<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.61.9-5.2.1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.61.9-5.2.1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="4" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="61" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The soldiers, guided by him up some steep ground, effected its capture,
							and after they had massacred those on guard, the rest, panic-struck,
							surrendered. After the town and citadel had been demolished, the legions
							were withdrawn from Volscian territory and the whole strength of Rome
							was directed against Veii. </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The traitor was rewarded not only with his freedom, but also with the
							property of two households, and was called Servius Romanus. Some suppose
							that Artena belonged to the Veientines, not the Volscians. </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The mistake arises from the fact that there was a city of the same name
							between Caere and Veii, but it was destroyed in the time of the kings of
							Rome, and it belonged to Caere, not Veii. The other town of the same
							name whose destruction I have mentioned was in the Volscian territory.
						</p></div></div></div><div n="5" subtype="book" type="textpart"><head>Book V</head><head>The Veii and the Destruction of Rome by the Gauls</head><div n="1" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Whilst<note anchored="true" type="sum" resp="ed" place="unspecified">The
								Siege of Veii —Appius and the Plebeian Tribunes.</note> peace
							prevailed elsewhere, Rome and Veii were confronting each other in arms,
							animated by such fury and hatred that utter ruin clearly awaited the
							vanquished. Each elected their magistrates, but on totally different
						</p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> principles. The Romans increased the number of their consular tribunes
							to eight —a larger number than had ever been elected before. They were
							Manius Aemilius Mamercus —for the second time —L. Valerius Potitus —for
							the third time —Appius Claudius Crassus, M. Quinctilius Varus, L. Julius
							Julus, M. Postumius, M. Furius Camillus, and M. Postumius Albinus. The
							Veientines, on the other hand, tired of the annual canvassing for
							office, elected a </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> king. This gave great offence to the Etruscan cantons, owing to their
							hatred of monarchy and their personal aversion to the one who was </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> elected. He was already obnoxious to the nation through his pride of
							wealth and overbearing temper, for he had put a violent stop to the
							festival of the Games, the interruption of which is an act of </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> impiety. His candidature for the priesthood<note anchored="true" n="1" resp="ed" place="unspecified"><emph>priesthood.</emph> A national priest was elected annually to
								organise the Games and other State solemnities.</note> had been
							unsuccessful, another being preferred by the vote of the twelve cantons,
							and in revenge he suddenly withdrew the performers, most of whom were
							his own slaves, in the middle of the </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Games. The Etruscans as a nation were distinguished above all others by
							their devotion to religious observances, because they excelled in the
							knowledge and conduct of them, and they decided, in consequence, that no
							assistance should be given to the Veientines as long as they were under
							a </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> king. The report of this decision was suppressed at Veii through fear of
							the king; he treated those who mentioned anything of the kind, not as
							authors of an idle tale, but as ringleaders of </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> sedition. Although the Romans had received intelligence that there was
							no movement on the part of the Etruscans, still, as it </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> was reported that the matter was being discussed in all their councils,
							they so constructed their lines as to present a double face, the one
							fronting Veii to prevent sorties from the city, the other looking
							towards Etruria to intercept any succour from that side. </p></div></div><div n="2" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>As the Roman generals placed more reliance on a blockade than on an
							assault, they began to build huts for winter quarters, a novelty to the
							Roman soldier. Their plan was to keep up the war through the winter. The
							tribunes of the plebs had for a long time been unable to find any
							pretext for creating a revolt. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>