<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:4.5.27-5.pr.3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:4.5.27-5.pr.3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="4" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="section"><div n="27" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> We must also ensure that it is free alike from omissions and from
                            redundance. Redundance as a rule occurs through our dividing into <hi rend="italic">species</hi> when it would be sufficient to divide
                            into <hi rend="italic">genera,</hi> or through the addition of <hi rend="italic">species</hi> after stating the <hi rend="italic">genus.</hi> The following will serve as an example: <quote>I will
                                speak of virtue, justice and abstinence.</quote> But justice and
                            abstinence are <hi rend="italic">species</hi> of tile <hi rend="italic">genus</hi> virtue. </p></div><div n="28" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Our first <hi rend="italic">partition</hi> will be between admitted and
                            disputed facts. Admitted facts will then be divided into those
                            acknowledged by our opponent and those acknowledged by ourselves.
                            Disputed facts will be divided into those which we and those which our
                            opponents allege. But the worst fault of all is to treat your points in
                            an order different from that which was assigned them in your <hi rend="italic">proposition.</hi>
                     </p></div></div></div><pb n="v4-6 p.155"/><div n="5" type="textpart" subtype="book"><head>Book V</head><div n="pr" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> There have been certain writers of no small authority <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">cp.</hi> Ar.
                                    <hi rend="italic">Rhet.</hi> i. 4 Also Quint. IV. v. 6. </note>
                            who have held that the sole duty of the orator was to instruct: in their
                            view appeals to the emotions were to be excluded for two reasons, first
                            on the ground that all disturbance of the mind was a fault, and secondly
                            that it was wrong to distract the judge from the truth by exciting his
                            pity, bringing influence to bear, and the like. Further, to seek to
                            charm the audience, when the aim of the orator was merely to win
                            success, was in their opinion not only superfluous for a pleader, but
                            hardly worthy of a self-respecting man. </p></div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The majority however, while admitting that such arts undoubtedly formed
                            part of oratory, held that its special and peculiar task is to make good
                            the case which it maintains and refute that of its opponent. </p></div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Whichever of these views is correct (for at this point I do not propose
                            to express my own opinion), they will regard this book as serving a very
                            necessary purpose, since it will deal entirely with the points on which
                            they lay such stress, although all that I have already said on the
                            subject of judicial causes is subservient to the same end. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>