<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi035.perseus-eng1:7.6-8.3</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi035.perseus-eng1:7.6-8.3</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div xml:lang="eng" type="edition" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi035.perseus-eng1"><div type="textpart" n="7" subtype="speech"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="6"><p>
               </p><p>Will it then be possible for you to rely on the certainty of any peace, when you
                    see Antonius, or rather the Antonii, in the city? Unless, indeed, you despise
                    Lucius: I do not despise even Caius. But, as I think, Lucius will be the
                    dominant spirit,—for he is the patron of the five-and-thirty tribes,
                    whose votes he took away by his law, by which he divided the magistracies in
                    conjunction with Caius Caesar. He is the patron of the centuries of the Roman
                    knights, which also he thought fit to deprive of the suffrages: he is the patron
                    of the men who have been military tribunes; he is the patron of the middle of
                    Janus. <milestone n="17" unit="section"/> O ye gods! who will he able to support
                    this man's power? especially when he has brought all his dependents into the
                    lands. Who ever was the patron of all the tribes? and of the Roman knights? and
                    of the military tribunes? Do you think that the power of even the Gracchi was
                    greater than that of this gladiator will be? whom I have called gladiator, not
                    in the sense in which sometimes Marcus. Antonius too is called gladiator, but as
                    men call him who are speaking plain Latin. He has fought in <placeName key="tgn,1000004">Asia</placeName> as a mirmillo. After having equipped his
                    own companion and intimate friend in the armor of a Thracian, he slew the
                    miserable man as he was flying; but he himself received a palpable wound, as the
                    scar proves. </p><p><milestone n="18" unit="section"/> What will the man who murdered his friend in
                    this way, when he has an opportunity, do to an enemy? and if he did such a thing
                    as this for the fun of the thing, what do you think he will do when tempted by
                    the hope of plunder? Will he not again meet wicked men in the decuries? will he
                    not again tamper with those men who have received lands? will he not again seek
                    those who have been banished? will he not, in short, be Marcus Antonius; to
                    whom, on the occasion of every commotion, there will be a rush of all profligate
                    citizens? Even if there be no one else except those who are with him now, and
                    these who in this body now openly speak in his favor, will they be too small in
                    number? especially when all the protection which we might have had from good men
                    is lost, and when those men are prepared to obey his nod? But I am afraid, if at
                    this time we fail to adopt wise counsels, that that party will in a short time
                    appear too numerous for us. <milestone n="19" unit="section"/> Nor have I any
                    dislike to peace; only I do dread war disguised under the name of peace.
                    Wherefore, if we wish to enjoy peace we must first wage war. If we shrink from
                    war, peace we shall never have. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="7"><p>
               </p><p>But it becomes your prudence, O conscript fathers, to provide as far forward as
                    possible for posterity. That is the object for which we were placed in this
                    garrison, and as it were on this watch-tower; that by our vigilance and
                    foresight we might keep the Roman people free from fear. It would be a shameful
                    thing, especially in so clear a case as this, for it to be notorious that wisdom
                    was wanting to the chief council of the whole world. <milestone n="20" unit="section"/> We have such consuls, there is such eagerness on the part
                    of the Roman people, we have such a unanimous feeling of all <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName> in our favor, such generals, and such
                    armies, that the republic cannot possibly suffer any disaster without the senate
                    being in fault. I, for my part, will not be wanting. I will warn you, I will
                    forewarn you, I will give you notice, I will call gods and men to witness what I
                    do really believe. Nor will I display my good faith alone, which perhaps may
                    seem to be enough, but which in a chief citizen is not enough; I will exert all
                    my care, and prudence, and vigilance. </p><p>I have spoken about danger. I will now proceed to prove to you that it is not
                    possible for peace to be firmly cemented; for of the propositions which I
                    promised to establish this is the last. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="8"><p><milestone n="21" unit="section"/></p><p>What peace can there be between Marcus Antonius and (in the first, place) the
                    senate? with what face will he be able to look upon you, and with what eyes will
                    you, in turn, look upon him? Which of you does not hate him? which of you does
                    not he hate? Come, are you the only people who hate him, and whom he hates?
