<GetPassage xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns="http://chs.harvard.edu/xmlns/cts">
            <request>
                <requestName>GetPassage</requestName>
                <requestUrn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2:41-60</requestUrn>
            </request>
            <reply>
                <urn>urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2:41-60</urn>
                <passage>
                    <TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg019.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div n="41" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Nay, everyone is aware of this also, that there is a superabundance of men who produce
          speeches for litigants in the courts. Nevertheless you will not find that any one of them,
          numerous as they are, has ever been thought worthy to have pupils, while I, as my accuser
          states, have had more than all the rest together who are occupied with philosophy. Yet how
          can anyone think that people who are so far apart in their ways of life are engaged in the
          same occupations? </p></div><div n="42" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But although I could point out many contrasts between my own career and that of the
          pleaders in the courts, I believe that the quickest way to disabuse your mind of this
          confusion would be to show that people do not study under me what my accuser says they do,
          and that I am not clever at the kind of oratory which has to do with private disputes.
        </p></div><div n="43" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For I think, now that the charge under which I formerly labored has been disproved, you
          are anxious to change your attitude and want to hear from me what sort of eloquence it is
          which has occupied me and given me so great a reputation. Whether, indeed, it is going to
          profit me to speak the truth, I am not sure; for it is hard to conjecture what is in your
          thoughts. Yet, for all that, I am going to speak to you absolutely without reserve. </p></div><div n="44" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For I should blush before my associates, if, after having told them again and again that
          I should be glad to have everyone of my fellow-citizens know the life I lead and the
          speeches which I compose, I did not now lay them open before you, but appeared rather to
          attempt to hide them away. Be assured, therefore, that you shall hear from me the whole
          truth, and in this spirit give me your attention. </p></div><div n="45" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> First of all, then, you should know that there are no fewer branches of composition in
          prose than in verse. For some men have devoted their lives to researches in the
          genealogies of the demi-gods; others have made studies in the poets; others have elected
          to compose histories of wars; while still others have occupied themselves with
            dialogue,<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Elsewhere called disputation (“eristic”). See
            General Introd. p. xxi.</note> and are called dialecticians. </p></div><div n="46" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>It would, however, be no slight task to attempt to enumerate all the forms of prose, and
          I shall take up only that which is pertinent to me, and ignore the rest. For there are men
          who, albeit they are not strangers to the branches which I have mentioned, have chosen
          rather to write discourses, not for private disputes, but which deal with the world of
            <placeName key="tgn,1000074">Hellas</placeName>, with affairs of state, and are
          appropriate to be delivered at the Pan-Hellenic assemblies—discourses which, as everyone
          will agree, are more akin to works composed in rhythm and set to music than to the
          speeches which are made in court. </p></div><div n="47" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For they set forth facts in a style more imaginative and more ornate; they employ
          thoughts which are more lofty and more original, and, besides, they use throughout figures
          of speech in greater number and of more striking character.<note anchored="true" resp="ed">See General Introd. p. xxiv.</note> All men take as much pleasure in listening to this
          kind of prose as in listening to poetry, and many desire to take lessons in it, believing
          that those who excel in this field are wiser and better and of more use to the world than
          men who speak well in court. </p></div><div n="48" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For they know that while the latter owe to a capacity for intrigue their expertness in
          forensic debate, the former have drawn from their pursuit of wisdom the eloquence which I
          have described; that while those who are thought to be adept in court procedure are
          tolerated only for the day when they are engaged in the trial, the devotees of philosophy
          are honored and held in high esteem in every society and at all times; </p></div><div n="49" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>that, furthermore, while the former come to be despised and decried as soon as they are
          seen two or three times in court, the latter are admired more and more as they become
          better and more widely known; and, finally, that while clever pleaders are sadly unequal
          to the higher eloquence, the exponents of the latter could, if they so desired, easily
          master also the oratory of the courts.<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Cf. <bibl n="Isoc. 4.11">Isoc. 4.11-12</bibl>.</note>
        </p></div><div n="50" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Reflecting on these facts, and considering it to be by far the better choice, they elect
          to have a part in that culture wherein, it would appear, neither have I myself been an
          alien but have, on the contrary, won a far more gracious reputation. Now you have heard
          the whole truth about my power, my philosophy, my profession, or whatever you care to call
