<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:3.1.1-3.1.3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:3.1.1-3.1.3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="1" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> IN the second book the subject of inquiry was the nature and the end of
                            rhetoric, and I proved to the best of my ability that it was an art,
                            that it was useful, that it was a virtue and that its material was all
                            and every subject that might come up for treatment. I shall now discuss
                            its origin, its component parts, and the method to be adopted in
                            handling and forming our conception of each. For most authors of
                            text-books have stopped short of this, indeed Apollodorus confines
                            himself solely to forensic oratory. </p></div><div n="2" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> I know that those who asked me to write this work were specially
                            interested in that portion on which I am now entering, and which, owing
                            to the necessity of examining a great diversity of opinions, at once
                            forms by far the most difficult section of this work, and also, I fear,
                            may be the least attractive to my readers, since it necessitates a dry
                            exposition of rules. </p></div><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> In other portions of this work I have attempted to introduce a certain
                            amount of ornateness, not, I may say, to advertise my style (if I had
                            wished to do that, I could have chosen a more fertile theme), but in
                            order that I might thus do something to lure our young men to make
                            themselves acquainted with those principles which I regarded as
                            necessary to the study of rhetoric: for I hoped that by giving them
                            something which was not unpleasant to read I might induce a greater
                            readiness to learn those rules which I feared <pb n="v1-3 p.373"/>
                            might, by the dryness and aridity which must necessarily characterise
                            their exposition, revolt their minds and offend their ears which are
                            nowadays grown somewhat over-sensitive. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>