<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:9.46.8-9.46.15</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:9.46.8-9.46.15</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="9" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="46" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> temple or an altar without being ordered to do so by the senate or by a
							majority of the tribunes of the plebs. I will relate an incident,
							trivial enough in itself, but affording a striking proof of the way in
							which the liberties of the plebs were asserted against the insolent
							presumption of the </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> nobility. Flavius went to visit his colleague, who was ill. Several
							young nobles who were sitting in the room had agreed not to rise when he
							entered, on which he ordered his curule chair to be brought, and from
							that seat of dignity calmly surveyed his enemies, who were filled with
							unutterable </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> disgust. The elevation of Flavius to the aedileship was, however, the
							work of a party in the Forum who had gained their power during the
							censorship of Appius </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Claudius. For Appius had been the first to pollute the senate by
							electing into it the sons of freedmen, and when no one recognised the
							validity of these elections and he failed to secure in the Senate-house
							the influence which he had sought to gain in the City, he corrupted both
							the Assembly of Tribes and the Assembly of Centuries by distributing the
							dregs of the populace amongst all the </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> tribes. Such deep indignation was aroused by the election of Flavius
							that most of the nobles laid aside their gold rings and military
							decorations as a sign of </p></div><div n="13" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> mourning. From that time the citizens were divided into two parties; the
							uncorrupted part of the people, who favoured and supported men of
							integrity and patriotism, were aiming at one thing, the "mob of the
							Forum" were aiming at something </p></div><div n="14" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> else. This state of things lasted until Q. Fabius and P. Decius were
							made censors. Q. Fabius, for the sake of concord, and at the same time
							to prevent the elections from being controlled by the lowest of the
							populace, threw the whole of the citizens of the lowest class —the
							“mob of the Forum” —into four tribes and called them
							“the City </p></div><div n="15" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Tribes.” Out of gratitude for his action, it is said, he received
							an epithet which he had not gained by all his victories, but which was
							now conferred upon him for the wisdom he had shown in thus adjusting the
							orders in the State — the cognomen “Maximus.” It is stated
							that he also instituted the annual parade of the cavalry on July 5. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>