<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi038.perseus-lat1:103</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi038.perseus-lat1:103</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="lat"><body><div xml:lang="lat" type="edition" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi038.perseus-lat1"><div type="textpart" n="103" subtype="section"><p><reg>deinde</reg> uni
cuique rationi opponendum est ab accusatore id quod, si
non esset in accusatione, causa omnino esse non posset.
Itaque ea quae sic referuntur continentia causarum vocen
<pb n="p.3030"/>

tur; quamquam non ea magis quae contra rationes defensionis adferuntur quam ipsae defensionis<note>defensionis <hi rend="italics">vulg.</hi>: defensiones et <hi rend="italics">P</hi>
                  </note> rationes continent
causas. Sed distinguendi gratia rationem appellemus earn,
quae adfertur a reo ad recusandum depellendi criminis
causa, quae nisi esset, quid defenderet non haberet; firmamentun autem, quod contra ad labefactandam rationed
refertur, sine quo accusatio stare non posset. <milestone n="30" unit="chapter"/>
               </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>