could do neither the one nor the other, but his goods
                     fell unto the lord of the place where he died. Which is no new law in Fraunce,
                     as the Italians complaine, but a thing common also unto the kingdome of Naples,
                     of Sicilie, and all the East, where the Grand Signior is not onely heire vnto
                     the straungers, but also to his Timariots, for their immouables; and to his
                     other subiects for the tenth. As in auntient time in Athens, the common
                     treasure receiued the sixt part of the inheritance of straungers, and al their
                     slaues borne in the citie: wheras in Rome the rigour was much <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> greater (the common treasure swallowing up all the
                     inheritance of straungers.) And albeit that where <hi rend="italic">Diodorus</hi> saith, The Aegyptians and Romans to have suffered the heires
                     of straungers to succeed them: he spoke therein like a straunger himselfe
                     without regard; for it is most certaine, that it was no way permitted for a
                     straunger to dispose of his goods, neither to receiue any thing by the
                     testament of a citisen of Rome, the common treasure carrying away the
                     succession: whereof our laws are ful. Which we may also iudge by the oration of
                        <hi rend="italic">Cicero,</hi> who to show that <hi rend="italic">Archias</hi> was a citisen of Rome, saith amongst other things, That he had
                     by his testament disposed of his goods. And himself in his own cause to giue
                     men to vnderstand that the decree of banishment made against him at the sute of
                        <hi rend="italic">Clodius</hi> the Tribune, was of none effect: What Roman
                        <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> citisen is there (saith he) that hath made
                     any doubt to leaue me what hee pleased by his testament, without regard to the
                     decree of my banishment. The selfe same argument used also <hi rend="italic">Demosthenes,</hi> to proue that <hi rend="italic">Euxithenés</hi> was a
                     citisen of Athens: have not his next of kinne (saith he) recouered the
                     inheritance of their father that suruiued? And like as in Fraunce, and in
                     England, particular lords take unto them the inheritance of straungers which
                     die within their iurisdiction: so the Romans also after the manner of their
                     auncestors, tooke unto them the heredetarie goods of straungers, whome they had
                     receiued into their protection, being left at Rome, which they called, The
                     right of application. And that is it for which they said in Rome, That the
                     right to make a will and testament was onely granted to a citisen of Rome.
                     Whereby it is plaine that <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> right of
                     application, or of Albinage (as some call it) to have beene most auntient, and
                     common as well to the Greeks and Romans, as to other people also, vntill that
                        <hi rend="italic">Frederick</hi> the second had derogated from the same by
                     his edict, which was but euill kept: For he gaue leaue to all straungers dying
                     within the compasse of his empire, by their testament to dispose of their
                     goods; or if they dyed intestat, to leaue their next of kin their heires. But
                     the force of that law is euen in Germanie it selfe nothing, and much lesse in
                     Italie, where straungers are much worse dealt withall than in Fraunce. For by
                     our customes it is permitted unto the straunger to get in this * realme all the
                        goods<note place="marg" anchored="true">viz. <hi rend="italic">France.</hi>

                     </note> mouable and immouable that he can, and them whilest he yet liveth, to
                     sell, giue, exchaunge, or dispose of by contracts made with men yet liuing,
                     according to his owne <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/> pleasure; and for a
                     small sum of money, as for some twentie or thirtie crownes paid into the common
                     treasure, to obtaine letters of naturalisation, and the right of a citisen; so
                     that he may by his will giue legacies, or appoint such an heire as himselfe
                     pleaseth. But in many countries of Germanie, and by the generall custome of
                     Bohemia, it is not suffered straungers to have one foot of land. As in like
                     case in Italie it is forbidden all<note place="marg" anchored="true">Strāgers in many places
                        hardly del<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> withall.</note> straungers to get any
                     immouables in proprietie, as in the duchie of Ferrara it is a formall custome.
                     And that more is, by the custome of Perouze, it is forbidden to transfer unto a
                     straunger not onely the proprietie, but euen the possession of any immouable.
