<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:5.9.4-5.10.6</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:5.9.4-5.10.6</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="5" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="9" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> On hearing this, the tribunes of the plebs, who had maintained a
							reluctant silence while the State was enjoying concord and prosperity,
							now made a sudden attack upon the consular tribunes, and threatened, if
							they did not bow to the authority of the senate, to order them to be
							imprisoned. </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> There upon C. Servilius Ahala, the consular tribune, replied: “As
							for you and your menaces, tribunes of the plebs, I should very much like
							to put it to the proof how your threats possess as little legality as
							you possess courage to carry them out, but it is wrong to storm against
							the authority of the senate. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Cease, therefore, to look for a chance of making mischief by meddling in
							our disputes; either my colleagues will act upon the senate's
							resolution, or if they persist in their obstinacy, I shall at once
							nominate a Dictator that he may compel them to resign.” </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> This speech was received with universal approval, and the senate were
							glad to find that without bringing in the bugbear of the plebeian
							tribunes' power, another and a more effectual method existed for
							bringing pressure to bear on the magistrates. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> In deference to the universal feeling, the two recalcitrant tribunes
							held an election for consular tribunes who entered office on October 1,
							they themselves having previously resigned office. </p></div></div><div n="10" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>The<note anchored="true" type="sum" resp="ed" place="unspecified">Internal
								Troubles —Impeachment of Sergius and Verginius.</note> newly elected
							tribunes were L. Valerius Potitus —for the fourth time —M. Furius
							Camillus-for the second time —Manius Aemilius Mamercus —for the third
							time —Cnaeus Cornelius Cossus —for the second time — Kaeso Fabius
							Ambustus, and L. Julius Julus. Their year of office was marked by many
							incidents at home and </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> abroad. There was a multiplicity of wars going on at once —at Veii, at
							Capena, at Falerii, and against the Volscians for the recovery of </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Anxur. In Rome the simultaneous demands of the levy and the war-tax
							created distress; there was a dispute about the co-opting of tribunes of
							the plebs, and the trial of two men who had recently held consular power
							caused great excitement. The consular tribunes made it their first
							business to raise a </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> levy. Not only were the “juniors” enrolled, but the
							“seniors” were also compelled to give in their names that
							they might act as City guards. But the increase in the number of
							soldiers necessitated a corresponding increase in the amount required
							for their pay, and those who remained at </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> home were unwilling to contribute their share because, in addition, they
							were to be harassed by military duties in defence of the City, as
							servants of the </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> State. This was in itself a serious grievance, but it was made to appear
							more so by the seditious harangues of the tribunes of the plebs, who
							asserted that the reason why military pay had been established was that
							one half of the plebs might be crushed by the war-tax, and the other by
							military </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>