<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:9.15.1-9.15.11</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:9.15.1-9.15.11</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="9" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="15" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>The soldiers were dismissed to quarters, and a council of war was held to
							decide whether they should press on the siege of Luceria with their
							whole force or whether Publilius with his army should visit the Apulians
							and ascertain their intentions, about which there was considerable
							doubt. </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The latter was decided upon, and the consul succeeded in reducing a
							considerable number of their towns in one campaign, whilst others were
							admitted into alliance. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Papirius, who had remained behind to prosecute the siege of Luceria, soon
							found his expectations realised, for as all the roads by which supplies
							could be brought in were blocked, the Samnite garrison in Luceria was so
							reduced by famine that they sent to the Roman consul an offer to restore
							the hostages, for whose recovery the war had been undertaken, if he
							would raise the siege. </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> He replied that they ought to have consulted Pontius, at whose
							instigation they had sent the Romans under the yoke, as to what terms he
							thought ought to he imposed on the vanquished. </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> As, however, they preferred that equal terms should be fixed by the
							enemy rather than proposed by themselves, he told the negotiators to
							take back word to Luceria that all the arms, baggage, and beasts of
							burden together with the non-combatant population were to be left
							behind; the soldiers he should send under the yoke and leave them one
							garment apiece. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> In doing this, he said, he was subjecting them to no novel disgrace but
							simply retaliating upon them one which they had themselves inflicted.
						</p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> They were compelled to accept these terms and 7000 men were sent under
							the yoke. An enormous amount of booty was found in Luceria, all the arms
							and standards which had been taken at Caudium, and what created the
							greatest joy of all —they recovered the equites, the hostages whom the
							Samnites had placed there for security. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Hardly any victory that Rome ever won was more noteworthy for the sudden
							change that it wrought in the circumstances of the republic, especially
							if, as I find stated in some annals, Pontius, the son of Herennius, the
							Samnite captain-general, was sent under the yoke with the rest, to
							expiate the disgrace he had inflicted on the consul. </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> I am not, however, so much surprised that uncertainty should exist with
							regard to this point as I am that any doubt should be felt as to who
							really captured Luceria; </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> whether, that is to say, it was Lucius Cornelius, acting as Dictator,
							with L. Papirius Cursor as Master of the Horse, who achieved those
							successes at Caudium and afterwards at Luceria, and as the one man who
							avenged the stain on Roman honour celebrated what I am inclined to think
							was, with the exception of that of F. Camillus, the most justly earned
							triumph that any down to that day had enjoyed, or whether the glory of
							that distinction should be attributed to the consuls and especially to
							Papirius. </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> There is a further mistake here owing to doubts as to whether at the
							next consular elections Papirius Cursor was re-elected for the third
							time in consequence of his success at Luceria, together with Q. Aulius
							Corretanus for the second time, or whether the name should really be L.
							Papirius Mugilanus. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>