                        <pb n="66" facs="36"/> And by the custome of Milan it is not permitted vnto
                     the straunger, so much <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> as to have the vse and
                     profit of any thing immouable, and that upon paine of confiscating the reuenew
                     with the inheritance; forbidding inheritours also to marrie with straungers,
                     upon like paine of confiscating their goods. And that which more vniust is, it
                     is not lawfull for the creditor being a straunger, to take his debtors
                     immouables or land, for default of paiment assigned unto him, but that he must
                     within the yere againe cleere his hands thereof; which causeth the creditor
                     oftentimes to sell his land vnderfoot, or for little, especially if the
                     naturall inhabitants feare or loue the debtour. And not long since, by the
                     ordinance of the emperour <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift, all
                     straungers are embarred from the succession of the subiects of Milan. By the
                     custome of Venice also it is lawfull to bind a citisen to a stranger, yet by
                     that bond are not the heirs bound, more <milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/> than
                     for so much profit as came unto them thereby; quite contrarie unto the Roman
                     civill law. And by the custome of Brixia in Italie, a woman married unto a
                     straunger cannot transferre her immouables unto straungers, neither the value
                     thereof, neither directly, or indirectly. See now the good entertainment that
                     straungers have in Italie; whereof they have no occasion to complaine of
                     Fraunce, seeing that in England the subiects cannot pawne their lands vnto
                     their creditors being straungers: whereof the ambassadors of forraine nations
                     have oftentimes complained to have reason of their debtors: yet suffer they the
                     next of kinne to enioy the goods and money of the straunger. The contrarie
                     whereof is done in Lituania, Moscouia, Tartaria, and all the Turkish empire: in
                     which place the goods of straungers dying there, are confiseat in like
                        <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/> manner as in Fraunce: where neuerthelesse
                     it is permitted to straungers if they die out of Fraunce, to make a will, and
                     to appoint his children borne in Fraunce his heires, so that their mother be
                     not a stranger. And as for the clause commonly ioyned unto the letters of their
                     naturalisation: <hi rend="italic">Modo haeredes sint Regnicolae,</hi> the
                     judges have so interpreted it of straungers dwelling in Fraunce, who are
                     preferred before them that are neerer of kinne dwelling out of the realme, in
                     the succession of the naturalised straunger: for otherwise it is requisit to
                     make the straungers children to succeed, for that they were borne in France,
                     and of a free citisen, or naturall subiect. But the children of strangers borne
                     in Fraunce, enioy their fathers inheritance, not by will (which is not lawfull
                     for strangers to make) but as from him dying intestat, if their mother be a
                     free woman <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> when the inheritance descendeth.
                     And more than this, it is graunted by our kings of an extraordinarie bountie
                     unto such marchant strangers as frequent the fairs of Champagne and Lyon, That
                     none of their goods, if they die in the meane time shall be confiscated: which
                     right the English marchants enioy also in Guienne. But as for them of the low
                     country of Henault &amp; Artois, of the townes of Amiens, Cambray, &amp;
                     Turnay, they are in the same state that citisens be, for so much as concerneth
                     the right of succession: and that the edicts of our princes, and iudgements
                     giuen, have oft times proued yet so as that the same should also be lawfull for
                     vs, that was for them. The companies also of marchants of those cities which
                     stand upon the Baltique sea, have obtained the same, or greater priueledges,
                     now euer since the time of <hi rend="italic">Lewes</hi> the younger, and more
                        <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> solemnly confirmed by king <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the eight: which a few yeares agoe were sent to
                     king <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the ninth (by <hi rend="italic">Danezay</hi> the French ambassadour, unto the king of Denmarke) to be by
                     him renewed. And yet this priueledge granted unto those marchants, extendeth
                     not unto other strange marchants, which have obtained the right of citisens, as
                     hath bene adiudged by the priuie counsell. Of which so many and so great
                     priueleges, by our kings graunted unto straungers, our marchants could obtaine
                     none in all Graecia, Asia, or Africa. For in our time when as <hi rend="italic">Crozile</hi> a rich marchant of Tours, diing, had left behind him almost
                     two hundred thousand crownes, nothing thereof came <pb n="67" facs="36"/> vnto
                     his neerest kindred, all the same being by the Turkish emperor giuen unto <hi rend="italic">Abraham</hi>

                     <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> the chiefe of the Visier Bassaes.</p><p>There is yet another difference (besides those we have alreadie spoke of)
                     betwixt citisens and strangers; for that citisens by the auntient law <hi rend="italic">Paetilia</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Iulia,</hi> may
                        forsake<note place="marg" anchored="true">Other differences betwixt a citisen and a
                        straunger.</note> their goods, leauing them in satisfaction unto their
                     creditors, which the straunger may not doe: for otherwise it should bee lawfull