            it.<note anchored="true" resp="ed">The language of this sentence is reminiscent of <bibl n="Plat. Apol. 20d">Plat. Apol. 20d-e</bibl>.</note>
        </p></div><div n="51" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>However, I want to set up for myself a more difficult standard than for other people, and
          to make a proposition which may seem over-rash for my years. For I ask you not only to
          show me no mercy, if the oratory which I cultivate is harmful, but to inflict on me the
          extreme penalty if it is not superior to any other.<note anchored="true" resp="ed">Cf. the
            boast in <bibl n="Isoc. 4.14">Isoc. 4.14</bibl>.</note> But I should not have made so
          bold a proposal, if I were not about to show you what my eloquence is and to make it very
          easy for you to pass judgement upon it. </p></div><div n="52" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> For it is this way: the best and fairest defense, in my opinion, is that which enables
          the judges to know the facts, so far as this is possible, in regard to the issues on which
          they are to vote, and which leaves no room for them to go astray in their judgement or to
          be in doubt as to which party speaks the truth. </p></div><div n="53" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>If, however, I were being tried for some criminal act, I should not have been able to
          produce the act itself before your eyes but you would have had to conjecture the facts
          from what I said and pass judgement as best you might. But since I am charged with
          offending by my words, I think that I shall be in a better position to make you see the
          truth; </p></div><div n="54" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>for I shall present in evidence the actual words which I have spoken and written, so that
          you will vote upon my discourses, not from conjecture, but with clear knowledge of their
          nature. I cannot, however, present them all in complete form; for the time which has been
          allowed me is too short.<note anchored="true" resp="ed">No case could occupy more than one
            day, and the speakers were limited in time by the clepsydra or water-clock.</note> But
          just as is done with fruits, I shall try to produce a sample of each kind. For when you
          have heard a small portion of them you will easily recognize my true character and
          appreciate the force of all my speeches. </p></div><div n="55" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> But I beg those of you who have read many times what you are now about to hear, not to
          expect new discourses from me on the present occasion nor think me burdensome because I
          repeat what has long been the talk of Athens. For if I were to repeat my orations in order
          to display my powers,<note anchored="true" resp="ed">That is, in making an epideictic
            lecture or show speech.</note> I should reasonably be liable to this complaint; but now
          that I am on trial and in jeopardy I have no choice but to use my speeches in this
          fashion. </p></div><div n="56" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>For it would be the height of absurdity if in a case where my accuser denounces me for
          writing the kind of speeches which both hurt our city and corrupt our youth I used other
          speeches in my defense, when I can clear my name of the calumnies which are being heaped
          upon it by producing before you the very discourses of which he complains. I ask of you,
          then, for these reasons to bear with me and to lend me your support. But for the benefit
          of the others on the jury<note anchored="true" resp="ed">That is, those of the jury who
            had not “read these discourses many times.”</note> I shall attempt to proceed with my
          selections, after a further word of explanation to enable them to follow more easily what
          is said. </p></div><div n="57" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> The discourse which is to be submitted to you first was written at the time when the
          Lacedaemonians were the first power in <placeName key="tgn,1000074">Hellas</placeName>,
          while our fortunes were at low ebb. In it I summon the Hellenes to make an expedition
          against the barbarians, and I dispute the right of the Lacedaemonians to take the lead.
        </p></div><div n="58" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p>Developing this theme, I show that Athens has been author of all the advantages which the
          Hellenes now enjoy. Then, having concluded the account of these benefactions, and desiring
          to show more convincingly that leadership in the expedition is the right of Athens, I
          further try to prove that far greater honor is due to her for the perils she has faced in
          war than for her other benefactions. </p></div><div n="59" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> Now I thought that I should be able to go through these passages myself, but I find that
          my age hampers me and causes me to give out easily. So then, in order that I may not break
          down utterly while there are still many things which I must say, let the clerk begin at
          the place marked and read the passage on the hegemony. <cit><quote type="Extract"/><bibl n="Isoc. 4.51">Isoc. 4.51-99</bibl></cit>
        </p></div><div n="60" subtype="section" type="textpart"><p> As to the hegemony, then, it is easy enough for you to make up your minds from what has
          been read to you that it should by right belong to Athens. But, I beg of you, consider
          well whether I appear to you to corrupt the young by my words, or, on the contrary, to
          inspire them to a life of valor and of dangers endured for their country; whether I should
          justly be punished for the words which have been read, or whether, on the contrary, I
          deserve to have your deepest gratitude </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>
                </passage>
            </reply>
            </GetPassage>