<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:3.11.6-3.11.10</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:3.11.6-3.11.10</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="11" type="textpart" subtype="section"><div n="6" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Moreover <hi rend="italic">cause</hi> seems to spring from <hi rend="italic">cause,</hi> or as the Greeks say <foreign xml:lang="grc">αἴτιον ἐξ αἰτίον</foreign> as will be seen from the
                            following:— Clytemnestra killed Agamemnon, because he had sacrificed
                            their daughter and brought home a captive woman as his paramour. The
                            same authors think that there may be several <hi rend="italic">lines of
                                defence</hi> to one <hi rend="italic">question:</hi> for instance
                            Orestes may urge that he killed his mother because driven to do so by
                            oracles. But the number of <hi rend="italic">points for the decision of
                                the judge</hi> will be the same as the number of alleged <hi rend="italic">motives</hi> for the deed: in this case it will be
                            whether he ought to have obeyed the oracles. </p></div><div n="7" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But one alleged <hi rend="italic">motive</hi> may also in my opinion
                            involve several questions and several points for the decision of the
                            judge, as for instance in the case when the husband caught his wife in
                            adultery and slew her and later slew the adulterer, who had escaped, in
                            the market place. The <hi rend="italic">motive</hi> is but one:
                                <quote>he was an adulterer.</quote> But there arise as <hi rend="italic">questions</hi> and <hi rend="italic">points for
                                decision by the judge,</hi> whether <pb n="v1-3 p.527"/> it was
                            lawful to kill him at that time and at that place. </p></div><div n="8" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But just as, although there be several <hi rend="italic">questions,</hi>
                            each with its special <hi rend="italic">basis,</hi> the <hi rend="italic">basis</hi> of the case is but one, namely that to
                            which all else is referred, even so the real <hi rend="italic">point for
                                the decision of the judge</hi> is, strictly speaking, that on which
                            judgment is given. </p></div><div n="9" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> As for the <foreign xml:lang="grc">σύνεχον</foreign> the <hi rend="italic">central argument,</hi> as I have mentioned it is
                            called by some, or the <hi rend="italic">foundation</hi> as it is called
                            by others, or as Cicero <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">De Inv.</hi> I. xiv. 19. </note> styles it <hi rend="italic"> the strongest argument of the defender and the most
                                relevant to the decision of the judge, </hi> some regard it as being
                            the point after which all enquiry ceases, others as the main point for
                            adjudication. </p></div><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The <hi rend="italic">motive</hi> of the deed does not arise in all
                            controversial cases. For how can there be a <hi rend="italic">motive</hi> for the deed, when the deed is denied? But when the <hi rend="italic">motive</hi> for the deed does come up for discussion,
                            they deny that the <hi rend="italic">point for the decision of the
                                judge</hi> rests on the same ground as <hi rend="italic">the main
                                question at issue,</hi> and this view is maintained by Cicero <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"><hi rend="italic">De Inv. I. c.:
                                    Part. Or.</hi> xxx. 104. </note> in his Rhetorica and <hi rend="italic">Partitiones.</hi>
                     </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>