<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:8.30.5-8.30.13</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:8.30.5-8.30.13</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="8" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="30" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> is the district called —and fought a battle with the Samnites. Such was
							the fortune of the fight that had the Dictator himself been present he
							could have done nothing to make the success more complete. The general
							did </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> not disappoint his men, nor did the men disappoint their general. The
							cavalry made repeated charges but failed to break through the massed
							force opposed to them, and acting on the advice of L. Cominius, a
							military tribune, they removed the bits from their horses and spurred
							them on so furiously that nothing could withstand them. Riding down men
							and armour they spread carnage far and wide. </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The infantry followed them and completed the disorder of the enemy. It
							is said that they lost 20,000 men that day. Some authorities whom I have
							consulted state that there were two battles fought in the Dictator's
							absence, and each was a brilliant success. In the oldest writers,
							however, only one battle is mentioned, and some annalists omit the
							incident altogether. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>In consequence of the vast number slain, a large amount of spoil in the
							shape of armour and weapons was picked up on the battle-field, and the
							Master of the Horse had this collected into a huge heap and burnt. His
						</p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> object may have been to discharge a vow to some deity. But if we are to
							trust the authority of Fabius, he did this to prevent the Dictator from
							reaping the fruits of his glory, or carrying the </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> spoils in his triumph and afterwards placing his name upon them.<note anchored="true" n="12" resp="ed" place="unspecified">The name of the
								victorious general was generally inscribed on such spoils of the
								enemy as were offered to a deity, generally either Romulus or
								Jupiter, and hung up in his temple. We have an instance of an
								inscription on the spoils in Vol. I. p. 244.</note> The fact also of
							his sending the despatches announcing his victory to the senate and not
							to the Dictator would seem to show that he was by no means anxious to
							allow him any share in the credit of it. At all events the Dictator took
							it in that night, and whilst everybody else was jubilant at the victory
							which </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> had been won, he wore an expression of gloom and wrath. He abruptly
							dismissed the senate and hurried from the Senate-house, repeatedly
							exclaiming that the authority and dignity of the Dictator would be as
							completely overthrown by the Master of the Horse as the Samnite legions
							had been if this contempt of his orders were to remain unpunished. In
							this angry and </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> menacing mood, he started with all possible speed for the camp. He was
							unable, however, to reach it before news arrived of his approach, for
							messengers had started from </p></div><div n="13" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> the City in advance of him, bringing word that the Dictator was coming
							bent on vengeance, and almost every other word he uttered was in praise
							of T Manlius.<note anchored="true" n="13" resp="ed" place="unspecified">Papirius was evidently hoping to take T. Manlius for his model and
								re-enact the scene described in chap. vii.</note>
						            </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>