<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:5.4.1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:5.4.1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> A like situation arises in the case of evidence extracted by torture:
                            one party will style torture an infallible method of discovering the
                            truth, while the other will allege that it also often results in false
                            confessions, since with some their capacity of endurance makes lying an
                            easy thing, while with others weakness makes it a necessity. It is
                            hardly worth my while to say more on the subject, as the speeches both
                            of ancient and modern orators are full of this topic. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>