<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.2.13-4.3.4</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.2.13-4.3.4</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="4" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="2" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="13" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Was Canuleius, forsooth, to have the audacity to give out before the
							senate that unless it was prepared to accept his conditions, like those
							of a conqueror, he would stop a levy being held? What else was that but
							threatening to betray his country and allowing it to be attacked and
							captured? What courage would his words inspire, not in the Roman plebs
							but in the Volscians and Aequi and Veientines! </p></div><div n="14" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Would they not hope, with Canuleius as their leader, to be able to scale
							the Capitol and the Citadel, if the tribunes, after stripping the senate
							of its rights and its authority, deprived it also of its courage? The
							consuls were ready to be their leaders against criminal citizens before
							they led them against the enemy in arms. </p></div></div><div n="3" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="1" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>At the very time when this was going on in the senate, Canuleius
							delivered the following speech in defence of his laws and in opposition
							to the consuls: </p></div><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> “I fancy, Quirites, that I have often noticed in the past how
							greatly the patricians despise you, how unworthy they deem you to live
							in the same City, within the same walls, as they. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Now, however, it is perfectly obvious, seeing how bitter an opposition
							they have raised to our proposed laws. For what is our purpose in
							framing them except to remind them that we are their fellow-citizens,
							and though we do not possess the same power, we still inhabit the same
							country? </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> In one of these laws we demand the right of intermarriage, a right
							usually granted to neighbours and foreigners-indeed we have granted
							citizenship, which is more than intermarriage, </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>