                     for strangers, for their aduantage to sucke the blood and iuice of the
                     subiects, and afterward to pay them with papers, although there be not fewer of
                     these bankrups than of them that forsake their goods. This also a citisen
                     differeth from a straunger, that the straunger in euerie place before he can
                     plead in action, either reall or personall, must put in caution for the paiment
                     of that which shall bee adiudged. Which caution our citisens, except they haue
                     before <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> plaid bankrupt, or forsaken their
                     goods, are not bound to performe. But in a personall action, whether the
                     defendant be a citisen or a straunger, he is not bound to put in caution to pay
                     the thing that is adiudged, as was in auntient time determined, as well in the
                     court of Rome, as in the court of Paris. But the same court hath departed from
                     the opinion of our auncestors, and adiudged it to be a thing reasonable, that
                     the straunger whether he be plaintife or defendant, should put in caution to
                     pay the thing that is adiudged. But there is one difference which is and hath
                     alwaies bene common to al people, that is to wit, the right of marque against
                     strangers, which hath no place against the subiects: for which cause the
                     emperour <hi rend="italic">Frederick</hi> the second, sent backe unto the
                     states of the empire, those which demaunded the right of reprisall against the
                     subiects of the <milestone n="C" unit="unspec"/> empire. And in briefe the
                     straunger might be driuen out of the countrey, not onely in time of warre (for
                     then we dismisse the ambassadours themselves) but also in time of peace; least
                     the naturall subiects manners should by the euill companie of straungers be
                     corrupted: for which onely cause <hi rend="italic">Lycurgus</hi> seemeth to
                     have forbidden the Lacedemonians<note place="marg" anchored="true">Plu. in Lycurg.</note> his
                     subiects without leaue to depart out of his kingdome, or to have the vse of
                     gold or siluer; as the East Indians of China forbid their subiects upon paine
                     of death from receiuing of straungers: so to meet with the enterprises that the
                     straunger might make against another mans estate. Wherefore <hi rend="italic">Cicero</hi> well foresaw not what harmes hang (as it were) over our heads
                     from straungers, when as he writ, They do euil which forbid straungers their
                     cities, and cast them out, as with our auncestors <hi rend="italic">Penuu<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>,</hi> and of <milestone n="D" unit="unspec"/> late
                        <hi rend="italic">Papius:</hi> For by such straungers, who for the most part
                     are banished men, the good manners of the naturall subiects are corrupted. But
                     if warre be proclaimed against the prince, the straunger may be detained as an
                     enemie, according to the law of armes: whereas otherwise he might not be
                     staied, if he had not otherwise bound himselfe by contract, or by some offence
                     by him committed.</p><p>Now if the straunger shall against the will, or without the consent of his owne
                     prince▪ submit himselfe unto the power of another prince, and be of him also
                        receiued<note place="marg" anchored="true">A stranger submitting himself unto the power of
                        another prince, is yet the subiect of his naturall prince.</note> for his
                     subiect; yet hath his owne prince still for euer power over him, and authoritie
                     to lay hands upon him as upon his fugitiue seruant; yea although he come as an
                     ambassadour sent from his new prince. For so the emperour <hi rend="italic">Theodosius</hi> the Great pronounced <milestone n="E" unit="unspec"/>

                     <hi rend="italic">Danus</hi> the tyrant to be a rebell unto his maiestie, and
                     cast in prison his ambassadours, being subiect to his power. So the emperour
                        <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> the fift did the like against the
                     ambassadours of the duke of Millan his subiect, whom he detained prisoner, at
                     such time as he vnderstood the duke his maister to have entred into league with
                     the other princes, and to have proclaimed warre against him. And howbeit that
                     the news thereof being come into Fraunce, <hi rend="italic">Granuellan,
                        Charles</hi> his ambassador, was by the kings commaundement there likewise
                     imprisoned, yet was hee forthwith againe delivered, so soone as it was
                     vnderstood that the ambassadors and heralds of Fraunce, England, and <pb n="68" facs="37"/> Venice, were with safe conduct sent out of Spai<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>e. Neither seemeth <hi rend="italic">Charles</hi> in so
                     doing <milestone n="F" unit="unspec"/> to have violated the law of nations, or
                     to have done any thing against the law: seethat the Romans did with greater
                     seueritie punish the fugitiue subiect, than they did the verie enemie. And the
                     best excuse that the Imperials could find to excuse the murther done upon the
                     persons of <hi rend="italic">Rincon</hi> and <hi rend="italic">Fregosi<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>s</hi> the French ambassadors toward the Turke, was,
                     That the one of them was a Spaniard, a naturall subiect of the emperours, and
                     the other a Genoway under his protection, both sent in the seruice of his
                     enemie; the bruit being giuen out, that they went to raise new warres against
                     him: how beit that the emperour would not auouch the murther, but promised to
                     do iustice upon them that had done the same, if they should fall into his
                     power. But doe the subiect what he can, yet can he not exempt himselfe from the
