<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:7.1.1-7.1.4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:7.1.1-7.1.4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p><hi rend="italic">Division,</hi> as I have already stated, <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">v. x. 63.</note> means the
                            division of a group of things into its component parts, <hi rend="italic">partition</hi> is the separation of an individual
                            whole into its elements, <hi rend="italic">order</hi> the correct
                            disposition <pb n="v7-9 p.7"/> of things in such a way that what follows
                            coheres with what precedes, while <hi rend="italic">arrangement</hi> is
                            the distribution of things and parts to the places which it is expedient
                            that they should occupy. </p></div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But we must remember that <hi rend="italic">arrangement</hi> is
                            generally dependent on expediency, and that the same question will not
                            always be discussed first by both parties. An example of what I mean, to
                            quote no others, is provided by Demosthenes and Aeschines, who adopt a
                            different order in the trial of Ctesiphon, since the accuser begins by
                            dealing with the legal question involved, in which he thought he had the
                            advantage, whereas the advocate for the defence treats practically every
                            other topic before coming to the question of law, with a view to
                            preparing the judges for a consideration of the legal aspect of the
                            case. </p></div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For it will often be expedient for the parties to place different points
                            first; otherwise the pleading would always be determined by the good
                            pleasure of the prosecution. Finally, in a case of mutual accusation,
                                <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">cp.</hi>
                                III. <hi rend="italic">x.</hi> 4. </note> where both parties have to
                            defend themselves before accusing their antagonist, the order of
                            everything must necessarily be different. I shall therefore set forth
                            the method adopted by myself, about which I have never made any mystery:
                            it is the result in part of instruction received from others, in part of
                            my own reasoning. </p></div><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> When engaged in forensic disputes I made it a point to make myself
                            familiar with every circumstance connected with the case. <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">cp</hi> iv.
                                iv. 8; IV. ii. 28. </note> (In the schools, of course, the facts of
                            the case are definite and limited in number and are moreover set out
                            before we begin to declaim: the Greeks call them <hi rend="italic">themes,</hi> which Cicero <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">Top.,</hi> 21. </note> translates by <hi rend="italic">propositions.</hi> ) When I <pb n="v7-9 p.9"/> had
                            formed a general idea of these circumstances, I proceeded to consider
                            them quite as much from my opponent's point of view as from my own. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>