                    What? what do you think of those men who are besieging Mutina, who are levying
                    troops in <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName>, who are threatening
                    your fortunes? will they ever be friends to you, or you to them? will he embrace
                    the Roman knights? For, suppose their inclinations respecting, and their
                    opinions of Antonius were very much concealed, when they stood in crowds on the
                    steps of the temple of Concord, when they stimulated you to endeavor to recover
                    your liberty, when they demanded arms, the robe of war, and war, and who, with
                    the Roman people, invited me to meet in the assembly of the people, will these
                    men ever become friends to Antonius? will Antonius ever maintain peace with
                    them? <milestone n="22" unit="section"/> For why should I speak of the whole
                    Roman people? which, in a full and crowded forum, twice, with one heart and one
                    voice, summoned me into the assembly, and plainly showed their excessive
                    eagerness for the recovery of their liberty. So, desirable as it was before to
                    have the Roman people for our comrade, we now have it for our leader. </p><p>What hope then is there that there ever can be peace between the Roman people and
                    the men who are besieging <placeName key="perseus,Mutina">Mutina</placeName> and
                    attacking a general and army of the Roman people? <milestone n="23" unit="section"/> Will there be peace with the municipal towns, whose great
                    zeal is shown by the decrees which they pass, by the soldiers whom they furnish,
                    by the sums which they promise, so that in each town there is such a spirit as
                    leaves no one room to wish for a senate of the Roman people? The men of Firmium
                    deserve to be praised by a resolution of our order, who set the first example of
                    promising money; we ought to return a complimentary answer to the Marrucini, who
                    have passed a vote that all who evade military service are to be branded with
                    infamy. These measures are adopted all over <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>. There is great peace between Antonius and these men, and
                    between them and him! What greater discord can there possibly be? And in discord
                    civil peace can not by any possibility exist. <milestone n="24" unit="section"/>
                    To say nothing of the mob, look at Lucius Visidius, a Roman knight, a man of the
                    very highest accomplishments and honor, a citizen always eminent, whose
                    watchfulness and exertions for the protection of my life I felt in my
                    consulship; who not only exhorted his neighbors to become soldiers, but also
                    assisted them from his own resources; will it be possible ever to reconcile
                    Antonius to such a man as this, a man whom we ought to praise by a formal
                    resolution of the senate? What? will it be possible to reconcile him to Caius
                    Caesar, who prevented him from entering the city, or to Decimus Brutus, who has
                    refused him entrance into <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName>?
                        <milestone n="25" unit="section"/> Moreover, will he reconcile himself to,
                    or look mercifully on the province of <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName>, by which he has been excluded and rejected? You will see
                    every thing, O conscript fathers, if you do not take care, full of hatred and
                    full of discord, from which civil wars arise. Do not then desire that which is
                    impossible; and beware, I entreat you by the immortal gods, O conscript fathers,
                    that out of hope of present peace you do not lose perpetual peace. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="9"><p><milestone n="26" unit="section"/></p><p>What now is the object of this oration? For we do not yet know what the
                    ambassadors have done. But still we ought to be awake, erect, prepared, armed in
                    our minds, so as not to be deceived by any civil or supplicatory language, or by
                    any pretense of justice. He must have complied with all the prohibitions and all
                    the commands which we have sent him, before he can demand any thing. He must
                    have desisted from attacking Brutus and his army, and from plundering the cities
                    and lands of the province of <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName>; he
                    must have permitted the ambassadors to go to Brutus, and led his army back on
                    this side of the Rubicon, and yet not come within two hundred miles of this
                    city. He must have submitted himself to the power of the senate and of the Roman
                    people. If he does this, then we shall have an opportunity of deliberating
                    without any decision being forced upon us either way. If he does not obey the
                    senate, then it will not be the senate that declares war against him, but he who
