<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.2.7-4.2.12</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.2.7-4.2.12</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="4" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="2" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> What other result would mixed marriages have except to make unions
							between patricians and plebeians almost like the promiscuous association
							of animals? The offspring of such marriages would not know whose blood
							flowed in his veins, what sacred rites he might perform; half of him
							patrician, half plebeian, he would not even be in harmony with himself.
							And as though it were a small matter for all things human and divine to
							be thrown into confusion, the disturbers of the people were now making
							an onslaught on the consulship. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> At first the question of one consul being elected from the plebs was
							only mooted in private conversations, now a measure was brought forward
							giving the people power to elect consuls from either patricians or
							plebeians as they chose. </p></div><div n="9" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> And there was no shadow of doubt that they would elect all the most
							dangerous revolutionaries in the plebs; the Canuleii and the Icilii
							would be consuls. Might Jupiter Optimus Maximus never allow a power
							truly royal in its majesty to sink so low! They would rather die a
							thousand deaths than suffer such an ignominy to be perpetrated. </p></div><div n="10" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Could their ancestors have divined that all their concessions only
							served to make the plebs more exacting, not more friendly, since their
							first success only emboldened them to make more and more urgent demands,
							it was quite certain that they would have gone any lengths in resistance
							sooner than allow these laws to be forced upon them. </p></div><div n="11" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Because a concession was once made in the matter of tribunes, it had
							been made again; there was no end to it. Tribunes of the plebs and the
							senate could not exist in the same State, either that office or this
							order (i.e. the nobility) must go. Their insolence and recklessness must
							be opposed, and better late than never. </p></div><div n="12" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Were they to be allowed with impunity to stir up our neighbours to war
							by sowing the seeds of discord and then prevent the State from arming in
							its defence against those whom they had stirred up, and after all but
							summoning the enemy not allow armies to be enrolled against the enemy?
						</p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>