<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:173-174</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:173-174</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="173" resp="perseus"><p> But now, as for that circumstance
    of poison being administered in bread, how improbable, how unusual, how strange a thing it is.
    Was it easier than administering it in a cup? Could it be hid more secretly in some part of the
    bread than if it had been all liquefied and amalgamated with a potion? Could it pass more
    rapidly into the veins and into every separate part of the body if it were eaten than if it were
    drunk? Could it escape notice (if that was thought of) more easily in bread, than in a cup, when
    it might then have been so mixed up as to be wholly impossible to be separated? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="174" resp="perseus"><p> “But he died by a sudden death.” But if that was the case, still that
    circumstance, from the number of men who die in that way, would not give rise to any
    well-grounded suspicion of poison. If it were a suspicious circumstance, still the suspicion
    would apply to others rather than to Habitus. But as to that fact itself, men tell most impudent
    lies. And that you may see this, listen to this statement of the truth respecting his death, and
    how after his death an accusation was sought for out of it against Habitus, by his mother.
     </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>