                    will have declared it against the senate. <milestone n="27" unit="section"/>
                </p><p>But I warn you, O conscript fathers, the liberty of the Roman people, which is
                    entrusted to you, is at stake. The life and fortune of every virtuous man is at
                    stake, against which Antonius has long been directing his insatiable
                    covetousness, united to his savage cruelty. Your authority is at stake, which
                    you will wholly lose if you do not maintain it now. Beware how you let that foul
                    and deadly beast escape now that you have got him confined and chained. You too,
                    Pansa, I warn (although you do not need counsel, for you have plenty of wisdom
                    yourself: but still, even the most skillful pilots receive often warnings from
                    the passengers in terrible storms.), not to allow this vast and noble
                    preparation which you have made to fall away to nothing. You have such an
                    opportunity as no one ever had. It is in your power so to avail yourself of this
                    wise firmness of the senate, of this zeal of the equestrian order, of this ardor
                    of the Roman people, as to release the Roman people from fear and danger
                    forever. As to the matters to which your motion before the senate refers, I
                    agree with Publius Servilius.</p></div></div><div type="textpart" n="8" subtype="speech"><head>THE EIGHTH ORATION OF M. T. CICERO AGAINST MARCUS ANTONIUS. CALLED ALSO THE EIGHTH PHILIPPIC.</head><div type="textpart" subtype="argument" n="arg"><head>THE ARGUMENT.</head><p>After the embassy to Antonius had left <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>, the consuls zealously exerted themselves in preparing
                        for war, in case he should reject the demands of the ambassadors. Hirtius,
                        though in bad health, left <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>
                        first, at the head of an army containing, among others, the Martial and the
                        fourth legions; intending to join Octavius, and hoping with his assistance
                        to prevent his gaining any advantage over Brutus till Pansa could join them.
                        And he gained some advantages over Antonius at once. </p><p>About the beginning of February the two remaining ambassadors (for Servius
                        Sulpicius had died just as they arrived at Antonius's camp) returned,
                        bringing word that Antonius would comply with none of the commands of the
                        senate, nor allow them to proceed to Decimus Brutus; and bringing also
                        (contrary to their duty) demands from him, of which the principal were, that
                        his troops were to be rewarded, all the acts of himself and Dolabella to be
                        ratified, as also all that he had done respecting Caesar's papers; that no
                        account was to be required of him of the money in the temple of Ops; and
                        that he should have the further <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName> with an army of six legions. </p><p>Pansa summoned the senate to receive the report of the ambassadors when
                        Cicero made a severe speech, proposing very vigorous measures against
                        Antonius; which, however, Calenus and his party were still numerous enough
                        to mitigate very greatly; and even Pansa voted against him and in favor of
                        the milder measures; though they could not prevail against Cicero to have a
                        second embassy sent to Antonius, and though Cicero carried his point of
                        ordering the citizens to assume the <foreign xml:lang="lat">sagum</foreign>, or
                        robe of war, which he also (waiving his privilege as a man of consular rank)
                        wore himself The next day the senate met again, to draw up in form the
                        decrees on which they had resolved the day before; when Cicero addressed the
                        following speech to them, expostulating with them for their wavering the day
                        before.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="1"><milestone n="1" unit="section"/><p>Matters were carried on yesterday, O Caius Pansa, in a more irregular manner than
                    the beginning of your consulship required. You did not appear to me to make
                    sufficient resistance to those men, to whom you are not in the habit of
                    yielding. For while the virtue of the senate was such as it usually is, and
                    while all men saw that there was war in reality, and some thought that the name
                    ought to be kept back; on the division, your inclination inclined to lenity. The
                    course which we proposed therefore was defeated, at your instigation, on account
                    of the harshness of the word war. That urged by Lucius Caesar, a most honorable
                    man, prevailed, which, taking away that one harsh expression, was gentler in its
                    language than in its real intention. Although he, indeed, before he delivered
