<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:9.17.13-9.18.12</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:9.17.13-9.18.12</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="9" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="17" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="13" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Would the Decii, who, after devoting themselves, rushed upon the enemy,
							or Papirius Cursor with his vast physical courage and strength? </p></div><div n="14" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Would the clever generalship of one young man have succeeded in baffling
							the whole senate, not to mention individuals, that senate of which he,
							who declared that it was composed of kings, alone formed a true idea?
						</p></div><div n="15" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Was there any danger of his showing more skill than any of those whom I
							have mentioned in choosing the site for his camp, or organising his
							commissariat, or guarding against surprises, or choosing the right
							moment for giving battle, or disposing his men in line of battle and
							posting his reserves to the best advantage? </p></div><div n="16" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> He would have said that it was not with Darius that he had to do,
							dragging after him a train of women and eunuchs, wrapped up in purple
							and gold, encumbered with all the trappings of state, He found him an
							easy prey rather than a formidable enemy and defeated him without loss,
							without being called to do anything more daring than to show a just
							contempt for the idle show of power. </p></div><div n="17" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The aspect of Italy would have struck him as very different from the
							India which he traversed in drunken revelry with an intoxicated army; he
							would have seen in the passes of Apulia and the mountains of Lucania the
							traces of the recent disaster which befell his house when his uncle
							Alexander, King of Epirus, perished. </p></div></div><div n="18" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>I am speaking of Alexander as he was before he was submerged in the flood
							of success, for no man was less capable of bearing prosperity than he
							was. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> If we look at him as transformed by his new fortunes and presenting the
							new character, so to </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> speak, which he had assumed after his victories, it is evident he would
							have come into Italy more like Darius than Alexander, and would have
							brought with him an army which had forgotten its native Macedonia and
							was rapidly becoming Persian in character. </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> It is a disagreeable task in the case of so great a man to have to
							record his ostentatious love of dress; the prostrations which he
							demanded from all who approached his presence, and which the Macedonians
							must have felt to be humiliating, even had they been vanquished, how
							much more when they were victors; </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> the terribly cruel punishments he in- flicted; the murder of his friends
							at the banquet-table; the vanity which made him invent a divine pedigree
							for himself. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> What, pray, would have happened if his love of wine had become stronger
							and his passionate nature more violent and fiery as he grew older? I am
							only stating facts about which there is no dispute. Are we to regard
							none of these things as serious draw- backs to his merits as a
							commander? </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Or was there any danger of that happening which the most frivolous of
							the Greeks, who actually extol the Parthians at the expense of the
							Romans, are so constantly harping upon, namely, that the Roman people
							must have bowed before the greatness of Alexander's name — though I do
							not think they had even beard of him —and </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> that not one out of all the Roman chiefs would have uttered his true
							sentiments about him, though men dared to attack him in Athens, the very
							city which had been shattered by Macedonian arms and almost well in
							sight of the smoking ruins of `Thebes, and the speeches of his
							assailants are still extant to prove this? However lofty our ideas of
							this man's greatness, still it is the greatness of one individual,
							attained in a successful career of little more than ten years. </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Those who extol it on the ground that though Rome has never lost a war
							she has lost many battle, whilst Alexander has never fought a battle
							unsuccess- fully, are not aware that they are comparing the actions of
							one individual, and he a youth, with the achievements of a people who
							have had 8oo years of war. </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Where more generations are reckoned on one side than years on the other,
							can we be sur- prised that in such a long space of time there </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> have been more changes of fortune than in a period of thirteen years?
							Why do you not compare the fortunes of one man with another, of one
							commander with another? </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> How many Roman generals could I name who have never been unfortunate in
							a single battle! You may run through page after page of the lists of
							magistrates, both consuls and Dictators, and not find one with whose
							valour and fortunes the Roman people have ever for a single day had
							cause to be dissatisfied. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>