<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:10.3.17-10.3.27</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2:10.3.17-10.3.27</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1002.phi001.perseus-eng2" type="translation" xml:lang="eng"><div n="10" type="textpart" subtype="book"><div n="3" type="textpart" subtype="chapter"><div n="17" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> On the other hand, there is a fault which is precisely the opposite of
                            this, into which those fall who insist on first making a rapid draft of
                            their subject with the utmost speed of which their pen is capable, and
                            write in the heat and impulse of the moment. They call this their rough
                            copy. They then revise what they have written, and arrange their hasty
                            outpourings. But while the words and the rhythm may be corrected, the
                            matter is still marked by the superficiality resulting from the speed
                            with which it was thrown together. </p></div><div n="18" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The more correct method is, therefore, to exercise care from the very
                            beginning, and to form the work from the outset in such a manner that it
                            merely requires to be chiselled into shape, not fashioned anew.
                            Sometimes, however, we must follow the stream of our emotions, since
                            their warmth will give us more than any diligence can secure. </p></div><div n="19" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> The condemnation which I have passed on such carelessness in writing
                            will make it pretty clear what my views are on the luxury of dictation
                            which is now so fashionable. For, when we write, however great our
                            speed, the fact that the hand cannot follow the rapidity of our thoughts
                            gives us time to think, <pb n="v10-12 p.103"/> whereas the presence of our
                            amanuensis hurries us on, and at times we feel ashamed to hesitate or
                            pause, or make some alteration, as though we were afraid to display such
                            weakness before a witness. </p></div><div n="20" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> As a result our language tends not merely to be haphazard and formless,
                            but in our desire to produce a continuous flow we let slip positive
                            improprieties of diction, which show neither the precision of the writer
                            nor the impetuosity of the speaker. Again, if the amanuensis is a slow
                            writer, or lacking in intelligence, he becomes a stumbling-block, our
                            speed is checked, and the thread of our ideas is interrupted by the
                            delay or even perhaps by the loss of temper to which it gives rise. </p></div><div n="21" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Moreover, the gestures which accompany strong feeling, and sometimes
                            even serve to stimulate the mind, the waving of the hand, the
                            contraction of the brow, the occasional striking of forehead or side,
                            and those which Persius <note anchored="true" place="unspecified">i.
                                106.</note> notes when he describes a trivial style as one that
                                <quote rend="blockquote"><l part="N"><quote>Thumps not the desk nor
                                        smacks of bitten nails,</quote></l></quote> all these become
                            ridiculous, unless we are alone, Finally, </p></div><div n="22" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> we come to the most important consideration of all, that the advantages
                            of privacy are lost when we dictate. Everyone, however, will agree that
                            the absence of company and deep silence are most conducive to writing,
                            though I would not go so far as to concur in the opinion of those who
                            think woods and groves the most suitable localities for the purpose, on
                            the ground that the freedom of the sky and the charm of the surroundings
                            produce sublimity of thought and wealth of inspiration. </p></div><div n="23" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Personally I regard such an environment as a <pb n="v10-12 p.105"/>
                            pleasant luxury rather than a stimulus to study. For whatever causes us
                            delight, must necessarily distract us from the concentration due to our
                            work. The mind cannot devote its undivided and sincere attention to a
                            number of things at the same time, and wherever it turns its gaze it
                            must cease to contemplate its appointed task. </p></div><div n="24" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Therefore, the charm of the woods, the gliding of the stream, the breeze
                            that murmurs in the branches, the song of birds, and the very freedom
                            with which our eyes may range, are mere distractions, and in my opinion
                            the pleasure which they excite is more likely to relax than to
                            concentrate our attention. </p></div><div n="25" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> Demosthenes took a wiser view; for he would retire to a place <note anchored="true" place="unspecified"> An underground room. See Plut.
                                    <hi rend="italic">Dem.</hi> vii. </note> where no voice was to
                            be heard, and no prospect greeted the sight, for fear that his eyes
                            might force his mind to neglect its duty. Therefore, let the burner of
                            the midnight oil seclude himself in the silence of night, within closed
                            doors, with but a solitary lamp to light his labours. </p></div><div n="26" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> But for every kind of study, and more especially for night work, good
                            health and its chief source, simple living, are essential; for we have
                            fallen into the habit of devoting to relentless labour the hour which
                            nature has appointed for rest and relaxation. From those hours we must
                            take only such time as is superfluous for sleep, and will not be missed.
                        </p></div><div n="27" type="textpart" subtype="section"><p> For fatigue will make us careless in writing, and the hours of daylight
                            are amply sufficient for one who has no other distractions. It is only
                            the busy man who is driven to encroach on the hours of darkness.
                            Nevertheless, night work, so long as we come to it fiesh and untired,
                            provides by far the best form of privacy. <pb n="v10-12 p.107"/>
                     </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>