<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:5.4.2</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:5.4.2</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Individual cases may however involve special considerations in this
                            connexion. For if the point at issue is whether torture should be
                            applied, it will make all the difference who it is who demands or offers
                            it, who it is that is to be subjected to torture, against whom the
                            evidence thus sought will tell, and what is the motive for the demand.
                            If on the other hand torture has already been applied, it will make all
                            the difference who was in charge of the proceedings, who was the victim
                            and what the nature of the torture, whether the confession was credible
                            or consistent, whether the witness stuck to his first statement or
                            changed it under the influence of pain, and whether he made it at the
                            beginning of the torture or only after it had continued some time. The
                                <pb n="v4-6 p.165"/> variety of such questions is as infinite as the
                            variety of actual cases. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>