<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:75-76</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:75-76</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="75" resp="perseus"><p> The judges rise to give decisions, when
    Oppianicus said, as he had at that time a right to do, that he wished the votes to be given
    openly; his object being that Stalenus might know what was to be paid to each judge. There were
    different kinds of judges, a few were bribed, but all were unfavorable. As men who are
    accustomed to receive bribes in the <placeName key="tgn,7014001">Campus Martius</placeName> are
    usually exceedingly hostile to those candidates whose money they think is kept back, so the
    judges of the same sort were then very indignant against this defendant. The others considered
    him very guilty, but they waited for the votes of those who they thought had been bribed, that
    by seeing their votes they might judge who it was that they had been bribed by. <milestone n="28" unit="chapter"/>
   <milestone unit="para"/>Behold now—the lots were drawn with such a result that Bulbus, Stalenus, and Gutta were the
    first who were, to deliver their opinions. There was the greatest anxiety on the part of every
    one to see what vote would be given by these worthless and corrupt judges. And they all condemn
    him without the slightest hesitation. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="76" resp="perseus"><p> On this, great scruples
    arose in men's minds, and some doubt as to what had really been done. Then some of the judges,
    wise men, trained in the old-fashioned principles of the ancient tribunals, as they could: not
    acquit a most guilty man, and yet, as they did not like at once to condemn a man, in whose case
    there appeared reason to suspect that bribery had been employed against him, before they were
    able to ascertain the truth of this suspicion, gave as their decision, “Not proven.” But some
    severe men, who made up their minds that regard ought to be had to the intention with which a
    thing was done by any one, although they believed that others had only given a correct decision
    through the influence of bribery, nevertheless thought that it behoved them to decide
    consistently with their previous decisions. Accordingly, they condemned him. There were five in
    all, who, whether they did so out of ignorance, or out of pity, or from being influenced by some
    secret suspicion, or by some latent ambition, acquitted that innocent Oppianicus of yours
    altogether. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>