<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.16.2-4.16.8</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3:4.16.2-4.16.8</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text><body><div n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0914.phi001.perseus-eng3" type="edition" xml:lang="eng"><div n="4" subtype="book" type="textpart"><div n="16" subtype="chapter" type="textpart"><div n="2" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> It was afterwards called the Aequimaelium. L. Minucius was presented
							with the Image of a golden ox set up outside the Trigeminan gate. </p></div><div n="3" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> As he distributed the corn which had belonged to Maelius at the price of
							one “ <foreign xml:lang="lat">as</foreign> ” per bushel, the
							plebs raised no objection to his being thus honoured. I find it stated
							in some authorities that this Minucius went over from the patricians to
							the plebeians and after being co-opted as an eleventh tribune quelled a
							disturbance which arose in consequence of the death of Maelius. </p></div><div n="4" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> It is, however, hardly credible that the senate would have allowed this
							increase in the number of the tribunes, or that such a precedent, above
							all others, should have been introduced by a patrician, or that if that
							concession had been once made, the plebs should not have adhered to it,
							or at all events tried to do so. </p></div><div n="5" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But the most conclusive refutation of the lying inscription on his image
							is to be found in a provision of the law passed a few years previously
							that it should not be lawful for tribunes to co-opt a colleague. Q.
							Caecilius, Q. Junius, and Sex. </p></div><div n="6" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Titinius were the only members of the college of tribunes who did not
							support the proposal to honour Minucius, and they never ceased to attack
							Minucius and Servilius in turn before the Assembly and charge them with
							the undeserved death of Maelius. They succeeded in securing the creation
							of military tribunes instead of consuls at the next election, for they
							felt no doubt that for the six vacancies- that number could now be
							elected-some of the plebeians, by giving out that they would avenge the
							death of Maelius, would be elected. </p></div><div n="7" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But in spite of the excitement amongst the plebeians owing to the
							numerous commotions through the year, they did not create more than
							three tribunes with consular powers; amongst them L. Quinctius the son
							of the Cincinnatus who as Dictator incurred such odium that it was made
							the pretext for disturbances. </p></div><div n="8" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Mam. Aemilius polled the highest number of votes, L. Julius came in
							third. </p></div></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>