<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:133-134</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2:133-134</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="133" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>Oh, but they visited Habitus himself with their censure. Not for any baseness, nor for any, I
    will not say vice, but not even for any fault of his own in his whole life. For no one can
    possibly be a more religious man, or a more honourable one, or more scrupulous in fulfilling all
    his duties. Nor indeed does the opposite party say anything to the contrary, but they adopt the
    same report of the judges having been bribed. Nor indeed have they any contrary opinion to that
    which we wish to be entertained about his modesty, integrity, and virtue; but they thought it
    quite impossible for the accuser to be passed over after the judges had been punished. And with
    respect to this whole business, if I produce one precedent from the whole of our ancient
    history, I will say no more. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="134" resp="perseus"><p> For I think that I ought not to
    pass over the instance of that most eminent and most illustrious man, Publius Africanus; who,
    when he was censor, and when Caius Licinius Sacerdos had appeared on the register of the
    knights, said with a loud voice, so that the whole assembly could hear him, that he knew that he
    had committed deliberate perjury and that if any one denied it, he would give him his own
    evidence in support of this assertion. But when no one ventured to deny it, he ordered him to
    give up his horse. <note anchored="true">“If the censors considered a knight unworthy of his
     rank, they struck him off of the list of knights, and deprived him of his horse, or ordered him
     to sell it, with the intention, no doubt, that the person thus degraded should refund to the
     state the money which had been advanced to him for its purchase. (Niebuhr, <title>Hist. of
      Rome</title>, vol. i. p. 433.)”—Smith, Dict. Ant. p. 895, v. <foreign xml:lang="lat">Equites</foreign>.</note> So that he, with whose decision the Roman people and foreign
    nations had been accustomed to content themselves, was not content with his own private
    knowledge as justifying him in branding another with ignominy. But if Habitus had been allowed
    to do this, he would have found it an easy matter to have resisted those very judges themselves,
    and the false suspicion, and the odium excited in the breasts of the people against him.
     </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>