                     power of his naturall soueraigne,<milestone n="G" unit="unspec"/>

                     <note place="marg" anchored="true">No subiect can exempt himselfe from the po<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>er of his naturall prince.</note> albeit that he
                     become a soueraigne prince in another mans countrey: no more than <hi rend="italic">Philip Barbarius</hi> a slaue, who being for his vertue become
                     Pretor of Rome, being pursued and chalenged by his maister, was yet glad to
                     agree with him for his libertie. For in that the lawyers all agree, That the
                     subiect in what place soeuer he bee become soueraigne, may by his prince be
                     called home. As not long since <hi rend="italic">Elizabeth</hi> queene of
                     England called home againe unto her the earle of Lineux, together with his son,
                     who but a little before had maried the queene of Scots; for not obeying of
                     which her command, she confiscated their goods, for that contrarie to the
                     custome of that realme, they had without leaue departed out of England, and
                     maried contrarie to the queenes commaundement. For the subiect wheresoeuer he
                     be, is bound to the lawes of his prince <milestone n="H" unit="unspec"/>
                     conceiued, concerning his person; in such sort, as that if the subiect be
                     forbidden to contract or to alienat, the alienations are void, albeit that he
                     make them in a forren country, and of such goods as he hath without the
                     territorie of his owne prince: and if the husband being out of his owne
                     countrie, giue any thing unto his wife, contrarie to the commaundement of his
                     prince, or the customes of his countrey, such a donation is nothing worth: for
                     that the power to tie and bind a subiect, is not tied unto places. And for this
                     cause princes have accustomed to vse mutuall requests one towards another,
                     either to call home their subiects, or to enforce them to obey, in such places
                     as wherein they have not power to commaund: or els by mutuall denouncing of
                     their griefes themselves to lay hand upon straungers, vntill that they doe obey
                     them. For when the <milestone n="I" unit="unspec"/> marquesse of Rotelin, who
                     had the tuition of the duke of Longueuille, was sued unto to suffer the
                     controuersie of Neu<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>chastel to be decided before the
                     judges of the court<note place="marg" anchored="true">Neu Castell.</note> of Requests at Paris:
                     the lords of Berne reuoked the cause, for that iudgement was to be giuen by
                     them, of lands contained within the precinct of their country. See here the
                     principal differences of subiects and citisens, from strangers; leauing the
                     particular differences of euerie countrey, which are in number infinit. As for
                     the differences of subiects amongst themselves▪ there are in many places no
                     fewer, or happely moe than▪ betwixt the subiects and the straungers (whereof we
                     have much spoken before) as not onely of the difference of the nobilitie among
                     themselves, but of the difference betwixt the nobilitie and the vulgar people
                     also. But particularly to prosecute how much the vulgar <milestone n="K" unit="unspec"/> people differ among themselves, with such other things as
                     appertaine unto the sex, age or state of euerie man, were a thing almost
                     infinit.</p><p>Now to make the matter short, it may be that of right among citisens, some be
                     exempted from all charges, taxes, and imposts, whereunto others are subiect:
                     whereof wee have infinit examples in our lawes. As also the societie is good
                     and auailable,<note place="marg" anchored="true">The diuision of citisens or subiects into
                        three estates▪ <gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/> thing obserued in all
                        Commonweale.</note> where some of the associats have part in the profit, and
                     yet beare no part of the losse. And that is it for which we see the diuision of
                     citisens or subiects into three estates, that is to say▪ the Spiritualtie, the
                     Nobilitie, and Commonaltie, which is obserued almost <pb n="69" facs="37"/> in
                     all Europe. And beside this so generall a diuision, there bee other more
                     speciall <milestone n="A" unit="unspec"/> in many Commonweales, as in Venice
                     the gentlemen, the citisens, and the common people: in Florence before it was
                     brought under one prince, they had the great ones, the common people, and the
                     reseall menie. And our auntient Gauls had their Druides, their Chiual<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ie▪ and the vulgar people. In Aegypt the priests, the
                     souldiers, and the a<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ans; as we read in <hi rend="italic">Diodorus.</hi> Also the aun<gap reason="illegible" extent="1+_letters" instant="false"/>ent law
                     giuer <hi rend="italic">Hippodamus,</hi> divided the citisens into souldiors,
                     handie crafts men, and labourers; &amp; hath without cause bene blamed by <hi rend="italic">Aristotle;</hi> as we read in the Fragments of his ordinances.
                     And albe▪<note place="marg" anchored="true">* Lib. a. Polit.</note> it that <hi rend="italic">Plato</hi> enforced himselfe to make all the citisens of his Commonwealth
                     equall in all rights and prerogariues; yet so it is, that he divided them into
                     three states; that is to wit, into Gouernours, Souldiors, and Laborers: which
                     is to show that there was neuer <milestone n="B" unit="unspec"/> Commonweale,
                     were it true, or but imaginarie, or the most popular that a man could thinke
                     of; where the the citisens were equall in all rights and prerogatives; but that
                     alwaies some of them have had more or lesse than others.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>