<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:8.2.21-8.2.24</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:8.2.21-8.2.24</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Such expressions are regarded as ingenious, daring and eloquent, simply
                            because of their ambiguity, and quite a number of persons have become
                            infected by the belief that a passage which requires a commentator must
                            for that very reason be a masterpiece of elegance. Nay, there is even a
                            class of hearer who find a special pleasure in such passages; for the
                            fact that they can provide an answer to the riddle fills them with an
                            ecstasy of self-congratulation, as if they had not merely heard the
                            phrase, but invented it. </p></div><div n="22" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For my own part, I regard clearness as the first essential of a good
                            style: there must be propriety in our words, their order must be
                            straightforward, the conclusion of the period must not be long
                            postponed, there must be nothing lacking and nothing superfluous. Thus
                            our language will be approved by the learned and clear to the
                            uneducated. I am speaking solely of clearness in style, as I have
                            already dealt with clearness in the presentation of facts in the rules I
                            laid down for the <hi rend="italic">statement of the case.</hi>
                     </p></div><div n="23" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But the general method is the same in both. For if what we say is not
                            less nor more than is required, and is clear and systematically
                            arranged, the whole matter will be plain and obvious even to a not too
                            attentive audience. For we must <pb n="v7-9 p.211"/> never forget that
                            the attention of the judge is not always so keen that he will dispel
                            obscurities without assistance, and bring the light of his intelligence
                            to bear on the dark places of our speech. On the contrary, lie will have
                            many other thoughts to distract him unless what we say is so clear that
                            our words will thrust themselves into his mind even when he is not
                            giving us his attention, just as the sunlight forces itself upon the
                            eyes. </p></div><div n="24" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Therefore our aim must be not to put him in a position to understand our
                            argument, but to force him to understand it. Consequently we shall
                            frequently repeat anything which we think the judge has failed to take
                            in as he should. We shall say, for example, <quote> I fear that this
                                portion of our case has been somewhat obscurely stated: the fault is
                                mine, and I will therefore re-state it in plainer and simpler
                                language </quote> ; for the pretended admission of a fault on our
                            part creates an excellent impression. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>