<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:95-96</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:95-96</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="95" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>And this principle you, O judges, ought, as your wisdom and humanity prompts and enables you
    to do, to consider over in your mind carefully; and to be thoroughly aware what disaster and
    what danger the tribunitian power can bring upon every one individual among us, especially when
    it is egged on by party spirit, and by assemblies of the people, stirred up in a seditious
    manner. In the very best times, forsooth, when men defended themselves, not by boastings
    addressed to the populace, but by their own worth and innocence, still neither Publius
    Popillius, nor Quintus Metellus, most illustrious and most honourable men, could withstand the
    power of the tribunes; much less at the present time, with such manners as we now have, and such
    magistrates, can we possibly be saved without the aid of your wisdom, and without the relief
    which is afforded by the courts of justice. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="96" resp="perseus"><p> That court of
    justice then, O judges, was not like a court of justice; for in it there was no moderation
    preserved, no regard was had to custom and usage, nor was the cause of the defendant properly
    advocated. It was all violence, and, as I have said before, a sort of earthquake or tempest,—it
    was anything rather than a court of justice, or a legal discussion, or a judicial investigation.
    But if there be any one who thinks that that was a regular proceeding, and who thinks it right
    to adhere to the decision that was then delivered; still he ought to separate this cause from
    that one. For it is said that a great many things were demanded of him either because he had not
    taken the oath to observe the law, or because he had not cast lots for electing judges in the
    room of those to whom objection had been made in a legal manner. But the case of Cluentius can
    in no particular be connected with these, laws, in accordance with which a penalty was sought to
    be recovered from <persName><surname>Junius</surname></persName>. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>