                    his opinion at all, pleaded his relationship to Antonius in excuse for it. He
                    had done the same in my consulship, in respect of his sister's husband, as he
                    did now in respect of his sister's son; so that he was moved by the grief of his
                    sister, and at the same time he wished to provide for the safety of the
                    republic. <milestone n="2" unit="section"/>
                </p><p>And yet Caesar himself in some degree recommended you, o conscript fathers, not
                    to agree with him, when he said that he should have expressed quite different
                    sentiments, worthy both of himself and of the republic, if he had not been
                    hampered by his relationship to Antonius. He, then, is his uncle; are you his
                    uncles too, you who voted with him? </p><p>But on what did the dispute turn? Some men, in delivering their opinion, did not
                    choose to insert the word “war.” They preferred calling it
                    “tumult,” being ignorant not only of the state of affairs,
                    but also of the meaning of words. <milestone n="3" unit="section"/> For there
                    can be a “war” without a “tumult,” but
                    there can not be a “tumult” without a
                    “war.” For what is a “tumult,” but such
                    a violent disturbance that an unusual alarm is engendered by it? from which
                    indeed the name “tumult”<note anchored="true">I.e. <foreign xml:lang="lat">tumultus</foreign>, as if it were <foreign xml:lang="lat">timor
                            multus</foreign>.</note> is derived. Therefore, our ancestors spoke of
                    the Italian “tumult,” which was a domestic one; of the
                    Gallic “tumult,” which was on the frontier of <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>; but they never spoke of any other. And
                    that a “tumult” is a more serious thing than a war may be
                    seen from this, that during a war exemptions from military service are valid;
                    but in a tumult they are not. So that it is the fact, as I have said, that war
                    can exist without a tumult, but a tumult can not exist without a war. <milestone n="4" unit="section"/> In truth, as there is no medium between war and
                    peace, it is quite plain that a tumult, if it be not a sort of war, must be a
                    sort of peace; and what more absurd can be said or imagined? However, we have
                    said too much about a word, let us rather look to the facts, O conscript
                    fathers, the appreciation of which, I know, is at times injured by too much
                    attention being paid to words. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="2"><p>
               </p><p>We are unwilling that this should appear to be a war. What is the object, then,
                    of our giving authority to the municipal towns and colonies to exclude Antonius?
                    of our authorizing soldiers to be enlisted without any force, without the terror
                    of any fine, of their own inclination and eagerness? of permitting them to
                    promise money for the assistance of the republic? For if the name of war be
                    taken away, the zeal of the municipal towns will be taken away too. And the
                    unanimous feeling of the Roman people which at present pours itself into our
                    cause, if we cool upon it, must inevitably be damped. <milestone n="5" unit="section"/>
                </p><p>But why need I say more? Decimus Brutus is attacked. Is not that war? <placeName key="perseus,Mutina">Mutina</placeName> is besieged. Is not even that war?
                        <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName> is laid waste. What peace can
                    be more assured than this? Who can think of calling that war? We have sent forth
                    a consul, a most gallant man, with an army, who, though he was in a weak state
                    from a long and serious illness, still thought he ought not to make any excuse
                    when he was summoned to the protection of the republic. Caius Caesar, indeed,
                    did not wait for our decrees; especially as that conduct of his was not unsuited
                    to his age. He undertook war against Antonius of his own accord; for there was
                    not yet time to pass a decree; and he saw that, if he let slip the opportunity
                    of waging war, when the republic was crushed it would be impossible to pass any
                    decrees at all. <milestone n="6" unit="section"/> They and their arms, then, are
                    now at peace. He is not an enemy whose garrison Hirtius has driven from
                        <placeName key="perseus,Claterna">Claterna</placeName>; he is not an enemy
                    who is in arms resisting a consul, and attacking a consul elect; and those are
                    not the words of an enemy, nor is that warlike language, which Pansa read just
                    now out of his colleague's letters: “I drove out the
                    garrison.” “I got possession of <placeName key="perseus,Claterna">Claterna</placeName>.” “The
                    cavalry were routed.” “A battle was fought.”
