<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi004.perseus-eng2:67</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi004.perseus-eng2:67</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="lat"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi004.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="67" resp="perseus"><p> We know that lately Cnaeus Domitius prosecuted Marcus Silanus on account of the
            injuries of one man, Egritomarus, his father's friend and comrade. <milestone n="21" unit="chapter"/><milestone unit="Para"/>
 Nor indeed has anything ever had more influence over the minds of
            guilty men than this principle of our ancestors, now re-adopted and brought back among
            us after a long interval, namely, that the complaints of the allies should be brought to
            a man who is not very inactive, and their advocacy undertaken by him who appeared able
            to defend their fortunes with integrity and diligence. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>