<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:171-172</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:171-172</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="171" resp="perseus"><p> Did Habitus, then, envy the life of this men? If he had hated him bitterly and
    utterly, ought he not to have wished him to live as long as possible? Would an enemy have
    hastened his death, when death was the only refuge which he had left from his calamity? If the
    man had had any virtue or any courage, he would have killed himself, (as many brave men have
    done in many instances, when in similar misfortunes.) How is it possible for an enemy to have
    wished to offer to him what he must himself have wished for eagerly For now indeed, what evil
    has death brought him? Unless, perchance, we are influenced by fables and nonsense, to think
    that he is enduring in the shades below the punishments of' the wicked, and that he has met with
    more enemies there than he left behind here; and that he has been driven headlong into the
    district and habitation of wicked spirits by the avenging furies of his mother-in-law, of his
    wife, of his brother, and of his children. But if these stories are false, as all men are well
    aware that they are, what else has death taken from him except the sense of his misery? Come
    now, by whose instrumentality was the poison administered? By that of Marcus Asellius.
     </p></div><milestone n="62" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="172" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>What connection had he with Habitus? None—nay rather, as he was a very intimate friend of
    Oppianicus, he was rather an enemy to Habitus. Did he then pick out that man whom he knew to be
    rather unfriendly to himself, and to be exceedingly intimate with Oppianicus, to be above all
    others the instrument of his own wickedness, and of the other's danger, In the next place, why
    do you, who have been prompted by pity to undertake this prosecution, leave this Asellius so
    long unpunished? Why did not you follow the precedent of Habitus, and have a previous
    examination, which should affect him, by means of an investigation into his conduct who had
    administered the poison? </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>