                    “A good many men were slain.” What peace can be greater that
                    this? Levies of troops are ordered throughout all <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>; all exemptions from service are suspended; the robe of
                    war is to be assumed tomorrow; the consul has said that he shall come down to
                    the senate-house with an armed guard. </p><p>Is not this war? Yes, it is such a war as has never been. <milestone n="7" unit="section"/> For in all other wars, and most especially in civil wars,
                    it was a difference as to the political state of the republic which gave rise to
                    the contest. Sulla contended against Sulpicius about the force of laws which
                    Sulla said had been passed by violence. Cinna warred against Octavius because of
                    the votes of the new citizens. Again, Sulla was at variance with Cinna and
                    Marius, in order to prevent unworthy men from attaining power, and to avenge the
                    cruel death of most illustrious men. The causes of all these wars arose from the
                    zeal of different parties, for what they considered the interest of the
                    republic. Of the last civil war I can not bear to speak: I do not understand the
                    cause of it; I detest the result. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="3"><p><milestone n="8" unit="section"/></p><p>This is the fifth civil war (and all of them have fallen upon our times); the
                    first which has not only not brought dissensions and discord among the citizens,
                    but which has been signalized by extraordinary unanimity and incredible concord.
                    All of them have the same wish, all defend the same objects, all are inspired
                    with the same sentiments. When I say all, I except those whom no one thinks
                    worthy of being citizens at all. What, then, is the cause of war, and what is
                    the object aimed at? We are defending the temples of the immortal gods, we are
                    defending the walls of the city, we are defending the homes and habitations of
                    the Roman people, the household gods, the altars, the hearths and the sepulchers
                    of our forefathers; we are defending our laws, our courts of justice, our
                    freedom, our wives, our children, and our country. On the other hand, Marcus
                    Antonius labors and fights in order to throw into confusion and overturn all
                    these things; and hopes to have reason to think the plunder of the republic
                    sufficient cause for the war, while he squanders part of our fortunes, and
                    distributes the rest among his parricidal followers. <milestone n="9" unit="section"/>
                </p><p>While, then, the motives for war are so different, a most miserable circumstance
                    is what that fellow promises to his band of robbers. In the first place our
                    houses; for he declares that he will divide the city among them; and after that
                    he will lead them out at whatever gate and settle them on whatever lands they
                    please. All the Caphons,<note anchored="true">These were the names of officers
                        devoted to Antonius.</note> all the Saxas, and the other plagues which
                    attend Antonius, are marking out for themselves in their own minds most
                    beautiful houses, and gardens, and villas, at <placeName key="perseus,Tusculum">Tusculum</placeName> and Alba; and those clownish men—if indeed
                    they are men, and not rather brute beasts—are borne on in their empty
                    hopes as far as the waters and <placeName key="perseus,Puteoli">Puteoli</placeName>. So Antonius has something to promise to his followers.
                    What can we do? Have we any thing of the sort? May the gods grant us a better
                    fate! for our express object is to prevent any one at all from hereafter making
                    similar promises. I say this against my will, still I must say it;—the
                    auction sanctioned by Caesar, O conscript fathers, gives many wicked men both
                    hope and audacity. For they saw some men become suddenly rich from having been
                    beggars. Therefore, those men who are hanging over our property, and to whom
                    Antonius promises everything, are always longing to see an auction. <milestone n="10" unit="section"/> What can we do? What do we promise our soldiers?
                    Things much better and more honorable. For promises to be earned by wicked
                    actions are pernicious both to those who expect them, and to those who promise
                    them. We promise to our soldiers freedom, rights, laws, justice, the empire of
                    the world, dignity, peace, tranquillity. The promises then of Antonius are
                    bloody, polluted, wicked, odious for gods and men, neither lasting nor salutary;
                    ours, on the other hand, are honorable, upright, glorious, full of happiness,
                    and full of piety. </p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>