<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.2.9-4.3.1</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.2.9-4.3.1</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="4" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="2" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> And there was no shadow of doubt that they would elect all the most
							dangerous revolutionaries in the plebs; the Canuleii and the Icilii
							would be consuls. Might Jupiter Optimus Maximus never allow a power
							truly royal in its majesty to sink so low! They would rather die a
							thousand deaths than suffer such an ignominy to be perpetrated. </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Could their ancestors have divined that all their concessions only
							served to make the plebs more exacting, not more friendly, since their
							first success only emboldened them to make more and more urgent demands,
							it was quite certain that they would have gone any lengths in resistance
							sooner than allow these laws to be forced upon them. </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Because a concession was once made in the matter of tribunes, it had
							been made again; there was no end to it. Tribunes of the plebs and the
							senate could not exist in the same State, either that office or this
							order (i.e. the nobility) must go. Their insolence and recklessness must
							be opposed, and better late than never. </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Were they to be allowed with impunity to stir up our neighbours to war
							by sowing the seeds of discord and then prevent the State from arming in
							its defence against those whom they had stirred up, and after all but
							summoning the enemy not allow armies to be enrolled against the enemy?
						</p></div><div n="13" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Was Canuleius, forsooth, to have the audacity to give out before the
							senate that unless it was prepared to accept his conditions, like those
							of a conqueror, he would stop a levy being held? What else was that but
							threatening to betray his country and allowing it to be attacked and
							captured? What courage would his words inspire, not in the Roman plebs
							but in the Volscians and Aequi and Veientines! </p></div><div n="14" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Would they not hope, with Canuleius as their leader, to be able to scale
							the Capitol and the Citadel, if the tribunes, after stripping the senate
							of its rights and its authority, deprived it also of its courage? The
							consuls were ready to be their leaders against criminal citizens before
							they led them against the enemy in arms. </p></div></div><div n="3" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>At the very time when this was going on in the senate, Canuleius
							delivered the following speech in defence of his laws and in opposition
							to the consuls: </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>